The Syndicate

Alizon Device wrote:Pop quiz, class!

1. You are Mary's teammate. But lately, Mary's started bugging out in the thread. Whether it is because you and your team advised her to do this or not, others cannot say. What do you do?

a) Vote early for Mary for civvie credit
b) Vote late for Mary for civvie credit
c) Try to get someone else lynched
d) Vote 7th for Mary to "throw in the towel"

2. You are Mary's teammate. Unfortunately, for whatever reason, you missed the day 1 vote, the one which is arguably the easiest for you and your team to blend in. Because of this, you have incurred a penalty. For some reason, your team thinks it would be a wise decision to miss another vote. Which one do you miss?

a) The day 2 bandwagon against Bridget Bishop
b) The day 3 bandwagon against Entjen (that got switched to Krystyna)
c) The day 5 bandwagon against Mary
d) The day 4 bandwagon against Margaret Pearson, in which you could have voted just about any other way and came out looking better for it.

3. Someone with a questionable thread presence gets resurrected. How, you cannot say. This person was not expected. Without consulting you or anyone else, this person places a second vote on Karin, urges everyone to do the same, and makes up easily refutable points to accomplish this goal. What do you do?

a) Vote Karin immediately
b) Listen to what others have to say
c) View the evidence for yourself
d) Voice your own opinion and wait for feedback
e) b, c, & d because wtf is this?

Alizon Device wrote:I hope after today, the class will wake up and study much harder.

We will have a guest speaker, hopefully here at Hogwartz for some time, and I am rather interested in hearing what she has to say.

Alizon Device wrote:Is it weird that after three days of Alizon / Malin votes, Karin is the most suspicious from both the resurrected? And no reasons were given?

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Anne Whittle wrote:I am fighting hard because we need civs. I don't fight for a productive lynch I fight for the civs.

I do not know if Alizon's productive lynch is for the baddies or the civs. She really does not say. She just says she is not fighting forher life but for a productive lynch. Whatever that means. :l

This is another nonsensical, to my eyes anti-civ statement. The lynch is the only tool we have for killing off baddies. You can't be anti-productive lynch and pro-civ. So when you say you are not fighting for a productive lynch, to me thta means you are not fighting for the civs.

Anne Whittle wrote:

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Anne Whittle wrote:

Malin Matsdotter wrote:I have thought Whittle was bad since her ridiculous claim that bandwagonry is good for civs. I'm going to vote for her now.

This is a complete lie Malin.

Please pull the quote.


again thanks Alizon for ignoring me.

Anne Whittle wrote:I would vote alizon but I think Merga is saying splitting the vote is how civs get lynched. so imma going with Malin

yep splitting the vote is bad for civs.

Funny I do NOT mnetion bandwagonery anywhere.

Nice try to dismiss me Malin.

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Anne Whittle wrote:I am fighting hard because we need civs. I don't fight for a productive lynch I fight for the civs.

I do not know if Alizon's productive lynch is for the baddies or the civs. She really does not say. She just says she is not fighting forher life but for a productive lynch. Whatever that means. :l

This is another nonsensical, to my eyes anti-civ statement. The lynch is the only tool we have for killing off baddies. You can't be anti-productive lynch and pro-civ. So when you say you are not fighting for a productive lynch, to me thta means you are not fighting for the civs.

Jane Southworth wrote:And here we are with a split vote, just like we didn't want. I still would rather vote Malin more than I want to vote Alizon or Anne.

Alizon, do you think Malin is bad? Do you think we can risk splitting the vote to put more votes on Malin?

Everyone who hasn't voted yet, where are you looking?

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Anne Whittle wrote:

Malin Matsdotter wrote:I have thought Whittle was bad since her ridiculous claim that bandwagonry is good for civs. I'm going to vote for her now.

This is a complete lie Malin.

Please pull the quote.


again thanks Alizon for ignoring me.

Anne Whittle wrote:I would vote alizon but I think Merga is saying splitting the vote is how civs get lynched. so imma going with Malin

Malin Matsdotter wrote:I have thought Whittle was bad since her ridiculous claim that bandwagonry is good for civs. I'm going to vote for her now.

Katharina Henot wrote:

Alizon Device wrote:Anyone who hasn't voted yet is welcome to ask me anything about my vote. I will gladly talk to you. But I am done wasting my time with people who vote and then try to direct traffic (Merga).

I'm willing to talk.

Why Anne - what is it specificly about her that makes you so sure she is bad?

I already told you - I get her vote and I don't know if I agree with it - but I understand it - I told you already I wasn't sure about the votes you took. I already asked all these questions but apparently - I'm not good enough to respond to. so AGAIN - I ask you - why did you vote Anne - what was it about HER posts that made you most convinced she was a baddie.

I was willing to talk long before this post, but apparently - I'm not worthy enough of a response from. especially from a civ fighting for their lives. When someone is giving them the BOTD.

Sometimes I feel like I'm talking to myself...

Alizon Device wrote:Also, the "mama bear" excuse means you gun for people actively participating. As someone who puts time into games I sign up for or replace into, that's discouraging.

Linki~ I never said they bandwagoned me personally. I think it's been going on all game. And for the third time, I specifically called out Anne Whittle. You're fine defending people who don't play, and you ignore what an active player has said to you twice now.

Alizon Device wrote:

Mary Eastey wrote:My question is why is Jennet's horrible case gaining traction? It's not on the merits of the case alone, that's for sure. But, why the recent influx in popularity? Apparently, she cannot be a baddie because of a failed NK attempt on her. So, who else is the game has questionable motives and possible teammates? The Teachers. That's the read I'm definitely getting from Jennet. It also makes sense why she was so offended when I was suspicious of them. We've had 4 nights, that's more then enough time for the Teachers to find each other.

So, let's say Jennet is a teacher, what should we do about it? A clarification from A Person says that the Students are civvies, the Teachers are indies, and Voldemort's Army are baddies. Unfortunately, I haven't really gotten much of a feel for anyone else, except maybe Entjen in terms of baddies. At this point, I'm open to lynching an indie because I feel like it would be very informative as to what their purpose is, and who the others are.

This doesn't make any sense. At all. Even if you lynched a teacher, it wouldn't tell you anything about their purpose, their secrets, their win conditions, nada.

And why would the teachers have found each other by Day 5?

Jane Southworth wrote:Yay Jennet! At least we aren't losing folks at night. Except poor Harry, it appears Yet a part of me doesn't want to take that info at face value. I mean why are we just now being told? What would cause that to happen?

linki: Yeah it's possible Hermione is involved... but unless she checked Agnes night 1 and is somehow just now sharing the info, then it must have been a dead role check, which could be a different power, perhaps an unlisted one. Either way it's weird that we were told, that almost never happens in games, and I'm not sure whether I should trust it or not.

Anna Koldings wrote:Voting Anne Whittle for flippancy

Anna Koldings wrote:Psyche. Randomized Sarah Good.

Anne Redferne wrote:Voting for *Anne Whittle* because I must be the Alpha-Anne.