The Syndicate

Alizon Device wrote:I'm going to seal the deal on Sarah Good. If you're good, you could have tried harder.

Jennet Bierley wrote:Sorry Sarah, but I don't think that lynching someone who has survived several deaths is a good idea either. Odds are that they'll survive another one, and we'll just be down a townie the following day. We don't know if you're right or not, and we're getting to a time where we can't just guess.

Jennet Bierley wrote:Sorry Sarah, but I don't think that lynching someone who has survived several deaths is a good idea either. Odds are that they'll survive another one, and we'll just be down a townie the following day. We don't know if you're right or not, and we're getting to a time where we can't just guess.

Malin Matsdotter wrote:Well, I am still convinced Sarah is bad and nothing she has said today causes me to think otherwise. I've never seen anyone so reluctant to provide positive, useful participation even in the face of a potential lynch, so I am casting my vote for her.

BIH Sarah (Not)Good.

Alizon Device wrote:

Jennet Bierley wrote:I voted myself. I do believe Sarah is good, or at least not bad, and we'll benefit more from my own lynch.

What leads you to that belief about Sarah?

Alizon Device wrote:

Sarah Good wrote:

Alizon Device wrote:

Sarah Good wrote:

Alizon Device wrote:I will leave it up to the other witches to decide if Malin is naughty or not. I hope the lesson we've learned is to not take someone's hasty ass word for it. Which smells like a hasty ass.

Jane is impaired. I hope to reach out to her, because she has good insight.

In the meantime, Sarah, you would do well to consider your words.

I'm the only one considering my words. :/

You have offered no words to consider.

Then why would you tell me to consider them?

That was word play.

In my first sentence, I was advising you to think before you post.

In my second sentence, I was giving you a Shakespearean smackdown.

Alizon Device wrote:

Sarah Good wrote:

Alizon Device wrote:I will leave it up to the other witches to decide if Malin is naughty or not. I hope the lesson we've learned is to not take someone's hasty ass word for it. Which smells like a hasty ass.

Jane is impaired. I hope to reach out to her, because she has good insight.

In the meantime, Sarah, you would do well to consider your words.

I'm the only one considering my words. :/

You have offered no words to consider.

Alizon Device wrote:I will leave it up to the other witches to decide if Malin is naughty or not. I hope the lesson we've learned is to not take someone's hasty ass word for it. Which smells like a hasty ass.

Jane is impaired. I hope to reach out to her, because she has good insight.

In the meantime, Sarah, you would do well to consider your words.

Alizon Device wrote:

Sarah Good wrote:

Alizon Device wrote:In all 44 of your posts, you've done absolutely nothing helpful. Don't try to start now.

Well, this buddy-buddy thing is pretty cute.

I'm giving you an opportunity to speak and be helpful. So is everyone else who has not voted for you. You're around. Even though you've already voted, you don't have other things to say?

linki @ Sarah~ Proof or GTFO

Alizon Device wrote:In all 44 of your posts, you've done absolutely nothing helpful. Don't try to start now.

Alizon Device wrote:In all 44 of your posts, you've done absolutely nothing helpful. Don't try to start now.

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Alizon Device wrote:

Jennet Bierley wrote:

Alizon Device wrote:That, coupled with my opinion that resurrected persons are working for Tom Riddle, had been giving me pause about Sarah Good being bad.

Wait, so you hinted that you brought me back to life, and yet you think it was the doing of Tom Riddle?

I never once implied that the method of resurrection had anything to do with the quality of life after resurrection.

Alizon Device wrote:Malin, what is your opinion about the resurrected ones?

I am very suspicious of Sarah Good. Or at least I will pretend to be because I want to discredit her suspicion of me.

Karin Svensdotter wrote:Alizon, speaking of players using a capital 'G'...check out this post made by Ms. Good herself.

Sarah Good wrote:Voted for Eastly cuz she's not Good

Alizon Device wrote:

Sarah Good wrote:Go ahead and vote for the player that sniffed out Mary from Day 1 and see how far that takes you.

Glad you said that. You know, you give yourself far too much credit for something that happened basically without you.

Day 1~

Sarah Good wrote:Voted for Eastly cuz she's not Good

So this is sniffing "out Mary from Day 1."

Day 2~

Sarah Good wrote:No time. Voted me.

If you "sniffed out Mary from Day 1" as you put it, why not vote for Mary on day 2 instead of yourself?

Day 3~ You didn't post at all, but voted Krystyna.

Again, if you "sniffed out Mary from Day 1," why not vote for Mary on Day 3 instead of Krystyna? Why not be a little more aggressive in trying to get people to vote for Mary like you are doing with Malin right now?

Day 4~ You posted (once) but you didn't vote.

Day 5~

Sarah Good wrote:Mary Mary quite contrary.

On day 5, you voted for Mary. Last. Without saying anything. Without trying to get her lynched. If you "sniffed out Mary from Day 1" as you put it, why not try to get others to vote for Mary? Why did you wait for eleven other people to vote before you tacked on your vote at the end?

Karin Svensdotter wrote:Even though you did sound snarky to me, I hear what you're saying about Malin commenting about the baddies. To be technical however, the Mafia could have killed Maret AND cursed Malin, am I correct? I mean, they (as a team) have more than just the kill, right? Then again, a civ role could have a curse too I am sure. I guess I'm just saying that we don't know for sure where the curse came from.

And, I still don't think your voting record for Mary clears you of being a baddie.

Karin Svensdotter wrote:

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Sarah Good wrote:

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Lizzy wrote: Malin Matsdotter has survived a kill attempt with the mysterious disintegrating curse.

Märet Jonsdotter has been killed by Voldemort and the Death Eaters.

You'll have to try harder than thta, baddies. :P

And RIP Maret, I was pretty sure you were good.

Did I miss the part where it says the baddies targeted you?

Girl, you'd miss the broad side of a barn. Snap!

Sarah Good wrote:So that'd be a no then.

I'm afraid these comments make me have an eye on you. You just seem too snarky for a civ who hasn't participated much.

Karin Svensdotter wrote:Well..that was quick. I challenge you all to go back and read Sarah Good. I promise, it won't take but a minute

She has contributed nothing. The only Good she has done in the game is vote for Mary which is what she claims proves her civviness. So let me give you a run down of her two votes for Mary.

Her first vote for Mary was Day 1 - She gave the second vote on Mary. All baddies do a little distancing, wouldn't you agree?

Her second vote for Mary was Day 5 - She was the 19th voter overall and voted 12th (LAST) for Mary.



What do you have to say for this Sarah?

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Lizzy wrote: Malin Matsdotter has survived a kill attempt with the mysterious disintegrating curse.

Märet Jonsdotter has been killed by Voldemort and the Death Eaters.

You'll have to try harder than thta, baddies. :P

And RIP Maret, I was pretty sure you were good.

Alice Nutter wrote:Wow, most obvious baddie team ever?

Seriously, guys. Games aren't as fun for me when you don't even try to be slick.

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Sarah Good wrote:

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Sarah Good wrote:Oh dang son look at Malin with her vote for Anne wow.

Wow indeed.

Now that I am not insane I can explain my vote. I thought Anne had been acting very baddie. She was completely silent and non-participatory until she started getting suspicion, then she was super-active and defensive, giving a lot of NO Us and quite a few arguments that made no sense. It smacked of desperation, and I really thought she was bad. She ended up being Slytherin, so I was pretty close, right? :P

I too have grave misgivings about the way Barbara and Jennet have been playing. It smells really fishy to just pop up out of nowhere, point to someone, shout "HER!" and then immediately cast votes. It feels manipulative and I don't like being manipulated. That being said, I have no real opinion of Karin and my vote was not about saving her, it was about voting my conscience as I have ALWAYS done this game and will continue to do. Sarah Good still hasn't contributed a thing and expects to win the game without ever making a single substantive post. I still think she's a baddie who has figured out how this site works.

What does that mean

It means that you've learned that the easiest way to win as a baddie is to never say anything anyone can use to make a case on you.

Which is pretty weak, by the way.

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Sarah Good wrote:Oh dang son look at Malin with her vote for Anne wow.

Wow indeed.

Now that I am not insane I can explain my vote. I thought Anne had been acting very baddie. She was completely silent and non-participatory until she started getting suspicion, then she was super-active and defensive, giving a lot of NO Us and quite a few arguments that made no sense. It smacked of desperation, and I really thought she was bad. She ended up being Slytherin, so I was pretty close, right? :P

I too have grave misgivings about the way Barbara and Jennet have been playing. It smells really fishy to just pop up out of nowhere, point to someone, shout "HER!" and then immediately cast votes. It feels manipulative and I don't like being manipulated. That being said, I have no real opinion of Karin and my vote was not about saving her, it was about voting my conscience as I have ALWAYS done this game and will continue to do. Sarah Good still hasn't contributed a thing and expects to win the game without ever making a single substantive post. I still think she's a baddie who has figured out how this site works.

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Anne Redferne wrote:which is a thing i'm even more sure of now that malin has made a post saying she thinks alizon is good even right after alizon made the statement about reviving mary :0

I didn't really take Alizon seriously about that. She has a sense of humor, you know. Do you really think an actual baddie would post "I'm resurrecting a baddie" in the thread? They would just do it without saying anything.

Sarah Good wrote: Lol u funny Voldemort.

Would you like to post a list of suspicions as the rest of us are doing, or just continue with the zippy, unhelpful, one-liners?

Malin Matsdotter wrote:Hey, I thought we agreed splitting vote was bad.

Here is my very brief list before I head off to work:
Alizon: I think she is good. Her arguments have been logical and direct and I don't see her as trying to manipulate anyone. I trust her.
Merga: An excellent participator, probably civ.
Maret: Confirmed civ as far as I am concerned due to the kill attempt.
Sarah: I think she is probably bad for reasons previously outlined.
Alice: survived a kill attempt, so probably okay.
Anne Whittle: I agree with Alizon that her strange bandwagonry yesterday smacks of opportunism. No trust there.
Katherina: I don't know, I will have to do a reread.
Anne Redfern: Has been a steady participator throughout, but tends to shepherd the discussion along rather than leading it. I could go either way but lan civ.
Jane: Alternately quiet and combative. Part f me distrusts her, but it could be my inner No U coming out.
Karin: I tend to agree with the others that, as low posters go, she is probably one of the better ones to look at, but she hasn't stood out in my mind so a reread is in order.

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Sarah Good wrote:Well Then. Vote=Mailin

Because I looked at you with a critical eye? I never even said I was voting for you.

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Sarah Good wrote:

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Sarah Good wrote:How can you include quotes of mine where I call out Mary Eastly as being bad (and she was) and then claim I'm bad?

How can you claim that baddies never throw each other under the bus to gain credibility, especially when the winds are blowing that way anyway?

On day 1?

I've seen it happen. Especially from people with unconventional styles like yours.

Malin Matsdotter wrote:

Sarah Good wrote:How can you include quotes of mine where I call out Mary Eastly as being bad (and she was) and then claim I'm bad?

How can you claim that baddies never throw each other under the bus to gain credibility, especially when the winds are blowing that way anyway?

Malin Matsdotter wrote:I did some rereading today and this stuck out to me. Below is Sarah Good's entire contribution to the game.

Sarah Good wrote:Re: [NIGHT 6] Harry Potter Mafia
Unfair I wanted that.

by Sarah Good
Sat Mar 01, 2014 6:21 pm

Re: [NIGHT 6] Harry Potter Mafia

I assumed this was the explaination regarding the poll.

by Sarah Good
Sat Mar 01, 2014 3:56 pm

Re: [NIGHT 6] Harry Potter Mafia

Märet Jonsdotter wrote:How do you know?

I have da fayf.

by Sarah Good
Sat Mar 01, 2014 11:46 am

Re: [NIGHT 6] Harry Potter Mafia
I voted for myself to receive the Elder Wand and so should everyone else.

by Sarah Good
Sat Mar 01, 2014 11:22 am

Re: [NIGHT 6] Harry Potter Mafia
I wouldn't mind an elder wand if you know what I mean.

by Sarah Good
Fri Feb 28, 2014 6:37 pm

Re: [NIGHT 5] Harry Potter Mafia
Three for me.

by Sarah Good
Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:44 am

Re: [DAY 5] Harry Potter Mafia
Mary Mary quite contrary.

by Sarah Good
Tue Feb 25, 2014 5:32 pm

Re: [DAY 4] Harry Potter Mafia
Good.

by Sarah Good
Fri Feb 21, 2014 3:37 pm

Re: [NIGHT 3] Harry Potter Mafia
RIP

by Sarah Good
Wed Feb 19, 2014 11:32 pm

Re: [DAY 2] Harry Potter Mafia
No time. Voted me.

by Sarah Good
Sun Feb 16, 2014 4:39 pm

Re: [NIGHT 1] Harry Potter Mafia
Death by Thestral would be a Good way to go.

by Sarah Good
Thu Feb 13, 2014 6:31 pm

Re: [DAY 1] Harry Potter Mafia
Voted for Eastly cuz she's not Good

by Sarah Good
Thu Feb 13, 2014 11:44 am

Re: [DAY 1] Harry Potter Mafia
Well we're off to a Good start.

by Sarah Good
Tue Feb 11, 2014 4:49 pm

Re: [DAY 0] Harry Potter Mafia
Arithmancy sounds "Good"

by Sarah Good
Sun Feb 09, 2014 8:06 pm

Re: [DAY 0] Harry Potter Mafia
"Good" to go!

by Sarah Good
Sun Feb 09, 2014 1:39 pm

I know we're not supposed to discuss real identities in this thread, but I think I am seeing a certain someone's baddie game here. Also, didn't Zombie Agnes hint that she had info about Sarah? Does no one find that worth pursuing?

A Person wrote:

Night 6: The Quest for the Deathly Hallows -The Elder Wand

Created by Death itself from the branch of an elder tree, the Elder Wand is the most sought after of the Deathly Hollows. The wand is said to grant its user near invicibility in combat, giving him (or her) magical power beyond their normal ability. In this event, you will decide which of you recieves the wand. Good luck.

Märet Jonsdotter wrote:How do you know?