The Syndicate

I'm gonna forget to vote if I don't do it now, and I certainly don't want to be modkilled I've read some arguments but I feel rather confused by most of them at the moment. (I blame it on vacation brain.) The one that does stand out to me is the case on Vomps. Not terribly strong, but what is on what is really a "Day 2" kind of vote? I've ignored Vomps before, and he's been good. I've ignored Vomps before, and he's been bad. Yeah, he has his moments of lucidity, but he has been a bit more on point with this game than I've noticed in others (especially those he turned out to be good), and it seems others have noticed this, too. I'm not gung-ho about the choice, but I feel stronger about voting him than anyone else at the moment.

I am soooo sorry for missing the vote. I've been traveling all day and just got some down time enough to check the thread I am NOT having a good track record with this game, and I apologize. I would have voted for two of the people who hadn't fought yet, but I wasn't set on any two in particular. The ones with the majority vote at the moment are fine with me.

Sweet baby Jesus that was a bloodbath! And all unrecruited Civs Sorry, guys. I'd also like to know why the tie turned out the way it did, but something tells me that info won't be divulged just yet...

Thank goodness I still had this page open; I nearly forgot the vote! I read this thread earlier, but didn't get terribly strong feelings. However, in the past couple of games I've played, inactive people have often turned out to be bad. Both Nevinera and johns2jj have been so, and I'm not really feeling Bullz as being bad. The flyby vote on Nevinera by johns2jj pinged me when I first read the thread, so I'm gonna go with him. Not a strong feeling, but I must vote so I don't suffer Sock's consequences.

Lots to read. I'm trying to keep it in bite-sized pieces, but holy crap. I'm off to participate in the Beerlympics for the night, but I'll be back to read and hopefully offer up some helpful thoughts. Just checking in