The Syndicate

Lot wrote:I know what you mean Absalom.

I'm comfortable about me, Balaam, Lazarus...

Jonathan and Rebecca could be called defensive votes (but that doesn't mean they are good).

That leaves Samuel.

Seriously? I have been looking at him for three lynches. You think that makes me bad then go ahead and vote me tomorrow but you won't be getting a heathen or a horseman or any other kind of baddie that might be out there.

Voted Jeph.

Obviously reading just three pages of posts has melted my brain and made all the names runs together.

Wait, Jeph wants to vote Jacob, I don't think I want to vote there. Ugh!

First time I made a mistake. Dang it.

As I was saying, I'm once again, unsurprisingly in complete agreement with Lot.

I would consider a Jeph vote. If others are not feeling that I'm not sure which way I would vote. Maybe Jacob I guess, though it would not be my preference.

To answer your question regarding the vote tally when I cast mine, the answer is no I was not paying attention. So no I did not know mine was the clincher, but it would not have changed my vote if I did. I know it is easy to say now but I have nothing to hide so I am fine with just saying outright I wasn't aware enough to realize I clinched it, but I am not bad so I would have had no reason to do something different than that.

i realize I am not contributing here, I'm really very sorry and if you all choose to eventually lynch me because of it, that is entirely understandable, but I am voting for Ruth as it seems the right place for a vote today based on what little I know.

It should come as no surprise that I am voting for Jeph.

I voted Jebusites just because.

Ok, I looked back at your massive post and realized I misread it. Sorry. However, I wasn't attempting to make you look bad. I honestly have no opinion on you. So whatever

Balaam, show me where I said that I was voting Absalom because I think you are good. I have no opinion on you. I voted Job because I believe Absalom is bad. If given a choice between two options and Absalom has voted already, I'm not going to vote the same way he does because I believe he is bad. Which is what I said. I would have rathered vote Absalom, but it was clear the votes were already falling on job and Balaam and I do not wish to waste my vote.

I cannot express enough how much I agree with You, Lot.

I call shenanigans and my votes are going for Absalom and Jeph... If they don't kill me first.

Judah wrote:

Jephthah wrote:I don't believe I'm doing it, but I think I'm voting Balaam. I am so freaking pinged by Samuel's vote

Why not vote Samuel?

Yeah, you were SO pinged by my actions that you did the EXACT SAME THING. I don't believe that for a second.

Well I am going with my gut here... Frankly, I don't trust Absalom. I would like to vote there but I think that would be throwing my vote away, so instead I am voting for the other option getting votes that Absalom did not vote for. I don't wish to vote the same way as him.

Voting Job.

Hey everyone. I'm so sorry, life has been kicking my tail. However, I have a very important question regarding the last lynch. Did anyone change anything up at vote wise at the last minute of the day period?

I'm not going to try to do a read through of everything I missed, basically if I try to consider it, I will become too discouraged and never play again. Instead I want to use what little I do know to suss out information. So again, can anyone tell me if someone changed things up at the end of the day period kind of out of left field?

Paul is an interesting kill. I wonder who was afraid of him enough to take him out...

I must go and take my sacrifice of repentance to pay for my sin of inactivity...

Samson wrote:As usual, the Syndicate votes for oddities instead of baddies.

Carry on.

Maybe if you didn't vote in a questionable manner with no good reason you wouldn't be receiving votes. Don't blame us because we voted for someone whose actions look bad.

Samson

Paul wrote:

Samuel wrote:

Paul wrote:i am tired of talking to myself anyway and understand the argument that useless posts do not help so will leave again now

that said i still think we should wagon the two options I said before

I find it real interesting you say nothing about Samson or anyone else

this phase would be real boring if everyone observed

You don't think my posts were scummy, yet you still think a wagon on me and someone else would be a good idea? Please explain.

And who is the comment about Samson directed toward.?

yo Samuel you want to be best buds? you seem like a cool guy

I think you misread

I want Samson and lot

Or Samson and nicodemus atm

not Samuel

also that was meant at nicodemus

All these names are obviously blending together for me. I will do a read of Samson and Lot and let you know what I think specifically of these two.

Paul wrote:i am tired of talking to myself anyway and understand the argument that useless posts do not help so will leave again now

that said i still think we should wagon the two options I said before

I find it real interesting you say nothing about Samson or anyone else

this phase would be real boring if everyone observed

You don't think my posts were scummy, yet you still think a wagon on me and someone else would be a good idea? Please explain.

And who is the comment about Samson directed toward.?

If you don't want to lynch Paul for possibly trying to conceal his identity, then no I don't find you as suspicious as I did. I mean, we are all concealing our identity, that would be a bad reason to vote him. I guess I misunderstood what you were getting at. Maybe I mixed up your response to Paul with others. I think those either wanting to vote me or Paul are opportunistic at the moment.

A wagon on me would be a bad choice. I don't have a problem with how you are playing, you just be you, that's cool with me. But if you are on the side of God's people you are going to be making a mistake by leading a lynch train on me. Just giving you fair warning.

I don't see any good reason in voting Paul. Let's say Ruth is right and he is really someone who has played here a long time. We are going to lynch him because he might be covering his true identity? I think that is just a crazy ridiculous reasoning. Which is why I am still looking at Ruth.

Paul, I'm only talking about Ruth because I find her suspicious. The only other people I would look at right now are the two who jumped on your suggestion my first comment was scummy saying it was. I think it is fairly obvious I am playing in character and goofed because I am relying on google for my info. Now my bible scholar cover is blown, was trying to keep my identity obscured, but oh well. But there was nothing but lighthearted joking intended with my first post. I might look at whoever just said something about female identities. How is that relevant to anything I have said? Because I call Paul bro? Whoever he really is, his sock is male so I will continue to address him as such. If that makes me scummy, this game is whack. I think there are some seriously opportunistic people jumping on the Samuel wagon.

Paul wrote:

Samuel wrote:Check in. I see we are all trying to play our little parts. How cute, in that case I recommend not crossing me or I may have to call down some bears on your ass. Just sayin'.

@Host, will it be relevant to the game to figure out who the other players are?

scum post if there ever was one

Dude, I was asking if I needed to figure out who other players are. Sometimes there is a quiz our something or prizes can be earned by knowing who is who. Why waste time on something that will earn me nothing?

Paul wrote:wake me when Samuel shows up

Wake up buttercup! I was busy trending to my priestly duties, some of us have responsibilities ya know.

What a surprise, Paul is trying to kill one of God's people. But I expect the scales will fall from his eyes and he will see the error of his way. So I'm not going to hold it against you, bro.

I am interested in looking at Ruth though, 'cause she seemed to be singling out people who may be new to our tribe. I don't see how that is good for anything.

I'm not bald anyway. I don't need to hide from any one eating with the birds. I anoint kings, bro! Now what's up?

Check in. I see we are all trying to play our little parts. How cute, in that case I recommend not crossing me or I may have to call down some bears on your ass. Just sayin'.

@Host, will it be relevant to the game to figure out who the other players are?