The Syndicate

Lizzy wrote:
Jennet Bierley has been killed by Voldemort and the Death Eaters.

Entjen Gillis has been killed by Vincent Crabbe.

Agnes Sampson has been summoned back to Tartarus.

It is now Day 6. You have 48 hours to lynch someone.

heh

o induere audio unum ad gradus hortatione

Diruto magna qui exterminabat, et omnia in viam, suus 'O miserere te ut plane proxime ad te elevat

M nwere ike na-eche-akpalikarị, ọbụna ugbu a. Na-abịa, soaring-erepịa ihe niile ha ụzọ

ukusithethelela izono futhi nawe usindiswe

Contra vigiliarum Diabolo surgere illum venit Deus, qui repulisti nos

I saw the devil.

I saw Merga Bien with the devil.
I saw Jennet Bierley with the devil.
I saw Alizon Device with the devil.
I saw Mary Eastey with the devil.
I saw Entjen Gillis with the devil.
I saw Sarah Good with the devil.
I saw Katharina Henot with the devil.
I saw Märet Jonsdotter with the devil.
I saw Anna Koldings with the devil.
I saw Barbara Kollerin with the devil.
I saw Malin Matsdotter with the devil.
I saw Kael Merrie with the devil.
I saw Rebecca Nurse with the devil.
I saw Alice Nutter with the devil.
I saw Anne Redferne with the devil.
I saw Margarethe Reinberg with the devil.
I saw Jane Southworth with the devil.
I saw Karin Svensdotter with the devil.
I saw Anne Whittle with the devil.
I saw Brita Zippel with the devil.

"And who are you, the proud lord said,
that I must bow so low?
Only a cat of a different coat,
that's all the truth I know.
In a coat of gold or a coat of red,
a lion still has claws,
And mine are long and sharp, my lord,
as long and sharp as yours.
And so he spoke, and so he spoke,
that lord of Castamere,
But now the rains weep o'er his hall,
with no one there to hear.
Yes now the rains weep o'er his hall,
and not a soul to hear."

heh heh heh

heh heh

heh

Barbara Kollerin wrote:Mary "NO U"'d Jennet? I had been thinking the case against Mary was a bit light, but instead of trying to find baddies, Mary votes, early, for someone who the baddies tried to kill? That's the biggest NO U I've seen in awhile!

If you'd actually read my post, you'd realize that I suspect her of being a member of the super shady indie team known as the Teachers, which Jennet seems to know a lot about. It's not just a NO U, it's an actual case.

Jennet Bierley wrote:

Mary Eastey wrote:

Alizon Device wrote:

Mary Eastey wrote:My question is why is Jennet's horrible case gaining traction? It's not on the merits of the case alone, that's for sure. But, why the recent influx in popularity? Apparently, she cannot be a baddie because of a failed NK attempt on her. So, who else is the game has questionable motives and possible teammates? The Teachers. That's the read I'm definitely getting from Jennet. It also makes sense why she was so offended when I was suspicious of them. We've had 4 nights, that's more then enough time for the Teachers to find each other.

So, let's say Jennet is a teacher, what should we do about it? A clarification from A Person says that the Students are civvies, the Teachers are indies, and Voldemort's Army are baddies. Unfortunately, I haven't really gotten much of a feel for anyone else, except maybe Entjen in terms of baddies. At this point, I'm open to lynching an indie because I feel like it would be very informative as to what their purpose is, and who the others are.

This doesn't make any sense. At all. Even if you lynched a teacher, it wouldn't tell you anything about their purpose, their secrets, their win conditions, nada.

And why would the teachers have found each other by Day 5?

How do you know that we wouldn't find anything out? We could also analyze her posts, her interactions to get an idea of who the others are. The Teachers right now are a big question mark, and I feel that lynching one could lead to more information about them. Of course, ole Voldy is a bigger threat, but I certainly don't think that we should ignore the Teachers.

While I find you effort commendable, I know that lynching a death eater would be for more helpful.

Of course I'd rather lynch a Death Eater, but you seem to want us all to ignore the shady indie team we know next to nothing about. Not really "civvie behavior" in the words of Krystyna.

Jennet Bierley wrote:Here we go again. We don't know what the teachers want, so we should go ahead and lynch them. This sort of case could only be made by a death eater, to whom the teachers are their biggest threat. I will not confirm nor deny whether I am a teacher, because I find that to be counter-productive to myself and anyone else that's a civvie. I will say that I believe that we need the teachers alive rather than dead.

You seem to have some information about the Teachers, Jennet. Would you mind sharing?

Jennet Bierley wrote:This sort of case could only be made by a death eater, to whom the teachers are their biggest threat.

That's right, anyone who is suspicious of the Teachers, which is a indie team we don't know the roles of or the win conditions of, must be bad!

Jennet Bierley wrote:Here we go again. We don't know what the teachers want, so we should go ahead and lynch them. This sort of case could only be made by a death eater, to whom the teachers are their biggest threat. I will not confirm nor deny whether I am a teacher, because I find that to be counter-productive to myself and anyone else that's a civvie. I will say that I believe that we need the teachers alive rather than dead.

spot the teacher

Margarethe Reinberg wrote:

Mary Eastey wrote:
How do you know that we wouldn't find anything out? We could also analyze her posts, her interactions to get an idea of who the others are. The Teachers right now are a big question mark, and I feel that lynching one could lead to more information about them. Of course, ole Voldy is a bigger threat, but I certainly don't think that we should ignore the Teachers.

I'm trying to think of an example of something we would find out by lynching an indie. We wouldn't find out their secret power, and we wouldn't find out their win condition, nor would we find out if they have bts or not. I do understand we could analyze the posts and see if we see any links to others though I am not as convinced that by day 4 the indies have all found each other. Mary, it would be helpful to me if you would give an example of what we could hope to find out besides possible links to other teachers. I don't mean you have to make a definitive statement that we WILL find something out specifically. I'm just looking for an example of what you are talking about so I can better understand your point.

The hosts revealed Agnes was Harry just for shits and giggles, maybe they will reveal more about the Teachers if we lynch them. It wouldn't be a completely out of left field. Possible win conditions, role descriptions, even hinting would be appreciated. That plus finding links to other teachers, and removing a big question mark variable from the game.

Alizon Device wrote:

Mary Eastey wrote:My question is why is Jennet's horrible case gaining traction? It's not on the merits of the case alone, that's for sure. But, why the recent influx in popularity? Apparently, she cannot be a baddie because of a failed NK attempt on her. So, who else is the game has questionable motives and possible teammates? The Teachers. That's the read I'm definitely getting from Jennet. It also makes sense why she was so offended when I was suspicious of them. We've had 4 nights, that's more then enough time for the Teachers to find each other.

So, let's say Jennet is a teacher, what should we do about it? A clarification from A Person says that the Students are civvies, the Teachers are indies, and Voldemort's Army are baddies. Unfortunately, I haven't really gotten much of a feel for anyone else, except maybe Entjen in terms of baddies. At this point, I'm open to lynching an indie because I feel like it would be very informative as to what their purpose is, and who the others are.

This doesn't make any sense. At all. Even if you lynched a teacher, it wouldn't tell you anything about their purpose, their secrets, their win conditions, nada.

And why would the teachers have found each other by Day 5?

How do you know that we wouldn't find anything out? We could also analyze her posts, her interactions to get an idea of who the others are. The Teachers right now are a big question mark, and I feel that lynching one could lead to more information about them. Of course, ole Voldy is a bigger threat, but I certainly don't think that we should ignore the Teachers.

Märet Jonsdotter wrote:Mary, if you're thinking Jennet is a teacher, why wouldn't you wait the rest of the day to discuss who might actually be BAD and then vote for Jennet if no fruitful leads came from there?

Why didn't you ask Jennet this question? The reason why I voted early is because I may not be around at the time of the lynch.

Jennet Bierley wrote:I know it's early in the day, but I went ahead and voted Mary. I believe she should be lynched today. I've already explained my reasons yesterday here, but I'm open for discussion.

HEY JENNET

In your rush to incriminate me, you forgot to actually respond to me. Your case against me had two points: I was suspicious of the Teachers. So me being suspicious of an indy group that we don't know the win condition of is obviously not "civvie behavior".

And that I voted for the lynched player in every lynch, which nicely put, is complete fucking bullshit. I called her out on it, and other issues about her case, she only responded to one.

Mary Eastey wrote:

Jennet Bierley wrote:
Mary Eastey has given me the highest ping out of active players. Yes she was Lunafied yesterday, so she fell off my radar completely. However she was trying to spread discord among us about the professors not being pro-town. She's also had a vote on every single lynched player this game so far. If I don't decide to vote an inactive player, Mary would be my choice.

Look, I was wrong. I admit it. But, we still don't know the Teacher's win conditions. Obviously, I'm focusing more on Voldy and the Death Eaters. I still have a raised eyebrow towards the Teachers. Also, get your facts straight. I voted for Entjen on Day 3. Not Krystyna. Why are you spreading false facts about me?

She didn't reply to anything else in my post except the fact that apparently she misworded her post, and it really meant that I voted for the leader of lynch poll.

Jennet Bierley wrote:I misworded my post. You have placed your vote on the vote leader each day, until today, when I happened to point it out.

And now, she votes for me incredibly early in the poll! Without adding anything, or actually contributing anything to the case. Just said "You can read my case here". Other people like Entjen and Merga are also saying that this is a good case, which it obviously is not, without adding anything or contributing to the case.

One thing that I despise with every fiber of my being is when I'm lynched without an actual case to defend myself from. Just "I think Mary is bad. *votes Mary*" and because either that person built up enough civvie cred to have people just support him/her blindly. Or, he/she is a baddie, who made the case, then had her teammates jump on it to add credibility. That stuff makes my blood boil, and I don't want it to happen here.

My question is why is Jennet's horrible case gaining traction? It's not on the merits of the case alone, that's for sure. But, why the recent influx in popularity? Apparently, she cannot be a baddie because of a failed NK attempt on her. So, who else is the game has questionable motives and possible teammates? The Teachers. That's the read I'm definitely getting from Jennet. It also makes sense why she was so offended when I was suspicious of them. We've had 4 nights, that's more then enough time for the Teachers to find each other.

So, let's say Jennet is a teacher, what should we do about it? A clarification from A Person says that the Students are civvies, the Teachers are indies, and Voldemort's Army are baddies. Unfortunately, I haven't really gotten much of a feel for anyone else, except maybe Entjen in terms of baddies. At this point, I'm open to lynching an indie because I feel like it would be very informative as to what their purpose is, and who the others are.

*votes Jennet*

voted for gargoyle strike

I overlooked Karin accidentally. After reading Katharina's posts, I agree that she seems like a very suspicious poster. I have to vote fast, so it's going to be for her.

Jennet Bierley wrote:
Mary Eastey has given me the highest ping out of active players. Yes she was Lunafied yesterday, so she fell off my radar completely. However she was trying to spread discord among us about the professors not being pro-town. She's also had a vote on every single lynched player this game so far. If I don't decide to vote an inactive player, Mary would be my choice.

Look, I was wrong. I admit it. But, we still don't know the Teacher's win conditions. Obviously, I'm focusing more on Voldy and the Death Eaters. I still have a raised eyebrow towards the Teachers. Also, get your facts straight. I voted for Entjen on Day 3. Not Krystyna. Why are you spreading false facts about me?

Märet Jonsdotter wrote:Jennet, do you think baddies ever play sloppy games because no one would ever think a baddie would do that? Or is that too obvious? Or is THAT too obvious????

It's a paradox, man!

I agree that we should still be looking at Entjen, but I'm willing to give him a free pass. I also think that looking at low posters is a Good strategy for right now. My general rule of thumb when looking for low poster baddies is seeing who almost never talks about the game, and is mostly OT. Two people fit that description, Merga Bien and Sarah Good.

Merga seems to be not even playing at all, only voting in the Day 0, and Night 1 polls. She posted this:

Merga Bien wrote:I'm sorry for not being more involved so far. I may be quieter for the next couple of days, but things are slowing down for me and I will more available.

Which makes me think that she just doesn't have time for this game.

Sarah is much more suspicious. Her "strategy" is to make puns with her name. She voted for me Day 1, without really offering an explanation, and then self voted Day 2. This seems to me like a baddie who is participating the bare minimum at the request of her teammates. She's definitely someone I'm going to be looking at today.

Dammit, RIP Krystyna.

18

Margarethe Reinberg wrote:Ok, it looks like this is boiling down to a race between Krystyna and Entjen. If that works out to be true after some others have voted, I will cast my vote against Entjen.

In this regard, the child window, game balls, we can hide an elegant magazine for women to hide from his wife, hide your wife, hide your kids. The Lord gave us hide the application security, Prime Minister of Nepal, Nepal, he said: friends, family, and home. Yes, I really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, we do not believe a shirt, step. 5 9 grill parties, 5-10, Cesar Bourarenskym in red, mini golf, balls, for example, for me, for the first time in the throat.

Ball valve Horsepis dog! But probably not a plastic sword, gold, life, add sembl misérabl of gold, copper, bronze.

17

Krystyna Ceynowa wrote:

Jennet Bierley wrote:

Mary Eastey wrote:With Christina Aguilera and don't know how bad. The population is six months, and total loss of logic was gold Hotel Christina. The river burn and give them opportunities for young people. This is décharg new.

12

Can I help you?

She voted Entjen, and this is the post (I think) for the vote, the timing fits anyways. Or she has a count she has to reach, and is padding out her posts to hit it before the day ends.

Black Magic is a long time in the next century. There are several of these two worlds. 4 times.

16

Karen's Jane, my friend. Configuration of the project. Oh Harry. The young man in the head, eyes, Christine Lynch Maturín. Joy!

15

Jennet Bierley wrote:

Mary Eastey wrote:With Christina Aguilera and don't know how bad. The population is six months, and total loss of logic was gold Hotel Christina. The river burn and give them opportunities for young people. This is décharg new.

12

Can I help you?

I must admit that with the right people. Draco and death. It is much more interesting.

14

Krystyna Ceynowa wrote:

Mary Eastey wrote:

Krystyna Ceynowa wrote:

Jane Southworth wrote:Even if you thought she did want to get lynched, why would wanting to get lynched make her a baddie? You even agree that it's more likely a civvie would say something like that than a baddie.

I will probably never agree with you on this and I need to figure out whether that's just based on our differing mafia principles or if has something to do with your alignment in this game. I'm trying not to read too much into it, but that Bridget lynch just felt so personal, and there was almost no remorse afterwards from the people responsible.

Well, to clarify, no, I feel no remorse for lynching Bridget. I think she wanted it, and she certainly got it.

For without the policy. convainc

11

Was this supposed to be a dick joke? I think this was supposed to be a dick joke.

But let décharg] is also involved.

13

With Christina Aguilera and don't know how bad. The population is six months, and total loss of logic was gold Hotel Christina. The river burn and give them opportunities for young people. This is décharg new.

12

Krystyna Ceynowa wrote:

Jane Southworth wrote:Even if you thought she did want to get lynched, why would wanting to get lynched make her a baddie? You even agree that it's more likely a civvie would say something like that than a baddie.

I will probably never agree with you on this and I need to figure out whether that's just based on our differing mafia principles or if has something to do with your alignment in this game. I'm trying not to read too much into it, but that Bridget lynch just felt so personal, and there was almost no remorse afterwards from the people responsible.

Well, to clarify, no, I feel no remorse for lynching Bridget. I think she wanted it, and she certainly got it.

For without the policy. convainc

11

Rebecca Nurse wrote:Anyone want to comment on my segment on Jane? Does anyone else see what I'm seeing?

It's so gross when you plabr your popcorn, Mary. Why can't you just eat like a normal person? You're embarrassing me!

In your country?

10

... Joy ... * Plabr * popcorn

Rebecca Nurse wrote:Oh yeah, and Mary can be fifth because - and I quote - "SUCK IT, MARY!"

No thanks.

9

Rebecca Nurse wrote:Mom! Mary is pretending she's just now learning English again. You said she couldn't do that anymore.

God, everything! You should always be your stuff! Always love more!

8

Katharina Henot wrote:

Mary Eastey wrote:

Krystyna Ceynowa wrote:

Malin Matsdotter wrote:I think it is reckless and irresponsible to assume evil on the part of the Slytherin students. It is not the Hogwarts spirit. The sorting hat and the professors never assumed that Slytherins were automatically bad in the books. It would be unfair for us to do so now.

Actually, during the Battle for Hogwarts, Slytherin students are not brought in to fight with the rest of the school, and put with the young students, because they are not trusted. During that entire year, they also help the Death Eater's that were put in charge of the school torture other students.

This is racism of the Slytherin people! Dumbledore is always for us, he is an asshole!

6

Is this you claiming to be Slyherin or are there supposed to be more words there that are missing?

No, it's just an unfair bad rap. It's not good.

7

Krystyna Ceynowa wrote:

Malin Matsdotter wrote:I think it is reckless and irresponsible to assume evil on the part of the Slytherin students. It is not the Hogwarts spirit. The sorting hat and the professors never assumed that Slytherins were automatically bad in the books. It would be unfair for us to do so now.

Actually, during the Battle for Hogwarts, Slytherin students are not brought in to fight with the rest of the school, and put with the young students, because they are not trusted. During that entire year, they also help the Death Eater's that were put in charge of the school torture other students.

This is racism of the Slytherin people! Dumbledore is always for us, he is an asshole!

6

Märet Jonsdotter wrote:

Krystyna Ceynowa wrote:

Krystyna Ceynowa wrote:
We KNOW that Lucius is searching for Draco each night. We don't know what happens if he finds him, but we do know neither he or Draco are anything that could be considered good people, and Crabbe, Goyle, and Pansy are worse.

Except it's been confirmed that teachers are independents, not baddies. So unless you want to tell me you think a game with 20 non baddies vs. 4 baddies makes sense, then more have to have that potential, and Slytherin has a history of being evil (Point in case: all 4 baddies were).

That's not fear-mongering, that's the reality of the situation, if you don't want to accept it, than that's on you.

....you literally said that Crabbe, Goyle, and Pansy-- roles to which we have zero confirmed indication that are recruitable (we have that indication on Draco) are worse than Lucius.

"I completely agree, maybe things will vote accordingly."

5

Rebecca Nurse wrote:Yeah, sister Mary. Do give a well-detailed, elaborate explanation

"Rebecca MOM!"

4

Märet Jonsdotter wrote: I did a quick reread and this stood out to me a lot. A lot of fear mongering. Eessentially saying that about 1/4 of the civvies could defect to the Death Eaters.

"It's very true."

3

"Oaesdgrjni Sapphire "

2

"But my bad insanivid ... ...."

1

This is an outrage.

TIES YAY

I have created something beautiful.
Something that symbolizes the whole of Harry Potter.
The struggle between good and evil, not only between Voldemort and Harry, but in Harry's soul.
It touches upon such heavy themes as racism,

inequality,

poverty,

and religion.

This piece seeks to answer the question "Is there a God?"

BEHOLD!



Look upon my works ye mighty and despair!

You see, it's a post postmodernism piece. The man under the invisibility cloak pleasuring himself represents the perversion inside of all of us. The incredibly unattractive lady with the sagging tits represents how we place beauty on a pedestal, when really the most beautiful on the outside are often the most ugly on the inside.

The black on white color scheme represents racism.

The black catches your eyes, it practically screams out "WHY OH GOD WHY!" This represents how we try to integrate POC into our culture, surrounding them by white. When really, we should let them celebrate their individuality.

Margarethe Reinberg wrote:

Märet Jonsdotter wrote:I voted.

Anne Redferne wrote:

Märet Jonsdotter wrote:

Anne Redferne wrote:Why bridget?

Did you read anything we've talked about?
Bridget claims to know that none of the members of Voldemort's team can survive a lynch. Regardless of what we think of Agnes, I see only one way that Bridget would know that no one on Voldemort's team can survive a lynch.

I have read everything, yes, but thank you for your concern, Märet.

To me it just seems like Bridget is making somewhat logical conjectures based on the available data, but stating them as absolute facts. Odd behavior yeah, but I don't see it as necessarily being a role related thing. I just don't think I'm quite as convinced as you are on the matter.

Yes, but ignoring unknown information indicates that she either knows the unknown information or doesn't care about facts.

I agree and will also vote Bridget.

I'm voting for Bridget because of this, not because of who she may be.

You must be fun at parties.