The Syndicate

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:I will currently be voting one of the following people:

MacDougall
DrWilgy
Quin
thellama73
Jackofhearts2005
Scotty

They have posted since my request for lie detector statements and failed to make such a statement. DF, FZ, MarMot, and Floyd have not posted since then. The rest of you are potentially cleared.

But I'm not bad.

But are you Civ?

How about you run this through your detector,
Wilgy = Baddie.obj || !(Civillian.obj)

I'm regards to PoE, there's 2-3 people I'd protect tonight at this point. I think it to be unwise to share this though. Would you still protect Epi?

Elohcin wrote:Referring to the Quin/llama/svs stuff....I think any of the three could be bad atm. BUt if one of them is bad, I think the other two are cleared. If Quin is bad, I don't think llama or SVS would go after their teammate so soon. If llama or svs is bad, I don't think the other would be so obviously in agreement with the other about the alignment of another.

Epignosis wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I'm really looking forward to hearing some Nickelback today.

That's literally the first time anyone has ever said that.

I really am. You know...

Spoiler: show

Epignosis wrote:I'm really looking forward to hearing some Nickelback today.

thellama73 wrote:

Long Con wrote:I will currently be voting one of the following people:

MacDougall
DrWilgy
Quin
thellama73
Jackofhearts2005
Scotty

They have posted since my request for lie detector statements and failed to make such a statement. DF, FZ, MarMot, and Floyd have not posted since then. The rest of you are potentially cleared.

I don't make lie detector statements. Vote for me if you don't like it.

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:I will currently be voting one of the following people:

MacDougall
DrWilgy
Quin
thellama73
Jackofhearts2005
Scotty

They have posted since my request for lie detector statements and failed to make such a statement. DF, FZ, MarMot, and Floyd have not posted since then. The rest of you are potentially cleared.

But I'm not bad.

Elohcin wrote:I'm going to vote for the next person who quotes the picture of that disgusting naked creature. I will never revisit page 5 again.

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:Wilgy, who should the President protect this evening?

It's too early to say LC. I do think a proper PoE could get this answer, but there's not enough discussion yet.

If you need an answer now, me!

thellama73 wrote:Feigning ignorance of the rules. Classic FZ move.

Marmot wrote:Epignosis was pushing hard for a game to start. I find his lack of activity suspicious.

DrWilgy wrote:

Quin wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!

What is the point of this?

He's letting us know we should lynch Epi Day 1.

Yes

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!

They said I could keep my doctor, but I now see I'm stuck with Wigly.



Sorry guys, that's the best I got, tonight.

Hiii Jaaaaaaack, do you want to conquer the world with me?

Quin wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone! I'm a doctor and Epignosis is bad!

What is the point of this?

He's letting us know we should lynch Epi Day 1.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:

Long Con wrote:

notsawyer540 wrote:

Quin wrote:Discrediting your own opinion on an argument while still making a point of giving it never looks good to me.

I'm afraid I don't see what you're getting at. I was saying that I didn't see an argument or any evidence as to why people thought you were bad, but qualifying it with the fact that I don't know many of the people here as well as the rest of you know each other. I've known LC for nearly a decade, which is my basis for the civ read I have on him. But I've also known him long enough to know he can't be trusted. He won the Star Wars mafia I hosted on Lostpedia as an Indy role, so I know what he's capable of.

I totally betrayed and murdered my Civ BTSC team for more power.

So we should probably lynch you regardless of your alignment then?

notsawyer540 wrote:

Quin wrote:Discrediting your own opinion on an argument while still making a point of giving it never looks good to me.

I'm afraid I don't see what you're getting at. I was saying that I didn't see an argument or any evidence as to why people thought you were bad, but qualifying it with the fact that I don't know many of the people here as well as the rest of you know each other. I've known LC for nearly a decade, which is my basis for the civ read I have on him. But I've also known him long enough to know he can't be trusted. He won the Star Wars mafia I hosted on Lostpedia as an Indy role, so I know what he's capable of.

Quin wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Quin wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Quin wrote:

notsawyer540 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:I'm a redhead- I have no soul

Me too!

I don't really find Quin suspicious. But then again this is only my second game on this site and there are only a couple people I know well enough to make judgments on. Getting a civ read on LC. Not really sure if going after low posters is a good idea here, but I don't really have any better ideas yet, so it may come to that for me.

I'm a civ and I support Hillary Clinton.

Other than that, it usually takes me a few cycles to start putting things together. If Ron Swanson were in this game, I'd say he's guilty as shit for three days before realizing it was Donna right before I'm killed!

Anyway I'm gonna get back to watching TV and nursing this hangover. I'll check back in periodically.

Discrediting your own opinion on an argument while still making a point of giving it never looks good to me.

Why? Are you always so sure of your own opinion that you can't see the drawbacks in your own argument?

No. But if I find it suspicious I'm going to say so. I want a dialogue.

What are the drawbacks in my argument?

I wasn't talking abour drawbacks in YOUR argument; I was talking about
You saying you found it suspicious that he was qualifying his opinion. It was essentially a rhetorical question. "Are you always so sure of your own opinions that you find someone who can see both sides of a suspicion questionable?".

Oh.

No, I don't. But I do find the act of discrediting one's own opinion to be innately suspicious. There's a difference between that and just not being sure.

Epignosis wrote:

I predict a mechanic that stops the person with the most votes from being lynched and the lynch is actually decided based on the location of each voter.

thellama73 wrote:

Long Con wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I could see an FZ vote as possible. I thought her question about the rules seemed contrived.

Your suspicions seem somewhat contrived.

Your face seems somewhat contrived.

thellama73 wrote:I could see an FZ vote as possible. I thought her question about the rules seemed contrived.

MacDougall wrote:

Long Con wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Long Con wrote:

MacDougall wrote:I have a question for everyone.

If I don't make 100 posts today will I get lynched again? Is that something I need to contend with? I would rather not.

Just don't make any jokes like "Rule 1: Always lynch X day 1" and you're off to a good start.

I have a rule. Long Con is always bad when he starts cracking wise and not being serious.

Emphasis on the 'wisdom' factor, I'd say.

Is this where I get voted for?

MacDougall wrote:

Long Con wrote:

MacDougall wrote:I have a question for everyone.

If I don't make 100 posts today will I get lynched again? Is that something I need to contend with? I would rather not.

Just don't make any jokes like "Rule 1: Always lynch X day 1" and you're off to a good start.

I have a rule. Long Con is always bad when he starts cracking wise and not being serious.

Quin wrote:

Long Con wrote:No, I'm sorry, the correct answer is "Epignosis".

Why?

MacDougall wrote:I have a question for everyone.

If I don't make 100 posts today will I get lynched again? Is that something I need to contend with? I would rather not.

Scotty wrote:

Marmot wrote:Epignosis was pushing hard for a game to start. I find his lack of activity suspicious.

Don't worry- if he's good, mafia will surely kill him night 1. And if he's bad, then we'll just lynch him! See how easy it is?