Thank goodness Day 1 didn't start yet. It would have been unfortunate for a social person such as myself to be late to the start of the game. Not that starting on the weekend is any better for me. Having re-read the thread, here are some observations...
Nicodemus wrote:Random voting sucks. You're much more likely statistically to find a baddie Day 1 by actually making an effort than you are by randomly voting, particularly en masse.
This man speaks truth. Random typically favors the ne'er-do-wells because it allows them to spread out but it often happens that Day 1 suspicions are more often than not stretches unless an honest to goodness slip-up occurs. Since this is a sock game, it will be nigh impossible to pick up on other player's tells until/if we figure out who they are.
Absalom wrote:well this is already getting interesting and it's not even day 1 yet. And people say there is no evidence this early. Pfft.
Care to share or are you waiting for Day 1 to start?
Ruth wrote:This is a test:
a) Mafia
b) Baddies
c) Scum
d) Wolves
Yes
Samuel wrote:Check in. I see we are all trying to play our little parts. How cute, in that case I recommend not crossing me or I may have to call down some bears on your ass. Just sayin'.
Leave my ass alone. He can talk you know.
Cain wrote:Ruth wrote:So what do you call them?
I do not like how you are trying to figure out who everyone is. Defeats the whole purpose of a sock game. Pray stop it or you will earn my vote day 1.
Oooh, a vote threat! How exciting.
Nicodemus wrote:So much to go on already! I told you guys voting based on suspicion would be posible for D1
Care to share or are you waiting for Day 1 to start?
