The Syndicate

Dom wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 12:47 pm
Dom wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 12:41 pm Let me tell ya something. that shit isn't straight at all.
it's gayer than me.
Also laugh at this i am hilarious

Don't worry, while catching up I had to read that post out loud so BR would hear it and also laugh.

Dom wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 10:49 am No one else finds it weird that Jay went to an office at 1AM and then at 3AM went to bed?
No one?

I just assumed he was not on Eastern Standard Time.

Fayt has not posted at all in Day 3. Silenced?

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 9:20 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 9:15 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 9:06 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:59 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:54 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 4:26 pm Wow, that was unexpected and awesome. RIP TSP and sprityo.
However this is a lot worse at face value than Jay's immediate reaction which felt more genuine.

Ughhh

Eh?
Just made me laugh... your "Ughhh", and just the fact that you would read into that post at all.
Reactions to mafia flips have caught mafia many a time. You know this very well. Why are you laughing

... again, "Ughhh" from you is a funny reaction and it made me laugh.

I made that post for a reason, and it wasn't because I'm a baddie somehow trying to seem natural and Civvish.

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 9:06 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:59 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:54 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 4:26 pm Wow, that was unexpected and awesome. RIP TSP and sprityo.
However this is a lot worse at face value than Jay's immediate reaction which felt more genuine.

Ughhh

Eh?

Just made me laugh... your "Ughhh", and just the fact that you would read into that post at all.

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:54 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 4:26 pm Wow, that was unexpected and awesome. RIP TSP and sprityo.
However this is a lot worse at face value than Jay's immediate reaction which felt more genuine.

Ughhh

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:08 pm I'm feeling it's LC.

It's not me, nut.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 7:05 pm Worthy of thought.

Rej lynched by a single vote on day 1.

Flipped wolf on his wagon.

Why did Speedchuck not just vote for LC?

It looks like speedchuck was gone from the thread before the LC thing really became viable.

Wow, that was unexpected and awesome. RIP TSP and sprityo.

Yeah, she was on me before switching off silently at some point in the last hour or two.

That was certainly not role-fishing. I don't see how it couold be. No one can give role indications at all, by the rules... and even if they could, I would not expect a rolechecker to just admit it.

The fact that one of the two baddies left tricks rolecheckers is something I wasn't thinking about. Originally, the post was going to be just A and B, and before I posted I thought, "Are there other options I could list?" It was a spontaneous addition, foolish in retrospect.

Michelle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:35 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:31 pm
Michelle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:30 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:11 pm I don't think I tend to put a lot of energy into *seeming* Civilian.
You don't need a lot of energy for that. You need just a villagery sparkle.
Yeah, but I'm too belligerent. I ain't dancing.
Let's ask the dictionary:

belligerent

/bəˈlɪdʒ(ə)r(ə)nt/

adjective

hostile and aggressive.

You are not belligerent.You are anti-belligerent.
Learn dance tbh. It brings joy in life.

I would say I am belligerent toward the idea of trying to act a certain way, just to appear towny.

Ok, well, you can: a) take my word for it. This solution is the most expedient, in keeping with your "ASAP" desire... or b) keep voting me until enough votes come in to ensure my lynch. This solution will leave you with no more doubts, but carries very unfortunate consequences.

c) if you're a rolechecker type, check me! This solution fails if you are not one of those.

Michelle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:30 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:11 pm I don't think I tend to put a lot of energy into *seeming* Civilian.
You don't need a lot of energy for that. You need just a villagery sparkle.

Yeah, but I'm too belligerent. I ain't dancing.

Michelle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:24 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:04 pm
Michelle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:49 pm How acts Long Con?
What defines you as either alignament?

Who are in your Poe?
I act how I act. I don't do a lot of Mafia self-reflection, I just say what comes to my mind. I'm pretty laid-back, but I can start throwing things around at times when the level of ignoring me gets high enough.

I don't have a POE.
If you are villager and I can't see you villager i will be very sad because that means i am an idiot voting for you.
How come you don't have a Poe. I am voting you. Am i a good one?
You are voting. The one you're voting is not in your Poe?

Using Process of Elimination is just one of many methods of playing this game. It's not my method.

If one is an idiot for being unable to tell who's mafia and who's villager with every vote, then I guess we're all idiots. Right? I don't get why you would be so hard on yourself for being unable to easily put me in a category.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:14 pm Long Con, who are your suspects apart from myself? If you already said so please point the way.

I'm still down with lynching Dragomir. Epignosis has pinged me a couple of times. Not Fayt. Not Mac. Dom.... I'd lynch Epi over Dom I think. I think nutella's ok.

Sprityo...I see the perspective Dom gave on his "unjustly lynched in other game" post. I don't know if he'd be that ham-fisted here if he were a cat. I probably won't vote for him.

I don't think I tend to put a lot of energy into *seeming* Civilian.

Michelle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:49 pm How acts Long Con?
What defines you as either alignament?

Who are in your Poe?

I act how I act. I don't do a lot of Mafia self-reflection, I just say what comes to my mind. I'm pretty laid-back, but I can start throwing things around at times when the level of ignoring me gets high enough.

I don't have a POE.

Michelle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:14 pm
sprityo wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:53 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:49 pm [VOTE: sprityo] aubergine
do it bitch
why so rude?

Semi-classic Syndicate catchphrase.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:32 pm Also, the “gamble” incident to me is just Rej projecting a civilian flip. Long Con is a “riskier” lynch, and it’s a “gamble” we can afford to take. When the flip returns civilian: “welp, I guess that’s the luck of the dice”.

Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:05 pmI like that point about calling me a "gamble". Sounds like subconscious baddie-speak for "It's going to be a Civ lynch".

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:10 pm I feel like I’m talking to brick walls regarding LC. Someone please engage what I said just a bit ago.

I liked it.

Michelle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:09 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:02 pm
Michelle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 11:07 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 10:41 am And if JJJ is scum then that makes two baddies you have defended.
i defended you too pretty much. If you are scum the second part of your sentence is still valid.

You lack something. Townish anger at my vote. Your tone is bland.
Unfortunately i don't have meta so i take it like it may be a wrong take from me. *shrugs
I feel pretty bland about it. I'm not going to get angry, vote me if you like.
this is not villagery

I tend to act like Long Con in either alignment.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:29 pmThe whole “it was coordinated distancing” spiel does not hold water for me.

I don't recall doing anything that resembled "coordinated" that Day.

sprityo wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:12 pm Do you like ties?

I like ties, but not when I'm involved in them.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:05 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:02 pm [VOTE: nutella] aubergine
Tell me more go Grease Lightning

Now that you mention it, your lack of Grease-related understanding earlier suspicious. Like, you were too aware of how you were presenting yourself and reacting to get the joke. Hard to explain... best I have is the way Watson caught the guy in Sherlock Holmes: Game of Shadows. He was so focused on acting a certain way that he didn't leave room for surprise reactions, so when Watson broke a glass or something he was the only one who didn't react. Something like that.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:01 pm LC, nutella, Sprit, TSP, Dragomir, and Michelle. JJJ can be subbed in for either of the last two if I'm wrong about the reliability of character calls.

Oh no is it a salad

@JaggedJimmyJay It's your favorite, POE! Come get it, boy. *whistles*

I'm surprised to see the ways people get themselves to believe that the Day 1 lynch incriminates me rather than the opposite. I thought I'd be more at risk of a nightkill after that, not a lynch.

Michelle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 11:07 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 10:41 am And if JJJ is scum then that makes two baddies you have defended.
i defended you too pretty much. If you are scum the second part of your sentence is still valid.

You lack something. Townish anger at my vote. Your tone is bland.
Unfortunately i don't have meta so i take it like it may be a wrong take from me. *shrugs

I feel pretty bland about it. I'm not going to get angry, vote me if you like.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 11:46 am This whole nightkill analysis based on character, devotion to the site and out-of-game closeness to TH is kinda angleshooty.

I know I can't condemn it, as I got caught up in it and the Mac/JJJ go has changed my perception a great deal, but I thought I'd put that out there.

Also, I've been on teams where I just don't give input to the kill, due to not being around, or not wanting my own personal stuff to influence game decisions for my team.

And if JJJ is scum then that makes two baddies you have defended.

LOL I'm not hiding behind anyone, that's not something I do. I just don't need to reiterate points that someone else already made very clearly.

Michelle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:04 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:39 am
Spoiler: show

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 6:44 pm I'll see what Long Con has to say for himself.
I am a dog. What more is there?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 7:51 pm I didn't "give up" the last time. I was caught. Doing anything else would have wasted everyone's time. I do not believe in wasting people's time.

If you want something to chew on, how about this: I would not condone the killing of Turnip Head Night 1. I don't kill the ones I've missed so soon.
Me too. And nutella. And Dom.

Dragomir wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 8:53 pm Now here is why I find LC to be bad. First is this post right here. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 38#p555038. This right here is a clear cut soft defense that LC tried to create. He tries using the opinion of Michelle to support Rej when Jay voted for him. I find such an attempt very weak based on the fact that Michelle's town read on Rej shouldn't matter to how he reads or Jay reads Rej. Since when do players just town read someone cause somebody else did? It's not like Michelle had info on Rej. It's an incredible wink link and really has no purpose behind it besides supporting/saving Rej. He tried and failed. Because he failed, he moves on to vote for Rej. I find this to be a distancing attempt. Rej is most likely to be lynched so drop the vote and look better for it. The vote is out of nowhere when LC had made no mention of any remote suspicion of Rej. Nothing at all. Hell, it's more likely that he town read Rej based on the post I linked here.

Now moving on to Rej's posts. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 99#p554999. Here, he brings up LC for the first time. There's a rushed tone to it. Like Rej just realized that he should mention his buddy in a bad light of sorts and try to create some distancing. It's what he did, whether or not it was distancing or just fake reads is up to you. Next, he votes for LC. Rej didn't want to save himself, he could have done that a long time ago by hopping on my wagon. No, he took the prime opportunity to distance. That's really all I can see from his vote on LC. Just how I feel about it.
Enh, I was just conversing using what I had in my mind. I thought Michelle's meta read on Rej sounded believable... there were pages that I caught up on in skimmish mode, and I wanted to make conversation with something current/relevant. It was quite the wink link though.
Spoiler: show

Epi's post about JJJ is how I feel. That whole schmeck at the end of Day 1 is mondo garbo as they say.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 11:47 pm Epignosis is probably a dog. I am juggling around thoughts to the contrary in my brain, and the one that I find recurring is "Epi is cranky about last game and wants to mislynch me this time", which is

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:04 am Dragomir has my vote currently.
Got a twinge of suspicion on Epi here for this... he's been going hard against JJJ for pages, and then goes for Dragomir (who I know he also expressed suspicion for). Feels a bit like "How To Act Civ: Don't tunnel! Keep an open mind and multiple suspicions going". Not enough to flip my axis on the Epi-or-JJJ front, if such a thing exists. And I know no one wants to turn Day 2 into one of those situations, but I say what I say.

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:11 amWhere's Long Con?
Trying to catch up and also watch El Camino. This has been a lot of posts, you prolific fuckers.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:23 am I actually thought Long Con was being at least a little facetious there.

@Long Con have a go.
Yes, that sounds accurate. Also, the stuff I said earlier in this post, something about going with what I had in mind, trying to be a little bit relevant with an opinion I had formed through a skim-read.

nutella wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:18 am Good lord this thread exploded
I know right?

I'll [VOTE: JJJ] aubergine
Please explain the bolded Long Con, i really don't understand why are you so understanding towards me. Feels TMI-stic...

And because your vote looks like a whim i need an explanation for it. Thanks

I don't really see how the bold statement could be considered TMI, since the statement where you defended Rej was proven wrong. I don't really know him and it sounded like you do.

My vote for JJJ is best explained by epignosis' big post against him, but also by a few of my own responses last night as well. JJJ's behaviour at the end of day one get most players lynched automatically, but he talks so much that's it's hard to break through, which I believe is part of his strategy.

Michelle, what do the terms TR and SR mean?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:06 am My reads are pretty in flux at this point. I feel quite good about Epignosis, Dom, Long Con, and TSP. I think Mac and nova generally look fine. I think Dragomir looks good, but he also feels like a potential blind spot. I think Fayt looks bad, but she also feels like a potential blind spot. Michelle, nutella, and speedchuck are swing reads. sprityo is nothing and thus bad.

If I were to draw up a POE of 4 (I think we're allowed more at this stage) right this moment, it'd be the last four names there.

Dragomir is the proverbial fourth name in this extended player salad. JJJ and Dragomir are my top suspects. Good night.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:59 am I take pride in my ability to extract abstraction from text. I once proposed, facetiously, a job in which I am responsible for mediating between messengers in dating sites/apps to help people avoid silly misinterpretation and miss obvious cues. I wonder why I never got that job.

I'd hire you.

nutella wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:52 am
MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:20 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:20 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:06 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:05 pm bleh [VOTE: Rej] aubergine
But Michelle says Rej is Civ.
I am going to veto a Long Con lynch.

This post here is not Rej's teammate.
What are you talking about, that is literally him using a third party to try to hard defend Rej? That's like the most teammate indicative shit ever lol.
Lol yeah I'm with mac on this one. Don't see how you could use that to clear LC in the slightest.

Probably right, though I liked Epi's opinion there anyway. There could be aspects of Epi being bad, and knowing how terribly inclined I usually am to suspect him, so a scrap of buddying is thrown my way to placate me. I can only imagine how much of a landmine I must be to him when he's bad, even though I don't usually get a big following when I go after him.

As for my comment there... I dunno, if I were bad, maybe I'd try to phrase that with a bit more oomph? Like, take Michelle's point and expand on it, or try to prove it's valid? Like JJJ said, it had a strong facetious element... which is something that bolsters my suspicion of him, in a TMI kind of way.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:50 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:48 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:46 am I think Long Con is fine.
Yes.
I'd appreciate it if you could take a quick look at my Michelle and sprityo reviews at the very start of this day phase. Rej treated them uniquely, and I want some input.

I can do that if I get up tomorrow and the thread isn't filled with new stuff I am compelled to interact with as a higher priority. Right now it's too bedtime for me to do that.

EBWOP "To" the people I mentioned...

Sorry, JJJ, you don't fit the criteria of "who wouldn't kill TH" in my books. The people I mentioned, TH is an old friend, a highly valued player for both nostalgic and personal reasons. You just don't have the past with him to qualify.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:46 am I think Long Con is fine.

Yes.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 6:44 pm I'll see what Long Con has to say for himself.

I am a dog. What more is there?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 7:51 pm I didn't "give up" the last time. I was caught. Doing anything else would have wasted everyone's time. I do not believe in wasting people's time.

If you want something to chew on, how about this: I would not condone the killing of Turnip Head Night 1. I don't kill the ones I've missed so soon.

Me too. And nutella. And Dom.

Dragomir wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 8:53 pm Now here is why I find LC to be bad. First is this post right here. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 38#p555038. This right here is a clear cut soft defense that LC tried to create. He tries using the opinion of Michelle to support Rej when Jay voted for him. I find such an attempt very weak based on the fact that Michelle's town read on Rej shouldn't matter to how he reads or Jay reads Rej. Since when do players just town read someone cause somebody else did? It's not like Michelle had info on Rej. It's an incredible wink link and really has no purpose behind it besides supporting/saving Rej. He tried and failed. Because he failed, he moves on to vote for Rej. I find this to be a distancing attempt. Rej is most likely to be lynched so drop the vote and look better for it. The vote is out of nowhere when LC had made no mention of any remote suspicion of Rej. Nothing at all. Hell, it's more likely that he town read Rej based on the post I linked here.

Now moving on to Rej's posts. http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 99#p554999. Here, he brings up LC for the first time. There's a rushed tone to it. Like Rej just realized that he should mention his buddy in a bad light of sorts and try to create some distancing. It's what he did, whether or not it was distancing or just fake reads is up to you. Next, he votes for LC. Rej didn't want to save himself, he could have done that a long time ago by hopping on my wagon. No, he took the prime opportunity to distance. That's really all I can see from his vote on LC. Just how I feel about it.

Enh, I was just conversing using what I had in my mind. I thought Michelle's meta read on Rej sounded believable... there were pages that I caught up on in skimmish mode, and I wanted to make conversation with something current/relevant.

It was quite the wink link though.

Epi's post about JJJ is how I feel. That whole schmeck at the end of Day 1 is mondo garbo as they say.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Oct 16, 2019 11:47 pm Epignosis is probably a dog. I am juggling around thoughts to the contrary in my brain, and the one that I find recurring is "Epi is cranky about last game and wants to mislynch me this time", which is

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:04 am Dragomir has my vote currently.

Got a twinge of suspicion on Epi here for this... he's been going hard against JJJ for pages, and then goes for Dragomir (who I know he also expressed suspicion for). Feels a bit like "How To Act Civ: Don't tunnel! Keep an open mind and multiple suspicions going". Not enough to flip my axis on the Epi-or-JJJ front, if such a thing exists. And I know no one wants to turn Day 2 into one of those situations, but I say what I say.

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:11 amWhere's Long Con?

Trying to catch up and also watch El Camino. This has been a lot of posts, you prolific fuckers.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:23 am I actually thought Long Con was being at least a little facetious there.

@Long Con have a go.

Yes, that sounds accurate. Also, the stuff I said earlier in this post, something about going with what I had in mind, trying to be a little bit relevant with an opinion I had formed through a skim-read.

nutella wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:18 am Good lord this thread exploded

I know right?

I'll [VOTE: JJJ] aubergine

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:21 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:19 pm I don't think I'm an arsonist. I just vote for who I think is suspicious. Dragomir is still suspicious to me. Rej as well. I've said why.
Self-preservation not relevant?

Obviously relevant.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:19 pm Rej could have saved himself all day by voting Dragomir. Instead he opted to push this Long Con wagon, which until three minutes ago was an unlikely enterprise for survival.

I think the Long Con lynch has been a good possibility for much longer than that. Rej doesn't savee himself by voting Dragomir yesterday, he saves himself by voting now.

Maybe we're all Civ.

I don't think I'm an arsonist. I just vote for who I think is suspicious. Dragomir is still suspicious to me. Rej as well. I've said why.

I'll vote Rej.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:11 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:11 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:10 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:05 pm I think Fayt is Civ. I like that point about calling me a "gamble". Sounds like subconscious baddie-speak for "It's going to be a Civ lynch".
Long Con encourages the Rej wagon right along while he keeps himself cozy on the Dragomir wagon. The thing about "subconscious baddie-speak" just looks like b/s.
Where did I encourage the Rej wagon?
Rej said the gamble thing which you just pooped on.

Oh, that was Rej? I was kind of skimming.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:10 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:05 pm I think Fayt is Civ. I like that point about calling me a "gamble". Sounds like subconscious baddie-speak for "It's going to be a Civ lynch".
Long Con encourages the Rej wagon right along while he keeps himself cozy on the Dragomir wagon. The thing about "subconscious baddie-speak" just looks like b/s.

Where did I encourage the Rej wagon?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:05 pm bleh [VOTE: Rej] aubergine

But Michelle says Rej is Civ.

I think Fayt is Civ. I like that point about calling me a "gamble". Sounds like subconscious baddie-speak for "It's going to be a Civ lynch".

Rej wrote: ↑Tue Oct 15, 2019 3:29 pm wait, Epignosis is also playing?

just looked at Long Con. He went like -> interaction with JJJ/push against Dragomir -> distancing(?)
@Long Con did you distance yourself there?

I don't recall any distancing from Long Con.

I hard-debunked the stuff against me already anyway.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:31 pm The thing you said about a car, see? I think was a joke, see? I also thought it had real function as being incredulous about my “tell me more” bit, see?

Not really. It not "real" in any way other than referencing Grease.

Search found 107 matches