The Syndicate

Metalmarsh89 wrote:TH, would you mind telling me how you went from this

Turnip Head wrote:I'm potentially looking at a MetalMarsh vote today and wondering how much support there would be behind that.
to this, your very next post (14 hour difference, yes)

Turnip Head wrote: From my reread, I don't think MM is a railroad. I would like to know his top suspicions outside of juliets... I don't think there's any reason to suspect jules at this point. Although she fooled me in Dr Who
The second post sounds fine, but the sincerity doesn't seem to match between the two. What changed your mind? Why were you garnering interest in my lynch when you had no reason to vote for me?

Linki: I agree, their votes had nothing to do with BWT based on the timing, but that doesn't mean the converse is false.

Also, didn't BWT vote for Boogs first?

No. Zeek voted me first, then BWT voted me and specifically said "I will vote Boogs now but will probably change my vote later" to summarize. He agreed with me on LC then tried to turn the tides on me and started saying i could be bad. Then when not enough agreed again, he flopped back to another player which I believe was LC to try to survive the lynch by that point.

I am still looking at LC or Llama as Railroads but i think an inactive player could be the last Utility. With us having replacements we cant vote for, it makes it harder.

bea wrote:thanks for the welcome you guys! I have to open/close today and work's still wonky so I will be hecka quiet but will do my best to catch up as quickly as possible. I'm on page 3 already so woo!

also - wb BR!

Yay Bea!! Kitties uniteeeeeeeee!

boo wrote:
Boogs wrote:Wow! Awesome! I am weary of bidding for the card, but i suppose i will. $10 on Electric Company

Boo- I dont see the bonus for people voting BWT in the auction? Also, TH bid on something yet I see no powers up for bid. Confused.
At this point I figure people know if they vote for the person lynched they get the $200 bonus. There was a power that was not bid on by anyone during the day period, when that happens they go up for sale and people can place the bid and then anyone else has 30 minutes to put in an increased offer or the person gets it.

New powers should be up for this night period like usual though, right? I forget if we do this now or during the lynch Day.

Wow! Awesome!

I am weary of bidding for the card, but i suppose i will. $10 on Electric Company

Boo- I dont see the bonus for people voting BWT in the auction? Also, TH bid on something yet I see no powers up for bid. Confused.

Apparently there is this lol

Where has DP and Bunny been?

Epignosis I counted that you had the last vote to win that dice at the end. If not you, then who outbid you that I missed after? Also, BWT is notable on your finding of flopping like a trout. Something to keep in mind on discussion for tomorrow.

fingersplints wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I was kinda trying to make a joke with you about you doing a bad job of it if you suspect me, but I guess that fell flat.
I got it.

Boogs wrote:Mp I feel like a total dumb cat. I re-ead and realized that Railroads Do NOT start with BTSC like mafia usually do, only the utilities do. So it makes total sense now Llama and LC are railroads and they found the third with the auto search. I was under the impression of normal rules that Baddies start with BtSC. I am on it now buddy and same page. Let's get them.
That seems incredibly lucky that they happened to find each other N1. And then just blatantly buddied up in the thread for no other reason then to flaunt their btsc. This doesn't fit the style of either of them.

It seems like you are changing why LC is bad to fit this. It doesn't make sense to me.

Also, I feel like this is incredibly distracting and that you have a one track mind at this point, which is keeping us away from discussing the rest of the players.

I'm keeping you from discussing? wow lol. Because you know I have a little voodoo doll controlling you and all in my left hand. You can do whatever the hell you want. I am bringing some real discussion on lynching rather than just everyone showing up to vote for the top voter because they are lazy like FZ yesterday. There have been plenty of other name mentioned to lynch Splints besides me suggesting LC. Don't get it twisted, sister.

This changes my whole perception of the situation that LC could have been a color set, and that in fact he could have auto searched a Railroad if Llama was already found. I agree his behavior was iffy on Day 0 and I agree with MP on the total turnabout on Llama. He did a fake back and forth with Bullzeye in Monty where i didn't bite on it too much and they played me at the end when they were distancing teammates. I would NOT put past LC to do it here again with Llama. Not to mention Llama and him having fake arguments today on "don't ruin my game" and stuff to now them not after each other again and focusing lights on me and MM to get out of the radar.

Mp I feel like a total dumb cat. I re-ead and realized that Railroads Do NOT start with BTSC like mafia usually do, only the utilities do. So it makes total sense now Llama and LC are railroads and they found the third with the auto search. I was under the impression of normal rules that Baddies start with BtSC. I am on it now buddy and same page. Let's get them.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Boogs wrote:Splints i am not being shady. I expressed my opinion on LC finding his teammate and possibly getting the third and start bankrupting us. A monopoly this early is just as dangerous as a mafia member. I am suggesting he could be bluffing also and is mafia. Its a win win for me and i stand by my decision regardless what other disagree with me on it. Im Civ and alone, and it makes most sense to cast my vote on LC. Not changing my mind.
So wait....you want LC dead regardless of what his role is? Even if he's not a baddie or LMS right now?

This kind of talk is starting to sound dangerous to me. Very dangerous.

Switches vote to Boogs

Misinterpreted what i said. His alignment as in if one of these is true:
He has a complete set or close to it and had a monopoly
Or
Is a Railroad or Utility (I dont think he's a Utility).

Vote me bwt, I'm good and dont care. If you think my motives or I am dangerous, you got 99 problems and Lc will be one not me.

thellama73 wrote:That's crazy talk, Boogs. The mafia kill every night. A hotel is not going to bankrupt a player every night or even ever other night.

Not YET, but say he finds the 3rd player then between them they can start buying the houses and stuff Day 5. Im basing this on regular monopoly where you get charged crazy prices. Maybe I am paranoid, maybe I am not, but i stand by my vote and decision. I dont care and wont flop my vote this time to the easy person to gain a card. Its a big move taking him out now before they get double chances to search.

Im not punishing anyone. Im stopping a threat to get me by NK or bankruptcy before he gets too powerful. People need to make big moves and start playing, which only like 10 of us are. You are a good liar. Another reason I didnt want to throw out but i will is when you played my Sailor Moon game you said in your baddie chat with teammates you dont like to kill your wife right away. It eliminates you as a Utility to me and you arent in my set, so you are Railroad or on a different set. Laying that out there.

Boogs wrote:Splints i am not being shady. I expressed my opinion on LC finding his teammate and possibly getting the third and start bankrupting us. A monopoly this early is just as dangerous as a mafia member. I am suggesting he could be bluffing also and is mafia. Its a win win for me and i stand by my decision regardless what other disagree with me on it. Im Civ and alone, and it makes most sense to cast my vote on LC. Not changing my mind.

Ebwop Others*

Splints i am not being shady. I expressed my opinion on LC finding his teammate and possibly getting the third and start bankrupting us. A monopoly this early is just as dangerous as a mafia member. I am suggesting he could be bluffing also and is mafia. Its a win win for me and i stand by my decision regardless what other disagree with me on it. Im Civ and alone, and it makes most sense to cast my vote on LC. Not changing my mind.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm not sure how I feel about this MM push. There are other players one could say are as equally contributing as MM.

Splints, can you tell me how you feel about keys at the moment, and vice versa?

What do players think of juliets?

I'm keeping my vote where it is.

I agree MP. I don't like the sudden change to MM but I also don't like so many people being quiet also. I think LC is the way to go and if he flips Civ, we have more Cred now to trust Llama. FZ was like a random train and I can see MM being that way too for us wasting a Civ getting lynched.

Long Con wrote:
keys56000000000 wrote:LC, you seem to be saying that you wouldn't be as much of a threat as the mafia, but it doesn't matter to the civ if they land on a mafia-owned hotel or a non-mafia-owned hotel. Sure, mafia have the NK, but a player with a hotel is still a threat to the civs.
Do you see a hotel? I have one BTSC partner, that's it.

But you each have a chance to find teammate 3 tonight. We have a one chance.

fingersplints wrote:
Boogs wrote:Who says you wouldn't go rogue? You just admitted you have the second teammate. The powers anyone can buy, so who is to say your team can't eventually get kills yourself or a special power forming monopolies or the set besides you as well? Not to mention, when you have a set complete the rent is more AND you can buy hotels and houses making US pay more which results we die. So do we die by NKs or by going bankrupt by people like you who have your set complete?

See the dangers everyone????
Boogs, do you think that LC is in a two person set? Or that he found one btsc partner and is looking for more? Because if he is still looking for more, I don't see how he is a bigger threat then someone who might be a railroad. I'm just trying to understand you right because you seem fairly confident in this and I am not sure why

No I think he's a three person set, but I also think it could be a bluff and he's a mafia team and bought the auto find to taunt us. Either way, I think he needs to go. If he isn't mafia, he could have almost a complete set and cause the rest of us as Civs to go bankrupt which also is dangerous and kills us from the game. So it's a balancing act. Do we keep him or go after him and if he bluffed and is mafia, we get a double win.

Long Con wrote:
Boogs wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:Llama and LC both seem super upset over these new allegations, wonder if that means anything.
Distancing and anger maybe?
Quit being so smug. You're wrong.

No U

Long Con wrote:Ok, fine, I was hoping that enough people playing aren't just out to punish people who win prizes or buy properties. I thought bidding on cool stuff was going to be a fun and interesting part of the game, and not an instant death sentence. If I was wrong, then I misjudged the game and the players and I'll be lynched today for it.

I thought we were going to focus on the baddies. I thought I could find a partner and be strengthened by getting BTSC and use that to help find and lynch the baddies. I think it would be a more fun game for everyone if we played that way, and I also think that it would be smarter. Even if I find my third colour group person tonight, even if I ALREADY found that person, there's no comparison at all to the level of danger the baddies pose. The worst I could do is build hotels and hope someone lands on them. The baddies are collecting properties all the time. The baddies are making lots of money. This money can be used to bid and win lynched properties.

Let's just focus on the baddies and stop trying to take me out because I found a partner.

Nice try to sway us not to vote you. I ultimately can see you being mafia and bluffing us again. You're a good liar LC, I have seen it firsthand .

Turnip Head wrote:Llama and LC both seem super upset over these new allegations, wonder if that means anything.

Distancing and anger maybe?

Long Con wrote:
Boogs wrote:
Long Con wrote:Contrived, my ass, MP. There's nothign contrived in that post, and it really upsets me that you said that. I wrote that whole thing before even seeing your case about me and Llama.

At least lynch Llama instead. I swear to GOD that he is messing with me with this trust stuff, and he is NOT my partner! Llama today, me tomorrow, don't let him take me down like this.
You're distancing like in Monty Python with Bullz. I don't buy it. Not letting you swindle your way to the end and outsmart me this game, taking you out while I can stop you.
You are a cat with your claws into something so tight that you will make yourself see anything that supports you and nothing that doesn't. You are lynching me solely because I bought the Autofind, at least admit it.

Whether Llama ends up being your partner like we think or not, YOU admitted you found your partner last night and are one step closer to bankrupting me. Not letting you have the chance and I hope you are bluffing and show up mafia and didn't find a partner, that would be a bonus.

TH is am sad we aren't on the same set though

I love you playing in then games i hosted.

Long Con wrote:I didn't ask for Llama to pull this crap, and I sure as hell wouldn't ask or want a teammate (and future possible LMS partner) to be doing it. We are not partners, I don't know this man, at the very least lynch him before me please.

What "powers" did I win?? I got an Autofind and used it. I don't have whatever "powers" we're talking about. All I have now is LESS money than Llama, and therefore LESS access to future bids.

Less money? How do WE know that? We move on the board every night. You could have tons as far as we know which was okay for you to buy that auto find.

Long Con wrote:Contrived, my ass, MP. There's nothign contrived in that post, and it really upsets me that you said that. I wrote that whole thing before even seeing your case about me and Llama.

At least lynch Llama instead. I swear to GOD that he is messing with me with this trust stuff, and he is NOT my partner! Llama today, me tomorrow, don't let him take me down like this.

You're distancing like in Monty Python with Bullz. I don't buy it. Not letting you swindle your way to the end and outsmart me this game, taking you out while I can stop you.

Turnip Head wrote:Good point Keys, I forgot about the two-property sets. LC could already be a non civ.

It's the fact that his defection won't need to be immediately addressed that keeps me from voting LC today or in the near future. He won't gain a kill or anything, he just can't win with us if he forms a team. In the meantime I think we'd be better off looking for the OG baddies.

linki: Hmmmm. Must process.

TH but you let him get his third piece and turn Indy since they can win and now they make rent more expensive for us all and can buy hotels. You need to get him now before we go bankrupt, which in the rules mentioned the person's cards in possession go up for auction. When THAT happens, LCs team has so much money they outbid us on that too! He is way to dangerous.
Please think people, mrow!

TH llama did not win powers, LC did.

NOT to mention Llama is steering us not to vote LC which if they were teammates makes sense. LC needs to go because llama didn't win powers plain and simple.

Linki great find Mp. He could have the whole set now which can triple the amount we pay and also can buy houses and hotels. They can make us go bankrupt which kills us JUST like nightkills.

Long Con wrote:Boogs: A male cat with a penis who still needs to grow balls.

First of all, that "discovery" of a post of mine on Day 0 was underwhelming to me, since I referenced it in my last post:

Long Con wrote:If you were mixing me up with keys at the start, then I'd understand. Keys pushed hard for not finding partners. What I did was ask questions and try to clarify exactly how the game would go. I never pushed for staying individual, the closest I can find is saying "I would advocate that, except for these reasons..." and I gave my reasons why that's not a good plan, and I called it lame.
There's no contradiction. I never said, like keys, that we should go ahead with that plan. It's an idealistic plan, and if we could be sure everyone would do it, it might work to get a tighter Civvie win. I made that post in order to give two major reasons why such a plan would not be a good idea: It would go against boo's concept of what Monopoly Mafia is about, AND there's no way everyone would go along with it.

Not to mention that, in the next paragraph, I presented what the fallout would be from such a plan, and called that lame.

There's no contradiction here, I was involved in the discussion about the no-search plan, and I came away from that discussion with the same opinions I have today. In the interim, I also put forth that it is beneficial to the Civvies to find ONE partner because Civvie BTSC makes it harder for the baddies.

I used the Autofind, and now I am in contact with one member of my group. Even if we end up finding the third member and go rogue, which may never happen, we still won't have a kill. We will still be dedicated to lynching baddies. The baddies still need us dead.

We still need to focus on killing the baddies, who are growing in power all the time by default. The rate at which they grow in power will only increase over time, when we start seeing more people getting access to multiple properties. Suddenly, a 3-member RR team is targeting a player who has three properties... it's just gonna get messy.

Please don't lynch me just because I bought the Autofind. The baddies are probably going to kill me anyway because I got the Autofind, so let's not do their work for them. Let's try to lynch a baddie today, not me, ok Boogs?

Who says you wouldn't go rogue? You just admitted you have the second teammate. The powers anyone can buy, so who is to say your team can't eventually get kills yourself or a special power forming monopolies or the set besides you as well? Not to mention, when you have a set complete the rent is more AND you can buy hotels and houses making US pay more which results we die. So do we die by NKs or by going bankrupt by people like you who have your set complete?

See the dangers everyone????

MovingPictures07 wrote:You're making a lot of assumptions, Boogs. I don't think those are fair to make, nor are they strong enough to lynch LC; it basically boils down to you wanting to lynch him for the Autofind win.

That said, I think I may have found something notable. I'll let you folks know as I continue procrastinating on PhD work and finish catching up. :P

Just saying, why wouldn't he have used it and have 2 chances to get the third piece tonight? Assumptions or facts is what you have to figure out. This game is different than a normal game and if you want to keep him around to let him get more strong and win more things along with his teammates winning to eliminate us, you be my guest. Me on the other hand, I don't trust him. Disagree if you want, but it's logical to vote him and people need to grow balls. FZ was lame and I went along to try to win extra money for the card. I'm confident in this one.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Boogs wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Thanks, Llama. I'm currently working on my thread re-read, but I'm curious: Where should we look today then? You said where we shouldn't look, but I don't think you've named a suspect yet.
I think we should grow some balls and vote LC just to be honest. But I'm open to listen to people. Think he deserves my vote though still.
Can you summarize succinctly why LC deserves to be lynched?

Certainly, sockatron9000:

A monopoly set wins together, just like mafia and cares less who else dies. LC is now one set ahead with one of his teammates (assuming his is a Civ) while the rest of us are majorities that have not found teammates. Now that he has, he and his teammate have a chance wtch night to find the third piece where we still have 1 shot in 20some players. Why let him continue then get his monopoly to have 3 votes to pick us off? We already have utilities and railroads to worry about. We could be seeing a bluff like I said from LC just like Monty Python and he is NOT seeking teammates and is bad himself. I see a win/win to vote him out now.

And TH to be honest i targeted you in the forum because I searched you and was distancing in case we were a color match. You still concern me having 2 powers though.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Thanks, Llama. I'm currently working on my thread re-read, but I'm curious: Where should we look today then? You said where we shouldn't look, but I don't think you've named a suspect yet.

I think we should grow some balls and vote LC just to be honest. But I'm open to listen to people. Think he deserves my vote though still.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Alright. =Llama's quote from LC came on Day 0. My quote came on Day 1. I guess one could view that as an early contradiction.

Does it mean LC contradicted himself, or that he changed his mind on keys' idea? Not sure yet. But it's interesting findings for sure.

Linki: Boogs, you latching onto the FZ vote the way you did was what made me feel you were a civ. I guess I don't understand how you think you might have a target on your back, or that the baddies would want you dead. If you think there's a reason why though, I'm all ears.

I guess I'm not terribly concerned about certain players being uber-powerful when it's only Day 3. I don't think anyone can be uber-powerful yet. At least, not until full teams find each other and start building houses and hotels on their respective properties. So I guess I'll just have to agree to disagree with you there.

Not saying I do have a target, im saying I have a disadvantage with a lot of players because they have powers or possible teammates now. I have yet to find a teammate after 2 attempts. And I keep trying to say LC won something and does have a teammate most likely. When they get 3, they have to turn on CIVS to win. I'd rather go after him today before he can do that and if he bluffed and took it to screw with the Civs finding someone then we still get a threat to our games.

BWT or I am a Civ who has no teammates yet and it fighting to stay alive and stop mega powerful teams from getting me first.

However, it doesn't change the fact I think LC finding a teammate shouldn't be off the radar. If a team gets all members, they MUsT eliminate players to win. While the rest of us have a 1 in like 20 some chance finding a teammate, I doubt very few have even found a teammate yet with only 2 attempts. Now LC and his teammate have double chances to find the third piece and then start killing us along with mafia? Don't know about you but I don't like a team of 2 utilities, 3 railroads, and a possible 3some having votes uniting to take and kill people in lynches and or nightkills.

juliets wrote:My spreadsheet shows 2 different winners than Boogs. I'll double check them before i put them up here and that will give people time to tell me not to if you think this info shouldn't be shared with the baddies and just be kept to ourselves.

Without polls ending times, I went 10 mins before each post from Boo and got those results. Day 2 was the one I got beat on so I remember looking at 9:59 being the end time.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote: Alright. I'l go back and re-read what you said, because I don't remember all the details. But if this is indeed the case, then I will take back what I said about you contradicting yourself.
So, you're contradicting yourself, BWT?
Not really. I remember (and still think) that LC latched onto the keys idea of "nobody search for anybody so we all stick together". I haven't had a chance to read back on it yet though. So I can't confirm or deny if that was the case or not.

I agree, I thought he latched on with keys. I could be wrong as well but I thought LC made comments.

zeek wrote:Of course not

I haven't played much with llama really, four cycles in Zelda but I was quite busy and couldn't follow the game fully. Even less with Boogs, she died before I did in that game. I do think the kitty thing is easy to hide behind though. Is this something she does when she's bad?

I'm interested in hearing from keys, as he's been very quiet after the searching debate and not said much about suspicions.

FYI i am a male and have a penis.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Boogs wrote:According to the rules here are the winners as follows as far as we know:
Day 1:
Hedge wins Windfall
Epignosis wins dice roll
Epignosis wins chance

Day 2:
TH wins Auto protect
TH wins jail card
LC wins auto find and has partner contact
BwT wins auction card

So Again, Epignosis and TH win 2 things. Also, how does Epignosis have so much cash to blow, he must be getting low or have help. And LC auto found a partner potentially last night making him very powerful.
I will vote for either of those 3 if we agree they are getting too strong, which I totally do.
I do appreciate the list. Thanks! I'll add it to my spreadsheet.

Do you have any reasons to think Epig, TH, or LC are bad though? The only one of those who's pinged me at all is Epig (with the stuff between LC and him), and it wasn't enough for me to vote him yet. Or do you just want to vote for them because you feel they are too powerful?

If they're powerful, then fine. But I'm going to stick with voting for people I think are bad for now.

Also, I don't think I won the auction card. Someone outbid me for it pretty close to the last minute. Can't remember who though.

Linki: That actually is a good point about LC. He seemed interested in keys' early idea about actively choosing to not search for partners. And then for him to go and bid/win an auto-find power doesn't tell me if he changed his mind, or is trying to keep others from getting it.

Exactly and thank you for reminding me of his discussion on partners Day 0. Why would he buy it unless he was preventing others of searching? I know he's a good liar in mafia because he fooled me down to the final vote in Monty Python where he kept me tell the end alive. Either way, I think it should be a vote on him today and it seems like a mafia thing to do by going back on his word for searching.
To answer you though on voting today: I do agree we need baddies but it could be a bonus if they are one of the powerful people. I think it's safe to say mafia members would be bidding on these things just like we would to prevent us as well as have powers to stop us later on for doing things. I think LC and Epignosis could be bad, TH I do not think is bad. I only wanted to vote him for being too powerful. So Epignosis or LC today is okay with me, and from the two i would do LC.

One last thing then I must continue my tv show, I think LC may be the best choice today if he found his partner. On the flip side of that, can we assume he is a Civ? Or that he could have won it to block us for searching as a mafia member? This game is nuts! Lol. Chance and a dice doesn't seem as dangerous on Epignosis as TH and LC getting crazy strong though.

According to the rules here are the winners as follows as far as we know:
Day 1:
Hedge wins Windfall
Epignosis wins dice roll
Epignosis wins chance

Day 2:
TH wins Auto protect
TH wins jail card
LC wins auto find and has partner contact
BwT wins auction card

So Again, Epignosis and TH win 2 things. Also, how does Epignosis have so much cash to blow, he must be getting low or have help. And LC auto found a partner potentially last night making him very powerful.
I will vote for either of those 3 if we agree they are getting too strong, which I totally do.

I'm going to research and create the rest of my memo who "won" what, meaning what publically looks like they won assuming they don't have any extra vote money on powers. Shall be back shortly.

Rip BR

So to address TH: Not sure what I said that made you worried, but I was just throwing it out there you were a target. The question now for myself is do we start lynching people with too much money that can be too powerful, or people with too many powers that can be? The reason I am wondering this is because we seems to be letting people grab tons of stuff and not pay attention to them and the ones with cash coming out of their arse like Epignosis which can be a double downer if one of the people doing these things is ALSO a baddie. I want to lynch someone today who is getting too powerful to be the most honest. And I'm sorry if that makes you a choice Turnip Head, but you having 2 powers and potentially more and the most of us having 0 is dangerous to me if you are bad. Im not sure who else has won 2 powers, if anyone can keep track. I'm trying to keep a meow-mo of it all.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Boogs wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:I don't know why. I forgot they don't kill tonight. Oops.
I wouldnt and can't kill you anyway because I am neither RR or a Utility. Imagine a cat driving a train, doesnt seem to work. Or operating an ekectric or water company... water yuck and ouch!

Lmao!!!!!

Turnip Head wrote:I don't know why. I forgot they don't kill tonight. Oops.

I wouldnt and can't kill you anyway because I am neither RR or a Utility. Imagine a cat driving a train, doesnt seem to work. Or operating an ekectric or water company... water yuck and ouch!

(Hisses at Epignosis) me thinks you like to stir up much trouble and think you are untouchable with all the cash mister Robert one

thellama73 wrote:Do I want Atlantic Ave.? Or do I want to force other people to pay more for Atlantic Ave.? Or do I have an as yet unrevealed ulterior motive?

$50 on Atlantic

Hrmmmm.... Purr ponder.... Purr ponder... I see your motive sir

Turnip Head wrote:Boogs what's with the harsh vibes man Calling me out to be targeted like that...

Not harsh, just you made yourself a target when you won 2 powers. I'm actually trying to get the baddies to have to make a tough decision by you all winning powers that can screw them. Do they attack a player that is powerful or the property winner? I want them to have a tough time.

Long Con wrote:
Boogs wrote:
Boogs wrote:I'm confused now who won't he auctions. Hope I get a pm.

And I bid 1 kitty dollar on Atlantic
EBWOP who won the * I love ipad autocorrect....
I didn't get the one I wanted, guess I should have kept bidding into the last minute instead of assuming it was cut off.

It was 10 mins before the poll ends. Sadly, TH got 2 and we got none.

The problem is TH now has 2 powers and we don't. The problem is: do they kill him to make him less of a threat for the future? Or kill who wins Atlantic tonight? Maybe we should LeT him win Atlantic to let him take a fall. Shows him to outbid us

TH it's a cutthroat game. I wanted a power and I have nothing yet after 2 days of uselessness. I mentioned winning is dangerous which is why I was cautious. I suggest you use that protect tonight, friend. Mrow.

Turnip Head wrote:$26 Atlantic

I'm curious to let you win this auction to put an even tastier reason for you to be attacked tonight lol. But I will bid 27. If someone else besides you wins, then they have to decide between people and power influencing them placing their kill.

Search found 140 matches