Sure.RadicalFuzz wrote: Llama can you elaborate on your conclusion that Luffy's posts scream "cop?"
Steering. This is a big pattern I see in Luffy. He is very interested in pumping people for opinion, GTH reads, explanations, and speculations on mechanics. He is constantly trying to get conversation going on a variety of topics... but the topics are of his choosing. When people discuss something he hasn't steered them towards, he tries to kill it.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:The whole Golden vs Matt argument feels like a waste of time.
Just my two cents.
Here's another example, where he quickly dismissed my suspicion of him.
Here's another example, where disucssion of the lynch wasn't going where he wanted it to, with people complaining about his leading them by the noses.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Not sure if serious or just llama.
What I am seeing is a very manipulative game. He seems like a great participant, because he always gets discussion going, but he controls the direction of the discussion and squashes it when it displeases him.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: Seriously guys, not gonna deny I had some influence in that lynch, but why are half the people on it saying they voted because "DDL said so"? A little more independent thinking, please? And I didn't even vote for Diiny myself, for fuck's sake. Worse is that the two guys are apparently players who always get lynched as civs for doing stupid crap, so I'm like "how do I even deal with them"?