The Syndicate

Epignosis- I honestly meant everything i said about missing the vote. We went to play games Wednesday straight after work and i was trying to vote there. I thought i hit submit, went home thinking so. Woke up, checked for a quick second the site and went to work. Looked at my phone on my break only to see the poll ended and i didnt see no vote from myself then. Take it or leave it, its the truth.

Made- I voted before bed so i wouldnt forget today because i am working. I dont know what case you are trying to refer to in order to get votes on me, so i think you are a terribly misguided Civ.

Sorry guys I didn't see the poll ended around noon, until later and I had every intention of still voting Llama. I stayed out late and thought I submitted my vote but it didn't go thru last night.

Made wrote:What's everyone's thought on boogs' vote yesterday? I found it suspicious enough to vote for him, and nothing i've seen has garnered enough suspicion to warrant voting differently tomorrow.

Why do you find my vote for Llama suspicious when I've been saying since we started I feel he's bad? You care to elaborate ?

Llama if you are Civ, you would want to keep all Civs alive. Not try to accuse players of Civ roles and let them die because you feel your role is more important or whatever the case may be. I don't understand how you think I'm keterman's partner, but okay. But by you trying to make it look like I am and saying it's okay for me to die isn't cool. I just think you're acting like you're caring less who dies because you're bad and know that you it won't be you, or you are Indy and want us to die for your personal agenda to win. You are NOT playing a Civ friendly game which is why I'm wanting to vote you out. It's been Day 0 and rolling now. People defending you and not seeing this or thinking you are Civ it making me MORE worried they're acting Civ themselves to make sure their Baddie Llama teammate stays out of discussion for votes. So I highly doubt you're dying tonight because your teammates wouldn't do that to a member of their group. I also want to point out Keterman's role said secrets, so I hope this doesn't have anything to do with him or his teammate being recruited and you just threw that out in the open and gained the baddies another partner. I'm just saying.

thellama73 wrote:

Boogs wrote:Rip Keterman :/ I think it's lame he got killed when he didn't even do anything. And Llama you aren't making me feel any better about you trying to accuse me of a role and say you don't care if I die since I suspect you instead of trying to change my opinion on your behavior.

Of course I care if you die. But if someone has to die, I would rather it be someone who's trying to kill me, all things being equal.

I'm hoping you covering your tracks repeatedly and getting away with these obscure type of comments catches other eyes.

Rip Keterman :/ I think it's lame he got killed when he didn't even do anything. And Llama you aren't making me feel any better about you trying to accuse me of a role and say you don't care if I die since I suspect you instead of trying to change my opinion on your behavior.

I have to clock in for work, so voting now for Llama.

its freaking 1 AMShouldn't be a you before teammates*

bea wrote:so boogsy - you are cranky at the llama because he didn't give enough time for low poster to check in before he started to suspect them?

Is that right? Or am I misunderstanding your point?

I'm not cranky, I'm saying it's very suspicious to me to make such a bold statement and assumption THAT early and be acting so cocky that he is sure he is awesome etc. He's really rubbing me the wrong way and Dfaraday trying to vouch for him that he's Civ isn't setting right with me either. I think he's acting very off compared to the games I have played with him recently. Either he's being weird on purpose, or he's confident you his teammates can assure he isn't going anywhere for a while for the behavior he has been showing in the thread, but in no way has he been contributing as a proactive civ as DFar stated.

EBWOP *Dont understand what proactive Civ

DFaraday wrote:I hope supatown stays a thing, I like it.

Also, I'm feeling like Llama is probably a proactive civ, so I need to look over the rest to see where I stand on the board. Most players haven't made much impression so far.

A proactive Civ? All I have seen is him act unusual and try to "stir the pot" to get certain people to cause conflict. Doesn't seem Civ like behavior in the least to me. Voting for a non participant always is a bad idea if you are Civ, and considering the game started a few hours on a holiday weekend before I can check in that he says he wanted to "get us to react" etc. doesn't feel any good to me. I'm most likely giving him my vote tomorrow. I don't what proactive Civ you see in him by most of the talk here about apples and off topic being helpful. Which makes me worried about you as well to say that about Llama.

thellama73 wrote:Six people haven't voted in the poll yet:
A Person
Boogs
Elohcin
Epignosis
Hedgeowl
Keterman

AP checked in at least, and Epig and Eloh are camping. That leaves:

Boogs
Hedgeowl
Keterman

I'll probably vote for one of them for being delinquent in their duties, especially if they haven't shown up by tomorrow.

Um dude, it's a holiday weekend? Can you cut a kitty some slack? Geesh. That's a little pre-game throwing down voting for me already when the game just started.