The Syndicate

thellama73 wrote:

fingersplints wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I knew you were bad, Roxy. Rob surprised me.

Mine is the other way around I thought it was juliets and Epi. but I wasn't good at picking the baddies this game. that first round threw me off

Oh, I was absolutely terrible. It wasn't until after I had died that I realized about Roxy.

I think these sort of lightning games are REALLY hard for the civs, since there is so little to go on.

thellama73 wrote:

Made wrote:Just a thought, we are wearing costumes of ourselves, but underneath, behind our facades, we are who we really are. Every thing is clear when the mask are gone... that's pretty deep...

Join me at the zombie bar, Made? I like the cut of your pseudo-philosophical jib.

S~V~S wrote:

Made wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Made wrote:5 mintues
I'm leaning SVS over Spints, Epig has been relatively tame which is throwing me off.

Why? I already voted for you btw.

Spints accusations come across genuine to me.
and noteded

So why did you vote for her?

S~V~S wrote:

Made wrote:5 mintues
I'm leaning SVS over Spints, Epig has been relatively tame which is throwing me off.

Why? I already voted for you btw.

S~V~S wrote:

Made wrote:Strategic thoughts for civvies. While this is definitely still forum mafia, It's going to be difficult to keep up with thread as well as rereading post to develop theories, So keep that in mind. In that sense anyways, this game will probably be more like party mafia than traditional forum.

yeah, that's why I siad this:

S~V~S wrote:

Made wrote:Just a thought, wouldn't baddies be a sort of disadvantage having to keep up with both BTSC chat as well as the thread?

They don't have to talk during the hour they are on the thread. It's like Party Mafia, you don't huddle in a corner talking to your BTS while everyone else is looking.

So do you have any thoughts on things other than the mechanics, Made?

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Made wrote:Strategic thoughts for civvies. While this is definitely still forum mafia, It's going to be difficult to keep up with thread as well as rereading post to develop theories, So keep that in mind. In that sense anyways, this game will probably be more like party mafia than traditional forum.

What's the point of this post?

S~V~S wrote:

Made wrote:Just a thought, wouldn't baddies be a sort of disadvantage having to keep up with both BTSC chat as well as the thread?

They don't have to talk during the hour they are on the thread. It's like Party Mafia, you don't huddle in a corner talking to your BTS while everyone else is looking.

fingersplints wrote:So announcing a probable random is less suspicious then announcing that far in advance wanting to lynch a low poster?

MovingPictures07 wrote:
I also find Made's suggestion first to lynch me, SVS, and splints, and now zeek, most bloodthirsty of anyone. Not sure what it means yet though.

thellama73 wrote:In all seriousness, this is going to be even more of a stab in the dark than a normal Day 1, with so little to go on. With that in mind, I'm inclined to go with a low poster (I know, I know) because the baddies may be laying low to avoid revealing anything.

thellama73 wrote:This is what happens when there is no linki: three people make the exact same post right in a row.

MovingPictures07 wrote:LOL, MM are you in CST like me?[/quot

fingersplints wrote:we can or can't change votes?