The Syndicate

Yeah, 4 baddies vs 9 civvies is pretty tough to recover from :P

Golden wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:Well played baddies. Nice attempt at bussing Lacey, Golden, but it put you on my radar Not that it mattered because you guys lynched me first
Yeah, it was pretty obvious I had to get you lynched instead

I was running short on time that day, and I was about to make a post highlighting the fact that none of your suspicions had a civvie thought process behind them, and then you went and made a post linking my behavior to some other game where I was bad. I was like, goddamnit Golden... :P And I thought MM would be an easier lynch target that day, which almost worked.

Well played baddies. Nice attempt at bussing Lacey, Golden, but it put you on my radar

Not that it mattered because you guys lynched me first

rezz plz

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I'm voting TH. I don't find Roxy suspicious at all, she's just not interested. I am certainly not voting for myself today.

Linki: well I agree with you about Roxy, Spacedaisy.

But do you agree with her about me?

Just gut, I got nothin' on you. I suspect the other 3 I named more than you, fwiw.

In case it's me I'll leave y'all with my final thoughts.

Sorsha, Golden, Greybonez, and Metalmarsh are my suspects. I think the three baddies are in that group. Daisy is a wildcard because she's barely been playing and that worked out well for her in Death Note. I doubt Lacey is bad. I feel good about Elohcin and Llama. If Roxy is a civvie I hope she gets her head in the game.

If Golden wanted to know what my thoughts were instead of calling my gameplay meaningless, he would have just asked what my thoughts were. Instead he created a narrative where I didn't want to share my thoughts. He also heavily telegraphed a vote for Lacey today that I think would have happened if I, ironically, hadn't called him out on it. The civ-Golden I know doesn't push to lynch inactives on Day 2 in a speed game where we have maybe 3 mislynches at our disposal (and a replacement/modkill system is in place).

I'm looking forward to getting mislynched, that way I can question people and probe for reactions as a civvie in future games without baddies scrutinizing my every move

Dom wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
Dom wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I'm voting for Scotty. I think his attacks on me have bee self-motivated and disingenuous.
????
I hardly call that an attack. I don't even see what Llama is talking about, Scotty voted for Greybonez. So I don't think much of it.
....you see nothing in llama being a hypocrite and completely contradicting himself?

I see that as completely typical Llama.

Dom wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I'm voting for Scotty. I think his attacks on me have bee self-motivated and disingenuous.
????

I hardly call that an attack. I don't even see what Llama is talking about, Scotty voted for Greybonez. So I don't think much of it.

Dom wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
Dom wrote:TH i'm not sure I buy that llama made a slip there, but that aside what do you make of him?
He seems like normal Llama to me. I thought his vote "to piss off Roxy" was in poor taste, but I don't think it makes him bad. And Llama voting for an inactive on Day 1 does not surprise me as much as Golden threatening to vote for an inactive Day 2 before the Day 1 lynch was even in the books.
then what do you make of his attack on scotty?

I must have missed that.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:TH, is Sorsha's suspicion misplaced?

Nah bro, you should lynch me!

Dom wrote:TH i'm not sure I buy that llama made a slip there, but that aside what do you make of him?

He seems like normal Llama to me. I thought his vote "to piss off Roxy" was in poor taste, but I don't think it makes him bad. And Llama voting for an inactive on Day 1 does not surprise me as much as Golden threatening to vote for an inactive Day 2 before the Day 1 lynch was even in the books.

Greybonez wrote:voted lipstick. Maybe I missed something, but sometime silent can be deadly.

Yeah, tell us about it.

Someone asked him if Greybones was on his team and Llama said "He's not on my team"

Dom wrote:Also, can someone just spell out the MM suspicion for me? I'm interested in that as well.

There's not much to it. He harped on Llama's "slip" and I think he's bad because of it

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:Sorry guys I haven't had any time for mafia today. Going into today I expected to vote for Golden but after sleeping on it and seeing his recent posts I think his suspicion of me is genuine - and this was one of my problems with him, I didn't feel like his suspicions/opinions were genuine. I'll look into him more tomorrow and respond to some of his observations about me and talk about what some of my concerns were, but I'm tabling my suspicion of him for now.

I'm voting Metalmarsh... again, but this time it's FOR REAL. I'm okay with Elo's observation about Llama, I think it was a "slip" worth bringing up and looking into... it's Metalmarsh's harping on the slip that I take issue with. His first post towards Llama is fine, his second reiteration of the point looks like someone trying to be opportunistic about a poor choice of words. It's something I expect more from baddie Marsh than a civvie one.

I also think Greybonez's vote and explanation is suspicious as hell but I don't know him well enough to decide if it's disingenuous and I don't have time to look into it.
You need to read the fine print bub.

Yeah I read it. It only made me suspect you more because, whether you were interested in benefiting from Llama's "slip" or not, it's the only thing you've talked about toDay

Sorry guys I haven't had any time for mafia today. Going into today I expected to vote for Golden but after sleeping on it and seeing his recent posts I think his suspicion of me is genuine - and this was one of my problems with him, I didn't feel like his suspicions/opinions were genuine. I'll look into him more tomorrow and respond to some of his observations about me and talk about what some of my concerns were, but I'm tabling my suspicion of him for now.

I'm voting Metalmarsh... again, but this time it's FOR REAL. I'm okay with Elo's observation about Llama, I think it was a "slip" worth bringing up and looking into... it's Metalmarsh's harping on the slip that I take issue with. His first post towards Llama is fine, his second reiteration of the point looks like someone trying to be opportunistic about a poor choice of words. It's something I expect more from baddie Marsh than a civvie one.

I also think Greybonez's vote and explanation is suspicious as hell but I don't know him well enough to decide if it's disingenuous and I don't have time to look into it.

Golden wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:I think it's odd that you expected a lot of case making, or even a lot of opinions, from me on a 24-hour Day 1 where three meaningless votes had been cast up to that point. The fact that you've had a lot of strong opinions, none of which feel organic to me, is actually a big reason why I suspect you.
I don't expect a lot of anything. But you contributed a lot. You posted a lot. But it was meaningless. If you hadn't contributed nearly so much, then I wouldn't have found it odd how little of it was actually relevant or providing any view on anything. You never even said 'I don't have any particular pings' or anything like that... you just posted a whole lot. And I have had literally zero STRONG opinions, which is why I was wanting to bounce ideas off people towards the vote. When I have strong opinions, other peoples views are not going to influence what way I vote. That doesn't stop me from saying what I see.

You call it meaningless, but earlier you said it seemed like I was looking for reactions. Is looking for reactions meaningless? Is asking questions meaningless? Maybe to baddies, because they want to know what's going on inside my head.

I'll elaborate on what I meant by strong opinions when I have more time.

I think it's odd that you expected a lot of case making, or even a lot of opinions, from me on a 24-hour Day 1 where three meaningless votes had been cast up to that point. The fact that you've had a lot of strong opinions, none of which feel organic to me, is actually a big reason why I suspect you.

I'm not trying to "entrap" you, I'm trying to understand you. And a lot of my gameplay is to gauge reactions, especially early on, I think that's par for the course for me. I'm asking questions about your gameplay because I think your gameplay is questionable.

I suspect you, and I'll make my case for Day 2.

Why did Llama's vote ping you?

Golden wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
Golden wrote:Have to go. Voting llama. I understand the points about lacey, but if she isn't here tomorrow I will vote for her tomorrow.
You're not making a lot of sense to me lately. Why are you voting Llama? Why are you already setting up a Lacey vote for tomorrow?
Because of those with votes llama and lacey were the only two I considered good votes, llama's vote

Looks like something is missing here. Llama's vote what? Why did you consider Llama and Lacey to be good votes?

Golden wrote:As for your second question, yeah I really have no good reason for that. I just get frustrated with and don't have much sympathy for absenteeism. But I don't know why I said it, except that in the moment I was frustrated, because I'd much sooner vote you tomorrow. Anyone I have a legitimate actual suspicion of, in fact.

Rest in peace Epi.

Who takes their love of books too far?

Poll ended at Fri Sep 25, 2015 1:23 am

Birdwithteeth11
0
No votes

Dom
0
No votes

Elohcin
0
No votes

Epignosis
3
Sorsha (5), Metalmarsh89 (7), Greybonez (12) 23%

Golden
0
No votes

Greybonez
0
No votes

Lipsticklacey
1
thellama73 (6) 8%

Llama
3
Dom (8), Golden (11), Scotty (13) 23%

Metalmarsh
1
Turnip Head (2) 8%

Roxy
1
Elohcin (3) 8%

Scotty
1
Roxy (4) 8%

Sorsha
1
birdwithteeth11 (10) 8%

Spacedaisy
0
No votes

Turnip Head
0
No votes

Host/Non
2
MovingPictures07 (1), DFaraday (9) 15%
Total votes : 13

Did Epi fall asleep?

Golden wrote:Have to go. Voting llama. I understand the points about lacey, but if she isn't here tomorrow I will vote for her tomorrow.

You're not making a lot of sense to me lately. Why are you voting Llama? Why are you already setting up a Lacey vote for tomorrow?

Golden wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
Golden wrote:I have to vote soon, but I was/am hoping to get input from others first... anyone else still here?
I'm here.

Your boy Epignosis has two votes and wants to vote for Sorsha. Where do you stand on that?
Sorsha was the first person I said I was not going to vote for and I don't want to go back on that.

But you said that because of an off-topic joke she made. What's wrong with going back on that?

Golden wrote:Also, I don't agree with epi's reasons for suspecting her, I don't actually think she can follow that through to become a legitimate suspicion, I think it was just a random reason for a random vote with no real ping.

But she can turn it into a legitimate vote; that was Epi's whole point.

Golden wrote:Well, thats it, right? And then epi comes and votes for the same person I do to save himself...

MM, what do you think are the merits of a lacey lynch or a llama lynch? At least one person to bounce it off...

How can there be any merits to a Lacey lynch?

Do you not want to bounce off of me?

Golden wrote:I have to vote soon, but I was/am hoping to get input from others first... anyone else still here?

I'm here.

Your boy Epignosis has two votes and wants to vote for Sorsha. Where do you stand on that?

Golden wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
Golden wrote:My preference would be a TH vote
Why?
I feel like you've posted a lot but I have no real idea where you stand on anything.

I don't stand anywhere on much of anything because not much has happened.

Golden wrote:My preference would be a TH vote

Why?

Dom do you suspect Llama or do you just not like his attitude?

Just another Days Ones at The Syndicate.

Sorsha wrote:Vote for me epi...

Epignosis wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I'm likely to vote for Sorsha. She gave a reason that was a fluff reason but one she could follow up on if she chose. I don't like those maneuvers Day 1.
What are you waiting for?
What do you think?

Well now you're probably holding it to save yourself :P But with less than three hours to go I wasn't sure why you didn't just follow through and see what shakes out. Maybe you were holding it in case you needed to save a teammate, is what I briefly wondered to myself.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I'm likely to vote Epignosis for his empty threat.

I'm likely to vote you for hypocri- oh wait.

Epignosis wrote:I'm likely to vote for Sorsha. She gave a reason that was a fluff reason but one she could follow up on if she chose. I don't like those maneuvers Day 1.

What are you waiting for?

Golden wrote:I didn't have any day zero pings. TH's vote for MM - I've been on the end of those early TH day one votes a couple of times, once when TH was good, once when he was bad... so I don't see it as being particularly meaningful.

I only remember the one time.

In any case my vote doesn't mean anything. I didn't think DF would be back in time to answer the question of votes being changeable but I thought it was a question worth answering. And lynching MM Day 1 is a time honored tradition.

Elohcin wrote:
Roxy wrote:I want to vote llama for saying to lynch Lips.
And we all know how I feel about noobs amirite?
I want to vote for Roxy for wanting to vote for llama for wanting to vote for Lacey Haha....why not be crazy this game!

Lol

I will not be voting for Elohcin today.

Votes are not changeable

Scotty wrote:Hello kindly gents.

I see Epi already has a headache. Good, good.

I think the note DIE-SQUITH sounds sort of like DIE-SOUTH, and that we should search there first

Or maybe "Due South"

Epignosis wrote:Shut the hell up.

Please.

Stifling discussion?

Will this game have more posts than Death Note mafia?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:Yay game! I have received my role. *votes Metalmarsh89*
Unlike you, I live in the west though.

Oh damn, geography burn

I voted east.

Hmmm, Metalmarsh89 is not on the poll. How convenient

Yay game! I have received my role. *votes Metalmarsh89*

Search found 45 matches