The Syndicate

Black Rock wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Don't worry, MM. It's not as bad and not being told you were recruited until dying a lonely death.

It was non-BTSC anyways. You would have been lonely anyways.

Master of Ancient Arts - Sorsha
-- What was your epic challenge? Search for Ahriman each night, get BTSC if I found him. I found daisy on night 11.
-- How did the dragon thing work? Anyone who targeted me would get burned and eaten.
-- Which targets did you switch on D/N1? Golden and Epignosis
-- Which players did you protect on N2? Myself, daisy and SVS
-- No dragon on D3, huh?
-- Which 5 votes did you negative on D/N4? Day 4 power: Scotty
Sorsha
Space daisy
Svs
The llama
(Actually didn't understand how this power worked. I thought it took 1 vote off their total in the poll but found out later it actually decreased the amount their vote was worth)

-- What new target did you enforce on D/N5? I made Dom pick a new target
-- Which player did you protect on N6? Protected bea svs and boomslang (I was actually thinking these 3 were bad at the time and wanted them to have the 3 extra votes the next day not really the protection)
-- Still no dragon on D7, huh?
-- Which targets did you switch on D/N8? Scotty and timmer
-- What new target did you enforce on D/N9? Scotty pick a new target
-- Which 5 votes did you negative on D/N10?none
-- Which players did you protect on N11?Myself, daisy and metalmarsh
-- DRAGOOON Got to eat Epignosis... He was extremely salty
-- Which 5 votes did you negative on D/N13? none
-- Dragon on D14? Huh? I was in position 3 for the last day/night cycle. Llama targeted me so I toasted and ate him.

Congrats Winners!

My only regret is that I didn't get to eat more people. I thought I was going to have a big night tonight

Black Rock wrote:Bonus points: Who can tell me where the first "Seemer" made it's debut?

A World Apart on LP? And wasn't it LoRab?

Devin the Omniscient wrote:

Sorsha wrote:Maybe everyone will get their wish and you'll both die

HOW IS THAT EVERYONE'S WISH?? It's not my wish... Why did you switch from llama?

But you want llama dead so it's 1/2 your wish.

I think if daisy is right about you being the BE then you are the bigger threat. Besides I think you're bad anyway... Even if you aren't the BE.

Maybe everyone will get their wish and you'll both die

Spacedaisy wrote:Not so fast. I doubt llama can be lynched today. I have a suspicion that Devin is the Brutal Executioner. I think he would be the better option. Get rid of a kill.

If this is the case then I may just switch to devin. I don't really care one way or the other who goes... But getting rid of the BE is good. Azura doesn't even have the kill this next night anyway.

BR or LC- could we please have the night poll from last night when you get a chance.

Also- voting llama

RIP TH

Sorsha wrote:Pull rank. You're the boos

i mean boss

Pull rank. You're the boos

Trizzy!

That would be nice

Devin the Omniscient wrote:Bea and Sorsha, are either of you considering increasingly likely possibility that llama is Azura, and that the lynch will kill someone else?

Is ubzargan dead? Won't the lynch get switched if bullz is ubz/ or on his team?

Throwing my vote on llama for now

The truth hurts sometimes

thellama73 wrote:There have been competitions in this game, and competitions usually carry prizes. Maybe I have friends who are good at competitions.

Well then your friends were not too smart to rez you on a day that a baddie has a rez....

RIP whoever was good there

Great result

In position 3 caelia can kill and Ahriman can block so I'm thinking it doesn't matter if we lynch Rey today or not.

I think I'll let them decide what to do with Rey and I'll switch my vote to Nutella.

Ok... But do you know who all the baddies are? How will you decide who to kill?

Sorsha wrote:True- I guess I just don't really understand why he came forward with this...

This was a reply to devin

Rey- like I said before though. We have no way of knowing if you'll turn against the civvies. If you decide to NK a civ (I'm not sure what the civ:bad ratio is right now) we might not have the numbers to lynch you.... And who knows what you got for completing your epic challenge. And the civvies only get their NKs on certain positions so it's not that easy for caelia or Ahriman to take you out.

I'm just not sure it's worth the risk.

How would you decide who to nk? Who would you listen to?

True- I guess I just don't really understand why he came forward with this...

Rey- don't you think the baddies will just kill you anyway? If you're trying to make a deal with civvies in the thread why would they want you around?

Right.. If there was a way to get Rey to just kill the baddies sure, cool, let's keep him.

How are we all going to agree on who he should target?

And ubzargan or azura will kill him first chance they get anyway right?

If we can pick someone who's likely a baddie for him to target tonight then ok, I'll switch my vote to Nutella.

I just can't think of a way this would work long term...

If you guys are right about Rey (and I think you are) it seems like he's the bigger threat right now. So I'll put my vote there for now.

nutella wrote:I'm voting for this nub Devin and encourage others to do the same. Or vote rey. He won't ever respond anyway.

What do you think about bullzeye? Do you agree with MMs case?

What do you think of Nutella metalmarsh? Are you thinking her voters are wrong or....?

nutella wrote:

Sorsha wrote: Phew that was a close one.

Nutella- your response to the post that Epi brought up against you yesterday was really underwhelming. If i had been around when that was all going down I can't say I'd really have been convinced to change my vote to you (based on his case alone) but your response to it is what worries me about you. It's like you didnt even have anything to say about it and weren't going to even try.....?

Who do you think we should look at today instead of you?

Can you pinpoint why you think my response was underwhelming? Please point me to what I need to elaborate on. I was in kind of a rush the other day and may have missed something.

As for today, Rey and Devin are both clearly baddie mcbadders and I can't believe we still haven't lynched either of them.

Mostly what he was questioning about bwt in this post:

Epignosis wrote:

nutella wrote:I'm voting for bwt because I thought boomslang was bad for a while and haven't been feeling good about him lately. I also wouldn't be surprised if tranq was bad.

I'm glad you posted this, as a matter of fact. Analyzing it linguistically, it's rotten. Regarding bwt, you "haven't been feeling good about him lately."

What does that mean? If you thought Boomslang was "bad for a while," then why would you feel anything else but bad regarding bwt?

What has birdwithteeth said or done "lately" (your word) to make you not feel good about him?

Here's his only post since coming back:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Sorry everyone. Just realized I had replaced back into this game. Too tired to read anything tonight, but I'll start catching up again tomorrow afternoon/evening after work.

That's it. Please tell me what is bothering you.

I'm switching my vote to nutella, and I encourage the other bwt voters to do likewise.

I guess I'm not sure it matters much anymore though since bwt is dead and revealed to be civvie now.

It just seems that I remember you making good cases on players and having solid reasoning for your votes and I'm not feeling that from you lately.

Phew that was a close one.

Nutella- your response to the post that Epi brought up against you yesterday was really underwhelming. If i had been around when that was all going down I can't say I'd really have been convinced to change my vote to you (based on his case alone) but your response to it is what worries me about you. It's like you didnt even have anything to say about it and weren't going to even try.....?

Who do you think we should look at today instead of you?

Voted 3

Spacedaisy wrote:

Sorsha wrote:With option 3 Celia gets to kill and Ahriman gets to block 5 people.

Option 1 gives Ahriman redirect powers and Celia a lynch pardon.

Either of these will give either one baddie leader or the other lynch/ nk immunity.

Option 4 doesn't give them immunity, just curse and poison. Ahriman can kill, Celia can send us a message.

I'm thinking either option 3 or 4 and hoping that Celia or Ahriman have good instincts for who to kill.

Daisy- why do you think 1?

What you are saying is you are ok with giving one of the baddie team leaders immunity but not the other? Interesting.

I want 1 because 3 is useless, it always gets skipped. And I think putting some control of the lynch outcome and night power redirects is a good thing right now. Probably the best thing for the civs at the moment actually.

Ahriman gets to block 5 people with option 3. That's pretty powerful too. And Celia got her kill in last time. I don't really care if a night gets skipped tbh.

With option 3 Celia gets to kill and Ahriman gets to block 5 people.

Option 1 gives Ahriman redirect powers and Celia a lynch pardon.

Either of these will give either one baddie leader or the other lynch/ nk immunity.

Option 4 doesn't give them immunity, just curse and poison. Ahriman can kill, Celia can send us a message.

I'm thinking either option 3 or 4 and hoping that Celia or Ahriman have good instincts for who to kill.

Daisy- why do you think 1?

looks like I missed an interesting turn of events.

I understand. And sometimes there really is nothing solid to go on and aapjes a great player who could definitely avoid leaving us anything. So I won't rule out a vote for him at some point.

Have you looked over daisys case on bwt?

Going to vote for bwt for now. I think that's the strongest case right now.

I don't really disagree with you on aapje, epi, but I like the points brought up on bwt better than just assumptions.

Epignosis wrote:If appje is good, and you were bad, would you kill him?

Me personally probably, but I don't know what's driving their decisions. Or how well they know aapje as a player.

Well if he's bad wouldn't the other team try to kill him too?

And to add to THs thought about the questionable moves of the kills. There are a few roles that switch powers and targets. So maybe they have tried taking him out but it's been switched to someone else?

Holy shit night. RIPiywg guys.

Linki- hell yeah I'd recruit aapje. Basically what th said

I do my own taxes too. It's not that hard.

Black Rock wrote:

Epignosis is replacing DharmaHelper. You are not allowed to night target him tonight and he is immune from lynch tomorrow. He has a lot of catch up to do. He is also going to very friendly an upbeat (that I added). He was The Speaker of Serenity in his past life.

@Black Rock - With G-Man you told us his recruitment status. Could you please tell us what Epis previous recruitment status was?

Maybe it's because you're an English teacher and not a math teacher?

Lol... Just vote for me! I want to prove you wrong!

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I can see good reason for any recruited player to claim unrecruited. Thus, it is almost pointless to discuss it

Agreed.

Epignosis wrote:Consider this:

It's recruitment Mafia.

No one submits anything for recruitment.

No one gets recruited.

Everyone but the recruiters remain unrecruited.

Boring.

That doesn't happen.

That isn't what is happening.

That isn't what has happened.

Do I need to exhaust my verb tenses here?

It's Night 10. Lines in the sand.

Lol... Ok Epi. Some players obviously have been applying for the recruitments, but not everyone has. I have not. I'm sure I'm not the only one. Of course I'm playing for the civvie side though so if you want to say I'm not actually neutral then fine. I'm still unrecruited.

Epignosis wrote:At this stage, I find the unrecruited claims bullshit. It's Night 10. Stop pretending that shit.

By Night 10 of RM3, recruitments were finished and no one was left unrecruited.

So get out of here with that, number one.

Number two, if you are unrecruited, you still have an allegiance.

Then what are you saying here?

Epignosis wrote:

Sorsha wrote:I'm not sure I believe that everyone who is saying they are still neutral actually are. I'm just calling bullshit on epi calling bullshit.

Then you're calling bullshit on yourself. And you're being defensive about it.

No I'm just at saying you're wrong about there being no unrecruited neutrals out here.

Epignosis wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Epignosis wrote:At this stage, I find the unrecruited claims bullshit. It's Night 10. Stop pretending that shit.

By Night 10 of RM3, recruitments were finished and no one was left unrecruited.

So get out of here with that, number one.

Number two, if you are unrecruited, you still have an allegiance.

Are you recruited, Epi?

I'm not answering that.

Sorsha wrote:Recruitments in this game have been completely by choice and I haven't submitted to any of the recruitment calls so no epi, you're wrong.

They have?

Well... Except for the first one I guess. The leaders submitted names for the first recruitment. But all the other ones have been asking for a story or some other submission from the player to a team.

Haven't they?

I'm not sure I believe that everyone who is saying they are still neutral actually are. I'm just calling bullshit on epi calling bullshit.

Recruitments in this game have been completely by choice and I haven't submitted to any of the recruitment calls so no epi, you're wrong.

Scotty wrote:

Sorsha wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

bea wrote:I *think* that you sawyer and I could possibly be the last neutrals out there. No one else is claiming it anyway.

I can confirm you are wrong

Me too!

Confirmed because you know info about bea, reywas and Roxy?

Noooo.... Confirming that bea is wrong about them being the only neutrals left. Because I'm not recruited either.