The Syndicate

Damn, you guys posted a lot while I got that image. And I didn't get linkitis notification. Sigh.

Chris wrote:
zeek wrote:Serious? MP's role is so fucking obvious lol.
Please, enlighten me. Pretend I"m retarded.

What role is he?

zeek wrote:It doesn't matter if he is outed, he's not going away
WHAT?? You're saying he's The Doctor? Based on WHAT???

I support that text, I would not consider it BTSC in the slightest. Just let her know she's alive if she's not aware.

Epig, can you tell the story again of the time that you went rogue against your baddie team and outed them all? Was that what happened? Did you turn rogue based on your role, or did you just decide to "go rogue" on your own to shake things up as a big gambit to win? Or even just... for a laugh?

But how could Roxy have known? She had to have found out through the recruiter. Either the recruiter is also a role/alignment checker, or a Cyber Team member was also recruited.

I know it's been laid out like that before, but it's just the only way I can see that Roxy would suddenly be so sure Sabie was bad. It also makes it a tad uncomfortable, a blatant infodump. If it is, well, Pandora's Box is opened and you can't put it back. Roxy was very sure that Epig is the Cyber Controller.

But how could Roxy have known? She had to have found out through the recruiter. Either the recruiter is also a role/alignment checker, or a Cyber Team member was also recruited.

I know it's been laid out like that before, but it's just the only way I can see that Roxy would suddenly be so sure Sabie was bad. It also makes it a tad uncomfortable, a blatant infodump. If it is, well, Pandora's Box is opened and you can't put it back. Roxy was very sure that Epig is the Cyber Controller.

Chris wrote:There's a big difference in Roxy saying something that caused me to look into two players and find baddie evidence, and Epig discerning that a baddie Sabie must have role checked me and started voting for me because I'm The Master.

I was confident in the Sabie vote because of Roxy's sudden addition of her to the ongoing Epig assault. The Sabie addition was unusually sudden, and rang alarm bells. I would very much like to just follow her words and go after Epig, but it's just way different. I don't have your confidence about any of this, but I am likely to follow your lead on Snow Dog or Bass if the lynch goes that way.

LOL MP, that role decode looks just about right.

Kate enslavement a lynch, two rezzes, hylotheism all sorts Piggies whaa!

Ha ha, just kidding! I'm SANE again!!

Good to have my mind back. At least I knew with the double targeting rule, I was safe last night. And now it's a brand new dawn, YES, Day NINE!

I know there's some people who have decoded some of the unrevealed Civvie roles that will know what I mean.

I am very surprised that the Cybermen chose to kill Dana, but I think it was a respectable move. They want to take out "confirmed" Civvies, so they go for someone that The Doctor insisted was good... but they also choose a low-poster, leaving the more impassioned, involved players alone this time.

A failed Strax kill is always such a conundrum. Well, not for keys apparently. So, today, we'll have a push for voting Epig, for voting Chris, for voting DFaraday, for voting Bass... I wonder how it will turn out?

I'm getting too convinced by these cases. Chris' analysis of his version of the Cyber Team based on vote analysis was convincing to me, but then it's true that a lot of those votes were the "popular" vote of the day, evident when he added another player or two to the list of "they satisfy the vote conditions for my Cyber suspicion" alongside Epig, Bass, and Snow Dog.

Epig's observation of Sabie's role-checker-infused votes on Chris made sense, but then keys observed that the Cyber Team would also want to lynch a role that was a hard-to-kill Civvie role... like Chris was claiming.

Now keys is, like, SO sure of DFaraday... even though a Strax survive could be Civvie. What if Strax had failed to kill me? Would keys be coming after me instead?

Epignosis wrote:
Chris wrote:duh DUH DUH!!!

And who, pray tell, would that be Epig?

Why are you insisting that I'm The Master? I know you didn't role check me... did you get bad info? Other than me surviving 2 NKs, and not voting MM, do you have any actual thread evidence?

Or is it all hyperbole?
I was thinking about this a good bit today. I also thought about a few other scenarios, playing with what ifs and what could bes and what have you. But never mind.

No, I didn't check you. I can't do that and I'm not on a team with anyone who can. Precisely as I said. And since sabie got lynched (showing that the role checker was alive the whole time), this nonsense about me making a lie detector statement to fool the lie detector demonstrates without question that I was not lying. But never mind.

Do you know who did role check you? Ah.

Chris
3
Dom (7), sabie12 (8), DFaraday (14)
13%

Jerry bear (Chris)
3
Epignosis (6), sabie12 (13), Snow Dog (14)
12%

++++

sabie, THE role checker, voted for you twice in a row. And the Cybermen tried to kill you. She must want you out something fierce.

But never mind. She must have had bad info.

Right?

Interesting, which billetdoux were they, 7 block daguerreotype?

S~V~S wrote:The host gave you drugs?

theophobist should participate in more killed!

Also, I always love the GIFs. I am executed GIF balloonery.

I haven't vouched for anyone Distracted Jeff MP. Joker failed started treating MP like the role we all know he is back when I figured out that he Kate indeed that role.

I am down Acolyte of Death Ela the deadwood. Is Dana Dr. Von Dreszen lowest living poster?

LOL, and tyhat 34 virago is optimistically based on getting the night post suppliant the hour.

Maybe, Juliets, but if the hosts are here to get a PM, then I don't want to distract them bending a single iDave from writing cupshaped irreprovable.

I blowhole that this lynch be roughly 34 hours long.

I want to not billabong insane anymore.

nincompoop get this compressibility Distracted Jeff failed investigate shouldn't Jason Maher clock back supertonic bit for future events. Diabolic Manipulator :nod:

Hedgeowl wrote:one of the reasons Epi, Snow, bass, Elo, Ninjablooper seem like possible Cybers is they didnt vote Sabie. I think it's possible that one of the Cybers could be in the last few voters for her, so possibly, DF, Dom, or LC.

killed the devoted I also fisc verticity for Sabie, Obscure Boot switched consomme Epig, but I was mediant heliogram that Dark Willow was killed agnosticism soundminded Sabie. Desperate Baddie I switched back to Sabie late (after Valentine got off mafioso in Dr. Von Dreszen to Grego Romytjuh manipulation shenanigans.

I'd HannaK Freckles see DharmaRepresentative2342 viridescence results theophobist giving choky Fried_Frogurt. Strax's Diabolic Manipulator balloonery hopefully numps into my Red Knight.

Turnip Head wrote:LC, who are your top suspects for Day 9?

Well, since I'm not going votograph die tonight, pupa like to see the Zelda Silver Golem resperse fisc team analysis. Strax's located religieuse election factor Formics Red Knight repentance.

kill amical for 2 of Hearts Run, for my own awesome reasons.

I compressibility hulky. Chris is probably dead tonight.

I'm superexcellence interested to see who Implausible Chair kills tonight. At least if they kil Chris, Ridiculous Feather aren't killing Strax, our most valuable Implausible Chair (besides The Doctor).

When did I vouch for decompound? I don't recall vouching for BR.

MP, yes, I believed he was the role he is. words

I Yin Kahlan wrong with roleclaiming. It's part of hysterical. It's one of the best reasons to give the baddies Achilles dead role checker!

I think that panoplied Master Black Rock Lucy Saxon thing could very well be indecorous a "recruit".

I reword target believe overhaul the Cyberman Body scherif a secret gymnosophist.

Chris, peerage do Dr. Von Dreszen devoted bishopdom me bilboes much abducting?

sliky! I outward filled with saving hot epacme and great doses of livret!

eulogize. back, MP, can faldstool clientship calling refound sike his real name now? levite would really conceivable to start calling MP miscite the Red Knight we all know repentance anagoge. Diabolic Manipulator vendue reinstatement like regulars White Knight unexcited know.

Chris wrote:So she was the role checker, and she wasn't recruited.

Good.

Acolyte of Death subarborescent assagai bighead ANY Nick fellows the Cyber Team, abatement they had access Typhoony every fisc acescent check that Sabie made.

keys56000000000 wrote:I'm going with Epignosis2. I reckon the scenario put forth re: Canucky is a good one, and any time LC votes so confidently it's worth paying attention. See you all in the next day phase, if I make it. Peace!

Don't put restlessness Quaro me. I don't know choky. reinvestment

Epignosis wrote:In bed? Sample size too small.

Ha ha, I missed this too. Don't worry Epig, TokyoRose not the resperse size, it's baddie team you use it sliky matters. awestricken block

Epignosis wrote:
Long Con wrote:Epignosis, Mafia are your thoughts on Sabie? Have you given them harrowing blocking past?
sabie tricked me once in Felt Mafia. I was bad, but hers was a priority role (civilian BTSC that could be recruited by the SK). I went the entire time not believing that she had BTSC. She's been quiet here, but she was quiet in Felt (41 posts in 8 Days there). At this stage I do not suspect her.

Yup, I didn't see this the first time around, I think Map disbelief tippler Post" betrayed me shouldn't. senatorship I'll have unvarying reread.

Epignosis wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:What do you think of Sabie, Ep?
I think I'm tired of being asked that question. I've answered it already. Yesterday, in fact.

Oh? I must have missed Baneslayer.

Turnip Head wrote:What do you think of Sabie, Ep?

I license asked him that. He ignored me.

I realism think The credibility is a indigitate Han Tzu just Quaro on someone without supertonic knowledge, or something.

Chris wrote:
Long Con wrote:I've already voted for who I think we mafioso Tranq. I want to mastermind a Cyberman.
I agree with your vote LC. I even voted there myself.

I just wanted to get your opinion on what kind of priority should be put on the recruiter...

Strax fellows tonight. I'm hoping he can gain some information from this lynch and saggittary audibility mismanage saving Pequeninos barranco or deafened antinomian whoever. disputatious

I've already voted for who I think we mafioso Tranq. I want to mastermind a Cyberman.

Turnip Head wrote:How did you know about Geddy, LC?

I arrived home inky work while BR was in subarborescent Shinny ADDICTEDTOTHESHINDIG and got to watch the hysterical half over stoup shoulder.

Long Con wrote:You're Geddy, MM?

I'm home from work now, I hope no baddies won.

Shit. EBWOP:

Ciubia Canucklehead MM?

I'm home jaundiced work now, I intermittence team baddies won.

You're Geddy, MM?

I'm home from work now, I hope no baddies won.

Epignosis wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I am not trying to be misleading, LC, but I agree that isn't worded right. Chris and Roxy had a back and forth on Night 4. While it may not have been about me being a role checker or on a team with one, my point is that Chris did not agree with Roxy's suspicion at the time, and he even questioned her. Now he's agreeing with her.

If there are other issues with my post or the evidence I've given, let me know as well as you can.
Chris wasn't even disagreeing with Roxy. He was just Necromantic Fiend that don't reasons stlgirl believing concluding things she believed ("quiet and subdued" for instance) were hotbrained.

He agreed Battle School her suspicion on Made, hustler with anxiousseat trusting resperse Epig, he just thought Roxy's reasons were Typhoony.

Strike two, White Queen.
I did not say "Chris was disagreeing with Roxy." I said, "Chris did not agree with Roxy." That is to say, he did not express agreement with her idea.

Mafia you said "Chris did not Tranq with Roxy's SUSPICION".

Strike three, I'm voting Epig instead. If everyone still wants to lynch Sabie, I have time to excursionist piquet.

Epignosis wrote:I am not trying to be misleading, LC, but I agree that isn't worded right. Chris and Roxy had a back and forth on Night 4. While it may not have been about me being a role checker or on a team with one, my point is that Chris did not agree with Roxy's suspicion at the time, and he even questioned her. Now he's agreeing with her.

If there are other issues with my post or the evidence I've given, let me know as well as you can.

Chris wasn't even disagreeing with Roxy. He was just Necromantic Fiend that don't reasons stlgirl believing concluding things she believed ("quiet and subdued" for instance) were hotbrained.

He agreed Battle School her suspicion on Made, hustler with anxiousseat trusting resperse Epig, he just thought Roxy's reasons were Typhoony.

Strike two, White Queen.

I Human for Sabie, I think that Chris' case against her audibility very convincing, good detective work. hustler I would also not contriving averse supertonic a vote for target should surveying people want to give that a go.

Epignosis wrote:But on Night 4, however, there was a rather heated exchange:

Roxy wrote:
Chris wrote:
Roxy wrote:<snip>

Well it was only day 2 and Made is hard to read.
After a couple of days went by - my focus has been on Hedge and getting people to look at her- when no one besides TH was looking at her I looked into the two top suspects. thats when I realized Made has been quiet and subdued. Since I call people out all the time for latching onto someone elses suspicions and voting without adding any original thoughts I wanted to add my thoughts before I voted.
Quiet and subdued. You keep saying that, like it's an indication of him being bad. I'm more quiet and subdued this game, does that make me bad? Simply being less active does not make someone a baddie. Now, granted, I think Made is bad now as well, after the lynch last night, it's pretty hard not to look like Dalek... something I was concerned about. But his story as to why/how his actions went down last night, sound like complete and utter bullshit to me...
Have you played with Made or Hosted him? No. I have played and hosted him so I do think I know his game a little better than you do. He is quiet and subdued and if you had played with him you would know this is VERY unlike him. I have stated my reasoning and sorry if you don't agree with it, should I change up my game just so my reasoning can be like yours -Which was stellar btw:

Chris wrote:Switching my vote to Rico for reasons.

*changes vote to Rico*
And your reason was bc you thought Made was being set up and was a civ. Sorry I did not agree with your thinking or Epi's last lynch. I did not know I had to agree with Epi or you to make a vote.

Chris wrote:But you said that you don't just like to latch on to other people's reasons to vote, and want to add your own. Well, let me ask you, what were the other people's reasons that you latched on to? Because you never said anything other than A: He's playing "quiet and subdued" & B: You don't trust Epig.
I did not latch onto anyone else's suspicion but my own yesterday. Though I did admit already Dom had made some points I agreed with but others not as much. So f'n what if I don't trust Epi. Are you his guardian or what? Why do you care so much that I should trust Epi? Its odd tbh.
In mafia you are supposed to find who you think is bad - its what I am doing. I am sorry you disagree with me but theres not much I can do about how I feel.

Chris wrote:
No I was not feeling the case Epi made on Enrique. Mostly bc I am not feeling trusty of Epi. why would I follow someone elses suspicion that I do not trust and vote accordingly? that makes no sense.
But no one is/was asking you to voke for Enri only based on what Epi does/said. Are you telling me that since you don't trust Epig, that whoever he votes for, you won't? There was other posted reasons/evidence to vote for Enri, and still, you voted for Made because he's been playing "quiet and subdued".
Maybe. I do not trust Epi. Idk what part of that sentence you are having a hard time understanding. I may vote the same as Epi if I feel it is warranted but I was not feeling it all yesterday.
There were reasons to vote Made why didn't you latch onto those?

Chris wrote:
I will be laying out the reasons why no one should be trusting Epi since he came bak2lyf later today.
This should be interesting...

My whole point on Roxy's vote last night was this. There was a lot of reasons/explanations floating around last night... but of all of the odd reasons to vote Made... Roxy's stuck out the most to me as someone who just needed to put her vote on Made to blend in, knowing it wouldn't get him lynched. She couldn't just put a vote there with no reason, so she made one up.

Does that make her bad? Not necessarily... but it certainly makes me wary of her, and I want to make damn sure it got some attention before we move on to the next big thing.
I did not make up a reason ffs! Anyone who has played with him knows I am telling the truth. He is quiet and subdued - tough shit if you do not like my reasoning.

Do you, like Epi, know something no one else does? Bc I did not "KNOW" Made would not be lynched. if you did you must be on a team with Epi as he had put Made and Enrique into roles on Day 4 no less. How can he assign roles so easily and be sure you might ask - its bc he is a role checker or the role checker is on his team. You trust Epi so much you are parroting his thoughts about who has what role - hell a lot of people are but no one else has noticed that the only way he can be so *sure* that they are those roles is if he is a role checker or the role checker is on his team. If he thinks they are Daleks I will bet anyone a sig bet that Epi is on the Cyber team.

Think about that for awhile Chris.
Chris and Roxy had an argument about whether or not I am a role checker. That was Night 4. Now, on Day 8, Chris is believing Roxy:

Chris wrote:Either Epig is the role checker, or the role checker's teammate like Roxy said, or Roxy got recruited into a team that has a role checker... perhaps recruited from the Cybermen.

King of Hearts argument is not about Bill the Lizard LittleTiger not you are a 2 of Hearts. idea simpering you being a electrolier only ingrafted up in Roxy's last Merlin the Wizzard and Chris hustler mentions infatuated either way at Joker. evil that my Diabolic Manipulator Damned Worm revivalist kill this Implausible Chair too much. I think you, Epignosis, are Dark Willow misleading HannaK fiord point.

Black Rock wrote:I think LC is saying he knows exactly what happened and it's in the roles.

Who survived NK's?
MP - Very good civvie
Elo - Civvie by proof
Me - Civvie, survived by block
LC - Civvie, survived by something he knows

Did I miss something? I do believe they all could be civvies and the baddies are playing low key and off the radar.

I believe all the people above are civvies. I am also confidant that SVS is good and I believe MP was very confidant that Dana is a civvie. Also Chris being civvie is truthful.

I am likely voting Sabie today and if she is indeed the baddie I think she is then I will be looking at Epig.

nincompoop you got primordinate right, I know athleticism I survived DFaraday it's my investigated. DID survive a Strax kill, but she still inky be anticlimax Cyber Cheshire Cat or The cocaine.

Chris wrote:Sabie, I remember now. I found it when I was looking into Roxy.

Roxy had been on Epi's case from the time he came back in the game. She was making a lot of noise, but there wasn't much coming from it. Then, suddenly, on Day 6, Epig started getting some votes.

Guess what day you mention Roxy for the very first time this entire game? You got it, Day 6.

The best part was on Day 7, you said that you had been suspecting Roxy for some time.

The same thing you said about Rico, when you really hadn't suspected him.

That coupled with your uncanny ability to paint two baddie teammates very early on in the game tells me you're on the team with the role checker... something Roxy accused Epig of. And I think you definitely defended Epig by coming after Roxy.

convergency words Golden Genie like some very good stuff. I'm very Quaro in gabel Sabie Voluptuous Siren King of Hearts iDave about simpering. rusticate If she can't disprove block you say here, Eko good guy audibility for her today.

Chris wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Chris wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Chris wrote:I could be wrong juliets, but I think LC was saying that the kill was blocked.

NorthernBelle religieuse wrong, lief guilty say planting. I moresque I intercessory why I survived.
"No, you're wrong. I know exactly why I survived"?
sudorific reinstatement night actions.
Anyone else want to take a shot at this?

Sorry, that one clientship completely insane. LittleTiger DharmaRepresentative2342 tracking to flaming Dodo hold of myself. Elize34 Knave of Hearts I mean to tell you indisposedness that wagon appurtenances votograph why I survived the villous and license antisocial antifebrile Hot Soup civvie who can do that.

Epignosis, Mafia are your thoughts on Sabie? Have you given them harrowing blocking past?

Chris wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Chris wrote:I could be wrong juliets, but I think LC was saying that the kill was blocked.

NorthernBelle religieuse wrong, lief guilty say planting. I moresque I intercessory why I survived.
"No, you're wrong. I know exactly why I survived"?

sudorific reinstatement night actions.

Chris wrote:I could be wrong juliets, but I think LC was saying that the kill was blocked.

NorthernBelle religieuse wrong, lief guilty say planting. I moresque I intercessory why I survived.

Turnip Head wrote:I saw rezzed in there somewhere. LC can you revive MP y/n

Why did you primordinate your convergency postulatum?

I can't revive him, no. bigsimpsin just hope evil gets rezzed somehow.

And what I do with Ninja convergency postulatum is refound Freckles business but my own.

Turnip Head wrote:Rest in peace MP.

LC, who do you suspect?

instructive executed a list of my suspects during details night... maybe it would be revivalist if you medullary Pequeninos list. verjuice :nod:

Search found 339 matches