The Syndicate

Queran Gloomsoul wrote:Went with pea because pea sounds like pee.

Queran Gloomsoul wrote:

Gaerwen Gleamingrace wrote:

Queran Gloomsoul wrote:On another note, I'm admittedly quite curious about last nights poll. The similarity with the lynch poll prior is curious. Yet I don't see any immediate effects. Thoughts?

In what way is it similar? I must have missed something. I'll go back and re-read both of them in the meantime.

Dividing everyone across locations, though the first set of locations (tables) served a much more obvious purpose. :/

Rhinfrew Flowingrass wrote:Vote for bea. She's the, alcoholic.

*hic*

Queran Gloomsoul wrote:On another note, I'm admittedly quite curious about last nights poll. The similarity with the lynch poll prior is curious. Yet I don't see any immediate effects. Thoughts?

Rhinfrew Flowingrass wrote:

bea wrote: see...I can share.....sometimes..... [/b][/color]

The hell she can! Share, she can! Bollocks!

You wanna hear what she did to me, this bea? She had me head off, she did!

...

And then she brought me back to life...

...when I had a store of her favorites from the Plutonian shore....

Let me think about this...

Dierdre Wonderbird wrote:So reading back and catching up, I noted a few little things, nothing big but enough to make a note of them for later.

First off, the only real topic of discussion on Day 1 was Rumpy and potential ways around his power. While I applaud discussion, and I think the back n forth was good, it inevitably led to one of the thing i hate about Day 1s which is that someone got lynched for something they said about a side topic which everyone seemed to admit could have been said by a civ.

With no real case or suspicion, it feels to me like the idea of finding someone in the Rumpy discussion to lynch would be a good move for the mafia, but more than that, a smart mafia would promote the idea in theory, let it take root, and then back away from it to avoid being attached to the lynch.

I don't have as much of an issue with the first part tbh. While it would certainly have been nice to have discussions on other topics, the fact that there was discussion at all is definitely much better than how many Day 1's have gone. I do agree with the second part though. It does strike me as a discussion that could have been mafia-led or mafia-influenced.

So I'll say that I've got my eye on Laine Crystalsteam. This progression of posts is ping-y to me. It's all promoting voting for people who had certain kinds of posts about Rumpy and then BAM, I'll just vote for this guy who said he'd vote for the lowest poster but then didn't quite vote for the lowEST poster. It smells.

Laine Crystalsteam wrote:I think I may vote for Gaerwen Gleamingrace, as I found it weird that he/she was against using foreign languages to circumvent Rumpelstiltskin's ability. I know it's not much of a reason, but it is Day 1 and that's all I have to go on.

Laine Crystalsteam wrote:

Dilan Bluemoss wrote:
I was against it as well, because it would have mad communication impossible.

Yes, I suppose you're right. It would be difficult. I just don't really have a reason for voting anyone.

Laine Crystalsteam wrote:
I agree with what you said about Caillic. Seems like a good way to go. It is very odd that he/she would not try to find a way around the ability. If she/he is on Rumpelstiltskin's team and knows that there are consequences, he/she might be faking civvieness by alerting us to consequences from the hosts. Though, it's very tricky to get a read on people right now.

Laine Crystalsteam wrote:I am thinking of voting for Bac because he/she claimed that he was going to vote for the lowest poster, which is Etain Royalskull (0 in-game posts) but Bac voted for Jorhan Poisondart who had one post at the time.

Laine Crystalsteam wrote:The Flying Satyrs have decided that our vote shall go to Bac Wunderelin, Rajah of the Twilight Pixies for his/her contradictions in his/her vote.

Dallon Redwarlock wrote:

Bac Wunderelin wrote:

Dallon Redwarlock wrote:so i had an idea on how we can combat rumpelstiltskin's ability. i know it would be really annoying to read, but during the night we could talk normally and during the day wecouldrunourwordstogetherlikethis.

Someone in another game I was playing on another forum had to do that as a punishment or something and the effect it had was sort of similar to the way the page looks when someone posts a giant image. You had to use the bottoms scroll to read posts. Way annoying. But that would work if maybe we only run together three or four words at a time. Easier to read too. Good idea

Yes, a couple of words at a time or even a sentence at a time, whatever works best. I think this will definitely minimize damage from rumpel until we can lynch him.

Caillic Lustroushair wrote:

Dilan Bluemoss wrote:That love table is looking awfully intimidating. It is filled with trolls, ogres, dragons and gargoyles.

The after-party should be quite interesting. Hubba hubba.