The Syndicate

thellama73 wrote:

Ambray wrote:
So nobody at all that has been posting has given you pings??

Well, He Man had exactly one post in the forty-eight hours of Day 0 and the First half of Day 1. Then I mentioned looking at low posters and now he has 13. Combined with the general incoherence of his posts, this worries me a bit.

You could say the exact same for me.



Still no one wants to weigh in on BWT.
THAT is speaking volumes to me.

Everyone else is just talking in circles and accusing any and everything that even dares to breathe in here.

thellama73 wrote:Ordinarily, I would agree with the points being made about not voting for low posters on day 1. However, I believe this situation is different than the norm, due to the highly vocal conflict (discussion, conversation, whatever you want to call it) providing good cover for baddies. If I were a baddie, and saw the civvies fighting amongst themselves, I would certainly stay out of it, so that is what I am basing my vote on today.

So nobody at all that has been posting has given you pings??

I noticed nobody, including BWT himself, has weighed in on the 2 times he has been brought up now. Anybody got an opinion?

linki - Thanks for posting that LT. Shows I was wrong that house had already won when the shippies came in. Maybe it was just an impression I was getting from the thread..


linki again - Epig and HM. Maybe take any problems you have with other games out of this one??

Ambray wrote:I'm a notorious low poster? Ouch, my feelings.

But Dex is right, quantity over quality.

Oh my gosh, quality over quantity.

What is up with me and confusing my words suddenly..



Okay, I'll be honest, this isn't sudden at all. >.>

reywaS wrote:

Ambray wrote:I never have and never will vote for a low poster on D1. To me, it's just bad form. It's been a day or 2, you can't even begin to make conclusions from how 'loud' someone has been after so little time. Further in the game, sure.

I'm surprised this has even been brought up from the more experienced players. Not with Llama, as he is fairly new. But Rey?

Pardon? I never said that I would vote a low poster or that I was even considering it. I think you have me confused with someone else.

Sorry Rey. Confused you with Epig there.

But still my point still stands. Haven't played with you before Epig, but I am guessing from how many posts you have, you are no stranger to mafia.

I'm a notorious low poster? Ouch, my feelings.

But Dex is right, quantity over quality.

I never have and never will vote for a low poster on D1. To me, it's just bad form. It's been a day or 2, you can't even begin to make conclusions from how 'loud' someone has been after so little time. Further in the game, sure.

I'm surprised this has even been brought up from the more experienced players. Not with Llama, as he is fairly new. But Rey?

Ah, that was the other thing I wanted to weigh in on. Boogs reminded me.

I do not feel like there was a push for house. There being a string of votes being placed on that option, to me, does not equate a push.

I am hoping someone has the voting order or got a snapshot of the poll, because if I am remembering right, the house had already won when others started discussing and posting about the ship? Correct me if I am wrong, please.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Okay, so I'm all caught up now. Sorry for missing the party, but it was worth it; Sigur Ros is a fantastic band and they put on an absolutely amazing show.

Getting to read all of the posts straight in a row, I thought it was weird there was this sudden push out of nowhere for House early in the Day 0 period. Knowing that people have info, this could be a civvie push, but it easily also could have been a baddie push. If it was a baddie push, I thought BWT's flip flop on "discussion is good, why vote so early?" to "Well, I might as well vote early now" seemed a bit odd. Not sure if it was suspect, but it's something. If it was a civvie push, then I find it interesting Snow Dog tried to argue house, but maybe if he was a baddie trying to push a non-civvie option he wouldn't want to seem so obvious.

Ambray wrote:Woo game on! I promise not to put an early ending to this one for you Andrew.

Also, lol at this comment. Spongebob memories, good times.

I agree with what has been said about BWT here. You beat me to the punch in bringing him up.

In regards to Llama and Snow dog, I don't really know what to make of them - do I know them by another name?
Their play styles seem new to me, so I don't think I do. Very dog with a bone and throwing out some bait to see who takes. Feels to me anyway. What to make of that, I don't feel baddie necessarily..but you don't see people so gung-ho that early in the game too often! Interesting to see how others describe llama's previous gameplays, too.
Roxy I am just seeing as normal, typical Roxy.

linki - SVS has answered my question on if I know them or not. I'm typing this as I read through the thread.


not linki anymore, back to rambling thoughts - Snow Dog has just posted 4 snark-filled posts in a row. Although it is early in the game and hard to come to a conclusion such as this so early, but I am not feeling baddie from him. In that I am not feeling like he has teammates. Perhaps this is the time for me to look at the roles.

I'm going to vote now, like I do in all these kind've polls. Especially as info in involved.

Talking just allows for influence. I'm voting home.

Woo game on! I promise not to put an early ending to this one for you Andrew.

Is it bad of me that I thought this was a game based on what I now realise is called Minesweeper? You know that game you get automatically on your computer?
I was wondering how on earth they were making roles from that game..

Then I come in here... something completely different.

Blonde moment.