The Syndicate

Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 2:01 pm
Ricochet wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 1:47 pm
Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 1:38 pm Thundal/Rondo not w/w
Thundal/Epi not w/w
Rondo/Ricochet not w/w (actually, maybe not... maybe again P#179 Tundal/Rondo both voting Ricochet)
falcon/Thundal not w/w
(Rondo voting falcon right after falcon voted Thundal lowkey makes me think Rondo/Thundal are paired, it's hard to unsee)
Rondo/Porscha not w/w (I feel like P#102 Porscha's response to Rondo was reasonable while P#103 from Rondo felt like it was overplayed and a bit stilted)
P#104 I still don't like this... I think I said it already but idc I'm saying it again and then put it together with P#106, which idk, is a bit of an awkward backpedal
P#109 talking about slankwolves because who's easier to push than slankers? (I realize this point could be slightly biased because on its own, it could also be bringing attention to UTR slots but idk, it feels too early for this to be a huge concern and felt like quite and abrupt switch from the OMGUS backtrack post so I had the sense Rondo was uncomfortable and shifting attention elsewhere)

and now I have convinced myself that Rondo is scum again lol

PSV still town probably
Neon still fine
I think I can find Roxy if they're town (hopefully)
On the two points raised about certain voting syncs, I’d find it very early phase for both wolves to do that. Or would need info on this being common from them. Not indicative, would say, or at least not until a flip or two.
well, it's there either way
what are your thoughts on the rest?

Not a w/w projection-maker by default, so I haven't looked into that perspective, at least not for this phase.
The only "not w/w" I can project is in fact you and Rondo, not with the 2-wolf format at least, since you'd both be flying too close to the sun with the votes received by each in the current state of game.

IIRC slanker-angle on Roxy was initiated by Epig, not an initial Rondo push?

Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 1:38 pm Thundal/Rondo not w/w
Thundal/Epi not w/w
Rondo/Ricochet not w/w (actually, maybe not... maybe again P#179 Tundal/Rondo both voting Ricochet)
falcon/Thundal not w/w
(Rondo voting falcon right after falcon voted Thundal lowkey makes me think Rondo/Thundal are paired, it's hard to unsee)
Rondo/Porscha not w/w (I feel like P#102 Porscha's response to Rondo was reasonable while P#103 from Rondo felt like it was overplayed and a bit stilted)
P#104 I still don't like this... I think I said it already but idc I'm saying it again and then put it together with P#106, which idk, is a bit of an awkward backpedal
P#109 talking about slankwolves because who's easier to push than slankers? (I realize this point could be slightly biased because on its own, it could also be bringing attention to UTR slots but idk, it feels too early for this to be a huge concern and felt like quite and abrupt switch from the OMGUS backtrack post so I had the sense Rondo was uncomfortable and shifting attention elsewhere)

and now I have convinced myself that Rondo is scum again lol

PSV still town probably
Neon still fine
I think I can find Roxy if they're town (hopefully)

On the two points raised about certain voting syncs, I’d find it very early phase for both wolves to do that. Or would need info on this being common from them. Not indicative, would say, or at least not until a flip or two.

Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 1:12 pm
Ricochet wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:58 pm
Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:48 pm
Ricochet wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:36 pm Betelgeuse shines dark purple tonight. I’m down with a lemon chop at this point, the plan2read-placehold vote sequence and reaction tone for one, which is not ideal town mindset to get heat on, and they seem to challenge all major town reads, but I don’t get much clarity or strong counterpoint from it.
[VOTE: Richochet] aubergine
Yet another rise out of being sussed. Peculiar.

[VOTE: Lemonfairy] aubergine

No issue with challenging, but it was solely that, at the end of an announced read up, no alternative townleans* (up until the most recent post you made), and it was not convincing or strong-minded of a read in my view.
it wasn't so much that you suspected me, but more your reason for it (which I did explain)

if you had no issue with me challenging the "major townreads", why did you bring it up?

Clarified one reply earlier that it was for solely shooting them all down, probably should have written it clearer in the original post, now that I reread it.

Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:48 pm
Ricochet wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:36 pm Betelgeuse shines dark purple tonight. I’m down with a lemon chop at this point, the plan2read-placehold vote sequence and reaction tone for one, which is not ideal town mindset to get heat on, and they seem to challenge all major town reads, but I don’t get much clarity or strong counterpoint from it.
[VOTE: Richochet] aubergine

Yet another rise out of being sussed. Peculiar.

[VOTE: Lemonfairy] aubergine

No issue with challenging, but it was solely that, at the end of an announced read up, no alternative townleans* (up until the most recent post you made), and it was not convincing or strong-minded of a read in my view.

Betelgeuse shines dark purple tonight. I’m down with a lemon chop at this point, the plan2read-placehold vote sequence and reaction tone for one, which is not ideal town mindset to get heat on, and they seem to challenge all major town reads, but I don’t get much clarity or strong counterpoint from it.

potentialsheltervet wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 11:42 am
Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 10:26 am hmmm I think I'm just going to ignore Rondo for now
I believe I am employing this strategy as well.

Why?

Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 10:25 am
Ricochet wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 10:21 am
Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 10:11 am
Ricochet wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 9:15 am
Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 9:08 am
RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 8:59 am Such bad catch-up. Gonna probably keep my vote here
I haven't finished catching up yet so idk what you're talking about

but keep your vote wherever you like
Why say you will read up, then vote without having finished reading up?

And why the puff back tone at Rondo?
because they said my catch up was bad
which is both false (because what catch up?) and uncalled for

and why shouldn't I respond to a post that poked at me first?
Didn’t say not to respond, asked why you used that tone.

Again, the sequence was will catch up — vote — still not catch up. Worth being called for.

Did you catch up now?
I read Rondo's post in a bad tone so I responded in a bad tone
don't know why you found that weird

I just placed a placeholder vote until I finished reading

I have caught up now
what do you want to talk about?

What purpose does a placeholder vote serve for you, in such context?

Talk about: anything besides Rondo from your catch up.

RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 10:17 am I mean technically if wolves don't kill me (which they're going to) I have already won the game because I have figured out a towncore

Do you always act so “I’m supatown” and “I solved the game” and “wolves gonna merk me first”?

Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 10:11 am
Ricochet wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 9:15 am
Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 9:08 am
RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 8:59 am Such bad catch-up. Gonna probably keep my vote here
I haven't finished catching up yet so idk what you're talking about

but keep your vote wherever you like
Why say you will read up, then vote without having finished reading up?

And why the puff back tone at Rondo?
because they said my catch up was bad
which is both false (because what catch up?) and uncalled for

and why shouldn't I respond to a post that poked at me first?

Didn’t say not to respond, asked why you used that tone.

Again, the sequence was will catch up — vote — still not catch up. Worth being called for.

Did you catch up now?

Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 9:08 am
RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 8:59 am Such bad catch-up. Gonna probably keep my vote here
I haven't finished catching up yet so idk what you're talking about

but keep your vote wherever you like

Why say you will read up, then vote without having finished reading up?

And why the puff back tone at Rondo?

Game is asleep, so here is a very nice song.

Today's rise, transit and set time of the Sun (all times relative to the local timezone Europe London)

RISE 4:54 Azimuth: 69.0°
TRANSIT 12:55 Max altitude: 59.6°
SET 20:57 Azimuth: 291.1°

Rondo, Epi and Thunal have posted and pushed stuff the most, I could place them in whatever amounts to a "pass" / "not voting today" / "townlean" range. Thunal on immediate vibes comes off doing fair and proper reads. Rondo has some beef with Zenon and Porscha that I can't wrap my head around rn (as in I'm trying to read the words and arguments in their written sequence and fail to -- maybe a morning / coffee thing). Some of Epig's lines a bit to clean (pep talk about town being active, wow revolutionary / that post about not judging anyone for vote tag goofs, whilst nobody was doing or intending to do that / the "me and Roxy and Rico go way back" meta angle), but consistent with having just half an hour to go through things, finding leads and doing just that.

Roxy could indeed slank or gimmick as wolf - IIRC there was even a recent game in which she "conceded" by posting just music videos until she got lynched as wolf - but it's not a full lock that she would actively pull a Dolby or Schiavetto on us, I think in general she would play fair and as active as possible.

No bearing on anyone else atm

wrt what was raised on me:
- I ain't no clever anything. D1s I'm either a clown (i.e. don't play properly) or a headless chicken D1 with anxiety about getting a lead on anything (i.e. play properly, against the doctor's advice)
- Questioning Zenon was halted after they said they referred just to Rondo's act, whilst I thought they meant the whole gamestate

That's all I could gather at this breakfast hour. Be back later throughout the day.

RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Thu May 25, 2023 9:00 am Did I ignore it?

Wouldn't say you addressed it, even tangentially, no.

Well, Phooto to that.

RondoDimBuckle wrote: ↑Thu May 25, 2023 8:36 am Why did you pay attention to what I was doing there Ricochet and ignore what Thunal asked for? Looks scummy to me [VOTE: Ricochet] aubergine

[VOTE:

Because the Moon passed in front of Jupiter, creating a lunar occultation.

You're on a project in which you skipped a beat, it stuck out to me, so I questioned it.

Thunal's line of questioning is something I can address or not, it hasn't received proper feedback from many others, either. In fact, you're sussing me for it, whilst you also ignored it.] aubergine

Shine a light ray on What do you expect, 50 posts in, to have been “normal”, “focused”, less “fake”?

Zenon wrote: ↑Thu May 25, 2023 5:21 am This feels... different than normal more unhinged less focused and organized more fake...

50 posts don’t amount even to a fraction of Mercury’s mass. What is normal and what is focused for you at this stage? What or who is more fake?

In space no one can hear you omgus

As I gaze through the belt of rocks and vote post debris, I wonder why Rondo skipped me in their vote-poke reactions.

Phony much?

Oh sun, of this great world both eye and soul!

The Syndicate

Search found 120 matches

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Solar System Mafia [Day 1]