The Syndicate

I would like to join the competition for favorite dead person, pls. I can offer a near endless amount of cat pics.

Made wrote:... and thought he was supposed to role play? He is a relatively inexperienced player and i did that my first game...

THAT WAS ROLE PLAYING?!?!? I THOUGHT WE WERE TRUE HOMIES MADE :'( :'( :'(

Also I would like to request a crying smiley. I think I could make good use of that. :'(

nijuukyugou wrote:It's a shame Dana died so early - she was rather good at the role decoding. I wonder what our challenge will be

rez pls

Avenge Delta Squadron!

boo wrote:
Long Con wrote:
boo wrote:
Long Con wrote:
boo wrote:No, you wouldn't because you already haven't by voting for me without Nisani having instructed you to.

But hey, all 3 of you in your alliance have already demonstrated you aren't going to follow through on deals you make, so you're interchangeably priorities 1-3 for me.
Actually, the goal of Delta Squadron is to act as a team and support each other. That's what I have seen happening.
Actually, the requirement of any Delta Squadron member was to vote how they were told to by Nisani. Neither you or Dana did so, which already undermined the authority of your supposed leader. So clearly he is ineffectual, and only went along with what the two of you did because to do otherwise would be to lose all credibility, and have his alliance crumble on Day 1. So none of you can be trusted, since not a single one you has kept your word (to one another), and you're supposed to be an alliance. If you can't keep your word to your allies, why would anyone who ever considers making a one off deal with you believe any of you would keep up your end? They wouldn't because you've already proved you won't. Since we can therefore never work with any of the three of you in good faith, we should kill you.
It was steadfast loyalty to our team that directed our votes, anyone can see that no matter how you try to taint it.
It was self-interest guised as loyalty, yes. But it wasn't loyalty. It was you breaching one of the most important requirements Nisani created, presumably in an effort to take control of your alliance out from under him, and have minions who will do your bidding, and who you can easily NK once you get them doing exactly what you want them to do, since it gives you excellent cover with the WIFOM.

It was just pure loyalty. Our leader was under attack so we used our votes to protect him. Not to take control from him, but to keep him alive. I don't see how this isn't loyalty. Nisani also agreed with and approved of our votes here:

Nisani wrote:In the interest of keeping this town cooperative, I am voting for boo. I see that the other members of Delta Squadron have done the same-- I approve of these actions.

If we were so disloyal to Nisani and Delta Squadron, wouldn't he be a bit upset?

Made wrote:
Dana wrote: I'm not just going to blindly follow/trust what (Made) says.
You really should start doing that

I was talking about Epi in this post. Context, Made.

Also voting 48/24 because college is difficult.

Epignosis wrote:
Dana wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Dana wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Ah ah ah. I don't give a shit about Made.

Notice how I picked you out of everybody? Notice how you didn't have any votes or attention at the time? I'm not trying to save Made. I'm trying to lynch you.
Okay nevermind now I'm just completely confused.
It's okay- I wasn't going to answer your question about tells anyway. I never do.
Then how do you expect people to believe you? Without any explanations or evidence you're just making empty claims.
I don't expect people to believe me. It's Day 1. Made has a few votes, so he'll die, because that's how stuff on this site goes: Dick around until a few hours before the deadline, and pick whoever has the most votes because it ain't you. If it works like that in a regular game, how much more will it work in Last Man Standing?

I'm not going to pull evidence from previous games to satisfy you on Day 1, sorry. If you don't want to take my word for it, fine. Not a problem. But are they "empty claims" as you think? I don't think so.

The fact that you voted boo just now with likewise no evidence (he's making sense) says volumes about you though.

I didn't say anything about if Boo was bad or a killer or had btsc or anything like that. I didn't make any claims against Boo at all. I voted him mostly because he voted for the leader of my alliance.

boo wrote: Then there's Dana, where everything she's said about voting is clearly bullshit, since she voted for me for 'making sense'. So I'll probably vote for her tomorrow, since none of us can ever trust her. She joined an alliance (like LC), hasn't followed through with it, but has also been contradicting herself all over the place. She's the first person who has made it clear that even if you make a deal with her, she won't keep up her end.

Again, I voted for you because I trust Nisani as a person, and there's not really much else to go on in a game like this. I would definitely keep up a deal if I made one, I don't know why you think that I wouldn't.

Epignosis wrote: You've picked up on my tells?

What are those tells?

Can you cite evidence?

Was this sarcasm or...?

Epignosis wrote:
Dana wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Dana wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Can we lynch you Day Two anyway?
I think I could maybe get behind this.
Why do you want to lynch me?

Am I making you uncomfortable?
Yes, quite. I like to understand things. When people back up their claims it makes for less confusion all around, and the way this game is set up is already confusing enough. I don't necessarily want to lynch you right now but I do want to know exactly why you think Bullz has BTSC, and if you can't explain that then I can't believe you.
It's Last Man Standing.

Dana needs Bullzeye dead to win.

Instead, she's pushing me to prove that Bullzeye has BTSC.

Think about that right there.

I'm pushing you to back up your claims, I don't care what those claims are. I don't know if Bullz has BTSC or not, and since you apparently do, I want to know why. Everyone needs everyone else dead to win in the end. I'm more concerned with getting rid of the teams and killers first. Even though it's everyone for themselves I do feel like there are still sort of "good" and "bad" roles.

Epignosis wrote:
Dana wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Can we lynch you Day Two anyway?
I think I could maybe get behind this.
Why do you want to lynch me?

Am I making you uncomfortable?

Yes, quite. I like to understand things. When people back up their claims it makes for less confusion all around, and the way this game is set up is already confusing enough. I don't necessarily want to lynch you right now but I do want to know exactly why you think Bullz has BTSC, and if you can't explain that then I can't believe you.

Epignosis wrote:
Dana wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Bullzeye wrote: Epi is more likely to screw people over than I am. Successfully, anyway.
Based on what? One game in distant memory in which I had little choice?

How about the GoC 2014, in which Dom recruited me and I still remained loyal to Eloh, juliets and Kate?
How about INH's Sherlock where I tried to stay loyal and got screwed?
How about Breaking Bad, where I tried to throw Lorab under the bus and was persuaded that such a thing wasn't the best idea for us?

Please. I'm loyal.
You'll give evidence like this to help yourself but not to help your case against Bullz?
The evidence to defend my honor required two minutes of my time.
The evidence I have against Bullz required two years to take in.

Can we at least get like a synopsis or something? Literally any tiny thing other than just saying that you know. Any sort of proof at all would be better than nothing, otherwise it definitely seems like you're making this up.

S~V~S wrote:Can we lynch you Day Two anyway?

I think I could maybe get behind this.

Epignosis wrote:
Bullzeye wrote: Epi is more likely to screw people over than I am. Successfully, anyway.
Based on what? One game in distant memory in which I had little choice?

How about the GoC 2014, in which Dom recruited me and I still remained loyal to Eloh, juliets and Kate?
How about INH's Sherlock where I tried to stay loyal and got screwed?
How about Breaking Bad, where I tried to throw Lorab under the bus and was persuaded that such a thing wasn't the best idea for us?

Please. I'm loyal.

You'll give evidence like this to help yourself but not to help your case against Bullz?

Bullzeye wrote: I'm assuming it is in fact you who have BTSC. I would even narrow that statement down to say Made is a teammate of yours. Hence why you specifically asked people to vote me instead of him. Let's face it, I'll probably die tonight anyway since you've painted a target on me by claiming to know I have BTSC, but you're just plain wrong. You act so sure, but you haven't got a clue.

I'm not so sure about that. Would someone with BTSC just outright bribe people to not vote for their partner? It would basically out themselves and their teammate immediately. It's too simple and I think Epig is a lot smarter than that.

Elohcin wrote:
Dana wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Dana wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Ah ah ah. I don't give a shit about Made.

Notice how I picked you out of everybody? Notice how you didn't have any votes or attention at the time? I'm not trying to save Made. I'm trying to lynch you.
Okay nevermind now I'm just completely confused.
It's okay- I wasn't going to answer your question about tells anyway. I never do.
Then how do you expect people to believe you? Without any explanations or evidence you're just making empty claims.
Wait. Don't you know Made IRL? Do you happen to know what is keeping him away? And, the fact that you are not wanting to vote Bullz (for a favor from Epi no less) over Made concerns me. I will be looking at you as teh BTSC partner is it turns out Bulls is who Epi thinks he is.

I sort of know him IRL? I know him from elsewhere on the internet and we've met a few times but I don't like see him every day or anything. I can try and get him in here. I chose to vote someone other than Bullz because Epi hasn't given a single piece of objective evidence for him having BTSC, and I'm not just going to blindly follow/trust what he says. This whole favor business bothers me a bit too, and I'm not sure how involved I want to get in that. I'm not trying to protect Bullz, I just don't see a reason for him to be bad, and the person that does see a reason won't explain it, and I don't want to unfairly lynch someone who, in my view, hasn't done anything wrong at all.

I'm going to go back to my original-ish plan and vote for Boo. Yay alliance loyalty I guess?

Epignosis wrote:
Dana wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Ah ah ah. I don't give a shit about Made.

Notice how I picked you out of everybody? Notice how you didn't have any votes or attention at the time? I'm not trying to save Made. I'm trying to lynch you.
Okay nevermind now I'm just completely confused.
It's okay- I wasn't going to answer your question about tells anyway. I never do.

Then how do you expect people to believe you? Without any explanations or evidence you're just making empty claims.

Epignosis wrote:Ah ah ah. I don't give a shit about Made.

Notice how I picked you out of everybody? Notice how you didn't have any votes or attention at the time? I'm not trying to save Made. I'm trying to lynch you.

Okay nevermind now I'm just completely confused.

Epignosis wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
I can tell you have BTSC.
You can? I don't. Sorry to break it to you but your psychic powers need work.
Yeah, I can.

I keep tabs on people, particularly when I am bad with them. I observe their tells. Then I use these in future games.

I do this with everyone I'm bad with. I love being bad. I learn shit.

You, sir, have BTSC.

Dana wrote:Linki- Epi can you give some evidence or something please? It really seems like you're just picking out of a hat to me.
Well, you weren't in Bioshock, the last time we were bad together. If he doesn't have BTSC, then I'll give up drinking for fifteen minutes.

Can you explain what some of these tells are and where they can also be found when he was bad for certain?

Epignosis wrote:
Dana wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:Funnily enough Epi, if keeping Made around meant that much to you, you could've just asked me not to vote him. I like Made too, I'm literally only voting for him because you told people to vote for me instead. If he gets lynched he can blame it on you.
Why not vote Epi himself, then? Why take it out on Made?

I'm sorry! I don't want to get on your bad side, I'm just trying to ask some 4 real questions in here and figure stuff out in this confusing game.

Bullzeye wrote:Funnily enough Epi, if keeping Made around meant that much to you, you could've just asked me not to vote him. I like Made too, I'm literally only voting for him because you told people to vote for me instead. If he gets lynched he can blame it on you.

Why not vote Epi himself, then? Why take it out on Made?

Bullzeye wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Dana wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I am voting for Bullzeye now.
Why are you voting Bullz, just to not vote Made? Why are you bribing people with favors to join you in voting for him?
Because I like Made, and he gets voted out early for bullshit reasons. Also, Affirmative Action!
And I am NOT voting Bullzeye just to note vote Made. That, madam, is a misrepresentation. I'm voting Bullzeye and I'm encouraging others to do so because I want him out of the game.
And why is that?

Yeah, I was more asking for the reasons why you want him out of the game. I like Made too and I don't want to vote him but I don't just want to pick a random other person to vote instead.

nijuukyugou wrote:BTW it's good to have you back, Dana! I missed your kitty's your face your and your kitty's faces around here

Thanks! Haha, I've missed mafia a bit, but college has been kind of insane recently. It was definitely a bad idea to join this game a few weeks before finals

Linki- Epi can you give some evidence or something please? It really seems like you're just picking out of a hat to me.

just like* day 1

Wait you guys if any of us can get our roles switched around every night then is every day just lay day 1? If we kill a killer can't the role just come back? Someone you trust/don't trust could just be someone completely different the next day. I'm so confused about how this game works. Also we got some Es in on the first page, so I'm going to start trying to decode that since that was super fun in doctor who.

Epignosis wrote:I am voting for Bullzeye now.

Why are you voting Bullz, just to not vote Made? Why are you bribing people with favors to join you in voting for him?

Boo's making a good amount of sense which sort of makes me want to vote for him. Most success I've ever had is voting for people I trust the most, so I'm considering that. Not that I necessarily trust Boo but I also don't distrust him at this point? Even though he did vote against my "leader" I'm willing to look past that since it's still so early in the game and these alliances are probably somewhat meaningless anyway.

I'm also considering voting a low poster but Made is mah homie I can't do that! How do you guys not let personal friendships get in the way of mafiaing? Especially all these married couples!

This challenge sounds exciting, I hope I'll be around. I have a class trip that day

Oh man, these alliances are getting serious. I'm a little unsure about this but I like friends so I'm going to do the thing.

I officially join Nisani's Delta Squadron. Praise go to Enrique, the greatest host ever.

Nisani homie don't let me down I trust you man.

I sort of feel like splitting up into so many little "teams" is just making it easier for the killers. If we're all against each other, then it'll be easier for them to kill us off while letting us just vote each other off. Though I do like the idea of the comfort of a group. Hmm. I'm still unsure who to vote for at this point.

Epignosis wrote:
Dana wrote:
Roxy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Nisani wrote:The rules are that I direct the actions of the Squadron. We act as one unit, stronger together than apart. Of course, if you disagree with my leadership, you are free to leave the Squadron... at your own risk. It's a dangerous world out there.

I cannot speak for game elements that the masterful host Enrique has placed in this game, as there are secrets that even I know not of.
If I disagree with you in any respect, I have the proper recourse at my disposal.
Oh really!?

This was pretty fishy...
It's called a vote. Presumably the two of you have that faculty as well.

Oh yeah voting is a thing. Though just one vote alone doesn't do a whole lot. You'd need lots of people on your side.

I am also heavily considering joining Nisani's group. Especially if its religion is based around praising Mr. Baller Enri.

Roxy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Nisani wrote:The rules are that I direct the actions of the Squadron. We act as one unit, stronger together than apart. Of course, if you disagree with my leadership, you are free to leave the Squadron... at your own risk. It's a dangerous world out there.

I cannot speak for game elements that the masterful host Enrique has placed in this game, as there are secrets that even I know not of.
If I disagree with you in any respect, I have the proper recourse at my disposal.
Oh really!?

This was pretty fishy...

unfurl wrote:
Roxy wrote:
unfurl wrote:So does Nisani tends to have a very unique style to post? like that big post is usual for her/him?
I dont know it sort sticks out
I think he/she is new to The Syndicate.
It looks you are right and Nisani is new cause he/she only has 5 post count, so for now I will leave this feeling in the back of my head, as I think is good to encorauge new players and will wait to see what more he/she has to say

Made, Enrique and I know Nisani from elsewhere. I think he's played forum mafia in the past? He's usually sort of a quiet person but it does definitely seem like he has some information. I don't think he'd make something like that up, especially being new to this forum. I see no reason not to trust his post.

Made wrote:
G-Man wrote:
Long Con wrote:Is anyone interested in having Long Con as an alliance member? I'm notoriously loyal.
I won't deny that I'm curious.

In the meantime, I'd like to propose a discussion point. Since it is now Day 1, and Easter has passed, technically we no longer have to be nice to our furry little friends...

Discuss!
Hmm, there aren't any rabbit in this game...there is however a newt...

There's definitely a rabbit in this game...

And it begins.

Early alphabet represent! Also NISANI!!! Yay!
I hope I haven't forgotten how to mafia. This game setup is pretty weird, idk how I feel about there not really being set good guys and bad guys. I like working as a team with the town, being alone is super scary so this game is pretty terrifying.

Sup homies?!

The Syndicate

Search found 35 matches

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Night 5]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Night 3]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 3]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 2]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 2]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 2]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 1]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 0]

Re: Last Man Standing 3 [Day 0]