BUT it was NOT a Tuesday afternoon, WAS IT?
It was Friday morning.
And now? It's SUNDAY AFTERNOON!
Where is Roxy?
Return to “The Avengers [ENDGAME]”
I would say don't assume, then? I'm fully capable of holding a cognitively dissonant pair of suspicions and respectfully write off counterevidence as distancing ploys.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 1:34 pm
Because I assumed you were TRing him since you believed I was being predatory to him
lol I don't know! Has he even posted since that exchange? Still hard to read the newer players. They were all Town in the last one? I think? So, still learning them.Do you think Simon is town?
I do have to scoff a little at the gall of Mr Four-Posts saying something like that.
Also, I don't think you're a limp noodle, man. I think you're a strong competitor and a good player.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 12:56 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 12:00 pmBy "demeaning", you mean "accusational", right?falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:24 amS~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:33 amVote and hope based on what? Did you pick him at random?
I tend to be the person most sus of LC, and I pretty much always bad read him. So now i am up to him having 2 votes for Trivia.
Not liking this, gonna be honest. It feels kinda icky.
Just because you think someone may not be bad, doesn't exactly mean you also think they are town. Especially on a quiet Day One.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pm
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
Like you, for instance. You feel sincere to me, I don't particularly think you're bad. But I haven't seem very much yet to point to and say, "Ah, Falcon is town", just a general attitude.
I will say that your vote for LC seems the most sincere to me of the three he has currently.
@Michelle why the Falcon vote? His slight aggro edge feels more like town Falc to me. Was it just a joke "no u" thing", since he had a vote on you at that point?
I have one errand to run about noonish, but otherwise I'll be in and out all day.
That's understandable, I get that. Differences in my mind are that LC did not say that, or anything, to answer my question, but framed it in somewhat demeaning light
I also had similar thoughts re: Simon, and then I realized that picking apart exactly what his definition of "a lot" is would be a little pedantic and bullying, and wouldn't likely bear any game-relevant fruit, so I chose not to do it. Why would you focus on something so nitpicky? What result did you imagine coming from it besides maybe Simon having less confidence in speaking his mind, for fear that it's going to be linguistically dissected and get him called out on whatever minor definitional discrepancy you decide to pounce on?Syn expressed he had similar thoughts re: Simon, and was intending to follow up as well
I'm trying to be as helpful as possible for you to understand where I'm coming from here, because I was less concise and more reactionary in my stance last night.
No, I think calling my question a "limp noodle" is somewhat demeaning
There is literally no irony. You reacted one way to the same thiughts, I reacted a different way.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 12:57 pm The irony of "I have the same/similar thoughts as you, but you're the predator/bully for asking" is delicious
By "demeaning", you mean "accusational", right?falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:24 amS~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:33 amVote and hope based on what? Did you pick him at random?
I tend to be the person most sus of LC, and I pretty much always bad read him. So now i am up to him having 2 votes for Trivia.
Not liking this, gonna be honest. It feels kinda icky.
Just because you think someone may not be bad, doesn't exactly mean you also think they are town. Especially on a quiet Day One.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pmSimon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pmIf we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
Like you, for instance. You feel sincere to me, I don't particularly think you're bad. But I haven't seem very much yet to point to and say, "Ah, Falcon is town", just a general attitude.
I will say that your vote for LC seems the most sincere to me of the three he has currently.
@Michelle why the Falcon vote? His slight aggro edge feels more like town Falc to me. Was it just a joke "no u" thing", since he had a vote on you at that point?
I have one errand to run about noonish, but otherwise I'll be in and out all day.
That's understandable, I get that. Differences in my mind are that LC did not say that, or anything, to answer my question, but framed it in somewhat demeaning light
I also had similar thoughts re: Simon, and then I realized that picking apart exactly what his definition of "a lot" is would be a little pedantic and bullying, and wouldn't likely bear any game-relevant fruit, so I chose not to do it. Why would you focus on something so nitpicky? What result did you imagine coming from it besides maybe Simon having less confidence in speaking his mind, for fear that it's going to be linguistically dissected and get him called out on whatever minor definitional discrepancy you decide to pounce on?Syn expressed he had similar thoughts re: Simon, and was intending to follow up as well
Ah, so they're like beneficial bacteria!S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:06 amI took a look at the guests, and by far most of them seem to be registered to "claude. bot" which is a competitor of ChatGPT. So it looks like they're scrubbing us for "intelligence" to replicate. Life on the web.Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 10:33 amI haven't gotten any errors, but there are 33 Guests right now and Syndicate pages are taking like 5 seconds to load. Normally, they load pretty instantly for me, and other web pages load instantly right now.
Not at all! Just making sure I understand correctly before follow-up questions.S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:00 amKinda, I guess? If someone posts a thing in thread, I think it's fair game for anyone to comment on. I found his "why is Simon town" question to be a bit black/white from my perspective, not accounting for the gray of a slow day 1, so I said so. Isn't this how we play Mafia, commenting on each others comments?Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 10:28 amAre you answering the question he asked me, here?S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:33 amVote and hope based on what? Did you pick him at random?
I tend to be the person most sus of LC, and I pretty much always bad read him. So now i am up to him having 2 votes for Trivia.
Not liking this, gonna be honest. It feels kinda icky.
Just because you think someone may not be bad, doesn't exactly mean you also think they are town. Especially on a quiet Day One.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pmSimon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pm
If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
Do you think that if someone is directing something at you, no one else can have an opinion on it?
Are you answering the question he asked me, here?S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:33 amVote and hope based on what? Did you pick him at random?
I tend to be the person most sus of LC, and I pretty much always bad read him. So now i am up to him having 2 votes for Trivia.
Not liking this, gonna be honest. It feels kinda icky.
Just because you think someone may not be bad, doesn't exactly mean you also think they are town. Especially on a quiet Day One.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pmSimon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pmIf we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
Hangover?
Maybe it's a combination of my "don't trust me" name, my elusively mysterious avatar, and my use of the emoji?S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 9:02 amHaving reread without reactions, this is the thing that sticks out the most to me. What did your gut tell you? Was it just random, was it becasue he had votes?
I think this is the sketchiest vote in the thread so far.
I am gonna drop a vote on [VOTE: motobot] aubergine for now. I am going to go back and reread him in the Hungry game, where he was bad, and see if he made this kind of vote there.
"Massive L"??
Agreed
I'd be willing to bet a great deal of money that this isn't entirely true.
Did you decide not to because:
OH lol I forgot about leetic's vote on me. I don't think we know why for that one either.
I thought I'd get it out of the way early this game. It is a direct reference to last game between us.
Yeah, motobot hasn't really explained his yet. You can come to your own conclusion about falcon's, it's all right out there and recent.
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 7:29 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:43 pmSo, this limp-noodle "gotcha" is supposed to direct attantion away from you? Is that the idea here?falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:24 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:10 pmWhat do you mean?falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pm
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
You said I'm being predatory of Simon...which shouldn't matter if he's Maf, right?
So why is he town?
No
My favorite part is how you characterize my question as a limp-noodle gotcha instead of just answering it
Is this seriously something you expect to pass the sniff check as "good logic"?
So, this limp-noodle "gotcha" is supposed to direct attantion away from you? Is that the idea here?falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:24 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:10 pmWhat do you mean?falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pmSimon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pmIf we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
You said I'm being predatory of Simon...which shouldn't matter if he's Maf, right?
So why is he town?
What do you mean?falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:05 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:01 pmI asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pmSimon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pmIf we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine
You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?
Why is Simon Town?
I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:30 pmSimon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pmIf we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
By "a lot", do you mean the twice?
IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?
Are they better or worse than nothing?Simon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:19 pmIf we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.
Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.
But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.
You have to have the keen Mafia sense to grasp the broad subtlety of the effectiveness of my posts. I won't hold it against you that you fail to see the bountiful fruit from a tree that is yet a seed.
Well, you haven't lived if you haven't spent a night in jail.