Ok I found myself focusing too much on agleaminranks in my head, so I tried to look at other people instead.
Simon:
... I got nothing. There's almost no content at all in his posts. He pops in to vote from time to time or to randomly post something. His reasons for voting are either to save himself or <insert arbitrary reason>.
Best I can go on is the judgement of other people who have played with him, and they seem to think he is not bad, but I would really like some content from him.
Spacedaisy:
Her Day 1 was dominated by defending Glorfindel because she would like to give him the chance to enjoy a light hearted fun game. That's odd to me, but she has explained this multiple times in a way that could make sense.
Day 2 she mostly talked about Sig/Simon/Epi like everybody else. When she is asking questions it seems to me she really wants to figure things out and doesn't just ask things for the hell of it. She ended up voting Simon to tie it up, which is a shit reason if you ask me.
On Day 3 she voted Matt
because he refused to make a case on Glorfindel, even after being asked for it, saying that nobody pays attention to his cases anyway and that the people questioning him are bad. Which is fair. There are also some other useful thoughts in that post for everyone to read.
On Day 4 she went against Glorfindel, mostly because she thought there could be a connection to Matt since he changed his mind on Glorfindel. She voted Matt again. Would've been interesting to see if she had gone against Glorfindel if Glor had survived N4, but alas.
And then there is Day 5, where she voted Epi because she felt more confident about Boom than Epi. Fair reason. Says she is susp of Me/Simon/Agleam in that order, has since made it Simon/Gleam/Me (I think?)
I'm leaning slightly more civ on her for now, and her read through made me more comfortable that Glorfindel was bad. I'll hold off on further judgement until she answers my earlier questions.
Also, while looking at the votes, I noticed that agleamingranks is the only one who hasn't yet voted for a lynched person. I find that suspicious... he knows who is bad and who not so it's easy to bathe his hands in innocence if anyone questions him on his voting record.
He has voted for people who were later lynched (
Scotty D2,
Matt D3). He never mentioned Scotty again after his D2 vote, except
AFTER Scotty died. Exactly the same thing
for Matt. And here I am focusing on algeaminranks again
![:p :p](./images/smilies/tongue2.gif)