The Syndicate

Screwed up the quotes in the spoiler tags... the "You are suspicious here because YOU are casting suspicion based on meta-crap. PHONY meta-crap, because that's not really Golden, so being "not himself" is a given." is the explanation for the first Marmot-suspicion.

Golden wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:40 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:14 am

Golden wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 1:06 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 07, 2018 11:55 pm Great job guys!

Golden wrote: ↑Sat Apr 07, 2018 9:37 pmThere’s no way we were ever going to win this. Literally the only person who suspected svs was gman and it was wholly unnecessary lol, you had the game on lock.

... I guess you mean, out of the living players at endgame?

I wasn’t sure what you were thinking for sure.

That's a strange things to say, considering Dom was red on my list pretty consistently, and I was voting to lynch him until he lynched me instead.

If someone uses gimmicks instead of words, I cannot decipher them at all, so I can’t retain any meaning from them.

That is literally - LITERALLY - the most disingenuous thing that has ever been said on this site. WTF dude?

And since I can talk now, I will respond to some perplexing things you said during the game, some of which I can't understand coming from a Civ:

Mármot wrote: ↑Wed Apr 04, 2018 9:34 pm Wilgy has the exact same rainbow list to me, but places me at deep orange. Doesn't that seem disingenuous to you? It does to me. Like his read of me is all based on meta-roleplay, no substance. It stinks as much as bare feet.

Ok, so how does having a similar rainbow list, but still suspecting you, mean anything at all? First of all, there's nothing inherently disingenuous about it. I suspected you. Period. That has nothing to do with where anyone else is on either of our rainbow lists, and, like, seriously, can you please explain this logic?

1. I post a rainbow list
2. You follow it with a nearly identical list
3. I analyze your posts and find you suspicious, re-post list with you in the red
4. You say "how can he have the same list as me and also suspect me??"

You copied MY rainbow list dude! Is that REALLY the kind of logic that makes sense to you? So, next time I'm bad, I just have to wait till a Civ makes a rainbow list, and then make an identical list, and then if that Civ ever suspects me, I can call them disingenuous and get them lynched?

.... you... you can see how that makes no sense at all, right?

Mármot wrote: ↑Wed Apr 04, 2018 9:34 pm...Like his read of me is all based on meta-roleplay, no substance.

Ok, and LITERALLY NONE of my read of you was based on meta-anything:
Feels good to be able to get that off my chest finally. You try to throw this crap at me when I can talk, and you will be lynched very quickly, and I think I made it pretty clear why it would be deserved.

Golden wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 1:06 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Apr 07, 2018 11:55 pm Great job guys!

Golden wrote: ↑Sat Apr 07, 2018 9:37 pmThere’s no way we were ever going to win this. Literally the only person who suspected svs was gman and it was wholly unnecessary lol, you had the game on lock.

... I guess you mean, out of the living players at endgame?

I wasn’t sure what you were thinking for sure.

That's a strange things to say, considering Dom was red on my list pretty consistently, and I was voting to lynch him until he lynched me instead.

Great job guys!

Golden wrote: ↑Sat Apr 07, 2018 9:37 pmThere’s no way we were ever going to win this. Literally the only person who suspected svs was gman and it was wholly unnecessary lol, you had the game on lock.

... I guess you mean, out of the living players at endgame?