The Syndicate

Epignosis wrote:Also, I have deduced Elohcin's role. She is a civilian.

That is all.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Lol, I didn't look at the distribution of the votes when I made those posts, Elo. I didn't realize there was vote manipulation this game, but now I think I get it. But just ignore me. :P I just couldn't believe Blooper was lynched and I assumed it was because we voted to lynch her, but there is obviously more way vote manipulation this game than I thought. But now it makes sense.

Also, welcome Mata!

MovingPictures07 wrote:Sorry everyone, I had dinner with my PhD cohorts and then had to stop by the grocery store and I thought I'd be back a bit sooner.

RIP Blooper. WTF EVERYONE! How could you lynch Blooper?!?! Will catch up in a second.

Epignosis wrote:

zeek wrote:

Epignosis wrote:That's bullshit.

This game is hilarious

I am pleased you think so.

Now I must accept that MP is good.

Epignosis wrote:Nota bene:

I have died and come back from a kill (not "survived") and someone still sees fit to vote for me.

nijuu has lived and someone else lynched in her place and someone still sees fit to vote for her.

Foolishness. But that's OK.

Mongoose wrote:Whoa lynch switch?

Also, can we have a Mass Mafia Meetup soon please? I've loved everyone I've met IRL to absolute pieces.

YES...everyone come to the exciting Raeford, North Carolina!!!

Epignosis wrote:Having been bad in the last two games, and having witnessed it both times from my teammates, I am willing to bet that Mafia didn't vote on Day 1. Although anyone could miss a vote for legitimate reasons, I've seen it far too often that Mafia miss a vote on purpose. So I would be looking at a missed vote followed by a reaction that belies the missed vote.

This, for example:

Mongoose wrote:WTF we had a lynch vote??

Mongoose posted seven times during Day 1, participating in a discussion of potentially suspicious behavior. Incidentally, two of those seven posts are ambivalent comments about missing voters. What I don't understand is that Mongoose voted in the Day 0 poll and voted in the Night 1 poll, but comes back later expressing shock that we had a lynch vote. What else would we have had between Day 0 and Night 1- a Parcheesi tournament?

Canucklehead wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I am going to look like a total skeez for saying this, but sabie WAS my top suspect. I held my vote just in case, and then once it was safe, I voted elsewhere.

Why?

MovingPictures07 wrote:Elo, she did vote Sabie... that was my point. How am I reaching? She clearly kept trying to push Sabie and MR's situations as being equal, once Sabie even entered the conversation, and before that she was clearly trying to push an MR vote.

Then she later votes Sabie and says Sabie's was the "most opportunistic" yet just three posts before she was essentially equating them in suspicion.

nijuukyugou wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:It seems sort of weird to be OK voting for Sabie when MR also voted someone without explanation, but I believe at least MR posted he was voting, and obviously was first -- whereas Sabie hasn't even posted why she voted MR, and the timing of her vote is what makes it suspicious IMO, as if it was an easy way to get out of having to explain a vote.

Still waiting on her response, or I will vote her.

46

Understandable, but MR's post wasn't really much better than not posting at all. No explanation. Both are weird.

25

Hedgeowl wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:If you HAD to decide on a knocker who was bad, who would be your choice and why?

19

I'm going to assume this was directed at me!!

Hmmmm... good question. It's really hard to tell with what little has gone on so far, but we do know that a civvie would have known what the poll was about, right? So, under that assumption, I doubt that person would have voted early... so I suppose Elohcin?

I know that's not amazing reasoning, but it seems logical based on eliminating someone at least from being that one role... since I don't really have any reads on anyone yet.

How about you?

4

I'm a bit confused, as I usually am in the beginning of a Mafia game. There was meaning behind the Day 0 poll? And, on top of that, I was supposed to know about it? Also....we can know who is on whose team by looking at the Day 1 poll? I must just be without a clue today. Haha....without a clue. I crack myself up.

25

you didn't get a PM? Then why are you posting numbers? or is it a family thing to post questions you already know the answer to for the sake of a posting challenge?

9

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:If you HAD to decide on a knocker who was bad, who would be your choice and why?

19

I'm going to assume this was directed at me!!

Hmmmm... good question. It's really hard to tell with what little has gone on so far, but we do know that a civvie would have known what the poll was about, right? So, under that assumption, I doubt that person would have voted early... so I suppose Elohcin?

I know that's not amazing reasoning, but it seems logical based on eliminating someone at least from being that one role... since I don't really have any reads on anyone yet.

How about you?

4