
[mention]Jackofhearts2005[/mention]
Return to βTake Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]β
Yeah, I wonder if we had missed that kill we actually would have won bc we could have gone along with Epi's theory.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: βTue Apr 07, 2020 4:16 am Maybe I shouldβve saved myself, idk, but I thought the game was easier if one of me or Epi was dead cause by N2 we were pretty well tunneled I think. Or I was at least![]()
Aren't you vegetarian
I am thoughJaggedJimmyJay wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 6:00 pmI mean you don't strike me as someone who is about to lose the game in 15 minutesnutella wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 4:45 pmWhat? I've been trying. You and Epi seem decided.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 4:33 pmWhy have you treated it like a source of utter boredom
What? I've been trying. You and Epi seem decided.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 4:33 pmWhy have you treated it like a source of utter boredom
lol
Fair enough. I'm more or less treating them equally and haven't had a specific reason to change (it's sort of looked like my lynch is a done deal) but if I'm more likely to be able to self-pres this way, works for me.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 3:53 pmYou suggested she was your favored vote out of some vague compatibility with me that Long Con does not share. If you've granted that I am a civilian, then that dynamic should be effectively meaningless.nutella wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 3:52 pmI don't followJaggedJimmyJay wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 3:49 pmIf I am a civilian, why is your vote on Michelle?nutella wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 3:49 pm I think you'd try to look similar but it would become evident that you weren't really considering every possibility as you have made an effort to do here. I think you'd fabricate those interactive analyses fairly closely but you'd lock onto one suspect a lot more easily and not be as willing to listen/dialogue with all the players
I don't followJaggedJimmyJay wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 3:49 pmIf I am a civilian, why is your vote on Michelle?nutella wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 3:49 pm I think you'd try to look similar but it would become evident that you weren't really considering every possibility as you have made an effort to do here. I think you'd fabricate those interactive analyses fairly closely but you'd lock onto one suspect a lot more easily and not be as willing to listen/dialogue with all the players
I think you'd try to look similar but it would become evident that you weren't really considering every possibility as you have made an effort to do here. I think you'd fabricate those interactive analyses fairly closely but you'd lock onto one suspect a lot more easily and not be as willing to listen/dialogue with all the playersJaggedJimmyJay wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 3:46 pmWhat do you think I'd do if I was a mafioso?nutella wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 3:45 pmYour lylo behavior more or less convinced me you are in this to genuinely solve it.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 3:24 pmWhat one "should" do is in the fingers of the typer, but I really don't see anything resembling LyLo solving, LyLo desperation, LyLo frustration, or anything. Frankly if you're a civilian, I'd expect you to be way up my ass right now about something or another. You rarely trust me anymore when you're good. Why am I clear? You opened the day with tinfoil about me and the Nanook kill. Where'd it go?
Your lylo behavior more or less convinced me you are in this to genuinely solve it.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 3:24 pmWhat one "should" do is in the fingers of the typer, but I really don't see anything resembling LyLo solving, LyLo desperation, LyLo frustration, or anything. Frankly if you're a civilian, I'd expect you to be way up my ass right now about something or another. You rarely trust me anymore when you're good. Why am I clear? You opened the day with tinfoil about me and the Nanook kill. Where'd it go?
I don't understand how you are getting this interpretation at all. You're saying essentially the opposite of what I meant. I am not throwing accusations at everyone, what I meant by that was that I am basically clearing Epi and (slightly less so) Jay at this point. What I said about accepting the loss if they've fooled me is more or less the opposite of "leaving my options open." I have determined via POE that you and LC are the most likely scum team. I did exactly what I should for lylo analysis. You are purposefully misinterpreting to paint me as bad.Michelle wrote: βMon Apr 06, 2020 2:58 pmShe said I am scum with LC and if you and Epi are scum then the game is lost (i didn't search now, it's what I remember). That means she doesn't show trust in no one and can turn against anyone, meaning she keeps all options open.
Can be a townie at lylo not trying to scumhunt and throwing accusations at everyone?
Idk man, you tell me.Long Con wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 4:36 pm
This is sketchy. First, Michelle wouldn't kill MP. Then, she'd let her partner kill MP, because everyone else in the game is insane if they don't kill MP.More likely that Michelle was feeling the noose close in just a little, and had to say something other than "Yeah, I guess I am one of the more likely players to kill MP". She actually says she wouldn't kill him, before saying she doesn't know him. So, why wouldn't she kill him if she doesn't know him? Where did the idea that he's a superplayer that MUST be killed immediately even come from?
The awkwardness of this exchange checks out with LC/Michelle being teammates. I called LC out for wording/framing that assumed Michelle had a scum mindset, and he backed off of that with a vague waffle on how he actually felt about Michelle. Like, maybe he's the one who felt his teammate was "caught for the wrong reasons" by Dizzy.Long Con wrote: βMon Mar 30, 2020 3:48 pmIt was about understanding Dizzy's perspective on why "you don't have a reason to think I'm scum" could look bad. Michelle accused Dizzy of illogic, and I don't agree. My opinion on it is that it's slightly scummy-looking when framed like that, but I'm not hopping on the train over it.
I'm lazy. I'll do more looking into it.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 7:15 pmThe basis for your vote is my report on my own compatibility -- something I have no reason to think about at all until you ask me.
It's not based upon your review of that compatibility on your own terms.
What?
I don't recall much violence between him and Dizzy. It was mostly softball as far as I could tell, until Dizzy ended up voting for him right before you replaced in, and you made sure that vote didn't stick when it mattered. That being said, I do recall your fiery spat later on, and yeah, that probably wasn't scum theatre since you seemed legitimately frustrated.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 7:09 pmIt should be pretty apparent that I am not Long Con's teammate given not only the violence between the two of us, but the violence that preceded between he and Dizzy. It's not just mutual distrust -- it's righteous indignation, it's pissing me off with sarcasm, and it's my initial belief that Nanook's red check on him was real.
When I've accused Michelle, her responses have often stopped short of full-on No-U. If she is a mafioso, she has shown trepidation in returning fire -- perhaps fearing the volume of my voice at EODs.
Depends on your answers to my above questions. Whichever of LC or Michelle is more compatible with you has a higher chance of being scum (even if I think the team is probably exactly those two, I have to weigh that in somehow).JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 7:04 pmWho should be lynched first?nutella wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 6:59 pmHis reaction to Nanook's fake peek didn't feel natural.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 6:54 pmYou're no longer in a game state where you have to wiggle about on instincts. There is a wealth of analytic evidence, whatever you may think of it. What do you think is the best case that Long Con is a mafioso?nutella wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 6:53 pm Your instincts are wrongLike, yeah, I can see why my LC interactions don't look great, because I'm never super confident about my read of him. Like I said I've always had a hard time reading him. He's just been sort of generally in my POE for most of the game.
He is compatible with Michelle, who is my other top suspect. (Yeah that's POE not a reason but whatever, you made the analysis so I'm not going to restate all the points there.)
His relation to the Mac wagon (both as a participant and a beneficiary) looked sketchy.
Well it's clear to me.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 6:55 pmYou didn't have to be role fishing. It's one possible interpretation among others.nutella wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 6:53 pmwhy?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 6:49 pmThat's a bad sentence.nutella wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 6:46 pmOh come on. I was so nervous lynching him when he wasn't here and I hadn't seen any evidence that he was aware of any of the claiming that had occurred. You're imposing scum motive on something that clearly came from a town mindset. I still wish he had logged in before eod and said anything.
When you tell me that it was clearly coming from a town mindset though, I actually snort. Give me a break.
His reaction to Nanook's fake peek didn't feel natural.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 6:54 pmYou're no longer in a game state where you have to wiggle about on instincts. There is a wealth of analytic evidence, whatever you may think of it. What do you think is the best case that Long Con is a mafioso?nutella wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 6:53 pm Your instincts are wrongLike, yeah, I can see why my LC interactions don't look great, because I'm never super confident about my read of him. Like I said I've always had a hard time reading him. He's just been sort of generally in my POE for most of the game.
why?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 6:49 pmThat's a bad sentence.nutella wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 6:46 pmOh come on. I was so nervous lynching him when he wasn't here and I hadn't seen any evidence that he was aware of any of the claiming that had occurred. You're imposing scum motive on something that clearly came from a town mindset. I still wish he had logged in before eod and said anything.
Oh come on. I was so nervous lynching him when he wasn't here and I hadn't seen any evidence that he was aware of any of the claiming that had occurred. You're imposing scum motive on something that clearly came from a town mindset. I still wish he had logged in before eod and said anything.
Nah that was all part of the bit, I didn't want to outright fakeclaim something and Nanook was being too serious about it so I let it go.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 2:25 pm
You seemed like you were going somewhere specific with that, beyond a "what the hell" kind of experiment, until Nanook clarified the matrix.
Idk, I wanted to see what you'd say. I was but a clueless vanilla who wanted to have some fun with the setup. With all that epistemological stuff I was talking about, I thought having a dispute like that might flush out something to work with.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 2:12 pmNah I need more. What spice?nutella wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 2:10 pmlol, that was just spice.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 2:02 pm /nutella tell me about this.
This was when I fake-claimed cop. You knew I was lying per the matrix. How?
lol, that was just spice.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 2:02 pm /nutella tell me about this.
This was when I fake-claimed cop. You knew I was lying per the matrix. How?
Hmm yeah that's a good point. He seemed to sense that Nanook was town fishing for reactions, rather than immediately flipping out on Nanook for fake-claiming. I can imagine LC just being that perceptive and figuring that getting reactions from it is worthwhile, but my instinct is that he didn't have the natural reaction a townie would have in that situation.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 1:36 pm
A civilian can technically still theorize innocent motivations for Nanook to fake that check, but such a theory has to completely supersede any instinctive what the fuck? that's bullshit responses that may otherwise emerge. I'll also note that when confronted with lesser "offenses" at other portions of the game (e.g. Dizzy's under-explained suspicion of him), his response was more along the lines of what the fuck? that's bullshit.
It's a curious handling of Nanook, and I could see it as bad.
Epignosis wrote: βSun Apr 05, 2020 10:37 am The bad news is that my theory was proved incorrect and I do not get to gloat.![]()
The good news is that my theory was proved incorrect and I get the opportunity to get this right, and that I have a 50% chance of being right.![]()
++++
A civilian would be happy to be able to confidently recognize a fellow civilian. nutella here is gloomy for it. It's as if she begrudgingly must remove me from the dwindling pool of possible civilian lynches rather than celebrate what she even admits is the truth.nutella wrote: βWed Apr 01, 2020 6:43 pmUgh I hate this argument but it's true.Epignosis wrote: βWed Apr 01, 2020 6:33 pmThis should effectively clear me.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βWed Apr 01, 2020 6:20 pm I doubt Epignosis kills MP when the latter is firmly in his camp and when it's his first game in a while.
Cop hunting may break this logic; I'll have to determine the veracity of such a thing.
You misunderstand. I hate the argument because it's borderline angleshooty/out-of-game. It's not a good reason to remove someone from a POE. I had suspected you for a while, and now I townread you for other reasons so this is kind of moot but at the time that was the main reason to remove you from the POE and it was lame.
++++
I want to talk about nutella's interactions with Long Con. I don't wish to quote all of them. They are there if you want to see them.
Page 1 interactions are what I would categorize as "softball." Neither one looks to be making an honest effort to sort the other. It's a token effort, if that.
Page 2:
You could put any name in this sentence, change the pronouns, and it could not be disputed. This post was made Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:41 pm EST.nutella wrote: βTue Mar 31, 2020 3:41 pmEven after all these years I'm not great at reading LC, so he's sorta null for me, but his posts have an independent/unafraid to speak his mind vibe. I don't see a scum agenda.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βTue Mar 31, 2020 3:32 pmAnswer me.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βTue Mar 31, 2020 3:25 pm Why are Dizzy and I wrong about Long Con?
You have five minutes. Answer immediately and with brevity.
Not true, I specifically have known LC longer than anyone else in this game and specifically have a worse record of reading him than most other players.
This post was made Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:07 pm EST. Folks, that is a differential of twenty-six minutes. nutella went from "I don't see a scum agenda" to Long Con is her second choice for a Day 1 lynch. LC did not post at all in that twenty-six minute window for him to have done anything for her to change her mind over.nutella wrote: βTue Mar 31, 2020 4:07 pmUgh probably LC but i don't feel great about it. I just have more reasons to townread everyone else.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βTue Mar 31, 2020 3:57 pm nutella, assume for a moment that Epignosis doesn't exist. Who are you lynching now?
I was townreading pretty much everyone but you at that point. He didn't stand out and therefore was a candidate.
That was Day 1. Here is a post from Day 2:
"You haven't caused me to townread you," as though the burden lies completely with Michelle for how nutella views her. Again, she could say this about any one of us and who are we to dispute it?
That's less important than the fact that nutella named LC as bad saying, "I just have more reasons to townread everyone else" Day 1 but on Day 2 to Michelle says "I believe I've stated a few times that you were in my poe and that you haven't caused me to townread you."
If you look at other games I've played with Michelle, this is a specific way that I treat her. Maybe it's unfair, but I have a particular way of spotting Michelle's town meta that has proved accurate in the past. If I don't find her townieness to be obvious, she is a candidate by default.
++++
This isn't related to LC, but I found it noteworthy. Before JJJ can even do whatever it is he is doing, nutella implied it was of little value.
I was so confused at that whole thing. I legitimately did not understand what he was doing.![]()
++++
The tone here is one of resignation rather than exuberance. Note that nutella sees fit to make sure Michelle is the follow up candidate without going into why it is "extremely likely." It's as though nutella senses that LC is caught and is going to be revealed and she needs to attach a name to that revelation.nutella wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 12:02 pmYou can have both though!! I regularly post as Jack does, responding to things as I read while missing current thread information, but I still make every effort to read every post in the game so I don't miss anything.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 11:38 am This is why Down With Ketchup is the one true way.![]()
![]()
Anyway [VOTE: lc] aubergine since it looks like nanook means it. Still think Michelle is extremely likely the other one.
Not resignation. I saw the cop claim, figured that would be the lynch because even if LC wasn't my top suspect, if there was a red peek on him that makes things pretty clear cut. Now we know there was no peek. But at the time I had no reason not to believe Nanook. Whereas the mafia would since they would have already known there wasn't really a cop, right?
I mean, it'll be funny if LC was mafia all along and Nanook just guessed it![]()
Just an observation at this point:
In page 3, Long Con is mentioned three times (and LC is mentioned 16). Michelle is mentioned 53 (!) times. I realize there is room for some of those 53 mentions being other people quoting or naming Michelle, but that is an astounding difference.
Here is one of those 53:
If Mac was obviously good, then we should see evidence that nutella made an effort Day 1 to persuade others to vote away from Mac.
No, that's ridiculous. I didn't expect people to suddenly start voting Mac in the last three minutes of the phase. At no point did I even think that was remotely likely until it was too late, so I had no opportunity to try to prevent it.
Twenty-two mentions of MacDougall on page 1 without a single word of defense (other than blindly agreeing with him about me).
The defense of Mac on page 2 consists of:
Is this not enough of an indication that I wasn't anywhere near thinking lynching Mac was a good idea??
Reminding us of his time zone and stating that he "seems" good.
Which is probably easily disproved (JJJ could do so I think), but whatever. The "I don't think" does not imply "Mac was obviously town."nutella wrote: βTue Mar 31, 2020 3:26 pmI don't think scum Mac puts that much effort into a case on d1.M Plus 7 wrote: βTue Mar 31, 2020 3:19 pmHeβs a much better town player than this. I town read his poop flinging in the moment, upon reflection earlier today I read it as NAI, and heβs continued to do all of jackshit since. I donβt get any sense at all that heβs trying to figure out alignments either, which means all heβs done so fling poo. That is more compatible with a scum Day 1 than a town one, considering the state of POE because I believe a lot of other players have town cleared themselves out of Day 1 lynch contention, including you now as well.
Reminding us again that it's against the rules to lynch people in their sleep.
"If Mac flips town."
That doesn't sound like it was an obvious thing at all. But at the same time, it sounds like nutella already knows the outcome here.
Alright, maybe I should have been more adamant about my town read of Mac before, because yeah I find him fairly easy to read and was pretty sure he'd flip town. No TMI, just strong gut. I had no time during the crazy last few minutes to even react to the vote changes.
Page four shows nutella attempting to link anybody she can to Long Con.
The obvious problem here is that if you are sure LC is bad with someone else, the right course of action is to lynch the common link first and go from there. This is not happening.
I think my suspicion of LC has been on about equal ground with my suspicion of Michelle for most of the game, and I would have liked for either of them to emerge as the main wagon on D2 but for whatever reason that didn't happen, through some miscalculations a few of us reached the conclusion that Jack was the best choice (once again while he wasn't even around) and I found that plausible enough to go along with. Yeah, I haven't fought hard to push a wagon on either LC or Michelle, I guess I've just lacked confidence. And I still do, because I haven't figured out which permutation of two of LC/Jay/Michelle is most likely, so there isn't one "common link" that gives me the best chance of being right. I'm not there yet.
I submit that the mafia team for this ballgame is nutella and Long Con.
I will explore the latter when opportunity presents itself.
[VOTE: nutella] aubergine
This is the first thing Jay says after the night post. Immediate indirect accusation of Michelle. Idk it smells kinda poopy.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βSat Apr 04, 2020 6:46 pmI doubt that creeps you out. Silly shade #3543245654
Sorry, I want to trust you on tone but we have a very narrow POE and I am seeing very little available possibility that you aren't scum here. Even then this isn't much of a defense, the fact that Mac was townreading you at the very beginning means nothing to me at this stage of the game. If you are town it has to be two of Jay, LC, and Epi, and the only way you can convince me you're town is if you convince me which of those universes we're in.Michelle wrote: βSat Apr 04, 2020 8:34 pmAre you villager for real? You refused to talk to me overnight and when I saw your last answer I gave up to talk to you :/
Is no way you can think I am with Nutella never in this world. And I am never scum.
I can tell you why. One is paranoia. I am cool when I am mafia, but I am a paranoid and often wrong as villager.
Villagers are wrong, they are making mistakes because they think their AI is enough to protect them.
I was homestly following my reads and I wasn't cowardly hiding no matter what.
When I left in the previous day, I was upset for real. But I came back when I calmed myself.
I was pushed by every single player alive. I am lonely, no one backs me up. I don't know who is villager because of the lack of trust I received all game. Usually I can find someone to trust...
My posts are out of my scum range. I am villager, and I was set for mislynch from long time ago. Mafia choose happy to push Jack instead of me because he was absent and didn't catch up properly and that was against him. They took advantage of the village who was so framed. Jack knows alot more than me about any player here so when the possibility of his mislynch appeared my wagon disolved.
The thing with 'who would kill M7' is wrong. Is made to clear someone and accuse at random. I said and I repet, every sane mafia would kill him because he cleared too many villagers He was present in the game and noticed Svs and me as villagers. I am sorry I didn't trust his read on Jack.
Nanook said he can self target but I know not every doctor can or he finished his shots already.
M7 read me villager. Nanook wasn't sure but didn't want me dead. Jack supected me but wasn't sure I am bad.
Mac's case was ignored all game like he is not one of this site's MVP :/ He didn't suspect me. What do you think now about this?
I exposed what i think shows me for you I am villager because for me I am lock town since the get go.
I don't really like how you keep coming back to that one point. It's bordering on angleshooting and citing out-of-game character as evidence. Like, you're probably right, but you're harping on it a bit much this late in the game when we have other stuff to use.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 10:29 pmI don't think he killed MP. If anyone in this game would have the same motivations to refuse that as I would, it's him.
I'm pissed that he thinks I did that, but whatever.
what is thisEpignosis wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 10:21 pmNo that's not right. I rescind my grin.Epignosis wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 10:19 pmTalk to me. World C would mean there's a two shot doctor. Right?Long Con wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 10:16 pmI believe Nanook. I don't see a fake doc-claim including this part about MP. He tried to protect MP night 1, and the kill still went through. If this is fake, then I applaud his attention to creative detail.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 9:34 pm So weβre in world C
Iβm the 2 shot doc, MP got strongmanned N1. I thought fake claiming a red and seeing how things broke would open up the game, especially as I knew two people would know the check wasnβt real. My plan was to then claim tracker at night and try to get my second save off.
Which is partly why I wanted nutella TKed, the way she jumped on the check smelled like someone setting up βTK the βredβ check then murder the fake cop.β![]()
Ok, I see what you mean. I guess it's reasonable that you didn't expect a townie specifically do pull weird shit. Nanook is just too many levels ahead of the rest of us I guess.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 10:12 pmYou're right, and whether you intended it or not that's my point:nutella wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 10:10 pmCome on. This is basic epistemology. If the only purpose is to create different setups, you can just pick the setup and then have the specific setup be known to the players. The mere fact that the matrix is the only public knowledge we have creates avenues for catching people in counterclaim traps based on which universes we may or may not be in.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 10:07 pmThere's probably some precedent for that somewhere, but no it's not what I envision from a matrix setup. The primary advantage of a matrix is that it enables a diverse array of balanced setups to be thrown into a randomized rotation -- one can run a lot of games with the same matrix and have them go a bunch of different directions.
The matrix does not facilitate effective pretending between setups (in the absence of janitors at least), because there will always be someone out there who knows something is wack. That's the mechanism I keep referring to. Mafia members may still be inclined to pull shenanigans; weirder things have happened. Typically though that'd be a desperation play and not a well-oiled gambit. It just doesn't work very well.
Come on. This is basic epistemology. If the only purpose is to create different setups, you can just pick the setup and then have the specific setup be known to the players. The mere fact that the matrix is the only public knowledge we have creates avenues for catching people in counterclaim traps based on which universes we may or may not be in.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 10:07 pmThere's probably some precedent for that somewhere, but no it's not what I envision from a matrix setup. The primary advantage of a matrix is that it enables a diverse array of balanced setups to be thrown into a randomized rotation -- one can run a lot of games with the same matrix and have them go a bunch of different directions.
I don't even mean specifically relating to the role cops. I mean, with a matrix, it seems likely that people are going to play with the possible worlds and mess with people's heads about it. No?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 10:04 pmMany matrices don't even have role cops. That's not what I think about when I think about role cops. Their primary function is to identify the biggest threats to them, and that's why I put them in there.nutella wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 10:03 pmJaggedJimmyJay wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 10:02 pmI already answered this. Read or get off the pot. When I placed role cops in this matrix, their purpose was to enable mafia to identify power roles and then kill them. Pretend to be in a different setup was not in my thought process, and that's because it would be a dumb decision.
Okay actually though I have a hard time believing that it didn't occur to you. Seems like kind of the entire point of having a matrix, no?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: βFri Apr 03, 2020 10:02 pmI already answered this. Read or get off the pot. When I placed role cops in this matrix, their purpose was to enable mafia to identify power roles and then kill them. Pretend to be in a different setup was not in my thought process, and that's because it would be a dumb decision.