The Syndicate

thellama73 wrote:

Mongoose wrote:Hi darlings.

Hope you are having a magical ass Monday!

This was my favorite thing I saw this year: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2407380/combined

What was yours?

Happy hunting!

My top three movies of 2014 were Grand Budapest Hotel, Boyhood, and Birdman.

thellama73 wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Llama, if you couldn't lynch Vomps today, who would it be instead?

Probably Rico. I don't have a lot of other strong suspicions. I think MM's ping on Bass is interesting. I have been historically unable to read Bass, so I am naturally distrustful of him.Ditto Blooper. I guess those four are at the top of the list.

I think I am one of the easiest people to read.

Maybe for other people, but not for me. You always seem good to me, which paradoxically is starting to make you always seem bad to me.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I also find it odd Roxy hasn't been posting more.

Odd or suspicious?

thellama73 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Llama, if you couldn't lynch Vomps today, who would it be instead?

Probably Rico. I don't have a lot of other strong suspicions. I think MM's ping on Bass is interesting. I have been historically unable to read Bass, so I am naturally distrustful of him.Ditto Blooper. I guess those four are at the top of the list.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Regarding Bass, first there is this post.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:so i really don't get all these votes for bwt. The two people who stuck out to me was MM and Ricochet which puts me in a tough spot because i don't want to vote someone who isn't here to defend himself and i also don't want to vote a new player on day one. So with that said i'm voting MM because his self vote really seemed like something a baddie would do to try and lay low when he wouldn't be around.

Then there is this one.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't understand why people keep bringing up llama's and S~V~S's vote for I think llama has made it pretty clear that BWT had enough time to say what he had to say before he voted. I think people keep bring this up to maybe distract the tread about talking about anything else.

SVS and llama voted for BWT. Why is there a sudden casual defense for SVS and llama even though he previously called them out for voting BWT.

Also Bass, why was my self-vote suspicious but you did not address AP's self-vote?

thellama73 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

FZ. wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

FZ. wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Also, SVS also said she doesn't like to vote for players who can't defend themselves and she was the first vote for BWT. Why not pick on her for a while?

Are you asking him to pick on SVS because you think she's bad? Do you think he's bad for selectively going after you and not her? Because you told him "You seem to think you have caught me in some kind of "gotcha" moment", which would mean you think he's genuine. If you don't think either is looking bad, why do you want him to go after her?

I don't want him to go after her. I was pointing out the hypocrisy in only calling me out on something other people did too. I don't think SVS is bad and I am still unsure about Rico.

Four other people voted for BWT because they saw it fit and did not invoke doing so despite hating to vote for someone who won't be able to defend himself (anymore). No hypocrisy there, I believe.

I don't know if llama is bad, but this seems like a weird reason to go after him. Why would he say that if he meant that in the case of BWT and then go and vote for him? So either, he meant it in regards to other people, like he claims, or he's a really silly baddie doing something like this

I'm willing to bet the former of the two. I think llama's post about lynching undefendable players and his vote for BWT are unrelated.

But I would like llama (and you) to explain why you want to lynch vomps today.

You are right, they are unrelated. I did not notice that BWT said he would be gone when I voted for him, until Roxy pointed it out. I was referring to you, not BWT.

I will gladly explain why I want to vote for Vomps. Basically, I just think I am seeing his baddie game. He's more engaged than he usually is, and more on topic. He reacted to my suspicion of him when I was the only one even talking about a vote for him, and in my experience, a civ Vomps would have been unfazed by that and ignored it. Then, he started trying to buddy up to me, calling me the epitome of a helpful civ. I have very often seen baddies try to support the people who suspect them as a way of engendering sympathy, and I have very often seen it work.

It doesn't feel like Vomps' normal game. He seems unduly worried about getting lynched (even though only two people really mentioned him as a lynch possibility) and in my experience, people with teams to support are more worried about getting lynched than lone civilians.

thellama73 wrote:Ricochet, you are a new player, so let me ask you a direct question (I hope you don't mind).

Are you bad?

A Person wrote:

Bass_the_Clever wrote:

A Person wrote:I had to pick PT Anderson because I've seen more from him than most people on the list. Also I kinda like his films.

PT Anderson is good but I have to say The Master was horrible in my opinion.

fight me irl

but really I did find it more conflicting than I usually find PTA. I think I need to rewatch it to get a good grasp on it.

A Person wrote:I had to pick PT Anderson because I've seen more from him than most people on the list. Also I kinda like his films.