The Syndicate

Oh, I only have a half hour to finalize my vote don't I? I'm moving it to NotSawyer. I thought his waffle-ironing on Quin was the most suspicious thing I've seen so far.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:@Llama

My avatar is anime demigods fighting.

Sawyer's avatar is a baseball bat, possibly named Lucille.

Does that help?

Who would you vote for if you weren't allowed to vote for players you confuse with other players?

Thank you. That does help.

I'm struggling with a lack of strong pings today, if I'm honest. I might vote for FZ, because I found her question about the rules contrived, like Long Con's face.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

thellama73 wrote:In answer to Epi's question, my vote for Quin is based on a Day 0 ping, odd, uncharacteristic behavior, which I tend to associate with baddies. I am also perturbed by Quin's unwillingness to take my vote seriously. I never really intended to leave my vote there, though. I haven't decided where to move it yet, but Notsawyer, for being wishy-washy, might get it. And JackofHearts, for being annoying and not answering questions seriously, might get it.

Can you be more specific?

I don't think there's a real question I've been asked that I didn't take seriously.

Convince me you aren't just being opportunistic by saying you might vote for one of the players who already has two votes for no real reason.

This post is pretty flippant, but in fairness to you, I think I keep confusing you with Notsawyer, since I don't know either of you. I can't tell you apart. Please try to be more distinctive.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:I don't like the cut of this jackofhearts character's jib. Voting there.

Well I don't like that your avatar is what you'd get if Diablo fucked a sharptooth.

But I don't vote for stupid reason.

Long Con wrote:I will currently be voting one of the following people:

MacDougall
DrWilgy
Quin
thellama73
Jackofhearts2005
Scotty

They have posted since my request for lie detector statements and failed to make such a statement. DF, FZ, MarMot, and Floyd have not posted since then. The rest of you are potentially cleared.

I don't make lie detector statements. Vote for me if you don't like it.

In answer to Epi's question, my vote for Quin is based on a Day 0 ping, odd, uncharacteristic behavior, which I tend to associate with baddies. I am also perturbed by Quin's unwillingness to take my vote seriously. I never really intended to leave my vote there, though. I haven't decided where to move it yet, but Notsawyer, for being wishy-washy, might get it. And JackofHearts, for being annoying and not answering questions seriously, might get it.

Long Con wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Feigning ignorance of the rules. Classic FZ move.

Which rules could FZ have read to answer her question about how the game is structured?

The rules for Heist submissions.

Oh, wait a minute. Notsawyer is the one who apologized for not being entertaining. Same question to you, Notsawyer. Who do you suspect and why?

I don't think I'v played with Jack of Hearts before, but I'm finding him annoying. He apologized for not being "entertaining" enough. Entertainment is not the goal of the game, boyo. Finding baddies is. Take the snark down a notch, why don't you, and answer me this:

Who are looking at voting today and why?

Epignosis wrote:

Quin wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Quin, I feel that you just like getting into arguments to see who is right.

That's not happening here. This is American politics. Being right has no place.

No, but thanks for that. And the stuff about not being able to read.

Jokes, mate, jokes.

I haven't said a single serious thing here and people want to keep taking offense.

This is American politics.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: How do I have the same number of Hilary points as Epi? How the heck does Llama have 3 Hillary points?

Can I...can I have your Hillary points, Llama?

No, get your own Hillary Points. Although I wouldn't be surprised if G-Man awards you some for trying to mooch off other people's earnings.

Epignosis wrote:I'm a civilian and fuck Hillary Clinton.

And her shitty clothes.

Don't you always steadfastly refuse to make lie detector statements as a matter of policy? This surprises me.

Notsawyer's equivocating is the kind of posting I generally dislike.

"Well, but on the other hand, but maybe, I'm not too sure." Feels like trying to play all sides. I'll be you, Notsawyer.

Quin, I feel like you are not taking my efforts to lynch you seriously.

Long Con wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I could see an FZ vote as possible. I thought her question about the rules seemed contrived.

Your suspicions seem somewhat contrived.

Your face seems somewhat contrived.

I could see an FZ vote as possible. I thought her question about the rules seemed contrived.

DFaraday wrote:

Scotty wrote:Everyone's checked in, so...ima thinking one of the low posters is definitely bad.

Jackofhearts, I see you.

Wouldn't almost everyone qualify as low posters at this point?

Agreed. No one has really contributed much yet. It's premature to go after low posters as such.

Long Con wrote:Are votes changeable?

G-Man wrote: 4) All votes are changeable.

To elaborate, there is a clipped terseness to Quin's posts this game that I don't remember observing from him before.

Okay, Day 0 was fun. Now down to business.

Mac is being a whiny baby about his last game, but I don't interpret that as a baddie move, so I'm not inclined to vote for him yet. Hopefully he will have something more productive to contribute when he's done feeling sorry for himself.

FZ. wrote:llama, why'd you choose Quin as your wild day 0 accusation?

Because I think Quin is bad. Something about his tone reads off to me. He is acting weird.

Quin wrote: Why don't you find out?

Ok. *Votes Quin*

Feigning ignorance of the rules. Classic FZ move.

And since we're throwing out wild Day 0 accusations, I think Quin is bad.

S~V~S wrote:

Quin wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!

What is the point of this?

He's letting us know we should lynch Epi Day 1.

I know what he's saying. But why?

Why does anyone say anything? Because in silence, we are forced to confront the deepest, darkest recesses of ourselves.

Marmot wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I think it's clear my vote is an ironic one.

I know you can iron pantsuits, but how do you iron honesty?

You don't iron it, but you have to take it out and shake the dust out of it once in a while, Metalmarsh89.

Elohcin wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Elohcin wrote:I don't know where to place my vote. The poll assumes we like Clinton. **scratches head** I think I will have to pick pantsuits.

Lol do you not?

No, but like llama and SVS, I am here to play, not debate.

If you're angling for Hillary Points, you're too late.

S~V~S wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I am here to play, not argue, as well! So let's play.

SVS, would you rather lynch mafia or civilians this game?

I want to lynch Mafia for sure. You?

Me too. I'm glad we're on the same page.

I am here to play, not argue, as well! So let's play.

SVS, would you rather lynch mafia or civilians this game?

S~V~S wrote:The poll doesn't assume you like Clinton, it asks you to find one thing about her that you do like. Different thing.

There was nothing on the poll I liked, so I vote for the thing which didn't exist.

I think it's clear my vote is an ironic one.

I'm here! Let's do this.