This reminded me to tell you, see I told you I wasn't badDom wrote:Also, sorry for sucking so much in this game
![:p :p](./images/smilies/tongue2.gif)
Return to “Occultism Mafia - THE END”
This reminded me to tell you, see I told you I wasn't badDom wrote:Also, sorry for sucking so much in this game
I remember a post saying that you were kind of defending Dom and me regarding our playstyles (that is how I read it) but we didn't catch your vote, and assuming you weren't voting either of us but when you did it surprised me.S~V~S wrote:Where did i say that?Boogs wrote:I can't tell who has how many votes, but im surprised SVS voted me after she said she isnt sure if I am bad ornot. Voting A Person to try to spare me dying.
Dom I really hope you aren't taking it to heart and interpreting my posts as you suck. That would never be something I would say to a player. What I'm trying to help you understand is, your read on people that I witnessed isn't as sharp as some players when they accuse baddies. It wasn't meant to say you are a bad player, it was meant to show you past situations that haven't been accurate to help you change your thinking of why you accused me and see it could be a different outcome. Does that make sense? Again, I'm sorry if you felt offended in any way. I hope that we can move forward and if we continue to not see eye to eye, then let's agree to disagree.Dom wrote:Just to be clear, this is the post with the genetic fallacy in it:
Boogs wrote:Because dude you do this every game. You get fixated on a single player and Bullz has told me how you do that to him EVERY game you play. When I hosted Pokemon you did it to him. You're doing this to me now. You have a really bad radar man. Taking myself out of the equation if I was any other player viewing what you said, I have no earthly idea how me making a joke about another game some how means I'm gunning to kill that player when my vote has not been for them or have I ever tried to rally or suggest any players vote for them.Dom wrote:*this suspicion has no basis because you're wrong*
what
Linki I didn't vote Epignosis because I didn't think he was
bad. Are you questioning any other players who didn't vote for Epignosis? No.
LINKI
Bad Radar, to you, is not good at picking out who baddies are. . .
. . . which is the entire point of mafia. . .
. . . so you said I suck at Mafia. . .
. . . and therefore must be wrong. . .
. . . rather than saying why I am wrong. . .
. . . you pointed out that the information came from someone you think sucks at mafia. . .
. . . so basically you don't care what my reasons are, just that others don't follow them.
Dude you're misinterpreting things. You're pulling words to all my posts in this game and twisting them.Dom wrote:What happened to the fact that all claims from me must be false because they're from me, Boogs?
I'm sorry if I like to make jokes with players I enjoy in a game? Is that something that makes me suspicious for doing so?Dom wrote:Boogs wrote:Epignosis, you be sure to tell us if your wife is evil once again with those spouse tingling skills of yours, okay? LolTwo times in a day with pretty much zero Epignosis response? Seems a bit much to me.Boogs wrote:Elohcin, do no doubt the great teacher one's sense of evil
Because dude you do this every game. You get fixated on a single player and Bullz has told me how you do that to him EVERY game you play. When I hosted Pokemon you did it to him. You're doing this to me now. You have a really bad radar man. Taking myself out of the equation if I was any other player viewing what you said, I have no earthly idea how me making a joke about another game some how means I'm gunning to kill that player when my vote has not been for them or have I ever tried to rally or suggest any players vote for them.Dom wrote:*this suspicion has no basis because you're wrong*
what
You're horribly wrong. I guess I'm the new Bullzeye for you since he's not playing.Dom wrote:You're bad.Boogs wrote:Sorry guys. Had a lot going on after work today and just now got home with Corsair. Rip Epignosis :/
I do think it's worth a look at some Epignosis voters without sound reason for doing it. I'm honestly surprised he got 5 votes myself.
And Dom I wasn't fixated in the least or I would have tried to get people to vote for Elohcin. I think it's weird you are fixated on me for a Day 0 comment, myself. But, it's just you being you I guess.
You asked about Elohcin MULTIPLE TIMES. Not just on Day zero. You're lying.
You're telling me that you didn't bring up this multiple times to try and get an easy lynch??
*votes Boogs*
Exactly my thoughts Blooper. My joke on A Day 0 turned into Dom thinking I was after Elohcin when I was being playful. I didn't bring up any reason to want to lynch her or encourage anyone to do so. I'm not sure why MP is agreeing with Dom and I know something weird is going on based on the way he talked.nijuukyugou wrote:I agree with changing the poll times - while I do stay up late, I prefer not having to vote at that time. Evening vote time, if possible
There are several people who haven't said a word since the last lynch (INH, AP, Hedgeowl, and Keterman), and nutella has posted since but without much substance that I can see. Perhaps one or two have been silenced (there are a couple of roles that allow for unexplained "hexes" and "potions"), but I'm thinking the baddies are lying low today. I don't like to vote for someone based solely on low posts, but it feels like those who are talking are Civvies going after other Civvies. Like Mongoose, I'm also not keen on this suspicion of Boogs. Dom's reasoning was that he was "fixated" on Eloh, but if that were the case, then why didn't Boogs vote Eloh Day 1? Or even halfway attempt a lynch? It just seemed like he was making a joke based on the Hobbit to me. Are there other reasons I'm missing? Or is anyone else suspicious of the silence? Thoughts??
Thanks for the clarification Vomps. I can see where you were coming from now.Vompatti wrote:It was rational because he voted for Lizzy for no reason, which was pretty much the only suspicious thing that had happened in the game by that time.Boogs wrote:Mp- Those two votes (Vomps and A Person) didn't really make sense. Like I totally get Day 1 is a crap shoot but Vomps said it was rational to vote him. How so?A Person wrote:That is why I'm voting Epi, I'm not sure what else to doVompatti wrote:I'd rather not vote Epi because I've been enjoying his posts so far, but if I choose to be rational that's probably where my vote will go.
And A Person voted Epignosis in accordance with a quote from Vomps and saying he isn't sure what else to do. Just seemed like an easy way out on that Epignosis train.
But I have to consider not all votes were in it looked like also. But we have not much to go on beside the vote record and content so far which isn't much posting.
Mp- Those two votes (Vomps and A Person) didn't really make sense. Like I totally get Day 1 is a crap shoot but Vomps said it was rational to vote him. How so?A Person wrote:That is why I'm voting Epi, I'm not sure what else to doVompatti wrote:I'd rather not vote Epi because I've been enjoying his posts so far, but if I choose to be rational that's probably where my vote will go.
Just making a joke was allDom wrote:I understand.Boogs wrote:I was referencing this:
Elohcin wrote:Boogs wrote:Epignosis, you be sure to tell us if your wife is evil once again with those spouse tingling skills of yours, okay? LolEpi's opinions are not flawless.
Why the fixation on Elo?
Elohcin wrote:Boogs wrote:Epignosis, you be sure to tell us if your wife is evil once again with those spouse tingling skills of yours, okay? LolEpi's opinions are not flawless.
Hello Dom! Nice to see you not being devoured by the NegaverseDom wrote:Does SVS's alignment in that game have any meaning in this game?Epignosis wrote:4 And it came to pass that the Tilded One spake ignorance of the goings and comings of the Hedgeowl, even though, on the Third Day of WWE (cf., The Twenty-third of December in the Year of our Lord 2013), the Hedgeowl announced its intentions to search for evil among those who had oft spoken.
5 And in those days, the Tilded One had walked in the ways of evil (cf., The Fifteenth of December, in the Year of our Lord 2013, being a strong and mighty Big Show, working for the worshipers of Mammon.Boogs, I never said hello back to you! So, hello! <3Boogs wrote:Day 1 is always a poop shoot, and no one has raised either of my two lovely kitty eyebrows yet. I don't agree top posters always mean they are bad even if that ended up coincidently working in Hobbit for whatever reason.
Also I agree that I don't think it was a reward poll per se, but probably just where are we going type of thing like when Epignosis did X Men.
Why "probably"?