In what world does Urist's alleged level of seriousness equate to chopping me?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:36 am If Urist is serious about the vault city post we should still chop LC I think
Search found 294 matches
Return to “Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]”
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:21 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
So literally the exact same thing I scumread Esooa for. Yet you acted like that was outrageous. Nanny fuck what's up?c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:27 amFake read: A read that isn't realLong Con wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:43 amWhat do you mean "fake read"? Why is that wolfy? What is "Nani the fuck"?c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:49 am Still catching up.
Nani the fuck you picked the single least vague post I've made in this entire thread to call vague. Fake read sir.
Wolfy: Dom wasn't actually trying to evaluate me but was acting like he was
Nani the fuck: Wtf
There's nothing incorrect about Dom's post. "I played games in places, and uh, I try to read posts." LOL yeah that's not vague at all. You're the fake one, Seefore.
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:45 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
Sloonei, Dom town. Esooa mafia. Alison/Joseph unaligned. Daisy town. C4 mafia. Poison town.
Heading to work.
Heading to work.
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:43 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
Catching wolves? I say do it loud and proud!
What do you mean "fake read"? Why is that wolfy? What is "Nani the fuck"?c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:49 am Still catching up.
Nani the fuck you picked the single least vague post I've made in this entire thread to call vague. Fake read sir.
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:04 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
Approved!staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:55 pmit usually results in people being suspicious of me for not outing my readsLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:53 pmHow do secret reads you don't share provoke discussion?staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:44 pmthe thing is - i do the "I Have Secret Reads That I'm Not Gonna Share Yet" is a maneuver that i do very commonly as either alignmentSloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:17 pmMy concern, as TSP alludes to, is that spf's secret town reads maneuver is something I do often, and notably did in the Champs Finale to the frustration of about half the roster. Part of me feels like spf is mirroring my town meta here, maybe unconsciously, as a way to earn my trust.staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:03 pm two primary reasons:
1. cloaking my townreads in ambiguity almost always gets interesting and telling interactions out of people. in this case, i think that foresight's intense amount of stress that only grew larger as i refused to directly answer his question is likely to come from a town indicative place. his irritation felt completely authentic- i honestly don't think that foresight would care that much at all if he was playing from a scum mindset
2. one of my early townleans was on you, but i felt uncomfortable outing that early into the game for a number of reasons. (partially out of the vanity of not wanting to be wrong). the other was on foresight
We have played... three? games together. Two were in the Champs setting (both town/town), and more recently we were scum partners in Grasslands here on The Syndicate. When we've been town together, we were both distinctly aware of one another (I think. I was aware of her, at least) because our playstyles are similar. I would expect a mafia staypositivefriend to be hyper aware of my perception of her in this game, in what would be the first game we've ever been aligned opposite each other. So kicking the game off by doing a combative thing that Town Sloonei does for attention would be a viable way to do that.
Except, like Foresight says, there really wasn't much call for that play here. When I did it in Champs, the thread was moving at a breakneck pace, but I felt it was lacking traction. I did it to slow things down and get people to focus on particular issues. This thread was not moving at a fast pace when spf dropped her post. If anything, it needed more spiciness.
I'm also unclear why she was hesitant to declare a town read on me a half hour ago, but is comfortable doing so now.
i did it in grasslands when we were teamed together, i did it in the rock falls invitational game when i was town, and i even did it multiple times in champs. it's just a style of scumhunting/provoking discussion that i really like doing, and i think it's a mistake to assume that this tactic that i do incredibly often of my own accord is something that i'm doing to appeal specifically to ~you~. truthfully, i didn't even associate that tactic with your playstyle at all
i would probably be incredibly aware about your perception of me if i rolled mafia against you, but your analysis implies a depth of thought that i haven't actually put into my posts so far.
my choice to withhold my reads provoked a lengthy discussion that we are still discussing right now 5 pages later - do you not agree that this might be more valuable than if i had simply said: "i townlean foresight and sloonei' and left it at that?
or people trying to guess what reads i have, which can be a good way into tricking people into sharing reads that they weren't consciously prepared to out
or people trying to badger me into outing my reads, which can be alignment indicative within itself (and i think it was for foresight)
in any case, it usually gets more interesting reactions than if i just say: "i townlean x'. it's the same reason why i like self-voting in RVS
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
How do secret reads you don't share provoke discussion?staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:44 pmthe thing is - i do the "I Have Secret Reads That I'm Not Gonna Share Yet" is a maneuver that i do very commonly as either alignmentSloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:17 pmMy concern, as TSP alludes to, is that spf's secret town reads maneuver is something I do often, and notably did in the Champs Finale to the frustration of about half the roster. Part of me feels like spf is mirroring my town meta here, maybe unconsciously, as a way to earn my trust.staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:03 pm two primary reasons:
1. cloaking my townreads in ambiguity almost always gets interesting and telling interactions out of people. in this case, i think that foresight's intense amount of stress that only grew larger as i refused to directly answer his question is likely to come from a town indicative place. his irritation felt completely authentic- i honestly don't think that foresight would care that much at all if he was playing from a scum mindset
2. one of my early townleans was on you, but i felt uncomfortable outing that early into the game for a number of reasons. (partially out of the vanity of not wanting to be wrong). the other was on foresight
We have played... three? games together. Two were in the Champs setting (both town/town), and more recently we were scum partners in Grasslands here on The Syndicate. When we've been town together, we were both distinctly aware of one another (I think. I was aware of her, at least) because our playstyles are similar. I would expect a mafia staypositivefriend to be hyper aware of my perception of her in this game, in what would be the first game we've ever been aligned opposite each other. So kicking the game off by doing a combative thing that Town Sloonei does for attention would be a viable way to do that.
Except, like Foresight says, there really wasn't much call for that play here. When I did it in Champs, the thread was moving at a breakneck pace, but I felt it was lacking traction. I did it to slow things down and get people to focus on particular issues. This thread was not moving at a fast pace when spf dropped her post. If anything, it needed more spiciness.
I'm also unclear why she was hesitant to declare a town read on me a half hour ago, but is comfortable doing so now.
i did it in grasslands when we were teamed together, i did it in the rock falls invitational game when i was town, and i even did it multiple times in champs. it's just a style of scumhunting/provoking discussion that i really like doing, and i think it's a mistake to assume that this tactic that i do incredibly often of my own accord is something that i'm doing to appeal specifically to ~you~. truthfully, i didn't even associate that tactic with your playstyle at all
i would probably be incredibly aware about your perception of me if i rolled mafia against you, but your analysis implies a depth of thought that i haven't actually put into my posts so far.
my choice to withhold my reads provoked a lengthy discussion that we are still discussing right now 5 pages later - do you not agree that this might be more valuable than if i had simply said: "i townlean foresight and sloonei' and left it at that?
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:16 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
Oh come on now
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:05 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
This is the Documentary Channel, C3P0.c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:03 pmMy satire radar is in need of repair, I'll need some help here.Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pmI have a theory: she doesn't like that I correctly called her out as scum, and is motivated to get discussion moving elsewhere, with her as the towny discussion motivator.Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pmWhat is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"
I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be
but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:04 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:02 pmyou're right I had an interest in not talking about your read. Mostly because it was bad and annoying meLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pmI have a theory: she doesn't like that I correctly called her out as scum, and is motivated to get discussion moving elsewhere, with her as the towny discussion motivator.Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pmWhat is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"
I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be
but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
I have a theory: she doesn't like that I correctly called her out as scum, and is motivated to get discussion moving elsewhere, with her as the towny discussion motivator.Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:56 pmWhat is your motivation for pursuing this discussion to the extent that you are?Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:55 pm as for the "there wasn't an organic reason to do it"
I'm not so sure about that. Honestly, calling attention to your reads in such a way I almost always dislike; it just feels showy to be
but it's also something that I've seen come from town *at least* as often as scum
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:38 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:35 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:34 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:32 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:30 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
Are you trying to make me happy?
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:30 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:29 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
I don't even see where KZA is actually discussing her alignment. He's discussing her usual role preference. I don't know if he townreads her or not.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:27 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
That is not what it shows. It shows I care about whether posts are genuine or not, and that I don't find Esooa's posts genuine.c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:25 pmThe read makes perfect sense to me. Esooa's saying KZA is playing pro-town in a way that doesn't look overly manufactured. Your latching onto this instance of her using two words with contrasting dictionary definitions shows that you don't care about actually evaluating her and just want a read to point to in case someone says you haven't been doing anything. [VOTE: Long Con] aubergineLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:18 pmAgain, that would indicate it's not a real read. Like wolves. Have to make up reads.c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:17 pmOkay cool you found what looks like a contradiction if you squint now say what's actually scum-indicative about it.Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:13 pmNow you seem to be contradicting yourself.Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:11 pmyes, the discussion is relating to my alignment, or you know, solving. And the off handed nature of it is why it's genuine. He did it because he wanted to. He didn't have any clear goal with his readLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:07 pmWhich discussion? Whether you prefer scum roles or not? It's towny to want to delve deeper into that? Was he even doing that?? His comment sounds quite offhanded to me, not indicative of "genuine want for discussion" or an opposition to it. Are you sure this is a real read?
How can he display a motive of genuine want for discussion and also have no clear goal with his read?
[VOTE: esooa] aubergine You're being fishy.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
Mostly I'm pretty casual about things, moreso than most on Day 1. People fire off suspicions all the time all Day long and I don't see most of them as convincing. Sometimes I get them too. Am I doing it wrong??
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:23 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:22 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
Question my coolness or question my alignment???
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:22 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:21 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:20 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:19 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
I guess now he knows better.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:18 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
Again, that would indicate it's not a real read. Like wolves. Have to make up reads.c4e5g3d5 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:17 pmOkay cool you found what looks like a contradiction if you squint now say what's actually scum-indicative about it.Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:13 pmNow you seem to be contradicting yourself.Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:11 pmyes, the discussion is relating to my alignment, or you know, solving. And the off handed nature of it is why it's genuine. He did it because he wanted to. He didn't have any clear goal with his readLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:07 pmWhich discussion? Whether you prefer scum roles or not? It's towny to want to delve deeper into that? Was he even doing that?? His comment sounds quite offhanded to me, not indicative of "genuine want for discussion" or an opposition to it. Are you sure this is a real read?Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:03 pmkza town read is cause of this post where he very casually gave information to defend me
towny because he felt prompted to say something in it without a clear motive
so I figure the motive is a genuine want for discussion
How can he display a motive of genuine want for discussion and also have no clear goal with his read?
[VOTE: esooa] aubergine You're being fishy.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
Like, you don't even consider that it's a casual pocket attempt?Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:15 pmyou don't really get what I'm saying soLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:13 pmNow you seem to be contradicting yourself.Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:11 pmyes, the discussion is relating to my alignment, or you know, solving. And the off handed nature of it is why it's genuine. He did it because he wanted to. He didn't have any clear goal with his readLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:07 pmWhich discussion? Whether you prefer scum roles or not? It's towny to want to delve deeper into that? Was he even doing that?? His comment sounds quite offhanded to me, not indicative of "genuine want for discussion" or an opposition to it. Are you sure this is a real read?Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:03 pmkza town read is cause of this post where he very casually gave information to defend me
towny because he felt prompted to say something in it without a clear motive
so I figure the motive is a genuine want for discussion
How can he display a motive of genuine want for discussion and also have no clear goal with his read?
[VOTE: esooa] aubergine You're being fishy.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 0]
I knew I had extended too far. Joseph.MacDougall wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:13 pmYou like Esooa's actual reasons better than my post that contained nothing? And felt the need to express that?Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:11 pmHmmm.. maybe. I like it better than Mac's take.Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:08 pmI scum read sloonei for this post. Saying someone is towny for something like mentioning masons being implicit town perspective just seems fake. It's a completely normal and easy thing to do, that I don't really feel like portrays a towny perspective the way sloonei does.
LC mafia. Ez game.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
Now you seem to be contradicting yourself.Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:11 pmyes, the discussion is relating to my alignment, or you know, solving. And the off handed nature of it is why it's genuine. He did it because he wanted to. He didn't have any clear goal with his readLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:07 pmWhich discussion? Whether you prefer scum roles or not? It's towny to want to delve deeper into that? Was he even doing that?? His comment sounds quite offhanded to me, not indicative of "genuine want for discussion" or an opposition to it. Are you sure this is a real read?
How can he display a motive of genuine want for discussion and also have no clear goal with his read?
[VOTE: esooa] aubergine You're being fishy.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 0]
Hmmm.. maybe. I like it better than Mac's take.Esooa wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:08 pmI scum read sloonei for this post. Saying someone is towny for something like mentioning masons being implicit town perspective just seems fake. It's a completely normal and easy thing to do, that I don't really feel like portrays a towny perspective the way sloonei does.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:09 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
Poison wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:08 pmRe: poisen and LC mafiaLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:04 pmI think you should look again, mine are all 100% pure town. Wine from the towny vine, and steaks from purebred town cows, raised in Town.Urist wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:47 pmTheir posts are bad.
I guess you agree on c4 since you didn't ask about that one
No, I don't believe he is.
CHAOS!!!!!!!
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
Which discussion? Whether you prefer scum roles or not? It's towny to want to delve deeper into that? Was he even doing that?? His comment sounds quite offhanded to me, not indicative of "genuine want for discussion" or an opposition to it. Are you sure this is a real read?
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:04 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
Sounds like a threat.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:04 pmafter that game three people tried it in other games and it didn't work so well for themPoison wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:02 pmWait you are still alive? Aren't you supposed to get lynched the moment you say mafia or "maphia"TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:01 pm I owe someone a thing. I was going to do this before eod0 but then I fell asleep. The best laid plans...
pros: limited
cons: f3 thrower
gameplan: sheep smart people then make a passionate case on d3 and get a townie chopped
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:04 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
I think you should look again, mine are all 100% pure town. Wine from the towny vine, and steaks from purebred town cows, raised in Town.Urist wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:47 pmTheir posts are bad.
I guess you agree on c4 since you didn't ask about that one
No, I don't believe he is.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Day 1]
If I'm already outed as town, what kind of fakeclaim should I give to deceive the wolves? Just claim vanilla?
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 12:24 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:46 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:13 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
- Sat Feb 27, 2021 7:26 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [AMERICA RISES]
- Replies: 9117
- Views: 201552
Re: Fallout 2: A Post-Nuclear Mafia Game [Pre-game]
Pros: Most likely to scumslip if mafia
Cons: Long
Gameplan: Read along and shake my head until someone does something that triggers me, proceed into tunnel
Misc.: Gameplay improves as game progresses
Cons: Long
Gameplan: Read along and shake my head until someone does something that triggers me, proceed into tunnel
Misc.: Gameplay improves as game progresses