The Syndicate

Ricochet wrote:Theses and camping. The natural enemies of playing mafia all day long around here.

thellama73 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Remember this the next time people give me a hard time for putting weight on the "are you bad" question.

You didn't even vote for TinyBubbles, silly llama.

I did on previous days, and I would have yestday except that I saw my vote wasn't needed and I wanted to make a statement about DH.

DrWilgy wrote:I'm currently packing for the move tomorrow, so I don't have alot of time left for mafia today, nor will I tomorrow. I'll chime in when I get the chance.

thellama73 wrote:Remember this the next time people give me a hard time for putting weight on the "are you bad" question.

Roxy wrote:I cannot believe the result. I would never have believed her to be recruited.
I will just admit my little rules about newbs can be quite silly.

TinyBubbles wrote:btw i wasn't lying about being emotionally invested, gonna take some time away from mafia. good luck players

DharmaHelper wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Does Doc Wiggles look bad after this result?

No.

Explain?

DharmaHelper wrote:Does Doc Wiggles look bad after this result?

bea wrote:
You guys I suck this game

DharmaHelper wrote:Lets see some lynch fuckery.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Yeah I don't remember either. I'm kidding anyway.

You just hate my post count.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:What do you think, MM?

I don't feel like lynching you, that's for sure.

I think that despite your persistence in asking us to motivate you to play to your own standards, you're doing just fine on your own.

Linki: Turnip is a fellow Shinigami as well.

I think this is our first game together in which you haven't suspected me.

What's your angle?

J/K

Spoiler: show

J/K?

Spoiler: show

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:What do you think, MM?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:JJJ, are you bad?

Nope.

DrWilgy wrote:

timmer wrote:So Doc, talk to me about your vote on SVS. What's your reasoning? I caught DH's thoughts, but I don't recall yours.

I'm not going to type out everything again, here's the short and simple version.
1. Past history shows SVS has a thing for being a baddie
2. SVS was one of the leaders in lynching Golden
3. SVS was one of the players who survived day 1, meaning they had immunity (Ububuzagoon)

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Well now I feel better about my vote.

Die DigruntledStevenWilson.

Why is that?

aapje wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:

aapje wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:

aapje wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Hello friends. I will try to answer some questions.

I'll try one. When are you planning on playing the game?

I am.

So apart from your lack of reading skills do you have anything of value to add to this thread?

I don't follow. My response made sense. You asked when I plan on playing, and I told you that I am playing.

And sure. I requested questions for a reason. For the record I plan on voting TinyBubbles again. She doesn't feel good to me.

Ah that would be why that response didn't make sense to me. We have a different definition of playing.

thellama73 wrote:I actually do think DH would have been a likely choice for an early recruit, before it became clear what style he was adopting this game, and his refusal to give us anything this game makes me think he is expecting to coast into endgame. Not on my watch, Jack.

timmer wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
In one paragraph, you say you jump on bandwagons and you're cool with it. In the next paragraph, you call the cases bullshit. So you are admitting to jumping on bandwagons with bullshit cases.

My mantra has been this: support people who are remaining true to themselves, such as the people I mentioned (SVS, DH, Canuckle, etc. ) and vote for people who seem to be "playing a part" or who are trying to act a certain way that feels false. Because I really don't think this format requires people to change. So yeah, that's the path I've been following, basically.

I'm happy to vote for TinyBubbles because she doesn't seem genuine.

ETA: Wilgy, I have no idea why the word arbitrarily is funny to you, but I like that you're rolling with it, and I doubt I'll be voting you anytime soon

Ricochet wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:Bold stance: next time we're in Position 2, the lynch will be switched again.

Will it be to save a teammate?

How will we be able to test that or get info out of that, if there'll be a lynch switch no matter what.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Obligatory for my last post:

timmer wrote:Holy cap, host, you spent a lot of time on that. But you missed every key point about my game up to here. I stayed quite simply right from the start that I wasn't going to play like a civ until I have reason to, and I've followed through on that worth perfect consistency.

Yeah, I've jumped on bandwagons worth little to no thought, because I can't trek who is on a team flow the most part and thus if someone does it's cool with me, because I'm still neutral. Plain and simple, I remain unrecruited and no that's not a clever truth to hide the fact that I'm a team leader, I am still neutral.

So let's see what is going on in this game. People have made a bunch of bullshit cases about players who were not recruited and lynched them while those on teams day back and laughed. If you lynch me, the same thing will happen. I'll take sigbets on it right here and now.

I've attempted every single recruitment challenge and my air apparently stinks so here I am.

Those of you on teams need to decide whether you want to tale the sage route and keep targeting people who can't defend because they don't believe they've done anything but we're Just playing the neutral scene add they saw fit, or you can actually try to win by taking out your rivals. Your call, I don't plan to deviate from this party as my defence.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'm just going to say that "I don't think we should lynch ______ because I don't think BR/LC would have made _______ a recruiter." is a sentence I will never employ again in this game after this post. I think it's a very dangerous perspective and honestly seems contrary to the spirit of Mafia in the first place. Y'all know these hosts better than I do, but

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:My Mafia motivation in general is crummy right now. I am feeling very lazy. If someone asks me to look into a particular player, I'll do it (provided I haven't already looked into that player). Please push me into action, don't tolerate my lethargy.

aapje wrote:@Hosts:
Any/how many missing PMs?
Did you take a screenshot of the N4 votes?

Position 4: Choose three players, nothing can happen at night and none can be lynched the next day

What happens if any of those 3 players receive the most votes?

Devin the Omniscient wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

Devin the Omniscient wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:Or the lynch was switched to make us lynch Bubbles again

If that's the case, why not just let her be lynched the first time?? I'm with SD on this one.

Because if you have a lynch switch power, why not use it?

I guess.

Spacedaisy wrote:Her response to the lynch switch is what makes me feel this is not the case. It was an exaggerated innocent, "I don't know what happened" response that didn't feel genuine to me.

Turnip Head wrote:I doubt that Canuck meant to be offensive with her remarks. She is baddie hunting, and that means engaging people and commenting on their play. My advice is don't take anything personally, the game is more fun that way. Because really this is just a game where some players are liars by design, and other players are bound to think you're a liar.

aapje wrote:Updated my vote graphs:
Day 1 short
Day 1 full
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4

aapje wrote:Re: the whole MP frustration extravaganza: I can see where he is coming from since I've often felt many of the same frustrations. That said, I think he took it a bit too far. On the upside, some of MM's posts have now registered with me :P

aapje wrote:Having seen more context for EoD I feel like can safely conclude it means end of day.

aapje wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:Aapje's single-mindedness in his pursuit of the lowest posters is concerning to me. I'll happily lynch a low poster on day one to let active people stay on, and will even extend that willingness through to day two in a really quiet game. But on day 4 of a ridiculously talkative game? Like a third of the players have had their names thrown out at some point already. Focusing on low posters purely because they're low posters seems off to me. Is aapje usually like that? I don't think I've played with him since some of my very first games.

It would be unwise to ever underestimate how much I dislike how DP is playing this game.

Epignosis wrote:And people don't like grammar why exactly?

S~V~S wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Here is a list of the games TinyBubbles has payed on the Syndicate:
Recruitment 4
Angry Birds
Frisky Dingo
Bullets Over Broadway
Watchmen
Death and Taxes
Omtera

Can we stop saying she's "new to mafia"?

Wow, I did not play many of those, but I played a couple (and modded several) and I don't remember her at all, really. I thought this was the first game I had played with her. I am so embarassed

DharmaHelper wrote:Even though llama is new to mafia I don't think we should give him a free pass.

Roxy wrote:

Roxy wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:MM, seriously, drop the fucking shit. Either play this game right or ask to be replaced or modkilled. Straight shoot me a reason you don't trust me. Right now.

Play this game right? What does that mean?

I've tried playing the game your way. I can't do it. Even if I could do it succesfully, I'd get lynched for not being myself. Recall the "it's just MP being crazy, so that's normal" excuse Devin gave for defending you? It's kinda like that.

Why don't you convince mafia to nightkill me or something instead?

It means actually play the game of mafia. It's Day 4 and you say you have no suspects. Get out of here.

Your over the top reaction to a couple of votes is quite illuminating. Why so emo over a couple of votes?
You are being mean to MM when you tell him to "actually play the game" and "Get out of here".

This is what I meant last time - it is toxic and no fun to read and unfortunately I play for fun MP not this.

I finished reading this part oif the thread and now Know neither had voted you - still this major reaction. I don't understand it at all.

nutella wrote:I see your behavior in this game as similar to (though maybe not quite to same extreme as) MM's. Speaking of which, MM owes me a few explanations. He's refused to contribute AT ALL to any thread discussions. MM, please give us something to work with here.

nutella wrote:MM has been incredibly annoying

TinyBubbles wrote:RIP unfurl ? and i am confused, why did unfurl get lynched and not me,according to the poll i got the most votes...?? if by some miracle im still alive i will be happy to address any questions! somewhat caught up and have time today