The Syndicate

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
bea wrote:awe - well played metal.

I think that's the first time I've ever been killed by both the baddie and the ninja. *giggles*

Great job goosey! This is a very interesting concept. I wonder how it would have worked if I'd have let myself get lynched. I thought about briefly voting myself on day 1 when I was getting votes.
In hindsight, it would have done wonders I think. I went with llama because it seemed clear to me that he was Lars and could double-vote. I really couldn't have gotten any luckier with the players lynched though. I won based on circumstance more than anything.

for what it's worth, my plan was well-thought out, but backfired horribly. I thought a baddie wouldn't be likely to miss the first vote, so I basically outed myself as Lars. I knew that after I did that the demon would try to kill me, but I was counting on the civ protector protecting me the following night. Instead, I saved the demon and killed the protector. Easily my worst performance ever.

I would like to hang my head in shame for single-handedly costing the civvies the game on Day 1.

Aw man.

Mongoose wrote:Remember to only trust your exorcisms to demonologists and other licensed, bonded and certified exorcists.

I don't need the government telling me which exorcists to hire. I can make that judgement for myself, thank you.

bea wrote: And also - there is only one baddie. So it's not like there's teammate defending going on...

Ture. This is something I keep having to remind myself about. No looking for potential BTSC in this game.

bea wrote: That's fair enough - what do you think of my point about AP and his fairly lame reason for voting MetalMarsh? I know my random was lame but AP said he did it because MM was too quiet - and a look at page one says that he was anything but quiet.

The trouble with AP is that he says things that make no logical sense ALL THE TIME. I think I have lynched him like three times for being illogical, and he always flips civ. That being said, I do think you make a good point and I am not feeling great about him right now.

bea wrote: I get that thinking - and was coming back to change my vote before time ran out - but I have to ask, if you were trying to avoid Metalmarsh from being killed, why wouldn't you have switched your vote to me or AP - we were the ones that voted him after all...

I'm happy to talk at night. I had to make a quick decision once I decided to change my vote, and I felt like I was getting a bit of a bad "look how helpful I am" vibe from MR. I am pretty upset about how wrong I was though.

insertnamehere wrote:My god, there's MYSTERIOUS TRENCHES IN THE WALL!!!!!!!~!!!!!!!!!!!!111!!!!112121212!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@@@@@@@@@@1

More like mysterious trenches in your mom's face.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Changing my vote for reasons which are my own.

Sorry, MR.
Why did you switch your vote then, care to share? Is it because you wanted someone lynched?

What part of "my reasons are my own" don't you understand?

I can elaborate a little. I was pretty sure that the lone baddie in a game like this wouldn't miss the first opportunity to lynch a civilian, so I wanted to protect you from being killed.

I had to read up on these, but the Demon Murder Trial seems the most intriguing.

I'm really upset about this. That was a good role to lose. Bad luck.

Rats. Sorry, MR, again.

Changing my vote for reasons which are my own.

Sorry, MR.

Mongoose wrote:
thellama73 wrote:What's the story on tied lynches, Goosefeathers?
Tie = No Lynch

We should settle on someone.

Mister Rearranger wrote:I don't hate the Vompatti suspicion, for one.

But maybe he just really likes The Beyond, idk. :/

Vompatti is always wacky, but this game he strikes me as trying too hard to SEEM like his normal self.

Mister Rearranger wrote:Llama, how strongly do you believe your "don't lynch" idea would work?

It would only work if we want a stalemate with no winners. If we want that, it would 100% work. I, personally, do not want that though.

Well, I'm voting Vompatti, because I think he's double bluffing.

Why bea?

A Person wrote:Is the demon playing "In the Air Tonight" over and over again? Because in that case Phil Collins is the right answer.

If I could lynch Phil Collins in real life, I would.

Ah, that changes things. We could force a stalemate, but I don't think anyone wants that. Let's lynch someone then. Was Vompatti making a daring double bluff? I wouldn't put it past him. A Person's avatar remains distractingly cute. One of those two, I think.

Plus one of the roles can't be NKed and one can protect, so the odds are that more than two of us will survive.

If we agree to tie every lynch, the civvies will definitely win, although there may only be 2 of us left.

What's the story on tied lynches, Goosefeathers?

I like mine a lot, but the phrase "illegible garden" is hauntingly beautiful.

Metalmarsh89 wrote: Also, your signature is too cute, it's distracting.

This is the best reason to lynch someone I've heard so far. I am a bloodthristy, demon hunting llama! Rarr!

Demonology is seriously really interesting though.

Mister Rearranger wrote:Let's get down to business,
To defeat the Huns.
Did they send me daughters,
When I asked for sons?

So who wants to start lynching people?

Hello! I voted The Exorcist. It is great.

The Syndicate

Search found 28 matches

Re: [ENDGAME]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren

Re: [ENDGAME]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren

Re: [Day2]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: [Day1]:Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologi

Re: Redacted Case of Ed & Lorraine Warren, Demonologists