The Syndicate

Nice.

"As long as all members of your organization are alive, it will stay that way and all actions against you will fail. You may not perform any action yourself to maintain your status."... I don't understand this role at all.

Good job guys.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 5:19 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 4:59 pm "exudes a certain towniness" is mondo garbo.

The other one is barely better. "slight scumread but, slight scumread but..."

If that's the best he's offering, I call fake.

Sorry about the vote tags.

Idk what to tell you, man. You’ve seen me correctly tone/mindset read these players in the past.

Have I? I can't remember.

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 5:10 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 4:59 pm "exudes a certain towniness" is mondo garbo.

The other one is barely better. "slight scumread but, slight scumread but..."

If that's the best he's offering, I call fake.

Sorry about the vote tags.
I'm gonna have to disagree there. Those are fine statements. The waffleyness is good in my book.

That said I'm on the fence about jack and don't mind that folks are voting him. I just think LC's reasoning is unsound.

Ok fine. I guess we'll see.

"exudes a certain towniness" is mondo garbo.

The other one is barely better. "slight scumread but, slight scumread but..."

If that's the best he's offering, I call fake.

Sorry about the vote tags.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 4:24 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 4:15 pm
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 3:20 pm Guys wanna vote jack with me

What what do you think of his claim that he cannot be lynched
It's not worth discussing. I could go for a Jack vote, I have had a few pings about him.
Talk to me about me.

Well, I just looked at the third page of your ISO, and I can barely find a stance on anyone. Lots of conversation, little stance. "Town DDL exudes a certain towniness". "I have a slight scumread on Tony but it’s based on one post and I had a slight gut scumread on Sloonei yesterday but he seems to be trying"

Nothing good, nothing that makes me think you're town. [VOTE: Jack[/town]] aubergine

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 3:20 pm Guys wanna vote jack with me

What what do you think of his claim that he cannot be lynched

It's not worth discussing. I could go for a Jack vote, I have had a few pings about him.

I'll sheep nutella's vote on Tony, since she's widely townread. [VOTE: Tony] aubergine (<unvote>) BOO

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 1:36 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 1:24 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 4:02 am it can't be that.
What can’t be what? I don’t get what you and Nutella and LC are arguing about here.
My alignment. They apparently know something about me that I do not.

When did this become about you?

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 11:14 am Fwiw I’ll probably be a bit more serious when the game narrows down more.

I don’t see a problem with having fun until then, this is a game after all

I support your style 100%.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 4:02 am it can't be that.

Oh, it's that. nutella has it 100% right.

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 11:52 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 11:51 pm
ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 11:43 pm
boo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:17 am
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:11 am Boo doesn’t seem to like me but we actually agree that inactives should die or get active

[VOTE: Zummi] aubergine

Especially on a day we get to kill two people, either play the game or die.
It's not personal. I just can't do anything with the playstyle you exhibited on D1, and find it actively not fun to play with.

But it's nice to see someone else who likes killing inactives. People are way to passive about assuming replacements rain from the sky and my least favourite thing about hosting is having to make the call to boot someone who just isn't around, assuming I even have a replacement available to do it.
Why do your preferences as a host have any bearing on your actions as a player looking for scum?
Shit, is this one of those games where you can't casually converse while you play?
I suppose my underlying accusation is that boo’s reason for voting Zemmi is frivolous and made-up.

That's more palatable.

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 11:52 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 10:27 am
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 10:03 am I'm thinking lynching zemmi is actually a good idea conceptually, now. But the fact so many people seem to be onboard with it is giving me pause.
Nah. Why would the Mafia team care about bussing a nonplayer member of their team? That's the easiest bus ever. I'll get on that boo vote. [VOTE: boo] aubergine
Didn’t you say earlier you were fine voting Zemmi for the same reason as Boo?

What, you want me to do your research for you?

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 11:43 pm
boo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:17 am
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:11 am Boo doesn’t seem to like me but we actually agree that inactives should die or get active

[VOTE: Zummi] aubergine

Especially on a day we get to kill two people, either play the game or die.
It's not personal. I just can't do anything with the playstyle you exhibited on D1, and find it actively not fun to play with.

But it's nice to see someone else who likes killing inactives. People are way to passive about assuming replacements rain from the sky and my least favourite thing about hosting is having to make the call to boot someone who just isn't around, assuming I even have a replacement available to do it.
Why do your preferences as a host have any bearing on your actions as a player looking for scum?

Shit, is this one of those games where you can't casually converse while you play?

boo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 3:22 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 3:08 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:56 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:51 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:36 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:35 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:27 pm [VOTE: LC] aubergine the other one.
Hey, what did I do?
Killed Dom.
I believe that would make me the vigilante. Why would the Mafia kill Dom after he came very close to getting lynched?

I didn't kill anyone.
I didnt mean you were literally the triggerman. But Omar (more likely than a vig, imo) bought into your Dom suspicion and killed him for it and that didn't work out, which makes me double down on my belief in your insincerity on the case against Dom.
Why? How does the vigilante buying into LC’s read make his read less sincere?
If Dom had been bad, LC would've been right, and then my finding it insincere would've been wrong. But Dom wasn't, so that reinforces my thinking that LC wasn't genuinely going after Dom because he thought he was bad.

Yeah, you're right. When I'm bad, I vote for town, and when I'm town, I vote for baddies. That's how I play. It's easy to catch me. I should come up with a scheme, when bad, to only vote for people who won't get lynched. Then my obvious tell, which you have picked up on, would be hidden.

dunya wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 10:26 am i like how LC contended sloonei's town read of him. it could be ballsy wifom, but i like it.

It's a classic LC move.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 10:03 am I'm thinking lynching zemmi is actually a good idea conceptually, now. But the fact so many people seem to be onboard with it is giving me pause.

Nah. Why would the Mafia team care about bussing a nonplayer member of their team? That's the easiest bus ever. I'll get on that boo vote. [VOTE: boo] aubergine

boo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:39 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:35 am I can answer you both at the same time, I think. When I'm mafia, I feel the need to have *cases* to make in order to appear Civ. Maybe that Predators/Prey Mafia game is a good reference? I don't know. When I'm Civ, I am more lazy and accrue suspicion for not having enough solid opinions.

So, there's no good reason to be giving me a solid townread for my Day 1. It looks more like my baddie game. The reason I get through my evil games with "minimal suspicion" (which is seriously questionable) is that I act Civ well, with believable cases, and carefully crafted deception. Not sowing chaos. Maybe you're thinking of Jack or Mac?

And the Britney thing was me.
Sure, but acting civ well and creating cases when mafia *is* sowing chaos, because you know the cases are BS (or in 2 mafia team environment, there's not really any reason to actually care if the case is correct, only if it's believeable).

And yea, thought so. So that's probably the real answer then, isn't it?

Oops, I did it again.

I can answer you both at the same time, I think. When I'm mafia, I feel the need to have *cases* to make in order to appear Civ. Maybe that Predators/Prey Mafia game is a good reference? I don't know. When I'm Civ, I am more lazy and accrue suspicion for not having enough solid opinions.

So, there's no good reason to be giving me a solid townread for my Day 1. It looks more like my baddie game. The reason I get through my evil games with "minimal suspicion" (which is seriously questionable) is that I act Civ well, with believable cases, and carefully crafted deception. Not sowing chaos. Maybe you're thinking of Jack or Mac?

And the Britney thing was me.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:17 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:02 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:33 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:32 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:27 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:27 pm [VOTE: LC] aubergine the other one.
Why?
It's provocative. It gets the people going.
LC remains a firm town read. Please state your case if you disagree.
For what?
I liked the tone of the way you handled the Dom suspicion yesterday. You stated the case, but indicated it was incomplete and not fully satisfying. It was enough for a vote, but you still appeared to be actively developing reads.

I don't like it. I think you're buddying me. [VOTE: Sloonei] aubergine

I'll put the second vote on Zemmi. I don't mind using the second lynch to cut an inactive. [VOTE: Zemmi] aubergine

boo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:18 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:16 am And... we're talking about "sowing chaos" here, right?
I am. In regards to you. Yes.

I don't think I do that.

And... we're talking about "sowing chaos" here, right?

boo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:07 am
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:59 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:56 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:51 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:36 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:35 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:27 pm [VOTE: LC] aubergine the other one.
Hey, what did I do?
Killed Dom.
I believe that would make me the vigilante. Why would the Mafia kill Dom after he came very close to getting lynched?

I didn't kill anyone.
I didnt mean you were literally the triggerman. But Omar (more likely than a vig, imo) bought into your Dom suspicion and killed him for it and that didn't work out, which makes me double down on my belief in your insincerity on the case against Dom.
.....ohhh

so you think LC is mafia who tried to bait a vig/3p kill onto a townie?
It seems like something he'd do in a situation where he didn't care about the lynch result. So since both Drago and Dom were civ, I think LC was bad and was using a bad civ D1 to sow chaos. It's what he does best.

Maybe my self-awareness is lacking, but I don't think that's what I do best. Do I do that?

nutella wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:57 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:51 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:36 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:35 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:27 pm [VOTE: LC] aubergine the other one.
Hey, what did I do?
Killed Dom.
I believe that would make me the vigilante. Why would the Mafia kill Dom after he came very close to getting lynched?

I didn't kill anyone.
I figured it was a vig too but maybe a somewhat-town-friendly 3p? Boo knows the show and is probably assuming it's Omar?

Bleeeehhhh, not interested in this line of thinking really. I don't see the solving relevance. Am I wrong?

boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:56 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:51 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:36 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:35 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:27 pm [VOTE: LC] aubergine the other one.
Hey, what did I do?
Killed Dom.
I believe that would make me the vigilante. Why would the Mafia kill Dom after he came very close to getting lynched?

I didn't kill anyone.
I didnt mean you were literally the triggerman. But Omar (more likely than a vig, imo) bought into your Dom suspicion and killed him for it and that didn't work out, which makes me double down on my belief in your insincerity on the case against Dom.

Oh... okay, fair enough. I did get Dom killed, from that point of view.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:33 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:32 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:27 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:27 pm [VOTE: LC] aubergine the other one.
Why?
It's provocative. It gets the people going.
LC remains a firm town read. Please state your case if you disagree.

For what?

boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:36 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:35 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:27 pm [VOTE: LC] aubergine the other one.
Hey, what did I do?
Killed Dom.

I believe that would make me the vigilante. Why would the Mafia kill Dom after he came very close to getting lynched?

I didn't kill anyone.

boo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:27 pm [VOTE: LC] aubergine the other one.

Hey, what did I do?

Ugly night. Very disappointing. Dom must have been a vig shot. Assuming that, why kill Mac?

Rej wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 6:36 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 9:05 am
Rej wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:39 am Wtf...daychat during night. So meh.
You'e not obligated to post. At least 95% of the games I have played over my long Mafia career have not closed the thread at night.
I see now, this is just a relaxing session

Wow, where did the Drago lynch come from? I have no way to find out.

Rej wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:39 am Wtf...daychat during night. So meh.

You'e not obligated to post. At least 95% of the games I have played over my long Mafia career have not closed the thread at night.

Should I switch to Drago or let it rand? Or will it even be a tie in two minutes?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:46 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:46 pm
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 2:21 pm Last time I accused speed of being mafia in a game it was because he was saying something scummy on purpose to gather reactions that could be analysed, and he was actually civ, so I fell into his trap (tho I was civ myself too).

This time around speed is wishing jack hadn't commented on creature's meta so me and other people would attack him. Producing reactions that can be analysed.

Second paragraph of this post reminds me a lot of the first one. In other words, I don't feel like suspecting speed for doing something I've noticed civ speed likes to do (do things on purpose to gather reactions).
Why did you make such a lengthy explanation of why you you ain't suspecting speed? Did anybody ask you why you weren't suspecting him or smn?
Why do you object to this information being put into the thread, Drago?

Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 9:07 pm
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:55 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:46 pm
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 2:21 pm Last time I accused speed of being mafia in a game it was because he was saying something scummy on purpose to gather reactions that could be analysed, and he was actually civ, so I fell into his trap (tho I was civ myself too).

This time around speed is wishing jack hadn't commented on creature's meta so me and other people would attack him. Producing reactions that can be analysed.

Second paragraph of this post reminds me a lot of the first one. In other words, I don't feel like suspecting speed for doing something I've noticed civ speed likes to do (do things on purpose to gather reactions).
Why did you make such a lengthy explanation of why you you ain't suspecting speed? Did anybody ask you why you weren't suspecting him or smn?
I have to wait to be asked to play this game?
I didn't mean it like that but ok
How did you mean it?

Dragomir wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 9:07 pm Mac and Rej are bad.
Why?

Dragomir wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 6:25 am Is it just me or do all posts just don't feel suspicious at all minus a few?
Except for the ones by Rej and Mac, if I'm following correctly?

I do not know why any of these posts exist.

This analysis is agreeable to me. I could switch to Drago.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:29 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:28 pm I don't have an issue with DDL's posts.
Do you have a reason to distinctly town read him?

I'll townlean him. His posts were pretty engaged. Some good thoughts.

I don't have an issue with DDL's posts.

Damn yo, I just got back from picking my kids up from karate. I wasn't gone that long.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 8:43 pm
boo wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 8:29 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 8:10 pm
boo wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 7:54 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 7:13 pm
sig wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 6:57 pm ...Dom doesn't seem outside his normal civ meta.
Is that really true though?

Take a look at Dom's ISO in Girl Genius. He was Civ, I think the "main" Civ? I think the differences are pretty striking.
The D1 differences? Browsing that, it doesn't read that different to me. Do you have any specifically damning differences in mind?
In this game, the bulk of his posts are about calling things bullshit and firing off mirroring questions with no evidence of caring about the answers. In Girl Genius, he was more interactive, gave reads, agreed or disagreed with people, and said things like "It matters that you have avoided answering direct questions."

Did anyone avoid answering his direct questions in this game? Can you tell if he even cares?
Ah. Tbh, Dom in general reads bad to me. I agree with you about how he comes across in this game, I just don't find the other game to be that different, or his game in general to be that different at the start of the game. It's when he gets quiet though, that I found he tends to actually be bad. And that I don't really see here so I'm undecided on if I want to vote for him. Be helpful if he were around to respond to stuff directly.
I do not follow the highlighted portion, boo. Are you saying that Dom has specifically been Not Quiet this game? If so, then why does he remain in consideration for a vote?

I think he has been quiet. That's a combination of few posts, and my judgement of the level of the engagement therein.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 8:40 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 8:30 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 8:13 pmHis (DoWm's) level of critical engagement has been a little less than I'm used to seeing. I don't find that in itself to be a particularly inspiring case, but it's worth exploring.
That's where I'm at, actually. I'm not super-inspired by the Dom vote either, and I wouldn't be surprised if a Dom lynch ended badly. When I went to compare the two games, I kept an open mind... if I had seen the same Dom, then I would have posted about it. Like I said, I found the differences striking, and it served to solidify my vote more. The scales are unbalanced without Dom here to defend himself, but I'm on the heavy side of the scales.. something else will have to tip the balance enough to chanfge my vote, if Dom isn't going to bring the weight down.

I have a sexy angleshooting alternate vote in mind, but I won't discuss that openly... I'll just let it inform my vote should the winds blow that way.
Who else is worth looking at?

I don't mind the Rej and Drago wagons too much. I haven't yet looked at DDL to see if he's been as insincere as some say... which I think is the main reason he has votes?

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 8:30 pm @sig why'd you forget speedchuck he's so scummy how does no one see what I see

I looked over his posts. I'm sorry, I don't see what you see.

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 8:33 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 8:30 pm
I have a sexy angleshooting alternate vote in mind, but I won't discuss that openly... I'll just let it inform my vote should the winds blow that way.
uhhhhh

Cat got your tongue?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 8:13 pmHis (Dom's) level of critical engagement has been a little less than I'm used to seeing. I don't find that in itself to be a particularly inspiring case, but it's worth exploring.

That's where I'm at, actually. I'm not super-inspired by the Dom vote either, and I wouldn't be surprised if a Dom lynch ended badly. When I went to compare the two games, I kept an open mind... if I had seen the same Dom, then I would have posted about it. Like I said, I found the differences striking, and it served to solidify my vote more. The scales are unbalanced without Dom here to defend himself, but I'm on the heavy side of the scales.. something else will have to tip the balance enough to chanfge my vote, if Dom isn't going to bring the weight down.

I have a sexy angleshooting alternate vote in mind, but I won't discuss that openly... I'll just let it inform my vote should the winds blow that way.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 8:15 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 8:10 pm
boo wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 7:54 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 7:13 pm
sig wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 6:57 pm ...Dom doesn't seem outside his normal civ meta.
Is that really true though?

Take a look at Dom's ISO in Girl Genius. He was Civ, I think the "main" Civ? I think the differences are pretty striking.
The D1 differences? Browsing that, it doesn't read that different to me. Do you have any specifically damning differences in mind?
In this game, the bulk of his posts are about calling things bullshit and firing off mirroring questions with no evidence of caring about the answers. In Girl Genius, he was more interactive, gave reads, agreed or disagreed with people, and said things like "It matters that you have avoided answering direct questions."

Did anyone avoid answering his direct questions in this game? Can you tell if he even cares?
Do you make anything of Dom's focus being mostly centered around Jack and nutella?

I think it's reminiscent of Australian Mafia Day 1, where Dom and nutella were bad, and Jack was good.

I don't even know if Dom is going to come back before the deadline.

boo wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 7:54 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 7:13 pm
sig wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 6:57 pm ...Dom doesn't seem outside his normal civ meta.
Is that really true though?

Take a look at Dom's ISO in Girl Genius. He was Civ, I think the "main" Civ? I think the differences are pretty striking.
The D1 differences? Browsing that, it doesn't read that different to me. Do you have any specifically damning differences in mind?

In this game, the bulk of his posts are about calling things bullshit and firing off mirroring questions with no evidence of caring about the answers. In Girl Genius, he was more interactive, gave reads, agreed or disagreed with people, and said things like "It matters that you have avoided answering direct questions."

Did anyone avoid answering his direct questions in this game? Can you tell if he even cares?

sig wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 6:57 pm ...Dom doesn't seem outside his normal civ meta.

Is that really true though?

Take a look at Dom's ISO in Girl Genius. He was Civ, I think the "main" Civ? I think the differences are pretty striking.

sig wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 6:57 pm If someone would like to clue me in on why DDL, Dom, and Drag have votes I'd be happy to listen, since Dom doesn't seem outside his normal civ meta.

All D's:

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:07 am
nutella wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 10:33 pm the D's haven't checked in lol @Dom @Dragomir @dunya and also @MacDougall hi hello otherwise I think everyone else has

I think we’ve just about got this solved.

He's making a lot of sense. Can wolves make that much sense?

That was my take as well. I thought it was spicy.

Took a look at Dom's ISO. It's not that long of a read. It consists of him asking superbasic questions ("And what does asking superbasic questions mean to you?") and telling people they're full of shit. No follow-up detected, so the questions appear to be designed to look probing, but it falls very flat every time. What that means to me is that Dom wishes to look aggressive toward Jack and nutella, and to seem game-solvey with the questions, but isn't putting any real heart into them. Questions without purpose are filler, and filler is a scum tell.

[VOTE: Dom] aubergine

boo wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 12:49 am Her fence sitting would feel a lot more in her baddie-meta than her civ-meta, to me Dom. I'm curious for her to weigh in on it herself now though.

Anyways, I just spent far longer on this than I meant to (and I'm aware most of that was far to meta a discussion to be particularly useful, so apologies for those who have no interest in that sort of overall game analysis and just like the skin and bones of a game to chew on, I'll try and focus on the issues at hand tomorrow), have an exam in a few hours and still need to actually sleep. I will be back with plenty of time before the lynch ends though, so shouldn't be an issue.

I looked at her recent Aussie baddie game, and I didn't see too much fence-sitting. More focused reads. Definitely buddied me when I voted like her.

Search found 168 matches