The Syndicate

S~V~S wrote:There are three left, so any given baddie has only 2 teammates left. MM seems to be assuming Wilgy is a Captain, so he could have only 2 teammates left. Unless I am misunderstanding something very basic, which is totally possible?

DrWilgy wrote:Silly Marmot. It's you and LC remember?

Nah, you got it SVS. Who do you think is bad now?

DrWilgy wrote:I tried Gleam.

Remaining baddies are Scotty, Epi and BWT.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'd like to thank all the players for maintaining such a civil game here so far, I love to see good sportsmanship. If anyone has any concerns at all don't hesitate to let me know. I'll continue to follow along.

Scotty wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Good morning everyone. So say we all!

How many tens of posts did I mist?

Lol I actually forgot you were playing this game. Any thoughts for what's happening here in ye olde times?

llamaman wrote:The second in my ambitious series of Kubrick themed mafias, based on my second favorite Kubrick film. This will be a straightforward game with no secrets and everything out in the open, only with an added Hierarchy mechanic. This being a story of people swept along by the whim of circumstance, the individual players are fairly limited in their night powers, but I do not think that will lessen the fun substantially.

DrWilgy wrote:I'm content with these results.

S~V~S wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Spoiler: show

S~V~S wrote:Becasue the main reason he had any suspicion at all was becasue of the "dragon" crosspost with Serge thing.

What I find suspect is people not seeing the worlds most obvious thing. I always miss role related stuff, and I caught this ASAP.

And back to this:

Scotty wrote:Sorry I've been absent a while. Getting back on track.

I want to stay away from the Wilgy/zebra lick-a-thon for now. Im not seeing baddies out of either of them and instead of possibly getting two mislynchesmislynches, I'll stick to more glaring developments.

I think Epi is right RE: SVS. Why make a comment chiding others for not voting if you havent even voted yourself? Then she leaves! it's absolute fluff to let everyone know she's still here and can make mistakes like the rest of the working class, and I don't buy it. I think Epi may be on to something.

Did you read my original posts?


Only 30 seconds apart! I came in and thought the poll was almost over. Surprised at only 2 votes. Posted,looked at the poll again, felt stupid, reposted. I had nothing to add since all the discussion had been Wilgy (whose game I have no clue bout, with this licking business) and Zeeb, whose points I either don;t understand or disagree with. SO I LEFT.

Thepost before mine was at 3:57, and the next post wasn't until 8:01, so noone seemed to care about showing themselves to still be here.

I was glad not ot have to vote since I was totally clueless, lol

linki, OK bai, postinganyhow

Ah, so this is how you can see player posts in seconds!

Go into the UCP, xhoose "Custom" as your date format, and put this into the syntax window: D M d, Y g:i:s a

Typhoony showed me that at RM.

And yay for not dying and yay that a baddie died

Scotty wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:@Scotty, so... Baddies lost a teammate and the person conversing with said teammate was me. Am I supposed to believe that the baddies team didn't chime in anywhere on me? It's also like I stated a odd pattern that two players gave 50% correct checks regarding both me and baddie.

Did 2 civs come up and portray this pattern? Not likely. A civ and a baddie? More likely. It's the same reason why I figured Sig and Zebra were on opposite teams. Similar patterns, but little connection.

First of all, I have no idea if LC is a civ, and I can't answer to that. Secondly, you seem so sure that we are diametrically opposed on the matter that I think your logic is a little skewed. There is no direct correlation between me and LC being bad based on each other's reads. It's just our reads. I'm not vouching for LC- he could very well be bad- but your line of thinking in getting to that conclusion doesn't make sense to me. Objectively.

If I called the sky green and LC called the sky red, who is right?

Long Con wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Long Con wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Long Con wrote:You both look bad right now to me.

Why is that?

This whole back-and-forth has reached the level of contrived.

So you're saying we're teammates? Okay.

That's the only possible meaning of "you both look bad", isn't it?

DrWilgy wrote:Depends. Are you civ or mafia?

DrWilgy wrote:Sorry, I meant in past games reffering to her punctuality. Does SVS's timing have anything to do with alignment?

DrWilgy wrote:Do point out observations on defence vs neutral and aggro please. Are there any key words that set a defensive tone?

Why do I change my spelling of defense?

...

Are both correct? I think both are correct... EPIIIIII!!! I need you!!!

Also, I like the SVS observation. Has she done this before?

thellama73 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Hi everyone!

I'm down for a Ryan O'Neal lynch, because that's who I'm currently voting for.

That is an illegal vote, MM. Don't make me regret letting you sub in.