The Syndicate

Do you honestly think I'd be this lame of a Penguin juliets?

Hello I am Typhoony and I am not a nub. Thanks for giving me this exciting opportunity to have a conversation with all of you directly. I will be here for the next two'ish hours!

Ask Me Anything about this game that you would like me to answer.

I liked THs post on Mac, so I will probably vote there.

I have some time right now though, so let's talk. Who are you looking at for a vote juliets?

Scotty wrote:

Typhoony wrote:So people seriously think that making mp say "sig is my #1 suspect" is something I'd do if I were the penguin?

Lmao nubs. Why the fuck would I do something shit like that? Explain to me why I would out myself in due time by giving them obvious posting curses? Please, humor me.

I'll await your answer and respond to whatever else is there when I get home.

I'm with juliets and others in that it seems like a pretty nub statement but what are your thoughts on what is actually happening? Let's say you aren't the Penguin. What do you make of these curses and their sources?

I dunno. One of the secrets I assume. Most likely looking at the roles is Joker.
If it's Ivy we'll find out soon enough if any of the cursed people die because of it.

So people seriously think that making mp say "sig is my #1 suspect" is something I'd do if I were the penguin?

Lmao nubs. Why the fuck would I do something shit like that? Explain to me why I would out myself in due time by giving them obvious posting curses? Please, humor me.

I'll await your answer and respond to whatever else is there when I get home.

S~V~S wrote: Some of the names and reasons for potential Nero teammates are confusing to me. Sometimes things really ARE what they seem, so not sure why everything has to be bussing all the time. Sometimes you suspect someone, AREN'T their teammate and you vote for them and try to get them lynched. This still happens, right?

This is quite vague. Which ones would you consider confusing?

Hello nubs.
I should actually have some time to play today, hooray for me. Tomorrow I'm starting a new job, dunno how much mafia'ing I can get done there.

Who wants to give me cliffnotes for the last 20 pages?

I see Zebra died.
Someone said she could have been Ra's and wanted to get lynched to have Wilgy be rezzed or something?
No mafia kill because of a block (?)

Did I miss something?

MovingPictures07 wrote:The Hosts pretty much implied that it's unlikely I'll be replaced at this point and that I should stick it out. So what am I to do, now, that I've made actions that are seemingly suspicious, don't have adequate time to keep playing even at the level I played this past weekend, and people are being closed-minded?

Probably take a break from the game for now, because I can see you are clearly frustrated.
Focus on real-life for a bit, try not to worry about the amount of posting that is being done, and drop in whenever you have free time to comment on something you deem worthy.

If you consider the game to be a burden you should probably ask for a replacement.

Why is that lolworthy?

Sounds like a plotline out of an Arkham Asylum TV-show.

Enrique, cliffnotes, now. Thanks.

I've barely read anything since Page 55.
Who is going to save me from torturing myself by providing me cliffnotes on what has happened?

Haven't really been able to read much since yesterday.
Voting mp. I think he was one of the few people pushing the Scotty is civ narrative and he has votes.

This is not a 'various reason'.

You're pushing the narrative that Scotty is civ. Is he in danger of getting lynched?
If yes, fair enough.
If no, why do this?

Would you do the same if you saw a rolehint for a civ? "Hello player x hinted at role y here look I'm solving the game".
No, you wouldn't.
We're here to figure out the baddies. We're not here to declare who all the civs are. That counts even more so in this game.

And now I really have to go. Bye nubs

Can you answer the question I asked Golden?

None of your convincing evidence actually makes sense.

Golden, all you are doing by claiming the Scotty is civ theory is convincing evidence is painting a huge target on his back for nightkills. If you truly believe him to be civ, why do this?

What is this clear evidence you are talking about Golden?

Then how would he possibly have info on Scotty th?

Why the fuck do people still think Wilgy was Robin when he was not around to send in the lynch stop? Please explain, thanks.

Also, I don't have a lot of time until Night 2 to follow the game so don't expect a lot from me

If there's one player in the game who advocated for sharing the info, it was sig. It's hard to read his posts and think otherwise.

Nerolunar wrote: Im kinda siding with Sig in the debate on information sharing, although I do not think you should look at tone when searching Glorfindel. He is always polite whenever he writes something, and I can´t seem to spot a post where he deviates from this. I assumes this is true even when he is mafia. I do belive that both of thekm are civs though, but I do not think we should share information about the map.

So which one is it?

Enrique wrote:@Hosts: What do you do in case of a tie?

Epignosis wrote:

Typhoony wrote:Hosts:

- How do you decide lynch ties?

Also, Wilgy wasn't around for the last 8'ish hours of the lynch looking at his posts. How would he have sent in a lynch stop?

Glorfindel wrote:

Typhoony wrote: Here you go my friend. Enjoy analyzing!

Day 1 Voting graph

Wow! That's pretty cool :-0 And yes, Sig - I think you have some explaining to do...

Just be sure to use the New version!

MacDougall wrote:

Typhoony wrote:

All the votes are fucked up. Lemme fix that

You just have Scotty and Wilgy as the wrong colour I think.

Nah more stuff is wrong, like somehow LC ended up on the graph. I modified an old graph, changed the names in the Excel sheet but the graph wasn't using the cells, it was just using the names I implemented by hand. So now it should be fixed.

Day 1 Voting Graph

All the votes are fucked up. Lemme fix that

DharmaHelper wrote:Anyone who feels SVS would not intentionally miss the vote, explain to me how she missed the vote after explicitly stating that she had to vote 10+ minutes before EOD

She's a human being.

Glorfindel wrote: Frankly, if it was someone that would be considered experienced then yes, I would. The thing is, I feel that any analysis of that is hampered simply by the way the site is set up. I should think a list of the voting sequence over the last hour/half hour or so before the EoD may be an interesting read...

Here you go my friend. Enjoy analyzing!

Day 1 Voting graph

I was at the Docks D1

I know the Docks smell like fish, but is there really nobody that wants to go there?

DharmaHelper wrote:

Typhoony wrote:Svs would not miss a vote on purpose, no matter what. Anyone that knows her and seriously thinks she would gets an

Really hyped on that SVS defense aren't you.

Really hyped on that svs attack aren't you.

Nerolunar wrote:Any combination of three night actions/votes earns a modkill. There is a possibility that someone would do it on purpose without getting punished

Participation score =/= modkill.

Linki: hence the "knows her well" Scotty

Svs would not miss a vote on purpose, no matter what. Anyone that knows her and seriously thinks she would gets an

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Scotty wrote: You call it tunnelly, I call it my normal day 1. Every game. Look at the D1's any of the other 10 games I've played on this site. I do tunnel, admittedly, but this is not an example of that.

Next time maybe I'll just vote in alphabetical order or something, because apparently that is a safe way to vote that won't induce criticism.

As scary as it sounds, this has proven to be somewhat correct.

Everybody should vote in alphabetical order.
Kills must also be done in alphabetical order.
I have hereby decided this.

Hosts:

- How do you decide lynch ties?
-Was this:

All GCPD win dead or alive as long as the individual win condition is met.

*A result of something that happened during the lynch?
*A result of the location poll?
*Always the case but just not yet changed in the roles?
*Something else?

MacDougall wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:As neat as it is to see everyone advocating participation for once lets try to avoid sheepvoting and keep in mind that it's pretty easy to just dump a vote onto someone and avoid accountability.

We should compile a list of people who vote for people having not mentioned them at all beforehand and sequentially landslide vote them out of this game imo.

Add me to the list!

Cause I'm voting Wilgy. Most comfortable voting him out of anyone with votes atm.

Enrique wrote:Typh, okay. I'm not saying BADDIES themselves would be sharing any real info, I'm saying they would want to know what others got. That's why as a baddie you encourage that discussion. That's why as a civ you don't.

Fair enough.

The Hosts said it is not in anyones best interest to discuss it. You said it was in the baddies best interest.

Those are two different things.

Enrique wrote:sig can we avoid the wifom please. You were very actively pushing for something that benefits the baddies. Even you seem to admit that it was too obvious? Why?

why would bad people do bad stuff sig i dunno you tell me

How do you know it benefits the baddies?

Golden wrote:

Typhoony wrote:Actually I don't think she's defensive as a baddie really. She herself agree

Interesting Typh. What about World Reborn?

As for teammates: She was not vocally defensive about Juliets, but she definitely pushed the thread into another direction by lynching Canuck. She said she saw me more civ than bad if I remember correctly.
Not sure how she reacted to suspicion aimed at herself, I remember Epi naming her as suspicious early on (as well as Juliets and me). I don't think she got overdefensive in the thread, but there was a bit of a freak out over that in the chat, but she always does that in the chat, she keeps it out of the thread.

Actually I don't think she's defensive as a baddie really. She herself agree

I think she's more emotional/defensive as a civvie. So right now I'd lean more towards civ.

Linki: That's about SVS

Juliets who do you think you'll be voting today?

Scotty wrote:

Typhoony wrote:

juliets wrote: I'd like to know where you're thinking to put your vote today and why?

Not sure, but I know I'm not staying at the Docks.

What's at the docks? (It's ok, explain in code that only I will understand)

Zebra was so kind to point out what's at the Docks here.

Also, it smells like fish aka your mom

I'd rather focus in individual cases.
Ie if you can point me to a player who's been unusually quiet and avoiding conflicts, I'm willing to listen.

Dunno.
I was not pinged by any of the major convo's going on.
I thought Nerolunar pushing Arkham Asylum with the Riddler thingy might have had a nefarious purpose, but it seems there aren't any negatives from going there as we now know.
SVS seemed to be trying something with Glorfindel, hence why I asked if she was suspicious of him.
I don't think she is an appeaser at all, but I do think I haven't seen her civ self this game yet. Too early to say if I've seen her baddie self though.

Typhoony wrote:

Enrique wrote:Typhoony do you think it's sketchy that some people really want to talk about their info? What would it take to make you do that?

I don't know if I would call it sketchy. As I said earlier somewhere, my main concern is that we have no idea what this thingy is about, who it benefits and who it does not benefit.
If I would be pushing for people to release info, I would know who the information benefitted. I don't think everybody pushing to share the info has an idea who it might benefit, but surely someone out there knows at the very least what we are talking about.

I'd also like to add that I find the wording of the rule peculiar.

14. Talking about the map is allowed, but not in your best interest.

It seems directed at every single player, which would mean that none of the players actually benefit from it... And solving whatever is going may have net negative results for everyone.
Maybe Epig is expecting our curiosity to get the best of us and talk about it anyway, only to say after everybody has shared everything "Told you right there in the rules".
Regardless, I'm very much against talking about it at this stage.