RIP Keterman! Sucks we lynched the Big Felt Daddy Day 1!
Bullzeye wrote:Vompatti wrote:Metalmarsh89 wrote:I miss Vompernoodles
He is in a better place now.
Also, since no one has been killed, how do even know there
is a baddie? Perhaps we should just wait and see what happens.
This is an interesting theory and would be quite the innovative twist, but there are baddies listed among the roles. That is the only hole I can find in your suggestion.
ture.
thellama73 wrote:Boogs wrote:DFaraday wrote:I hope supatown stays a thing, I like it.
Also, I'm feeling like Llama is probably a proactive civ, so I need to look over the rest to see where I stand on the board. Most players haven't made much impression so far.
A proactive Civ? All I have seen is him act unusual and try to "stir the pot" to get certain people to cause conflict. Doesn't seem Civ like behavior in the least to me. Voting for a non participant always is a bad idea if you are Civ, and considering the game started a few hours on a holiday weekend before I can check in that he says he wanted to "get us to react" etc. doesn't feel any good to me. I'm most likely giving him my vote tomorrow. I don't what proactive Civ you see in him by most of the talk here about apples and off topic being helpful. Which makes me worried about you as well to say that about Llama.
"Lynching non-participants is always a bad idea if you are civ" is not remotely true. There have been lots of baddie non-participants and lynching them is good.
Furthermore, my objective in stirring the pot was to get people talking on topic. We had no real discussion, and nothing to go on, so throwing out a few accusations to see how people reacted is a good way to get the ball rolling. When people are accused, they react, and sometimes a lot can be gleaned from their reactions. I would say it's working.
I am always this cocky, btw.

I find myself agreeing with llama's thoughts here about non-participants and pot stirring. I am also interested in how this vote went down with Keterman vs. Llama. I am feeling better and better about my llama vote, dontcha know.
Vompatti wrote:I dunno, Keterman's vote seems about as argumented as Boogs', and Hedge's was pretty much random. It's possible that they're all civs. But if it's between Keterman and Llama, I'd rather vote Keterman.
I now suspect you Vomps, purely for this well structured vote reason.

WHooooo are you?
Epignosis wrote:Elohcin wrote:I am doing school with the kiddos, finishing up laundry from our camping trip, and the kids have gymnastics at 11am. I don't have time to catch up and I won't be here to vote later so I have to do it now. I am randomizing :/. *votes keterman*
Elohcin wrote:oh wow....I had no idea I was the 5th to vote him.....weird that is who came out randomly for me when so many others already voted him. May I add, I know some of you watch the thread and probably have seen me signed in for a while, but truth is, I signed in to try and catch up but have not sat down to look at the thread til now....so even though I have been signed in, I haven't had a chance to read anything.
If I didn't know better, this would sound suspicious and fidgety.

Yup, it really does in light of the fact that Keterman was lynched.
Elohcin wrote:Elohcin wrote:Interesting...big felt rolls had btsc with felt samples. I will go back and read to see if anyone was trying to defend Keterman.
Hmm, no defense that I saw. So, as some of you have been talking about low-posters already, I would guess Felt Samples is among them. If I were Felt Samples, I would try to speak up on behalf of my BTSC partner as much as I could without info-dumping.
Why would you go on and on about this if you are civvie? Let the poor Felt Samples live alone in peace. Why paint a "HUGE neon sign" as Roxy said on a possible civ once their btsc partner is already dead.
OK, I am feeling pretty good about my llama vote still, and am adding Vomps, and Elo to my list of possible suspicious peeps.