The Syndicate

Quin wrote:

Matt wrote:'Sides Golden, Quin is reading funny to me. Can't put my finger on it. Perhaps an ISO is in order!

Do it! This is the first time anybody's even talked about me, I was getting lonely.

Golden wrote:

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:The whole Golden vs Matt argument feels like a waste of time.

Just my two cents.

I don't think so.

Matt tried to put out a case on me, where he literally didn't give a shit if he was right or wrong. He doesn't care at all to question, or to understand. He just wants me lynched.

I don't see how this can be civilian Matt. Even tunnelly civilian Matt. I think Matt is bad as they come. If you ask me what I think Matt is doing... I think he is trying to get people to go 'oh, there's tunnely Matt... his claim is so outrageous and he won't listen... he must be town.' I think he is trying to create civ cred for himself. And I'm not buying it.

I will almost certainly be voting for him tomorrow.

Golden wrote:I'll be voting for you tomorrow, Matt. I've never quite come across the case before where someone literally says "explaining your thought process is of no relevance to my ping, where I question your ability to have had a thought process within the available time."

linki - I have no read on llama. I have one on you though.

Golden wrote:So, Matt, thats it? You are just going to keep saying 'I think it was dishonest' and 'it was odd' and ignore any attempt from others to get you to think?

For the record, since I've given you the opportunity to test this over and over and you've refused.

I liked Mongoose and Silverwolf on a tone level.
SVS and DDL, I liked the approach they took to engaging with DrWilgy's plans at the top of the game (something I had read and participated in).
sloonei and epis approach to questioning and responding to others reminds me of their civvie selves. It felt like there was genuine effort from both to generate reads in their own way.

I probably had all of those six reads before I had LC, but I hadn't identified that I had them until I went through the poll thinking about each person in turn.
In the same look through, I identified that I hadn't really read anyone as bad yet.

This differs from LC, who had a specific idea which, all by itself, gave me a civ vibe. It is easy for me to identify the exact moment at which I got a read on LC, because it was from reading one specific post he wrote.

All of my reads were entirely genuine. Any one of them, I could have told you immediately after I posted them the reasons why I did them.

Sloonei wrote:@ Matt: but also my initial "wut" was in response to the bottom paragraph of your post, where you seem to say that me removing my vote doesn't mean I see him as town, but then attempt to contradict this by saying I see him as less suspicious. Are these not essentially the same thing?

Golden wrote:Your suspicion of me feels to me way more like trying to get others to see me in a strange light, and far less like you actually found something suspicious.

Golden wrote:The only vote on me I really don't object to the logic is silverwolf, although I think Matt's responses to me earlier seemed genuine

Bullzeye wrote:Also based on how fast today has been I'm gonna be asking to be replaced

Golden wrote:

Matt wrote:

Golden wrote:

Matt wrote:I think that's odd.

Why? Diiny asked me to think about my reads, so I did. Putting LC on my list was reactionary to a specific post. The rest were me putting thought into the vibe I was getting from people.

C'mon dude, like I said, within 11 minutes or less you went from having your first rainbow read to declaring seven players you wouldn't vote for.

Just a small ping, but it's there.

Anyway, thanks for responding. Nobody else commented on my brilliant case

Well, I went down the entire poll list figuring out who I had reads on in those 11 minutes. Don't say come on... why is it suspicious?

Golden wrote:

Matt wrote:I think that's odd.

Why? Diiny asked me to think about my reads, so I did. Putting LC on my list was reactionary to a specific post. The rest were me putting thought into the vibe I was getting from people.

Golden wrote:

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:@LC

So your idea is to basically dump the whole traitor thing under a pile of WIFOM so big nobody can draw any conclusion from it?

I like it.

I like it too

LC is the first person to get a colour on my rainbow. It's very lightly green.

Golden wrote:

Diiny wrote:Reading back, I'll also extend that question to Golden, who posted a lot about the setup/plan but not much about players which research shows is a tad out of character.

I hadn't bothered reading much of the thread. I've just sat down to do my first read through now. I am getting quite a few non-null reads. Unless something happens to change my mind, I won't be voting for LC, DDL, sloonei, mongoose, epi, SVS or silverwolf. I don't really have much in the way of pings yet, but I'll see where I'm at when I'm caught up.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Matt was way more active last game I played with him. he couldn't shut up. Now he only made one post, about how he intends to read Zebra. I know this is too soon for make such demands, but I miss active Matt.