Golden wrote:And also because it is not the truth???MacDougall wrote:I would encourage you in this situation to not bother trying to force a case out of this ping because you will find absolutely nothing to support it beyond your own faulty intuition.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Ok.MacDougall wrote:Please don't make matter of fact statements like this without making a case or I will make your experience in this game very unpleasant.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Mac and Fuzz are teammates (in a bad kind of way).
Search found 132 matches
Return to “Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions”
- Fri Jan 08, 2016 10:41 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: Day 1~ 2015 Game of Champions
Okay, finished a reread of Golden. Didn't see much there, although he is notoriously hard to read (at least for me.) I'm happy to stick with Sig for now. I do want to point out this post, though, which is amazing and brings Mac back up my suspicion ladder a bit.
- Fri Jan 08, 2016 10:25 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: Day 1~ 2015 Game of Champions
Despite his malicious attempt to lynch me based on nothing, I really like RadicalFuzz's observations about Golden buddying. Buddying is a classic tell. I think Golden deserves a reread.
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 6:31 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: Day 1~ 2015 Game of Champions
How little you know me.DharmaHelper wrote:No I don't think you'd want to curse the guy you have been defending.thellama73 wrote:If I had the power to curse people, does anyone think I wouldn't have used it on Rico? Come on.
Nah.MacDougall wrote:There's loads of useful shit been posted. This has been a very productive game so far.thellama73 wrote:They are not really worth reading.Tranq wrote:25 pages already?
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 4:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: Day 1~ 2015 Game of Champions
They are not really worth reading.Tranq wrote:25 pages already?
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 4:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: Day 1~ 2015 Game of Champions
I'm flattered, but he's not my type.Epignosis wrote:He's saying you drive him crazy and that you are his top suspect. I think he would rather do something to you than tell you something.thellama73 wrote:I am sorry. I will take you seriously from now on.Ricochet wrote:Llama, have you cursed JJJ?
Also, my green color may lose its intensity if you keep dismissing me as jokey.
No, I did not curse JJJ, and I have no idea what he is trying to say, although it seems like he is trying to tell me something in his last post.
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 2:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: Day 1~ 2015 Game of Champions
If I had the power to curse people, does anyone think I wouldn't have used it on Rico? Come on.
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 2:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: Day 1~ 2015 Game of Champions
I am sorry. I will take you seriously from now on.Ricochet wrote:Llama, have you cursed JJJ?
Also, my green color may lose its intensity if you keep dismissing me as jokey.
No, I did not curse JJJ, and I have no idea what he is trying to say, although it seems like he is trying to tell me something in his last post.
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 2:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: Day 1~ 2015 Game of Champions
To further elaborate, I guess I view Rico as remaining jokey all game. MacDougall suddenly switched from jokey attacks to serious business, which is not in itself bad, but it looked to me rather insincere in the case of his attack on Rico.
Anyway, I'm off MacDougall now. That was just a starting point that led me to Sig, my current top suspect.
Anyway, I'm off MacDougall now. That was just a starting point that led me to Sig, my current top suspect.
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 2:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: Day 1~ 2015 Game of Champions
Nevermind, I went back and looked and see what you mean.thellama73 wrote:I don't actually know what you're referring to here. Can you be more specific?Dom wrote:Llama, why did you dismiss DH rather than take issue with the content of the post?
I don't know what there is to address. I read Mac as behaving a certain way, and DH says that same read applies to Rico. I don't really agree. It amounts to different interpretations of the same data.
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 2:42 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: Day 1~ 2015 Game of Champions
I don't actually know what you're referring to here. Can you be more specific?Dom wrote:Llama, why did you dismiss DH rather than take issue with the content of the post?
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 11:59 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: Day 1~ 2015 Game of Champions
I like your line of reasoning.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Voted LoRab for no reason.
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 11:02 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: Day 1~ 2015 Game of Champions
Yeah, I'm voting for Sig after that crazy misrepresentation of my point.
I don't particularly want to see Ricochet lynched, but I guess it will at least make reading the thread easier.
I don't particularly want to see Ricochet lynched, but I guess it will at least make reading the thread easier.
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:47 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: Day 1~ 2015 Game of Champions
sig wrote:I still disagree with this DH, even if a player skims my post which I'd say isn't that big they'd see the first line.This is obviously a starting fluff, if anything it would make people skip the rest of my post.sig wrote:I want an apology also, I'm not sure what I want it for, but by God I want one!
I had a few OT lines then this.
Another obvious fluff portion. Anyone skimming would see the quotations breaking up the post and at the very least I'd think they would read what I was quoting. Then another quote this time from Llama, and his thing with Zebra, which was done in good fun.sig wrote:Mac has a role from the TH game, or I'm getting my old people bands mixed up? :PMacDougall wrote:Yes Ricochet is most certainly bullshitting hard. This is not my beautiful Ricochet.
So I highly doubt anyone skimming my post would think it had any OT stuff since the OT stuff was between much more noticeably fluff.
Not to mention like I said in my above post it was Night 0 and like many people I was messing around. I still find it very odd that you single out this post, and make it seem like a bigger deal then it is. Not to mention the fact that Llama quickly agrees with you about it.
I mean he could just be doing that since I made light of a post which he didn't want me to joke about and he was mad that I did this, however I don't know his personality enough to know if that is the case or not, and I doubt a mature adult would get pissy that I made a joke about how he was referring to Zebra. This leads me to think he is either budding up to you for an unknown reason, he is mafia and thought this was good to mention, or he wanted to appear like he was more involved in the game and this was a safe way to do so.
I think it is semi likely that either DH or Llama are mafia.
I also still have some reservations about DH/JJJ for the audio posts.
I notice DH mentions my fluff post after I brought up the points about the audio posts, I don't recall him ever directly answering me about my theory on this while I do remember JJJ doing so. This is another ping for DH in my book.
Sig, you're completely misrepresenting what I (and I assume DH) found fluffy about your post. It wasn't the jokey comments. It wasn't OT material. It was the on topic portions that actually said nothing. For example, you said my point about MacDougall was "interesting" and left it at that. Why was it interesting? What was interesting about it? What is your opinion of my point, is it a good one or a bad one, and why? I asked, and you never answered. That's what I mean by fluff - the illusion of contribution.
- Wed Jan 06, 2016 6:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
Right now I want to vote for SIg though, for that obvious fluff I pointed out earlier, and DH is pointing out now.
- Wed Jan 06, 2016 6:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
The cool thing about these games is that different people can interpret the same text differentlyDharmaHelper wrote:Still catching up and this post jumped out at methellama73 wrote:Wow, okay, there is a lot of noise to cut through in this thread. Weirdly, I don't have bad feeling about Ricochet this game, although I do enjoy the back and forth between him and Zebra (who is a girl).
The person I a starting to have bad feelings about is MacDougall. He started off basically accusing a bunch of people of being bad, including Ricochet, in a jokey fashion, which felt like a distractionary tactic, and then he allowed his jokey attack on Rico to morph into a real one, joining Zebra (who is a girl). It feels like opportunism to try to eliminate a dangerous rival early, and I'm not reading his attacks as wholly sincere.
But then again, it's not even day one yet, so all this could change.
1. aGREENed, lots of crap to trudge through for what is essentially a waiting period.
2. Orange you certain this is what you meant? Sounds like you got those two players confused.
3. YELLOW? Anyone home? This is exactly what Rico has been doing. Seriously, take Mac's name out and put Rico's in and tell me that doesn't fit.
3.
- Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
Hey, I never said anything about editing or proofreading.Epignosis wrote:thellama73 wrote:I don't to butt heads. The market has determined that I am the better writer, since I get paid for it.Ricochet wrote:LoRab and llama have not butted heads over who is the better writer and poster.
confirmed fishy
- Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
I don't to butt heads. The market has determined that I am the better writer, since I get paid for it.Ricochet wrote:LoRab and llama have not butted heads over who is the better writer and poster.
confirmed fishy
- Wed Jan 06, 2016 12:16 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
All you non-Xander voters are going to be mighty sad when timmer and I win.
- Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:44 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
In what way is my point interesting? Or are you just saying things to look like you're saying things?sig wrote: I think Llama raises an interesting point about Mac, Zebra seems to be acting like Zebra. Rico seems to be posting a good amount of stuff.
- Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:40 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
MacDougall wrote:Horseshit!thellama73 wrote:Wow, okay, there is a lot of noise to cut through in this thread. Weirdly, I don't have bad feeling about Ricochet this game, although I do enjoy the back and forth between him and Zebra (who is a girl).
The person I a starting to have bad feelings about is MacDougall. He started off basically accusing a bunch of people of being bad, including Ricochet, in a jokey fashion, which felt like a distractionary tactic, and then he allowed his jokey attack on Rico to morph into a real one, joining Zebra (who is a girl). It feels like opportunism to try to eliminate a dangerous rival early, and I'm not reading his attacks as wholly sincere.
But then again, it's not even day one yet, so all this could change.
I started off accusing a bunch of people with THE EXCEPTION of Rico, who I actually did not get pinged by and said as much when he asked if I also thought he was bad.
I didn't make a "jokey" accusation until ages later. And it was indeed a joke.
It was then another long period before I came back and saw posts that actually pinged me.
To say that I "allowed" my joke scum read on him to morph into a real one is a misrepresentation of what actually occurred as all three engagements occurred very much separate of one another. I quite clearly started out with no ping. Later on made a joke post. Then was pinged even later on that led to now.
As for saying my accusations felt like a distractionary tactic I'm not even sure what you're getting at. For what purposes do scum engage "distractionary" tactics on day 0? Are you suggesting that there was actually something I was distracting everyone from seeing?
You didn't even bother to quote posts and if you had have you'd have realised your case was flawed as you were doing it. So did you intentionally leave out the quotes so you could make up a story about me that's not true? Or are you just being a lazy civ posting based on chopped up memories of what you think happened?
I await my apology.
Ages later? The game has been in existence less than two days. Now calm down, we're all friends here.
- Wed Jan 06, 2016 10:16 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
I think that you think that I take myself more seriously than I actually do. Yes, I identify as a girl, no, I'm not going to antagonize anyone that doesn't agree.[/quotea2thezebra wrote:thellama73 wrote:Zebra (who is a girl)
Zebra (who is a girl)
I'll be the judge of that.
- Wed Jan 06, 2016 10:07 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
Wow, okay, there is a lot of noise to cut through in this thread. Weirdly, I don't have bad feeling about Ricochet this game, although I do enjoy the back and forth between him and Zebra (who is a girl).
The person I a starting to have bad feelings about is MacDougall. He started off basically accusing a bunch of people of being bad, including Ricochet, in a jokey fashion, which felt like a distractionary tactic, and then he allowed his jokey attack on Rico to morph into a real one, joining Zebra (who is a girl). It feels like opportunism to try to eliminate a dangerous rival early, and I'm not reading his attacks as wholly sincere.
But then again, it's not even day one yet, so all this could change.
The person I a starting to have bad feelings about is MacDougall. He started off basically accusing a bunch of people of being bad, including Ricochet, in a jokey fashion, which felt like a distractionary tactic, and then he allowed his jokey attack on Rico to morph into a real one, joining Zebra (who is a girl). It feels like opportunism to try to eliminate a dangerous rival early, and I'm not reading his attacks as wholly sincere.
But then again, it's not even day one yet, so all this could change.
- Tue Jan 05, 2016 7:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
This. Some of us are in places where we can't play sound, and it's not fair to hide your content from us in that way. Very suspish.Sorsha wrote: Stop with the vocaroo. This is not a vocaroo Mafia.
- Tue Jan 05, 2016 7:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
DharmaHelper wrote:You played Death Note but don't recognize Watari?Bass_the_Clever wrote:Hey everyone , wow 7 pages in night zero. I'm voting for the only role I recognize.
- Tue Jan 05, 2016 3:59 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
Well, that's blatantly wrong. Dictionary makers have gotten sloppy.
- Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
Me too, as this has been annoying me lately. Increasingly, people have been using the phrase win-win to describe a situation with multiple winners. That's not what it means. Win-win is properly used to describe a situation where either of two possible outcomes will result in a win for the relevant party.DharmaHelper wrote: Also, I would argue the definition of a win win.
For example, an opportunistic player might reason thusly: "If DH gets lynched and is bad, I win because we lost a bad guy. If he gets lynched and is good, it draws suspicion onto the people who voted for him and away from me. Win-win."
This has been a public service announcement from your friendly neighborhood llama. Thank you.
- Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:20 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
Ricochet is really coming out swinging today. I like that. It makes me not want to vote for him, at least not yet. I also love DH's analysis of the rainbow list. Wonderful.
- Tue Jan 05, 2016 12:36 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
Scandalous!Elohcin wrote: Llama didn't read the rules?!?!
Also must not have read the thread before posting either. I'm shocked!
- Tue Jan 05, 2016 12:20 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
RadicalFuzz is acting weird. I say we lynch him.
- Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:33 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I think you've mistaken llama for a camel.
- Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:55 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
I love you both.Ricochet wrote:Night 1 might be to late... for you.Long Con wrote:Ok Mr Smart Guy, let's test this. If you die Night 1, then it was me. Then everyone will know I was given a baddie role.Ricochet wrote:I wish there was a rule not to end up creating any ties between the Night 0 options, so I can create them.
Also, how soon are the others willing to test the idea that Black Rock and Long Con were given baddie roles?
- Tue Jan 05, 2016 9:59 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions
- Replies: 8411
- Views: 178415
Re: [Night 0] 2015 Game of Champions
Good morning, Gentlemen!
Very glad to be here in this game of champs. I'm voting for Xander Crews because I hosted that game and I like the character. I see there's already been some pot stirring, and Ricochet's rainbow list is hilarious. Very good.
Very glad to be here in this game of champs. I'm voting for Xander Crews because I hosted that game and I like the character. I see there's already been some pot stirring, and Ricochet's rainbow list is hilarious. Very good.