Return to “[NIGHT 4] Fight Club Mafia - Wilmington, DE”
It depends on your philosophy about the nature of time.S~V~S wrote: And Llama, just because we always do something does not mean we HAVE to keep doing it
Only if you really mean it.Bullzeye wrote:If I say yes will you vote for me to fight?thellama73 wrote:Every mafia game I've won has been won with love. I love you, Bullz. Do you love me?Bullzeye wrote:I don't recall ever winning a mafia game with love. Not to mention this is fight club, love club would be something else entirely, probably on a completely different website...thellama73 wrote:Wow, everyone sure is violent in here. Why so eager to fight? Don't you realize love is the only way?
Every mafia game I've won has been won with love. I love you, Bullz. Do you love me?Bullzeye wrote:I don't recall ever winning a mafia game with love. Not to mention this is fight club, love club would be something else entirely, probably on a completely different website...thellama73 wrote:Wow, everyone sure is violent in here. Why so eager to fight? Don't you realize love is the only way?
Because we always end up locking horns, as you well know.S~V~S wrote:Why do you say this?thellama73 wrote:I reckon I should probably fight S~V~S since, let's be honest, it's going to happen eventually.
Since it appears that losing fighters do not move on (based on Aces wanting to come here, but not being here after being defeated by BWT), I would prefer not to fight here. I hope to be chosen tomorrow back in DC.
I am planning on voting for a Level 1 fighter, someone who has not fought yet, who wants to fight.
Indeed I am not. I like the cut of your jib, BWT, but I don't want to fight you since you are super strong now!birdwithteeth11 wrote:That's because you're not one of the players who doesn't mind being modkilled.thellama73 wrote:Oh, and MP, I can edit my posts.
Not that I would ever dream of doing such a thing.
I thought the exact same thing about Hedge's post, Timmer, but I was worried I had said something I wasn't supposed to say about having a hometown, so I tried to cover for myself. She is definitely right at the top of my suspect list for a non-civilian.timmer wrote:Over in Penns Grove, we chatted a bit about the fact that it seems to be in everyone's best interested to figure out who Tyler Durden is, since the policemen need to find him to win, and we all win if we survive to the end. If Durden is found early, maybe that handicaps project mayhem etc and helps everyone win.Hedgeowl wrote:
I saw that, but it didnt mean anything to me. So you think other people are in a different hometown?
So, for whichever of you may be policemen, I would like to point this post out. Hedge is no longer here to reply about it, so I'm putting this post here as a marker until maybe hedge can respond to it later, but.... Hedge doesn't seem to understand about the hometown thing. I checked with MP about referring to roles in this way and he said it is acceptable, so, without going into too many specifics... My original thread was Penns Grove, NJ. I understood the reason I was there because of my role pm. You guys should have understood the name of your first thread based on your role pms.
So all I'm saying is... Tyler Durden could very well not have a hometown since he is a fictional part of the narrator's brain. It's potential that hedge didn't understand about the hometown reference because of a role pm that doesn't have one. Since the policemen search for Durden every night, I thought I would put that out there. Food for thought.
Don't feel bad. I get that from everybody.nijuukyugou wrote:Hahaha I'm dumb and hungrythellama73 wrote: No, because elaborating on a joke diminishes the impact of its humor.
No, because elaborating on a joke diminishes the impact of its humor.nijuukyugou wrote:I was wondering the same thing as Sorsha. Can you elaborate, llama?thellama73 wrote:They would be granted absolutely autocracy over that town. We don't want that to happen.Sorsha wrote:I wonder what would happen if only one person was left in a location?
They would be granted absolutely autocracy over that town. We don't want that to happen.Sorsha wrote:I wonder what would happen if only one person was left in a location?
I do.Keterman wrote:I don't see why that game mechanic would be out of the question.
Hedgeowl wrote:I thought the same and didn't even notice the stay here option when I voted. I just didnt want to miss another votes since I had just missed the first. Since the question is 'what will you do?' maybe it is an individual move, but that's a lot to coordinate for MP. Oh well, I am moving on most likely. That'll teach me to vote early.bea wrote:Ok llama that makes sense. For some reason I was thinking we stayed or moved as a group.
I'm going to go ahead and vote to stay so that I don't forget to do it later.
Your system was the opposite of my system! Amazing!Roxy wrote: I would have voted for llama. I going to vote for the top poster at the time it was llama. My system is out in the open now
bea wrote:I don't understand your thinking here. How is this any different from leaving? Are we assuming we'll have some sort of home field advantage over a fight we still haven't learned the details of? I'm assuming you're proposing a voting block? Which we would (I hope) have regardless of traveling or not. What am I missing?thellama73 wrote:Isn't it reasonable to assume that other towns face exactly the same problem though? They will reduce their numbers as well, and some of them will doubtless move here.Keterman wrote:So it is the top two candidates that we voted for pitted against each other. Because of that, staying here seems like a bad idea. I imagine we would only lower our numbers without making any progress. Maybe not, but moving feels like much less of a risk at this point.
I propose a Wilmington Alliance, where we stay here and then make the newcomers fight each other when they arrive.
>SpaghettiEverywhere wrote:Whoever even considered voting for me for the reason of me not being here, I am disappointed. Already I have bad feelings about llama and its barely even a day. I didnt want to fight I wanted to give hugs.
No. No one else has a mind that works like mine. I assure you I am the only one to come up with the alliance plan.Keterman wrote:Assuming that the other towns have the same amount of knowledge as we do, it's not unlikely that someone proposes the same argument that you did in each town. Then no one moves, and the numbers are reduced in each town, which I imagine can't be a good thing.
Isn't it reasonable to assume that other towns face exactly the same problem though? They will reduce their numbers as well, and some of them will doubtless move here.Keterman wrote:So it is the top two candidates that we voted for pitted against each other. Because of that, staying here seems like a bad idea. I imagine we would only lower our numbers without making any progress. Maybe not, but moving feels like much less of a risk at this point.
Those are not remotely the same movie.Sorsha wrote:I just realized that I never saw this movie. I thought I did but I confused it with Snatch.
That is exactly what someone who tried to sneak in an elaborate code would say upon getting caught.bea wrote:I never said anything about a tie.my.periods were.because I'm at work and on my cell. I'm too time pressed to be.passed.to.fix it from my phone.
It was Bea's idea, not mine.Devin the Omniscient wrote: And no, Llama, this is not to TIE up the votes. I hope someone else gets more
Why are you putting periods between words? Is this some sort of hidden Morse code? ... means S and a Single dash, like the one you have after my name, means T.bea wrote:Llama _ because I don't want to do it at the moment. And we have little.to.go on as far as what will happen. Call it a champion call it a sacrificial Lamb. I get paranoia but the numbers favor the blind civs at this point so I doubt its likely we would give a benifit to someone nafarious. I could vote you too.
Why to you want to nominate someone who wants to be nominated? We do that for President and it never works out.bea wrote:welcome boogs. So - we have keter and boogsy who volunteer. And llama and rox using secret criteria. 8 hours till the poll ends. I have to work but I will check in later and vote. My vote will prolly go to one of the volunteers.
Revealing the nature of the system undermines the system's effectiveness.nijuukyugou wrote: People are saying they have a system. I have a feeling I know the answer to this already, but could you enlighten us more on what your "system" of voting in this type of game might be? Even a little hint?
___Roxy wrote: I will not be voting for a volunteer as they could very well just be curious but they can also have ulterior motives. So I have a system instead.
I would imagine so.Hedgeowl wrote:I saw that, but it didnt mean anything to me. So you think other people are in a different hometown?thellama73 wrote:I meant the town that is the name of this thread. Does nobody read the name of the thread but me?Hedgeowl wrote:Hey game! This is an exciting start!
Llama, which hometown? Past, current?
I have no idea about who to pick. Does anybody besides Sorsha want to volunteer?
I meant the town that is the name of this thread. Does nobody read the name of the thread but me?Hedgeowl wrote:Hey game! This is an exciting start!
Llama, which hometown? Past, current?
I have no idea about who to pick. Does anybody besides Sorsha want to volunteer?
Hint: It's not a pillow-fight.Keterman wrote:And how will this "fight" go down exactly? I assume it won't be pretty for anyone involved.
I know you so well.MovingPictures07 wrote:Good question.thellama73 wrote:I have a question for our magnanimous host. Are we voting for someone to fight Tyler Durden, or will the top two vote-getters fight each other, or something else, or will you just respond to this post with a feb smiley?
Now it isn't.thellama73 wrote:And your poll is broken.
