The Syndicate

Beck wrote:Who are the best wolves in this lineup? Who are the best villagers?

This depends upon what specific skill you're looking for. I would suggest though that the most dangerous possible scum would be Epignosis, MovingPictures, Sloonei, and Golden. That's no slight on the rest though, everyone is capable of putting together a strong game. It's a solid lineup. The "best" villagers are whichever ones make bloody posts. All of you can fight over that title by making bloody posts.

Beck wrote:Is there anyone who cannot play one alignment well?

I don't think this question can be answered without slighting someone, so I'd prefer to leave it alone. I know that's not your intention, so no worries.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Your the one who has placed the vote, sir.

I am truly a Republican.

Beck wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Hey Beck, I hereby accuse you of using (trying to use) a fake random vote as a means of comfortably getting your feet into the scary cold water that is this game. I've done it before. What say you?

I say nay!

I voted for MP7 for one post in particular -- would be curios to see if you see what I see.

But let's say I did vote for MP7 to ease myself into the game, what does that make me?

When a townie places a random vote, it is typically meant to incite a reaction (either from the recipient of the vote or whoever else might comment), which can serve as a springboard for those sikk readz.

When a mafioso places a "random" vote, it is typically meant to give the appearance of inciting a reaction. The visible difference is often negligible, but I do propose that scum random votes more often come in the form of just a name, whereas town random votes are more often accompanied by an accusation -- even if a silly early Day 1 caliber accusation.

Your "vote" was thrown into the thread in a vacuum without context, and it was presented with a light-hearted personality, which I think can be indicative of the latter example. The vote exists for appearance rather than for a pro-town strategic purpose (if my assertion is accurate).

In MP's posts I can see perhaps one moment that might inspire a quick vote. I'm not telling you what it is though until you tell me first. Your the one who has placed the vote, sir. The onus is on you to provide the inspiration if you're to assert than an inspiration exists. I will not hand it to you.

well there's some linki salad

Sloonei wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Hey Sloonei, why aren't you molding this game thread into a lively pile of discussion?

I've been molding another thread into a lively pile of discussion, and also working.

Okay.

Hey Sloonei, why aren't you molding this game thread into a lively pile of discussion?

Ricochet wrote:Day 1: lynch democrat
Day 2: lynch democrat
Day 3: lynch democrat
Day 4: lynch whatever we still need to lynch

Rico confirmed for anti-town independent.

Hey Beck, I hereby accuse you of using (trying to use) a fake random vote as a means of comfortably getting your feet into the scary cold water that is this game. I've done it before. What say you?

I'd say Day 0 is usually around 95% and 5% .

Day 1 advances to about 75% and 25% .

Epignosis wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Day 1 cannot arrive soon enough.

Aside from the poll itself, what does Day 1 offer that Day 0 does not?

Players playing.

Day 1 cannot arrive soon enough.

As an Ohioan, I wield the power to decide who shall rule.

Those of you associating S~V~S with Hillary just for being a woman are no better than those bleeding heart liberals who only support Hillary because she's a woman.

Ricochet wrote:The only b/s I'm tired of hearing is Crooked Hillary giving false hope to the American people.

You've reached the correct assumption, but you could very well be a democrat bending the curve and distancing from the rest of the baddies who you think might indulge in questioning or shooting down my perfect speeches. Such an easy thing to do, really, com'on. Com'on. No tacos for you!

I could very well be anything doing anything.

Do you have anything to say about anyone who's posted so far?

Ricochet wrote:Concern for what accusation? I've heard no accusation so far. Plus, there are no real accusations that can be brought to a Trump campaigner like myself. Ridiculous!

I feel you prepared a statement for a conflict that doesn't exist (yet). As if you're trying to compliment me and get on my good side. Although it's much appreciated. Shady!

There hasn't been any accusation of any kind, or any positive remark. It's all been goofing off. However, you can be certain that "you're hiding behind your roleplay!!!1111" would become a thing in due time. It always does. Someone always pulls that shit.

I think baddies tend to be wary of hearing that b/s and take the measures necessary not to hear it (i.e. they goof around less). So neato for you.

Hey look guys, a real post!

I like Rico's roleplay. It might not contain relevant content, but I appreciate that he's willing to have fun with his posts without concern for that accusation. Town lean.

Scotty wrote:But I probably won't vote those people exclusively for not checking in....I....I might go craaazy this game and not just vote a no-show or low poster on day 1.

Now you've gone and done it. I'm going to hold you to that.

I like Quin yelling in caps lock. Town lean.

#Day0reads

I'm with Sloonei. "Low-energy Jeb" is so awful that it's endearing.

There's plenty of snark to go around.

Ricochet wrote:But you didn't answer my question. What's up with that?

Well let me tell you this, if you really want to know what we're gonna do about immigration, well just listen. We're going to do some things, some big things, big changes, we're gonna build a wall, I am going to get a lot of the best people, and we're going to look at some things.

This makes me wish Marco from NF was in this game.