The Syndicate

colonialbob wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 4:42 pm
reywaS wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 4:40 pm will he become a suspect for you on day 2 or will you assume he was just wrong and let him keep his civvie civvington badge for another day?
Why are you focused on this now?

Yeah I don't like Rey's deal here. Does he know speed is innocent? Looking to set up the blame game on Jay to distract from the real targets? It's somewhat bold to try and set up a Jay mislynch, bit maybe the boldness is the point.

[mention]Jackofhearts2005[/mention] you uncultured swine

Someday we'll find it, the mislynch connection, the townies, the scummers and meeeee
All of us under its spell, we know that it's probably mafia....

But also is jack actually speed's teammate setting up a mislynch connection

Oh I'm liking this jack vs sloonei. Fight fight fight. Bring on the spice.

Girl I suspected speed before it was cool.

Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:27 pm voting nutella. The speed wagon looks scummy.

How so and why me?

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:29 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:28 pm @speedchuck and @reywaS, I would very much like to know how each of you reads the other with at least some detail.
He has good taste in scumreads and makes funny jokes. I usually read him while drinking tea and chuckling.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:30 am Speedchuckling, even.

Nnnoooooope nope nope

Lynch this man

.....I keep saying bad words I'm sorry friends

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 4:10 am
Spoiler: show
speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 4:49 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 4:13 pm speedchuck, I'd be interested to hear about your present feelings on Elohcin, regardless of the GTH read.
Absence makes the heart forget why we ever loved in the first place

Meh. I asked him this because he'd called Elohcin a civilian in his 2/2 and then a mafioso in his GTH reads. The switch doesn't have to be a problem. I suspected though that he'd forgotten his own fake read and gave her a red in the GTH, because mafia members need reds and she was an easy one given her low post count.

...and he did forget.

Holy shit I love this.

[VOTE: speedchuck] aubergine

I would say go to bed dude but I just spent like half an hour making a music recommendations post that probably nobody will pay attention to so I shouldn't talk

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:22 pm Getting real tired of scrolling through those creepy ass pictures every time I need to iso someone.

[mention]Epignosis[/mention], sorry I know you hate being tagged but since the ISO links are there for the benefit of people using mobile I think you should put them at the top of the first post before all the images because long strings of images are a pain to scroll through on mobile.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 4:21 pm
reywaS wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 4:20 pmsloonei and nutella were my civ reads in the 2civs2bads read FTR
k

I guessed

He said there was a code. It was the order in which he said "mafia/civ civ/mafia" in the post. So obvious lrn2read

I feel the weakest about my decisions on Audrey and Luna. They are both basically 50/50 to me.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:46 pm NOVASELINENENVER
COLONIALBOB
AUDREYTHETATTLETAIL

Town
Town
Town

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:45 pm NUTELLA
SABIE12

Best Civilian
Town

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:43 pm JACKOFHEARTS2005
SPEEDCHUCK

Mafia
Mafia

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:40 pm JAGGEDJIMMYJAY
LUNALEE

Town
Town

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:37 pm SLOONEI
ELOHCIN

Town
Town

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:35 pm LEETIC
REYWAS

Town
Mafia

I can gth

reywaS wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:06 pm i feel pretty good about Triple J now, so i'll remove him from my mafia read list. His posts are all very thoughtful and insightful....and they all seem to be a legit effort at finding the evil among us.

Yes, tell us more, sloonei. I'm all eyes....or ears if you decide to use vocarooooni

Yuck

...Yeah jack and speed are wolfie wolf city.

[VOTE: jack] aubergine because I gotta pick one

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:25 am
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:19 amTell me more about this chucker of speed.
On my phone now so I’ll drop some bullets:

~ When he involved himself in the busy thread I wasn’t left feeling any impression (and neutrality is a negative for him to me).

~ His suspicion of you reads kinda fake right now.

~ His initial response to my suspicion was less than weak.

~ He isn’t holding up the standard we’ve set for the game pace, and slackchuck isn’t getting a break.

Word, dude.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:47 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:44 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:38 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:37 amB
Dig in!
I already did. Something smelled fishy when I was catching up. I sensed a lot of energy moving in one direction coming from a lot of folks, but then Jack’s posts did not seem to be in sync with that energy. He seemed to be moving against it.
Is this what the crystals and incense tell you?

(I don't disagree. It's a vague description, but it resonates with me anyway. Something feels off there. I get a similar impression to a greater degree from speedchuck.)

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:49 am [VOTE: speedchuck] aubergine

Tell me more about this chucker of speed.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:19 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:10 amThe Grand Unified Theory of Mafia (GUT M) is whacke because a mafia member will tout any suspicion that might remotely smell viable in an early game situation when finding themself in an environment which is already otherwise filled with kooky postulations. One must look the part.

Bob from the colonies over here is not producing an original idea, but he is running with an independent suspicion of the player most invulnerable to suspicion. No harm can come of it and he appears bold and open-minded for floating it. I will maintain a healthy skepticism.
Bleh. Whaddya mean "no harm can come of it"?

I believe he means that Bob is "playing it safe" while looking daring at the same time by declaring a bold suspicion on the player who is least likely to get (mis)lynched

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:19 am
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:16 am Jay what the Hell is that
Early campaign for 2019’s post of the year.

Actually his math is quite impressive

Ahh I was thinking of his assertion that Nova's first post about sabie was a joke.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 2:35 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 2:31 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 2:29 pmWhy is Nova up high?
His first post looked authentic. His expansion on that post looked authentic. He looks authentic.
His first post which was a joke looked authentic?

Please teach me to joke authentically cause my jokes always come across too jokey.

Jay what the Hell is that

Hmmm developments from the sloot front hmmmm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 1:23 am
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 1:18 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 12:18 am nutella, whaddya think of leetic?
I think he's town.

And his not having played with me is very relevant, when he is commenting on my tone.
Why do you hate Jack?

I believe there was a comment related to sabie that set me off and I haven't liked anything he's said since (or before, probably).

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 12:18 am nutella, whaddya think of leetic?

I think he's town.

And his not having played with me is very relevant, when he is commenting on my tone.

novaselinenever wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 10:31 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 10:24 pm @novaselinenever, you should say more in response to @leetic's suspicions.
I'm not sure what to say. Not only do I not think that I've been defensive (I was the one pushing Sabie, not the other way around), I'm not sure what is suspicious about being "defensive". I also don't care much about the argument "a bit defensive compared to previous users" 'cause that doesn't say much, and it puts an arbitrary benchmark on defensiveness lol.

Neither omgus not anger.

Have you played with me before leetic?

reywaS wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 8:52 pm im still curious why nutella thinks my read post was serious. Waiting for a response. Thanks.

It didn't contain any obvious jokes/sarcasm aside from the double e thing. Besides that part it looked like you were giving your actual (albeit largely non-committal) initial thoughts on the players. Also I read it like two minutes after getting out of bed so

And specifically defensive in a way that looks scummy? You can't just drop the word "defensive" as a reason to vote someone; civilians are defensive all the time.

AudreyTheTattletail wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 8:48 pm i promise you nutella is a were wolf otherwise why would she use lots of bad words in a small sentense if she's not a were wolf well than who else could be seriously.

Did I use bad words? Well excuse me

Doesn't mean I'm a bad person. In the game or otherwise..... I hope.

[mention]leetic[/mention] can you elaborate on your suspicion of me a bit? When/where/how did I seem defensive?

Tfw the game is solved before day 1 has started

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 7:10 pm Let's do an exercise! Yay!

I would like everyone to name two civilian reads and two suspects. Please and thank you for your efforts toward a civilian victory.

Civilian: Jay, Bob
Suspects: sloonei, jack

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 6:09 pm It has been 25 minutes since the last post. Unacceptable.

26

Scum telling sloonei is a busy bee

wolves are DDL, Enrique, Jackofhearts2005 and Quin

colonialbob wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 2:24 pm
colonialbob wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:03 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 12:55 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 12:49 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 12:39 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 12:15 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 12:13 pm

Really?
Yep.

Filler post. And you said REY was trying too hard? Bugger off with that.
The fuck is a filler post? Do you not want me to generate content? I don't believe you really suspect me for that post. You just thought it would be an easy thing to appear suspicious of.
Yes, I want you to generate content. That post said nothing, had no content.

I am accusing you of pretending to generate content. Was that unclear?
Well they're my thoughts so far, take them or leave them. I'm accusing you of fabricating a suspicion.
What content would you say is present in your post? What should I take away from that post that helps me get a feeling either on you or from you on others?
nutella

That I was eager to hear more from you and Sloonei, and that in sloonei's case I was putting him on the spot/warming that I would end up suspecting him if he didn't start producing content, and he still hasn't so he is still on notice whereas you have provided civilian-indicating data.

It wasn't like the Mac post though. It was made to look more serious at least.

Alternatively he was just being goofy and that whole post was a joke (the double e thing makes this seem likely along with his personality) and I look silly for taking it seriously at all.

Sure, but they were not particularly coherent reads.

Jay he was just trying too hard. To do anything in particular I'm not sure. But he made a pointless post saying something about every player when the thread had hardly started. So much pointless "eh would lynch" crap at too early a stage. It's forced participation/making himself look like he's contributing thoughts but they are empty ones. Say the same about my sloonei bob post if you will, but at least I didn't waste a ton of time on it.

Damn we can't even vote yet

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:51 pmWhacke

Agreed on bob.

Search found 111 matches