"well certainly not me"... I was chill, you said WHAA. Who overreacted?Porscha wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 9:26 pmokay... what did you not agree with thenLong Con wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 9:24 pmOk, sorry. I just don't agree with most of what you said.Porscha wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 9:21 pmyou know I came into this determined to not tunnel you like I did last time, and you're making it really hard for me to not follow my instinctsLong Con wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 8:57 pmCool story, I'm more into non-fiction though.Porscha wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 8:55 pmwell certainly not me lol, you specifically took my general comment and asked about yourself like you're worried that I was including you and when I did (very casually too), you omgus'd me and took it up a notch with a vote xd you seem overly worried about your position since it isn't like you argued with me about the threadstate or the 2 reads I did make, you made it about you instead
"asked about yourself like you're worried that I was including you" There was no indication of worry, that's something you're trying to inject. You said I howled and I was interested to know where.
"you omgus'd me" meaningless catchall term for any time someone votes for a player who suspects them. So no. "Generally performative" is the weakest thing I ever heard, and you knew it, so you tried to handwave it to "general threadstate". Like I told you, it feels fake.
"you seem overly worried about your position" Again, there's no point in this game where I have "seemed overly worried" about anything. I know this is true because I'm not worried at all. This is you trying to make me appear to exhibit negative qualities that aren't real.
"it isn't like you argued with me about the threadstate or the 2 reads I did make, you made it about you instead" This is how I play. This is how I interact with the game, at least in the early stages.
That's what I didn't agree with.
