Return to “Barry Lyndon - Endgame”
Opinion noted.Epignosis wrote:My opinion is in.Long Con wrote:Good point on the low poster thing, S~V~S. I may have to put my vote on sig for not paying enough attention to get that right. That's a baddie indicator to me.
About an hour left to vote! Right now, my aim is at sig... but I'm here till the deadline, so I'll hold off on the hard vote until I see more opinions coming in.
Well that's cool, but like I said before, we don't have BTSC.Sorsha wrote:The LC/Serge dragon thing- It's possible they do have BTSC and decided to see who they could rile up for a reaction. There is just as much civ bts this game as there is mafia though. I don’t think prodding someone or fishing for reactions is something only mafia do. They deserve to have an eye kept on them for sure but I don't plan on voting for either of them today.
I feel like he's Civ. Unless he's known for playing in a wacky way as his usual meta (which I'm not familiar with), I think his "vote with any leading bandwagon" statement isn't one a baddie would likely make. Also, he kept going with the dragon thing, whereas if he and I were bad and it was a BTSC faux pas, he'd be more likely to want to sweep it under the rug.Scotty wrote:What do you think of Serge?
Well, the reactions are still ongoing, though I do admit that adding the dragon part has soured it a bit, because it made the focus be on that.S~V~S wrote:And what did it tell you?Long Con wrote:Just to see how you would react, and to get some discussion going.S~V~S wrote:Why were you taunting me?
That doesn't make sense, calling it "much more believable than the linki business". I would not have had a hanging quote with no meaning, I would have had "And actually, I find this to be much more believable than the linki business. You would have had a hanging quote with no meaning had you NOT "added" that sentence.
Getting nervous, S~V~S?" all by itself. Then I saw a similar sentiment in Serge's post, and riffed off that as a nod to the similar sentiment.
"I didn't think it needed a linki tag, considering it was after the post that Serge made. I thought you would just read it as it was, chronologically with Serge's, and just "get it". I don't know why you would call it a "coincidental" dragon, because it was not coincidence at all, it was me reading Serge's post in linkitis, and adding a sentence to my post as a nod to his post. If you think that's what coincidence is, then you need to rethink your understanding of the word. "Rushed" is mildly acceptable. I did just jam it in there after writing my complete post.Scotty wrote:You had a "slip" about knowing Daisy's role in Downton Abbey that sig harped on for some time- this turned out to be a misunderstanding and was not a slip at all.
But the way you explained this one makes it seem like you rushed your coincidental "dragon" which I am much less inclined to believe, considering it wasn't included with a linki. It's like you ordered an omelette and half way through the chef making your omelette, he realized he forgot the egg, so he throws in an egg- shell and all- into the pan, so you end up with some ghetto-ass egg monster on your plate.
It's unlikely is all I'm sayin
Just to see how you would react, and to get some discussion going.S~V~S wrote:Why were you taunting me?
Epignosis wrote:Long Con wrote:Or, I saw his post in linki, and added a sentence to my own?S~V~S wrote:I guess i just found it interesting to be referred to with a dragon metaphor by two different people within a few minutes
I thought I might have been missing a film related link to dragons.
The first part is a response to Serge.Long Con wrote:That's not possible, there is a specific rule against role-outing and such things.Serge wrote: I believe Barry Lyndon should come out now and help us get rid of the captains. Come out Barry. We have fancy cakes and teas and potatoes and stuff all Victorian people like. Plus, monoliths. Here, Barry, Barry, we promise we don't have an axe somewhere.
S~V~S wrote:OK, if you say so. I don't think you can, but shoot. Put it out there.
That false-ending poll made some cool stuff happen, made Epi and sig reveal their hands early.
Do either of you expect to be casting your vote at your chosen targets by tomorrow's deadline?
The third part is a general comment about sig and me.
That middle part is calling S~V~S a dragon within a minute of Serge doing so. You would have us believe
You claim you saw Serge's post when you tried to post, and that you added a sentence. You weren't saying anything else to S~V~S but "Getting nervous, S~V~S?" and you felt the need to go out of your way to add the dragon comment in between two unrelated thoughts? I don't buy your explanation.
Well, yes. I was taunting S~V~S, and then I saw his post with the dragon in linki, and then I thought of deleting it altogether because he kind of beat me to the punch, and then I added the dragon part as a nod to his post in a quick way.Or, I saw his post in linki, and added a sentence to my own?S~V~S wrote:I guess i just found it interesting to be referred to with a dragon metaphor by two different people within a few minutes
I thought I might have been missing a film related link to dragons.
That's not possible, there is a specific rule against role-outing and such things.Serge wrote:I believe Barry Lyndon should come out now and help us get rid of the captains. Come out Barry. We have fancy cakes and teas and potatoes and stuff all Victorian people like. Plus, monoliths. Here, Barry, Barry, we promise we don't have an axe somewhere.
S~V~S wrote:OK, if you say so. I don't think you can, but shoot. Put it out there.
Getting nervous, S~V~S? Is the dragon coming out?
Good enough for me.sig wrote:Why wouldn't they?Long Con wrote:Well hey, if either of them does some obvious scumslip, all bets are off, of course.
There's a baddie role that has BTSC with Civ role. What reason does he have to ever go in there?
I'm not sure I like LCs Sorsha thoughts. I understand it, but after getting mafia so often it makes me think probability wise she is more likely to get it then other players. :P
I don't plan to lynch her today though.
Because he Gambler's Fallacy'd me. It was humour-based.sig wrote:Sorry for multi posts, LC why did you place a fake vote on DF?Long Con wrote:Fake-Vote DFaraday
You're right about BWT, and Sorsha has had a lot of bad roles lately, so I'm going to assume she's not bad to start this one.a2thezebra wrote:I get BWT being a common Day 1 lynch target and all but what about Sorsha?
'Tis but a traditional Irish greeting, nothing more. Don't make me waggle my shillelagh at ye!Scotty wrote:Lol Epi gonna Epi.
This sounds like a captain tryin to fit in with the peasants, don't it?Long Con wrote:Top o' the morning to ye all!
