The Syndicate

Event: Directors Respond to Negative Film Reviews http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-CsIqfL_auX4/T1VtcFruAjI/AAAAAAAAANU/zDrkvKwoeRo/s1600/rock3.jpg Roger Ebert was known for his sometimes scathing reviews of film. Ebert's story is being told in the new biodoc Life Itself. I sobbed uncontrollably when I rea...

In reply to BWT's post : I find your read on what happened interesting, but I can't figure out where you draw the line between me making rookie mistakes and slipping as a baddie. I also don't see how all the issues are connected, the way you put it. You say you agree SVS was quite "reaction-y&q...

Canucklehead wrote:"Mausoleum" should read "plausible", because autocorrect is a pretentious bitch.

Canucklehead wrote:OmfuckingG. I wrote "phone-posting", not "pig ears-posting". What in the actual fuck.

LOL

Oh, and I'll vote for Mr. Fantastic Fox in the poll. Truly delightful. I should revisit TRT, I think it's his best, but I haven't seen it since I was much younger. I get that Moonrise Kingdom can seem like it's the whole wesandersonian universe into one movie, but it more annoyed me than not, reall...

RIP Alex. :rip: And thank you, Mr. Kubrick. :noble: I'll agree that, statistically at least, SVS' and Roxy's votes look bad for two consecutive lynches. And the dynamic of the voting is telling: three strong, consistent votes (i.e. players who have mostly suspected and voted for him throughout the w...

For Vomps.

It's almost 3am here and deadline is still two hours away. Too late for me to stay because I need to sleep, so voting now.

linki @SVS: No, I said I think the outcome could be 50/50, because of Vomps' gameplay itself. How I feel about his gameplay weighs more for me to vote for him, right now.

Not that you've done admirably well to defend yourself so far, Vomps, but how is throwing a couple of names without backing it up in any way supposed to help you?

linki: One cautious re-read away from deciding, perhaps, but inclined to vote him. Overall I still it could very much be 50-50 regarding how he'll flip. He usually pleaded players to reconsider lynching him when the day phase was at its beginnings, more relaxed, but switched back to his pretence wh...

I've basically been doing it*
Overall I still think*

Oh sure, now people are suspicious of Ricochet. I was doing it before it was cool. :mafia: For me it was since yesterday morning when he made that remark about the Big Case. He would post, then leave the site completely, he did not show as being here, then he would come back as soon as I spoke to h...

S~V~S wrote:Its amazing how you always just pop up when people mention you.

Yes, I always do my best to reply to people who address me.

Dom wrote:
Ricochet wrote:I mean she. Sorry. More d'oh.
That was not the first time you messed up Canuck's gender. Where did you learn it?

From the person who posted right before I did, as well as all the others in this thread.

If Canuck is indeed silenced, it could mean that she was blocked last night by John Waters, which makes her a likely candidate for a killer. But would a killer telegraph that she was silenced by voting early? BWT said he would likely not post today, so no surprise there. I don't understand the part...

It's not clear from what you said that she* is also silenced during the night, but Llama says she is. *she as in hypothetically Canuck, of course No, she's not silenced at night. She's blocked at night, and silenced during the day. Well, I asked if she's both during one of the phases. Sorry if that...

It's not clear from what you said that she* is also silenced during the night, but Llama says she is.

*she as in hypothetically Canuck, of course

If Canuck is indeed silenced, it could mean that she was blocked last night by John Waters, which makes her a likely candidate for a killer. But would a killer telegraph that she was silenced by voting early? BWT said he would likely not post today, so no surprise there. I don't understand the part...

D'oh, forgot about the silencer. But if Canuck was blocked during the night, he could have still posted. Maybe just circumstancial? (He didn't come her to post during N1, but was silenced and could only vote during D2) There is the one role (John Waters I think) that blocks AND silences a player. T...

I mean she. Sorry. More d'oh.

D'oh, forgot about the silencer. But if Canuck was blocked during the night, he could have still posted. Maybe just circumstancial? (He didn't come her to post during N1, but was silenced and could only vote during D2)

Interesting. Is that what you make of Vomps' vote for Dom? I think he [V], AP and MP* were tied at 2 votes at that point (*Dom's vote for MP is the only one I can't trace, judging from the posts, when it happened, so it could have been 1 or 2 votes for MP). I think Vomps' vote for Dom was in keepin...

Interesting. Is that what you make of Vomps' vote for Dom? I think he [V], AP and MP* were tied at 2 votes at that point (*Dom's vote for MP is the only one I can't trace, judging from the posts, when it happened, so it could have been 1 or 2 votes for MP). I think Vomps' vote for Dom was in keepin...

Quite the early vote from Canuck.

Any idea why? He hasn't been active since almost two day ago.

SVS - I hope I was not the one who you thought was rude. I hate to even say this but you still have not answered my only question. I guess at this point it does not matter but I would have liked a response and your thoughts about the other people who used your reasoning for their vote for Teeth. I ...

could see into the three-way tie a save in this direction [MP's] as well*

FZ. wrote:Oh, so you think that if there was a save, it was MP and not Vomp?

I replied to llama earlier on the page, but then corrected my knowledge of how the votes stood when Vomps voted. I suppose everyone suspecting MP could read into the three-way tie could see a save in this direction as well.

*Oh, silly me. I should have checked the poll results for the order (I manually revisited the topic instead). Dom's vote for MP was before Vomps votes. So it was a three-way tie.

Here is DF's post regarding the NK. I think this is his only post of the day I've finally just about caught up! I think it's very odd that Sabie would be targeted for an NK so early in the game, and even weirder if someone decided to protect her. I'm thinking Sabie herself probably was the cause of...

No certain civs are not expendable, although that is not the point i think FZ is making. She means that even if Vomps is a civ, this lynch will give us alot of direction. For instance, one of the reasons Llama had for suspecting me was that he felt I was saving Vomps. Yet Vomps is not proven baddie...

Did Llama offered you the quotes you wanted, SVS? That was the main issue I was referencing, myself, anyway. I still find it intriguing that you would have read all that and not want to address it, missing or not any direct questions. He did :) Tell him I said Thanks! Nah, just kidding. Maybe. I di...

I have to study the Vomps case, as promised, and maybe look back at everything posted by SVS, since there's a big case brewing on her, apparently. This is a bit pingy. This, considering Rico wouldn't go find evidence of it for SVS, sounds like baddies had been chatting all night in btsc and "t...

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:@Mongoose~ lovely hostess, are all fail kills portrayed the same way, or are distinctions made?
Hiya Mongoose. I'd love an answer to this when you get a chance.

As would I to this

Ricochet wrote:Any results from the Scorsese contest? What was the prize and who got it?

Did Llama offered you the quotes you wanted, SVS? That was the main issue I was referencing, myself, anyway. I still find it intriguing that you would have read all that and not want to address it, missing or not any direct questions.

I can tell that you are now fully in game mode, but you keep twisting my original post over and over. Did I say you are ”the only big case coming"? No. I said I'll look into Vomps (who now worries me with his style of baddie-pretence defence) and you (who have been questioned by others for your...

LOL, you come and drop that into the thread, and won't back it up? I read after the lynch, and did not see that any "big case" was coming up. I would lke to know why YOU think a big case is coming up. Cause I don't see it :) Sorry if you read it that way. I only meant I'll look into what ...

I have to go in 15 mins. Can't you track what was posted right after AP's lynch as announced? I could do it, if you still want, but only later.

Mostly the discussion post-AP kill, pages 22-23.

Who are you going after this Day, folks? I have to study the Vomps case, as promised, and maybe look back at everything posted by SVS, since there's a big case brewing on her, apparently. I'll be fairly busy today because of a class I have to prepare for and personal issues, so I'll probably spend ...

Woo, no death! But what an intriguing outcome, indeed. I think it's safe to say that Sabie, at this point, is the only inactive player (i.e. didn't participate in-game, didn't vote in-game). I went over her posts: she posted a bit on Day 0 (and voted for a director) and excused herself for not manag...

He was great in Gangs of New York. Okay in everything else. It's the cold, harsh truth. While I'm dissing beloved actors... Meryl Streep is fucking awful. I don't see how his "baddie" in Gangs is superior to his "baddie" in Blood. Does her Oscar overnomination these past years i...

zeek wrote:There Will Be Blood is overrated...

So is Daniel Day-Lewis.

THAT's RIGHT, I SAID IT. HE IS.

Boo this man.

thellama73 wrote:Who do you guys think the baddies will kill tonight? Do you think it will be me?

Why you? Are you good?

S~V~S is statistically the only person who voted for both lynches. I may look further into this, considering I've said I believe there has been more coordinating than reasoning in the lynches, so far.

Any results from the Scorsese contest? What was the prize and who got it?

I'll check them and the thread, then, thanks.

Snipping and highlighting the relevant part in my own post, in order for feedback on this. 2. I know I just voted Llama for his case on Vomps, but I'm starting to consider looking more carefully at Vomps, given that he's not helpful in his defence so far, quite the opposite. I'd like to know what ot...

For me (and I think I said this somewhere?), on a day when there are a few strong (in terms of cases and/or number of votes already placed) candidiates for lynching, I really don't like voting for someone with no votes, or someone who is very unlikely to be lynched. It's too much like shirking resp...

Apologies again for being offline for basically an entire day now. My 10-hour journey was followed by a long sleep. But I think the poll ending time is much more convenient now for everybody else and, provided it won't be delayed even further in the next days, I will be able to stay up late myself n...

Forgot to vote, thanks MP.

I hate parties, but this could somehow work in my favour here. I'm in.

Search found 10837 matches