The Syndicate

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Hey llama, you were almost certainly aware of my beef with you on Night 0 (you acknowledged other posts in the same vicinity), but never even acknowledged my existence. Then on Day 1 I made it as clear as possible under the circumstances that I wanted your attention and you still ignored me. Why?

I smell an impending vote for Bos Tauros.

no idea what any of that is. I might vote for the Equus one because Equus is a good ass player on RYM.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Hey llama, you were almost certainly aware of my beef with you on Night 0 (you acknowledged other posts in the same vicinity), but never even acknowledged my existence. Then on Day 1 I made it as clear as possible under the circumstances that I wanted your attention and you still ignored me. Why?

Golden wrote:It's not a polar bear???

• Brown spider monkey
  Domestic cow
  Plains zebra
  Yellow-bellied marmot
  Brown bear

a2thezebra wrote:I'm voting marmota because marmot, hellooooooo

Draconus wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:10 pages down, 27 to go. WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?!?

Rico is all over the board and I find it really strange that so many people actually want to vote for someone who so blatantly seems to be trying to draw attention to himself. My feelings are anyone who looks like they want to be lynched probably shouldn't be. But maybe there is more I just haven't gotten to yet.

I have a little bit of time yet, going to read a bit more then vote.

Vote for somebody who is potentially your mafia teammate.

Is this the marmot I am looking for?

Spacedaisy wrote:10 pages down, 27 to go. WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?!?

Rico is all over the board and I find it really strange that so many people actually want to vote for someone who so blatantly seems to be trying to draw attention to himself. My feelings are anyone who looks like they want to be lynched probably shouldn't be. But maybe there is more I just haven't gotten to yet.

I have a little bit of time yet, going to read a bit more then vote.

Ricochet wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:We are relying on you Ricochet.
Stay determined.

SOON

a2thezebra wrote:That idea's worth noting, Mac. HamburgerBoy has replaced juliets on my list of the six to potentially be killed by me. Killed. KILLED.

linki - I'm not claiming to know how you play in general, only how you have played recently. Which is not this. Or at least, it wasn't.

linki - stop stop stop lemme post ugh

Ricochet wrote:I'm gonna go take a bath. Need to look my very best for my date with Death.

thellama73 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:I think zebra just wants to show up on top of my lynch pile, so he'll claim he took a hard, last minute decision and look civvier.

she?

Zebra is a girl.

Ricochet wrote:I think zebra just wants to show up on top of my lynch pile, so he'll claim he took a hard, last minute decision and look civvier.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Metalmarsh, what's the story on your vote for Sig?

Ricochet wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:You know what, I think Rico wants to be lynched.

I don't think we should give that to him. Discuss.

You voted zebra and I followed. That was the only vote ever placed on a confirmed baddie during this phase. I'm sorry if that's the best I could do.

Put yourself in my shoes (wash your feet first, tho) and tell me what I should do right now. Vote properly and achieve a 1 vote on a confirmed baddie. Much achievement. You're a notorious self-voter. And known to like apples. Discuss.

Zebra is confirmed town though.

The fark he is.

I can confirm that in my proffesional mafia opinion, a2thezebra is civilian, I do declare.

On what grounds?

a2thezebra wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:If Rico REALLY wanted to be lynched then they wouldn't go about it the way they are. They would be more subtle. Getting lynched on Day 1 does not require a performance like the one Rico has given. Just say this or that and/or come off as disingenuous with a few actions and rest assured you will get lynched on Day 1. This is WAY more than that, it's unnecessary.

But if that is his goal, it has been effective.

True, but it has also brought up suspicion from you, Mac, and others that perhaps he is deliberately trying to get lynched - and there's a possibility that if enough people listen to you, someone else will get lynched before the day ends. He could have (and would have) easily gotten lynched today without arousing that particular suspicion had he been more subtle.

Ricochet wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:You know what, I think Rico wants to be lynched.

I don't think we should give that to him. Discuss.

You voted zebra and I followed. That was the only vote ever placed on a confirmed baddie during this phase. I'm sorry if that's the best I could do.

Put yourself in my shoes (wash your feet first, tho) and tell me what I should do right now. Vote properly and achieve a 1 vote on a confirmed baddie. Much achievement. You're a notorious self-voter. And known to like apples. Discuss.

Zebra is confirmed town though.

The fark he is.

Ricochet wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:You know what, I think Rico wants to be lynched.

I don't think we should give that to him. Discuss.

You voted zebra and I followed. That was the only vote ever placed on a confirmed baddie during this phase. I'm sorry if that's the best I could do.

Put yourself in my shoes (wash your feet first, tho) and tell me what I should do right now. Vote properly and achieve a 1 vote on a confirmed baddie. Much achievement. You're a notorious self-voter. And known to like apples. Discuss.

a2thezebra wrote:If Rico REALLY wanted to be lynched then they wouldn't go about it the way they are. They would be more subtle. Getting lynched on Day 1 does not require a performance like the one Rico has given. Just say this or that and/or come off as disingenuous with a few actions and rest assured you will get lynched on Day 1. This is WAY more than that, it's unnecessary.

Elohcin wrote:This game is moving way too fast for me.

Golden wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

RadicalFuzz wrote:

Golden wrote:But yeah, I was talking in the theoretical because I am in particular one of those who would criticise people voting off wagon without much explanation, and so I think talking through Fuzz's perspective is helpful for me to understand him.

Fuzz is my strongest town read right now.

Explain something to me. How can I, with my reasoning for voting Llama literally attributed to "I'm following the guy who can only speak in smileys," be your strongest town read when in the same post you claim you would criticize people voting off wagon without much explanation?

Fair enough Marsh. You realize, then, that if we're going to operate on the possibility of separate scum teams that catching scum provides very little credibility, correct?

That goes without saying.

Speaking of which, it amazes me that Golden was willing to give you such high credibility already.

When Golden senses civilian intent and quality play Golden is not feint with praise. This is normal for him.

This is not a testament to his alignment though.

It amazes you that I'd do it, even though you know it is something I do regularly enough that you can say it isn't testament to my alignment?

MacDougall wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

RadicalFuzz wrote:

Golden wrote:But yeah, I was talking in the theoretical because I am in particular one of those who would criticise people voting off wagon without much explanation, and so I think talking through Fuzz's perspective is helpful for me to understand him.

Fuzz is my strongest town read right now.

Explain something to me. How can I, with my reasoning for voting Llama literally attributed to "I'm following the guy who can only speak in smileys," be your strongest town read when in the same post you claim you would criticize people voting off wagon without much explanation?

Fair enough Marsh. You realize, then, that if we're going to operate on the possibility of separate scum teams that catching scum provides very little credibility, correct?

That goes without saying.

Speaking of which, it amazes me that Golden was willing to give you such high credibility already.

When Golden senses civilian intent and quality play Golden is not feint with praise. This is normal for him.

RadicalFuzz wrote:

Golden wrote:But yeah, I was talking in the theoretical because I am in particular one of those who would criticise people voting off wagon without much explanation, and so I think talking through Fuzz's perspective is helpful for me to understand him.

Fuzz is my strongest town read right now.

Explain something to me. How can I, with my reasoning for voting Llama literally attributed to "I'm following the guy who can only speak in smileys," be your strongest town read when in the same post you claim you would criticize people voting off wagon without much explanation?

Fair enough Marsh. You realize, then, that if we're going to operate on the possibility of separate scum teams that catching scum provides very little credibility, correct?

Black Rock wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:How many baddies do you think there are Mac?

Can I hazard a guess? 8. 4 and 4. Or 7 if one big team. Probably a SK too.

I wish I knew what role(s) were taken from my game.

MacDougall wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:How many baddies do you think there are Mac?

Depends how many teams there are. If there is 1 team there's probably 5 or 6 baddies and a shit ton of independents. Unlikely.

If there are 2 teams then there are probably 2 teams of 5. So 10 Mafia. Perhaps 2 teams of 4 if there are lots of independents.

Perhaps even 3 teams of 4?

Hard to say. I hadn't really thought much about it until now. What's the purpose of the question?

MacDougall wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Mac and Fuzz are teammates (in a bad kind of way).

Please don't make matter of fact statements like this without making a case or I will make your experience in this game very unpleasant.

Ok.

I would encourage you in this situation to not bother trying to force a case out of this ping because you will find absolutely nothing to support it beyond your own faulty intuition.

MacDougall wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Mac and Fuzz are teammates (in a bad kind of way).

Please don't make matter of fact statements like this without making a case or I will make your experience in this game very unpleasant.

MacDougall wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:I second what Fuzz says.

9 out of 19 of your posts have been some variation of "random words Fuzz". You are either buddying or distancing.

Draconus wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Draconus wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:METALMARMOT

Isn't this fun?

I thought you meant you were going to self-vote too.
Was there a miscommunication? Is Self-Voting more fun?

Draconus wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:METALMARMOT

Isn't this fun?

Matt wrote:I'm not trying to policy lynch MM.

Anyway, it's not much, but this caught my eye...

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Ricochet wrote:LoRab and llama have not butted heads over who is the better writer and poster.

confirmed fishy

I think I'm cool with lynching llama first. I hope I don't forget by the time I have to vote.

Which team do you think he is on?

This is a closed set up, and though there are most likely two teams of baddies, I think there's also a possibility that there is a big team of 7 or 8 like there was in Talking Heads.

But Marmot automatically assumes two teams.

Draconus wrote:MM, do you want to vote for yourself with me?

Ricochet wrote:The more I think about it, JJJ reminds me of my teamie back in Syndicate Mafia, who couldn't muster past 100 posts overall in the whole game. He could be bad after all. His unwillingness to lynch Zebra is food for thought.

Black Rock wrote:Now that I have quoted the post deleted the twirls and previewed it I can be satisfied.

Interesting back and forth between Rico and LoRab.

I haven't read the 11 pages before page 20, and I won't be unless I think I missed something important. Ricos posts don't count.

My opinion is all though Rico has been distracting and posting a lot of crap (all the way up to page 8) I don't find him that suspicious. Would he really want that much attention? I was thinking he had a neutral role, if those exist in this game.

He did have a point about LoRabs original post. Seemed easy and even her Matt points were wishy washy at best. Not the best example of LoRabs mafia play. Is she bad? or just not that into it?

Ricochet wrote:Muh case.