The Syndicate

I'll learn to do quotes someday, hopefully.

Ricochet wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
Long Con wrote:I don't suppose anyone has the voting records for the last lynch?
I do.
Can I see them please?

Rezz first.[/quote]
No, seriously, do you have them or not?

Well, I fucked that up nicely.

Ricochet wrote:
Long Con wrote:I don't suppose anyone has the voting records for the last lynch?[/dead]

I do.

Can I see them please?

I don't suppose anyone has the voting records for the last lynch?

thellama73 wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:I think I'm starting to see how this game is different than normal mafia. The BTSC is usually only a mafia power so people are hesitant to "defend" each other.

So this round I do have BTSC but the other member of my civ group is functionally non existent, so I'm not gonna get any endorsements this round. I did want to lunch Ty, but now I'm leaning more toward Snowman. He just posts so little and I can never get a read on him. LC, all your posts sound suspicious to me so I doubt know if you ate bad or if I'm biased.
Personally, I think it would be smarter of you to lunch Long Con. Unless of course you are bad this round.

Unless YOU are bad this round, your vote should be going to Bass. I don't believe what he says about being alone on a Civvie team.

Also, Zomberella, when I came after you last round with a 'weak' case, it was because my BTSC partner said that he and some old teammates had a Roxy-approved secret code going on, and I think he said that you and S~V~S were baddies according to it. I mad eup some stuff about my own deductions based on letters, etc... but then Russ got lynched. I really expected the code-people to follow along with what I said and come after you then, so I don't know what happened with that. You were bad then, right?

S~V~S wrote:And BR is one of the people I small actively not worried about.

Say this sentence again, if you don't mind. It's got a hitch in it.

S~V~S wrote:I think there is a civ alone, and Bass' post makes me think it is him.

I know.

I see what Bass is trying to do as well, and that earns my vote. If you don't want to lynch him because of his Real Life issues, then that's totally understandable. But he's the one.

It's probably quiet because of Death Note starting and being so talkative. If the double kill on FZ. is all we have to go on, then it's slim pickins. Bass was in on the pact that FZ. knew about, maybe he has some information he'd like to share.

It's best to dive headfirst into an unconventional game and figure out how to win it within its own unique system. keys56billion could not get there in the Monopoly game, and his fun quotient diminished significantly because of it. He was there to play a more standard Mafia game, and I feel like he was stuck in that point of view, and never redeveloped his notions from the ground up of 'how to win'.

Same with this game. We're playing Texas Hold'em here, and maybe some people are still upset that they don't get to put any cards down from their hand to draw new ones.

Actually, I might be up for a zomberella lynch. I've been looking at the original letters and made a couple of assumptions based on the night polls , and I may have a pattern to follow. It points to Z and one other player as likely baddies based on what I know, and eliminating roles who have died.

I'm fine with you voting for Russ. I don't know what role he changed into. I don't want to tell you who my old teammates and roles were, because I'm trying to stay as far away from the complicated line of info-dropping. If everyone else starts sharing this information, if everyone is in agreement that it's the way to go, then I'll gladly follow along and do the same. I'm just not going to be first out of the gates on this one, I don't need any more run-ins with the Infodump Police.

FZ. wrote:Since three people are off the lynch poll, I wonder if there's a pattern there. Say at least one person has to be on the poll from each group. If there are two people in the group left, one is off and one is on. If there are three, two are on, and one is off, etc'. Not sure what happens if only one person is in the group, but I assume they are still on. I also think we have 5 groups because Levina is killed. We have 10 players alive and 7 are on the poll. If we can figure out how many people in each group are dead, we can know if my theory is right. If so, 2 out of the seven people are baddies and it will be easier to figure out who they are. Does that sound crazy?

I like this idea. Are two Donners dead right now that we know of? I'd say there's four Civvies dead that I can feel sure of, and any that have been killed at night are not within my field of view... maybe a couple more Civs gone?

Ten out of seventeen players left, and... did we kill one baddie or two so far? If two, then the four Civvies dead that I'm thinking of, and one at night. I'd like to think that there's a couple of baddies represented on the poll at least.

Have you said yet who your system told you is a baddie? I caught up on my phone a little, so I might have missed it.

I also do not understand this "who moved first" talk. After the first rotation, all my family's roles stayed the same, but there was a number of abilities changed. After the second rotation, everything changed... my family, my role, my ability, my teammates.

Is this not the experience that everyone else had?

FZ. wrote:Russ, LC and BR were the only reason some of us didn't vote for you in previous days. I assumed they were grouped together with you. Now BR says she didn't trust LC for those reasons, but others, Which if I'm reading right, means that BR, you and Splints started out together and LC was not on your group. This makes me think that my evaluation was wrong and LC started out as Epi's team mate and BR was wrong, but I guess it doesn't matter any more

Before I share anything, I want you all to tell me if anyone had some sort of a pact with their team. Not asking you to tell me what it was or who was on it, just if there was anything. I think at this stage, it's crucial to know if people are defending previous buddies or not, if we want the civvies to win

I made no pact or secret code with my team, because I thought it was made crystal clear that anything like that would be against the rules of infodropping and role outing.

FZ. wrote:
Long Con wrote:Sounds overthinky to me. Do you have an idea of the pattern of role-rotation, FZ.?
I have some, but I'm not sure I should discuss it.
Can you tell me why you trusted BR, Splints and Russ up until this day, when it's obvious they were not your BTSC all days?

I don't think that's relevant any more.

Sounds overthinky to me. Do you have an idea of the pattern of role-rotation, FZ.?

Snowman wrote:Well, my BTSC is pretty dead, so I'll just ask here--Ty or Russ, who should die next?

Definitely Russ... I used to know who that guy was (we're allowed to say that right?), but these days he seems much shiftier.

Epignosis wrote:Winter is coming.

Wait, no it's not.

It's pretty damn here in Ontario.

Voted for Bass because I'm leaving for work now and he could just be a baddie!

FZ. wrote:
Long Con wrote:That analysis made me more suspicious of MovingPictures07 than fingersplints.
I don't get why. I also think Splints was very likely Hunger last round, and I do wonder if she's lying about it now.

I think his points about her are opportunistic and weak, actually. I'd be surprised if fingersplints turned out to be Epig's teammate, I don't get that read at all from going over her posts. It looks more like MP07 is cleverly trying to put together various far-fetched points into a cobbled case.

That analysis made me more suspicious of MovingPictures07 than fingersplints.

Yeah, I'm unchanged. MP

Bass, who are your top three suspects? What do you think of MovingPictures07?

What's Snowman's current status? Opinions?

I'm voting for 'u' again because I want to vote for U!!

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Roxy wrote:The Long Walk
Good book.

My favourite by Mr King/Bachman!

Very nice result.

S~V~S wrote:
FZ. wrote:Hey, don't the Donners have a rezz? Or was it someone else? They can rezz llama

@linki: yeah, but we don't know if it was on purpose
They HAD a lynch stop.

I need to walk away from here for a bit. See you all later

Don't get your feathers too ruffled. Maybe you'll come back after tonight as a baddie, and you'll be lovin' it like Mickey D's!

And Sarah Keyes has a rezz, maybe she can rez Llama (or Metalmarsh) now!

Ricochet wrote:Yeah, I think I'll switch to LC now.

You scum, you should have killed me and voted Llama, at least.

And I call you scum in only the friendliest way, not in any personal way. I call my two-year-old "scum" on a daily basis. True story.

Linki: I think voting Russ makes no sense, I have gotten a Civvie vibe from him this round. And if you suspect Ty, why not vote Ty?

That would make sense with the "no one supports Rico" thing.

Also, despite the anti-Civvie choice of who to kill, I'd rather lose Jacob Donner than Levinah Murphy. Sort of.

There was a reason why it was likely Llama was a Donner before his death, right? Was it that he was off the poll on Day One? I think that was it.

I guess Ricochet, Llama's only seeming suspecter according to the current poll...

... will have to vote for someone else!

Apparently she thought Llama was a non-Civvie. Now <<the Civvies>> have lost two important Donner-Civvies!

Bass could be bad. I don't think anyone has vouched for him, have they?

FZ. wrote:Could LC just be a jester? Or is he acting like that to make us think he is, so we don't lynch him?

No one wants to lynch a jester! But no, I'm just a regular Civvie dude, I don't know who's bad or anything. I'll try to find a new place for my vote now.

Zomberella12 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
fingersplints wrote:I see the evidence against Rico, it is fair, but not as good as the evidence I see against LC and Russ (and now maybe TySlayer thanks to FZ). I will keep my vote for LC to ensure that he doesn't fall off the civvie lunching radar for D3.

I am SO bad, my friends, that even when the rotation happens at the end of this Day, I will be unable to assume a Civvie role.

That's so badass.

fingersplints wrote:I think that SVS's logic re:llama being taken off the poll is pretty sound. I've had take someone of the poll roles many times and if I were a Donner I would absolutely take my teammates of the poll. Especially early in the game where I don't have any feels for anyone.

I think the more obvious reason for taking one's own Donner teammate off the poll is that they may have only one chance to EVER use the power, so of course they will choose one of the only people they know for a fact is Civvie.

And I just realized that Metalmarsh was Tamsen Donner. That really really sucks for the Civvies, Tamsen could have been the key to winning the game.

Snowman wrote:
Russ wrote:I doesn't! However, I am against using info to lunch baddies. See X-Men.
What alternative is there? Lynching baddies by telepathy?

Actually, that's what I'm trying with S~V~S... it doesn't seem to be working though, because it seems to me like Zomberella is on S~V~S' team, and they're feeling Civvie to me. I should probably change my vote. I guess it worked as a tester vote, because I think it gave me information about Civvies.

I'll vote for someone else, haven't decided yet. I'm not trying to manipulate, I promise.

Did you major in irony?

S~V~S wrote:LOL, even though you are trying to kill me

Ha ha yeah, I guess that's a little bit funny.

Zomberella12 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:
Snowman wrote:I feel like LC is working altogether too hard to be obnoxious. I think he's trying to take the heat off someone else. I also think that LC must feel confident that ha can't be killed. He's trying to take the bullet (for Rico, perhaps) .
Agreed. Also, no one has defended him, either day. And he keeps pointing the finger without any real reason. I'm just not sold on his innocence. I really want to lunch LC. You're off the hook in my book Rico - for now *switch vote from Rico to Long Con*
There are a couple of people that could defend me right now, but they don't have to. In fact, if they did now, it might be considered infodumping. And as I recall, one of them DID defend me. You just don't want to see it, I think.
Page reference?

Ha ha no, not going to happen.

Zomberella12 wrote:
Snowman wrote:I feel like LC is working altogether too hard to be obnoxious. I think he's trying to take the heat off someone else. I also think that LC must feel confident that ha can't be killed. He's trying to take the bullet (for Rico, perhaps) .
Agreed. Also, no one has defended him, either day. And he keeps pointing the finger without any real reason. I'm just not sold on his innocence. I really want to lunch LC. You're off the hook in my book Rico - for now *switch vote from Rico to Long Con*

There are a couple of people that could defend me right now, but they don't have to. In fact, if they did now, it might be considered infodumping. And as I recall, one of them DID defend me. You just don't want to see it, I think.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
FZ. wrote:Okay, thanks for clarifying, Roxy. This means we're back to looking for baddies.

I have three questions:

1. What do people make of the fact that two people "defended" Rico? Do you think it's just their assumptions or does it look like he could be legit? Since they defended him before we knew the roles will be switched at the end of the day, defending someone on your baddie team would be very dangerous. So if their defence seems real, I'd trust that he's a civ. If it just their opinion, then Rico could be Epi's team mate.

2. Any theories on why LC self voted too?

3. Since it's the other team's turn to kill the next night, will it make any change if we lynch one of them in terms of the kill?
1. They could just be people who don't think he's bad without being on his team. I still think the case on Rico is as good as any I have ever seen on Day 2 and I don't intend to move my vote.

2. I don't understand why anyone self votes, ever. Never have, never will.

3. Both teams kill every night. If Rico is Hunger, as I theorize, then one of the teams will be eliminated, and we will have less to worry about.
Well, I was going to answer the questions, but Llama did such a good job answering them that I will just say:

"This."

I'd go for S~V~S if I were you...

Roxy wrote:You will be told when a rotation has begun speaking of which......[/dead][/b]

Whhaaaa....!

S~V~S wrote:I just looked at my groups roles on the first page, and our abilities have not changed. Perhaps that is still to come. Rox is mysterious, and trying too hard to solve her mysteries will only make her strive to be even mysteriouser.

That's my fear, actually. I want to develop a system to predict role changes, but I'm afraid if I talk about it Roxy will just alter it so I'm wrong!

So... I might end up as the same role with different abilities? Or a different role with the same abilities?

Neat!

Search found 79 matches