The Syndicate

Spacedaisy wrote:I did protect myself. I wasn't sure who I could trust and once I realized my civ team's win was riding on me surviving I made sure I was protected then. Apologies ekeknat. I seriously considered protecting you but couldn't risk it especially since Made was lynched in part because of me.

I was very worried that the Civvie protector would mess things up for us, and when ekeknat died, I felt like, great, it was sig or SVS or something! Little did I know it was one galactic flower, selfishly using her power on herself!

Yay! Nice win, team! I roleblocked sprityo once, and that was when SD woulda died. You're welcome, SD... unless you were ALSO protecting yourself, and then... well played SD.

Now that we winners have our Game of Champions 2016 slot secured, we can sit back and chill.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Long Con wrote:Do dead posts break it up for the non-consecutive rule?
But you posting helps me get posts.

Can I win if I reach the quota before the living players do? :P
Only one way to find out!
Ooh! Tell me what it is.

Mega-multiquote powerrrrr!!!!!!!!!

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Long Con wrote:Do dead posts break it up for the non-consecutive rule?
But you posting helps me get posts.

Can I win if I reach the quota before the living players do? :P

Only one way to find out!

Do dead posts break it up for the non-consecutive rule?

My god you guys! I voted DF, please vote him and not me, and thank you for caring about a civ win when you didn't have to.

Sorry, DF, it's a process of elimination partly, and partly some of your votes and possible buddying. I know my votes are not much better, but I know I am Civ so

. Unless sig AND S~V~S were both GP baddies.

Also, no one's around. Tell you what, if you come in and decide to play, please vote for DFaraday or zebra, if you love Civvies.

I'll vote as late as I can in case a way to survive appears.

a2thezebra wrote:Okay, Long Con.

I don't think there's much that can save me, and that's fine. The game will be over today, and the GP Baddies and Coq Civs will win together. That's why zebra is being so bold, she has either one or two teammates left, and knocking me off will be their win.

ekeknat wrote:
Long Con wrote:Still not getting you here.
We need to lynch you, and then we need to lynch Zebra. How about that?

Could you dumb it down a bit?

Still not getting you here.

indiglo wrote:What I'm not understanding is why you think Typhoony would have insider info based on his role. That's the part I'm having trouble wrapping my head around. The only info he had access to is the info in the thread. Unless I'm missing something uber obvious?

That's what I'm saying. He's acting like Typhoony was some sort of info role.

ekeknat wrote:- Think about why Typhoony had any reason to believe I was innocent, when I had just helped lead a mislynch on him.

- Think about why he'd say the phrase "LYNCH LC IF YOU WANT GP MAFIA" with so much certainty.

Yo, buddy, your trick isn't working. Spacedaisy figured you out already, and everyone else will too. Here, I'll help out for those who are just blindly nodding at you:

Vanilla. Will appear as a random member of The Gay Parade to any role checkers.

THAT is Typhoony's role. So yeah, I "thought about" why Typh would clear you and accuse me, and it's because he was wrong and fooled by you. Unless you'd like to peddle another interpretation of his role that works in a couple of magical (yet still wrong) role checks?

I think you need to change your story.

Dana wrote:
Long Con wrote:I gots ta go! OR, we could lynch a baddie. That would be legit.
I mean I do think you're bad but the lack of opposition to your lynch is making me pretty uncomfortable. I am also very inclined to believe that if I think someone is bad then they're probably not. So I don't know. I believe you're bad but I don't believe in myself/my thought process, if that makes any sense. Who do you think is bad at the current moment?

Posts like this make me feel better about you than I have, Dana. I can see what Made was talking about.

I don't think Spacedaisy is a baddie. zebra, ekeknat, and indiglo/DFaraday are my guesses, if sig or S~V~S weren't Gay Parade baddies. Two of those four, maybe, and it doesn't seem very likely to be DF and indi. Who knows, it's possible that the GPB are down to just one member. And I am not that member. I am a member of one of the two Civvie teams.

Spacedaisy... you were saying such nice things about me before!

I gots ta go! OR, we could lynch a baddie. That would be legit.

Sorry, Made! I should read the roles better, I didn't realize that the Detective gets insanified himself, that's the most obvious reason for multiple insanifications.

RIP my friend, I hope we get the ones who killed you!

Ok, voting Made, I'm pretty sure he has to be a Gay Parade baddie.

Depending on how the nightkills have gone, it looks like up to a third of the players alive have already won. It's good to see that the idea of Civs winning with Civs is popular, and the fact that someone I suspect is Coq says it warms my heart.

I really think a Made vote is the way to go today.

DFaraday wrote:Made's comment felt genuine about Dana to me.

However, is there any reason that people stopped suspecting Made for being insanified?

EBWOP: I see LC just brought it up.

You are using EBWOP incorrectly, friend. The term you are looking for is "Linki" or "Linkitis"... coined way back on LP for Link McCloud's tendency to post and miss the recent posts before his that were posted after he had started replying. EBWOP is Edit By Way Of Post, used because we can't edit our posts directly in games, so when you make a mistake in a post, and correct it in the following post.... that's an EBWOP.

DFaraday wrote:Made's comment felt genuine about Dana to me.

However, is there any reason that people stopped suspecting Made for being insanified?

EBWOP: I see LC just brought it up.

Hello, DF. Disagree with the first statement, and the second statement is very relevant.

Spacedaisy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Made wrote:Knowing Dana quite well irl, she's very much herself. She seems quiet relax or whatever have you. I have no clue what a baddie Dana would look like, but I feel like this isn't it. If I had to guess, I'd assume she really likes her role,or just really enjoying game in general. She seems very comfortable. Maybe because she hasn't taken much heat this game? That or she just got really good at playing civvie all of the sudden.
This post is pretty waffly. It seems like your gut wants to read her as bad and you're trying to wiggle your way into reading her as good.
I don't read that post as waffling.

I read this post as waffling:

Spacedaisy wrote:I felt very certain about Nutella, since then I'm finding it hard to feel as confident about someone else. I suspected Long Con of being her partner, clearly I was wrong on that. The thing that changed my mind about him might not preclude him from being gay parade, but it felt more like a civ move than anything else. I won't preclude him from being bad, but I'd be interested in hearing cases on others too...

Thoughts?

Sorry Made, but your defense of Dana actually shoots you up my suspicion list. It's like this: Dana is one of my main suspicions, so defending her looks questionable to me. I don't want to tunnel her too much though, but when I look at your pro-Dana posts with the idea that she is a Civ, it makes you look even worse, like you're just buddying up to a Civ to get her good will. The reason I see it that way is that your defenses of her are based on "knowing her in real life" even though you've "never seen her baddie game". If you have never seen it, how can you be SO SURE that you would know what it looks like?

It reeks of buddying.

Since last night, I've been a lot more suspicious of you, Made. You have been insanified twice, and that means that you are Gay Parade. There are likely three Gay Parade baddies left, unless sig or S~V~S were Gay Parade baddies and got killed by the Coquelicot baddies. The likelihood of you being a Gay Parade baddie at this point is very high, and you are my most likely vote today. I have about an hour left to vote, so I'll wait to see if you get a response in.

Now your question was rhetorical. Ok. Maybe you need to work on your delivery, because it sure looks exactly like you were talking about how zebra and I acted toward him before his lynch, and then using that to try and throw shade at me.

Scotty deliberately got himself lynched by faking a slip into the thread. That's obvious enough to be considered a fact. I fell for the slip, and voted him for it. You, on the other hand, avoided talking at all about Scotty and still managed to vote for him. But it only makes me bad, not you.

Day 2 you voted for Boulders because he was "annoying". You skipped out for a few days after that, and came back with a vote for me for having a "scummy air" while also saying "I just definitely don't think Dana is bad based on that vote, i've got a real towny read on her."

And you say you were so sure of me being bad, and yet you voted for Typhoony because we were "baddie teammates", but you were sure to let everyone know that you weren't bandwagoning, nope!

You and Dana are teammates, based on your soft defenses of her with little to no actual reason... and zebra is your third.

Not completely sure about Dana, eh? Sure.

ekeknat. a2thezebra. Dana. Lynch any of these three, and if they're not Gay Parade baddies, then you can lynch me and I won't argue.

Linki: which question?

ekeknat wrote:[
Long Con wrote:What points did you think made sense? Just order the points from most convincing to least, if you don't mind. Numbered would be good. Thanks!
i'll oblige your smarmy smiley face request by making a case against you, though hopefully you're fine with the lack of numbers.

I was asking Dana that for a reason, but thanks for not waiting to see her response. I suppose you don't think that the fact that she came into the thread and didn't answer the question is suspicious at all? I repeated the question and still no response.

First, yall all know how gut reads are just, like, a part of playing mafia? When you're playing it in real life, maybe you get it from people's body language and whatnot. Here you've just got what people say and really contribute to the game to go off of, and from the beginning I've kind of had a feeling about LC. Your early posts seemed kind of like establishing yourself as civ presence without actually saying anything, and I just always got that vague read like I didn't WANT to trust you. As an example from early on (though your post history ITT is rife with things like this) around the time of Scotty's lynch for which he was Immortal, you and zebra were the two who pushed the subject to the point where he DID get lynched (and subsequently killed). To quote a dead man,

Scotty wrote: You're forgetting that I didn't ask to be lynched. You kept pushing it. You and zebra. But you were completely flumberbuxt with my answers.

Why WOULD he want to be lynched?

Scotty surviving a lynch confirms him as a Repudiated Immortal. A neutral role that nobody needs dead to satisfy their Win Condition. It's not hard to understand, unless you are deliberately avoiding understanding.

You completely derailed the conversation here (and in a number of other places where you got called out). WTF? I derailed which conversation again? Another example is that failed Spacedaisy lynch train, started literally because she "seemed too civ" and hopped aboard by you because she had voted for you... days before.

The Typhoony lynch where I voted for Typh, partially because I read heavy WIFOM between the two: I was busy and jumped the gun hard this day - his role coming up was a bit of a facepalm for me. I definitely should've voted LC this day, since I only read Typh as bad in relation to how he was speaking to LC. If you go back and read over it, the case is made much stronger by him than I could make it myself.

I'm posting this now. If I think of anything else I'll come back and say it, but really, how much of this game is made up of just gut reads and feelings on people? At this point, town members, you believe me or you don't.. if you're not convinced, that's fine, but I'd like to hear your genuine suspicions.

This is really weak. I'm sorry about your "gut feel", but you don't know me and you don't know how I play. I don't think you're wrong, I think you are bad and trying to go for what you think is an easy lynch.

a2thezebra wrote:Let this be a lesson to all remaining baddies who think they can get away with not defending themselves.

You're next, LC.

Sure zebra. Anyone who's paying attention at all to your game would know you are bad. You actually think that going after Black Rock gives you some sort of cred? In what world does that make sense?

Long Con wrote:
Dana wrote:So it seems like we were very wrong about Typhoony (sorry)
I definitely do not feel very comfortable with all the votes for Black Rock. I mean I'm not sure I completely trust her but I just have a bad feeling about lynching her, and how easily it seems to be happening. It definitely seems like the baddies could have killed S~V~S just to frame BR like someone said earlier.
As for who to vote for, I am torn between Zebra, LC, and Spacedaisy. Anyone else find it weird that Spacedaisy was almost lynched and then didn't get voted for again after that (as far as I can remember)? I think ekeknat is making a lot of sense with his points about LC, but I am going to vote for Zebra today just because I trust her the most at the moment and voting for suspicious people does not seem to be working, so hopefully this will.
What points did you think made sense? Just order the points from most convincing to least, if you don't mind. Numbered would be good. Thanks!

I felt like BR was hinting at a particular role, I won't be voting for the easy candy today. I agree about Spacedaisy, and I feel like she has been laying low.

Made wrote:Daylight's savings time got me. My bad everyone.

Who would you have voted for, Made?

Oh, damn, I just realized it's ending in a couple of minutes. Voting for Zebra now, as the only one of my suspects who has votes.

Dana wrote:So it seems like we were very wrong about Typhoony (sorry)
I definitely do not feel very comfortable with all the votes for Black Rock. I mean I'm not sure I completely trust her but I just have a bad feeling about lynching her, and how easily it seems to be happening. It definitely seems like the baddies could have killed S~V~S just to frame BR like someone said earlier.
As for who to vote for, I am torn between Zebra, LC, and Spacedaisy. Anyone else find it weird that Spacedaisy was almost lynched and then didn't get voted for again after that (as far as I can remember)? I think ekeknat is making a lot of sense with his points about LC, but I am going to vote for Zebra today just because I trust her the most at the moment and voting for suspicious people does not seem to be working, so hopefully this will.

What points did you think made sense? Just order the points from most convincing to least, if you don't mind. Numbered would be good.

Thanks!

I felt like BR was hinting at a particular role, I won't be voting for the easy candy today. I agree about Spacedaisy, and I feel like she has been laying low.

ekeknat wrote:At this point in the game, I definitely trust BR more than LC (not that I really trust either). I don't know if I'll have time to come back and vote later, so I'm going to stick my vote on him (LC). I would heavily caution against a lynch of BR on this day - if we do that, we leave Gay Parade mafia fully intact way too far into this thing.

Black Rock wrote: I think you're a gay parade baddie. That goes without saying since you were insanified. I think you think if I flip bad you will be safe.

I think this is worth taking into account. Don't be too convinced by anything a person does. I could easily see an LC/zebra team at this point, quite honestly - heavy doses of WIFOM thinking are required, due to their conversations, but don't write this possibility off at all with experienced mafia in this thing. At this point there are probably as many or more gay parade mafia left as there are gay parade townies, lending a bit of credence to the "insanity" theory.

I'm not revealing whether I'm Gay Parade or Coquelicot, but I am not Mafia, ekeknat.

Ok, I'm headed out the door now. Voting Typhoony.

Typhoony wrote:
sprityo wrote:Sorta clarification: I only interact with typh and I get roleblocked, therefore they are likely to be related and I should vote him
This doesn't make a whole lot of sense. According to that logic, SVS was most definitely killed by BR seeing as she had the most interaction with her. You're seeing two completely unrelated things and think they must have a connection because you have no other information or connection to fill in any possible gaps in your reasoning. It's a human thing to do, but it's faulty.
It's also a dumb move because you're acknowledging that you have a power so you're more likely to be nightkilled.

So, earlier in this quote, you make it clear you're aware of the dangers of exposing yourself to nightkill targeting...

But you KNOW I am not bad. You know I am not on nutellas team because I was instrumental in her lynch. You also know I'm not on the Gay Parade baddie team because you are on that yourself. I'd much rather focus on taking out nutellas teammate which is why I haven't been after you all that much. I'm sure you can figure out why my friend

... but then you go ahead and expose yourself (supposedly) as a Coquelicot Civvie, which puts a much bigger target on your head than just telling the thread about a roleblock.

I call shenanigans.

Defend myself from what exactly? Lay it on me, there is literally nothing I cannot defend against because I have done nothing shady or evil. I'm trying to play the game and kill baddies, and anything that tries to prove that's not true is doomed to failure.

a2thezebra wrote:
Long Con wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:It's not an interpretation, playing along with baddie WIFOM is essentially partaking in that WIFOM. It's not your place to say how people interpret your posts because you don't get to decide how they should be interpreted.

Actually, it is my place to call you out when you interpret posts with simple meanings as WIFOM. I can't tell people how to interpret my posts, but when those interpretations fall so far into the realm of unbelievability, it's my responsibility to call you out on it.

You refer to it as the "realm of unbelievability" yet you don't even attempt to defend yourself against it. Dodgy much?

Also the comparison of me to Typhoony is just absurd. You yourself when quoting my triple-word assault replace the word "misrepresent" with "misinterpret" because you yourself know that I'm not misrepresenting you.
First of all, I never "compared" you to Typhoony. I pointed out that you and Typh are fake-arguing to distance yourselves from each other. And apparently I switched up the word "misrepresent" and "misinterpret"... that's because I do not see a huge difference in the general meaning. As I was using the words, both meant a deliberate intention to deceive the thread. I understand how, from one angle, "misrepresent" is evil and "misinterpret" can be innocent, but you saying that I switched the words for some sort of purpose is not valid. It, as I said, is an angle that you are trying to utilize because you are bad. I don't actually think anyone is going to fall for this kind of tripe.

So "misinterpret" is always deliberate? Wow. Why else would you switch the words? You're making accusations that you don't even believe in, of course you're going to try to make them more believable to everyone else. You're just doing it very, very poorly. You compared me to Typhoony by quoting my frustration with him as if to indicate that I was doing the same thing that I was angry at him for doing when you clearly know yourself that I wasn't. How in seven heavens is that not suspicious? You're the one that's trying to utilize false angles.

Typhoony WAS misrepresenting me every time he responded. The difference is monumental because one is unintentional and the other is deliberate. If you think I'm deliberately reading your posts incorrectly, step up and call me out on it. If not, don't accuse me of the same thing that I accused Typhoony before because you know it's an invalid comparison.
Oh, I see why you said "comparison", because you were doing what you are "accusing" Typh of doing. No. I already DID "step up and call you out on it", so... get with the program, dude. Dudette.
Wrong. You switched the words, which means that you know that saying that I actually misrepresented your arguments would be a bullshit and obviously disingenuous accusation. By saying that I merely misinterpreted them, you can throw discount shade on me while still making an attempt at not making it too obvious that you don't believe a word you're using against me. You can't step up because you don't even think I'm suspicious to begin with. You just need someone to suspect so you can try to blend in with everyone that's actually hunting baddies.

Let me put that misconception to rest. Please view my use of "misrepresent" and "misinterpret" as a complete synonym. I'm not trying to angle around so I have some sort of out regarding what I said. I didn't even realize that I was using a different word, but I intended them for the same meaning. You are bad and are both intentionally misinterpreting and misrepresenting my posts.

a2thezebra wrote:It's not an interpretation, playing along with baddie WIFOM is essentially partaking in that WIFOM. It's not your place to say how people interpret your posts because you don't get to decide how they should be interpreted.

Actually, it is my place to call you out when you interpret posts with simple meanings as WIFOM. I can't tell people how to interpret my posts, but when those interpretations fall so far into the realm of unbelievability, it's my responsibility to call you out on it.

Also the comparison of me to Typhoony is just absurd. You yourself when quoting my triple-word assault replace the word "misrepresent" with "misinterpret" because you yourself know that I'm not misrepresenting you.

First of all, I never "compared" you to Typhoony. I pointed out that you and Typh are fake-arguing to distance yourselves from each other. And apparently I switched up the word "misrepresent" and "misinterpret"... that's because I do not see a huge difference in the general meaning. As I was using the words, both meant a deliberate intention to deceive the thread. I understand how, from one angle, "misrepresent" is evil and "misinterpret" can be innocent, but you saying that I switched the words for some sort of purpose is not valid. It, as I said, is an angle that you are trying to utilize because you are bad. I don't actually think anyone is going to fall for this kind of tripe.

Typhoony WAS misrepresenting me every time he responded. The difference is monumental because one is unintentional and the other is deliberate. If you think I'm deliberately reading your posts incorrectly, step up and call me out on it. If not, don't accuse me of the same thing that I accused Typhoony before because you know it's an invalid comparison.

Oh, I see why you said "comparison", because you were doing what you are "accusing" Typh of doing. No. I already DID "step up and call you out on it", so... get with the program, dude. Dudette.

So you're playing the meta card, with an S~V~S-style helping of "here's what you should already know". I wish I were a Mafia computer-brain that recorded everything that everyone does across every game they play, but that is not the case.

I associate constant mud-flinging with baddieness, because I mostly see baddies doing it. Maybe you do it as a Civ, and maybe you don't, I see it as a scum tell.

And as for the "duh" response... the "duh" wasn't "duh, obviously I'm a Civvie", it was "duh, obviously that's what I meant with my comment that you labelled as WIFOM".

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE STOP STOP STOP MISINTERPRETING MISINTERPRETING MISINTERPRETING MY MY MY POSTS POSTS POSTS!

But seriously, once again, there's no reasonable way you actually read my post that way. You're right about one thing, though:

And why the fuck even have "I do not control the baddie kill" as part of your sentence? If you're not bad isn't that a little redundant?

It IS redundant, because my post that you labelled as WIFOM implies it clearly. The only reason I had to reiterate it in plainer language is because YOU decided to attack and misinterpret it.

a2thezebra wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Typhoony wrote:
Long Con wrote:Hmmm... another good answer. Maybe too good...
Tell you what, LC. If you don't get lynched today, you can kill Zebra Night 5. Feel free to pin it all on me if you like!
That's a very generous offer, but unfortunately, I have to turn it down.
Speaking of WIFOM...

And this... are you kidding me? What reasonable person would label my response as "WIFOM"? It's not hard to understand that I said what I said because, duh, I am not bad and I do not control the baddie kill.

a2thezebra has been flinging mud pretty much everywhere to see what sticks... she obviously wants the thread to think she has a rage out for Typhoony, but hmm, where did she vote today?

Spoiler: show

ekeknat wrote:So, at this point, I'm pretty darn sure LC and Typhoony are teammates. I'm not so sure about Black Rock (and at this point, it would be him alone on coquelicot side if i'm keeping track of things correctly - nutella switched MM over and they both died, and the role left that insanifies people is a civvy role. Since the kills switch off like they do between teams, I think it would be better to take one of them out this go around so as to preserve that lack of coordination between mafias. Since there's votes on Typhoony already, i'm going to go ahead and vote for him - think it would be a purty darn good idea to take one of them out today no matter what

It's funny you should say this - it's not Typhoony and I that are teammates, it's a2thezebra and Typhoony. Just look back over their "argument" posts, several times during this game. These are not real arguments, they're arguments for the sake of distancing. Lemme pull up the example that really clicked it for me...

a2thezebra wrote:
Typhoony wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Why are you obligor to reason with Dana if you mastermind her vote was baddie-motivated to begin with and she is therefore not genuinely confused wagon to why a tie wouldn't be beneficial? Oh I know! Because you're the one who's putting on saving act.
If you read my posts, you would know I don't think Dana is nutellas teammate.
This has nothing to do conglutination nutella, hermitage Karma Chameleon macaronic mention nutella. Voluptuous Siren PLEASE liar lied STOP STOP bilboes is that a piano? digladiation ME EVERY EVERY EVERY TIME TIME theophobist YOU YOU YOU RESPOND RESPOND team.

Lemme translate the insanity. "This has nothing to do with nutella, I didn't even mention nutella. PLEASE STOP [MISREPRESENTING] ME EVERY TIME YOU RESPOND"

The discussion had everything to do with nutella, because they were talking about Dana being nutella's teammate, because it revolved around Dana trying to save nutella in that lynch.

There's no reasonable interpretation of Typh's post that would lead to a reaction like that, and that's because it is fake. It's extreme distancing. I would rather vote for a2thezebra today, but Typh already has 2 votes, so we'll see. If a couple of votes come in for zebra, then I'll gladly place my vote there as well, otherwise you can count me in for a Typhoony lynch.

There's also this:

Typhoony wrote:
sprityo wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
sprityo wrote:
Typhoony wrote:Yes I forgot about that. Please stay insanified so I can act like I don't know what you are saying. In the mean time I will just kill you so I won't have to bother with you anymore. Great idea if I say so myself

Harmless joke or something else?
Good question.
for the irony that everyone hopped onto Scotty for essentially something almost like this. humor me with explaining why you might even suggest killing zebra, typhoony?
It's called a joke.

Also it is far from "essentially something like this".The big thing against Scotty was that his post was considered a slip, something he wanted to post in a BTSC thread. If you view my post as something that I actually wanted to post in a BTSC thread, you've got yourself a point. But you don't, so don't present it like that.

@ LC: If i wanted to call a hit on her, I'd do it on a night that the non-nutella baddie team kills. So next night maybe

Long Con wrote:Hmmm... another good answer. Maybe too good...

S~V~S accused me of "pokey jabs" or something like that, but that's not what I was doing. Typh's answer here actually made me suspicious because it just shows how his thinking is immersed in the baddie team. I totally believe him that he's not on nutella's team, but just bringing up what he did in his answer to me shows *how* he's thinking about the idea of "calling a hit". Personally, I haven't thought too much about which baddies are killing on which night, but it's clearly on Typhoony's mind.

If you get my drift.

Look under each person's avatar to find a red link that says "In Topic".

RIPSVS.

indiglo wrote:Some very interesting stuff there though, looking at her voting record the past couple of days, and what she's been saying lately.

From my (Civ) point of view, this was an easy and obvious way for the baddies to secure a frameup job. Of course you won't know that, because you're not me... but I know it.

S~V~S wrote:No, I am not question cursed. I am just fairly tentative.

Personally I find B;ack Rock to be more of a threat than you, but I still find you scawy.

Are you purposely misspelling her name in order to avoid talking about her in the thread?

I am pretty scary sometimes.

S~V~S wrote:
Long Con wrote:
S~V~S wrote:LC, you seem all about making pokey jabs at people?

Am I right about that?
No, you are not right about that. I have many other facets to my gameplay... don't I? Are pokey jabs actually all I've done this game?

Also, that first sentence looks more like a mild accusation than a question. Why is there a question mark?
Maybe I am punctuation challenged?

Are you Question-cursed???

Typhoony wrote:
Long Con wrote:Hmmm... another good answer. Maybe too good...
Tell you what, LC. If you don't get lynched today, you can kill Zebra Night 5. Feel free to pin it all on me if you like!

That's a very generous offer, but unfortunately, I have to turn it down.

S~V~S wrote:LC, you seem all about making pokey jabs at people?

Am I right about that?

No, you are not right about that. I have many other facets to my gameplay... don't I? Are pokey jabs actually all I've done this game?

Also, that first sentence looks more like a mild accusation than a question. Why is there a question mark?

Hmmm... another good answer.

Maybe too good...

sprityo wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
sprityo wrote:
Typhoony wrote:Yes I forgot about that. Please stay insanified so I can act like I don't know what you are saying. In the mean time I will just kill you so I won't have to bother with you anymore. Great idea if I say so myself

Harmless joke or something else?
Good question.
for the irony that everyone hopped onto Scotty for essentially something almost like this. humor me with explaining why you might even suggest killing zebra, typhoony?

Maybe he's trying to call a hit on her.

Just one man's humble opinion... if the night were to be shortened by a few hours, provided all PMs are in... that would be cool. I know it has crept forward as the phases have gone by.

Enrique wrote:Effective immediately, indiglo replaces skycatguylover98.

Bye skycat! Welcome, indi!

It's all good, I do appreciate your intentions with your vote, despite the reality that I had already been more than saved.

My attitude right now is that there are no Indies left in the game, assuming Scotty was an Immortal and not saved by the Civ role that pardons lynches. I don't think it's very likely that that role would have used up the save on Day 1 Scotty.

Just Civvies and baddies here, folks!

Long Con wrote:DUDE! DP had two extra votes against him.

sprityo wrote:btw as it stands Disgruntled Porc has 3 votes while Blackrock and LC have 2
That was posted before the lynch, I guess you missed it and forgot about the Host announcement saying the same. But chill on your latest theories, because that is the actual explanation.

EBWOP: at the time of sprityo's post, DP had 1 'apparent' vote, and BR and I both had 2.

DUDE! DP had two extra votes against him.

sprityo wrote:btw as it stands Disgruntled Porc has 3 votes while Blackrock and LC have 2

That was posted before the lynch, I guess you missed it and forgot about the Host announcement saying the same. But chill on your latest theories, because that is the actual explanation.

Search found 96 matches