The Syndicate

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 8:43 pm Did anyone save the poll?

I know that the Tony voters were me, sabie, Dom, Epi, and Michelle.
I know that G-man and LLD did not vote.
I don’t remember how the other two wagons looked, but the voting record should still exist in the thread.

sabie12 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 8:39 pm Hmmm the plot thickens. Jack and tony both felt pretty confidently that nutella was bad and now they both have flipped civ. I've been iffy on nutella from the beginning and am inclined to believe maybe tony and jack were right about her. Putting my vote there for now.[VOTE: nutella] aubergine

I do not follow. Nutella did not vote for Tony, and I find it a bit of a stretch to assume that Jack was killed for the purpose of silencing his criticism of nutella. Plus, we now know that Jack would have been a perfectly viable counterwagon yesterday if nutella was bad and the mafia team wanted to save her. There wouldn’t have been a need for any of them to push to Tony (and no reason not to. My point is that I don’t see how this pair of deaths reflects poorly on nutella specifically). Is there more to this suspicion?

Did anyone save the poll?

Can you at least tell us what direction the water in your toilet flows?

G-Man wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 7:54 pm Nice kill choice baddies. It gives me a sense of direction to start my day with.

[VOTE: Quin] aubergine

Why Quin?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 7:41 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 7:40 pm of course lmao

[VOTE: epignosis] aubergine

tell me why you aint full o shit

I had a BM promptly at 2pm EST and have not had anything to eat since then.

What do you think Michelle’s alignment is in this game? What do you think nutella’s alignment is?

Michelle wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:02 am Every time I see someone doing in day 1 the math of gow many mislynches are needed I see it as a red flag. Because usually mafia are doing so, to show they care about the game and they focus on it. It's also a way of posting something. Yes I didn't make an essay about it, I posted only raw thoughts. For me writing more is not easy and I am usually catching wolves for the wrong reason. I was wrong this time but also Tony didn't cooperate with me.

Why? Can you tell me a time in another game where you caught mafia specifically doing this?
I've argued in the past that "suspecting people for talking about mechanics is more suspicious than talking about mechanics." I'm gonna stick to that here. It is not my experience that a player who talks about mechanics is more likely to be bad than good.

We now know that Tony was not nefariously angling to shade Michelle, and I don't think this was an accurate read in the moment either. Tony is being lynched here, with the counterwagons of Jack and nutella. He's hard defending Jack and advocating for a nutella lynch. There isn't much reason for an evil Tony to start devoting energy to shading and antagonizing a civilian Michelle in this moment. He would be trying to convince her to change her vote.

If I'd been awake I expect that my vote would have moved, but there's no use saying that now. I'm not a fan of Michelle's progression here.

@Michelle why did you feel like Tony's actions were "wolfy"? What specifically made you feel that way about him, and why did you think his agenda was visible? Who are your next suspects going into Day 2?

The green part: he didn't do this, he was not voting me but I was from the posts understading his first suspect just he didn't move the vote. That means for me he was pleased with the wagons and I had a town read for both Jack and Nutella after their fight.

I know. That is my point. If Tony was bad and you were good, there would have been no strategic reason for him to try to shade you there. In that moment, you are voting for him and he is in danger of being lynched. He is interacting with you directly. If self-preservation is his top concern, he's going to try to get you to change your vote. Instead he accused you of being bad. That is a good look.

This is underexplained indeed and if you notice I posted after the mod posted the lynch, I was still in the idea of interactimg with him.
I didn't notice the Eod is so close. Midday Eod never happened for me. Even European friendly at 11 pm for me are extremely odd because MU has horrible Eods at 2-5 am for me. I thought we still have time to play.

I believe this. The Day 1 deadline was at an unusual time.

I see the point of asking the lynching wagon about their votes and I saw you posted your own guilt about this mislynch. You passed though quick over it. Isn't the way you are accusing everyone a way to cover your own skin?

Feel free to ask me any questions you have about my Day 1 vote. I'm not capable of investigating myself and I know what my motivations were anyway.
A civilian was lynched on Day 1 after I initiated a case against them. My instinct is to assume that at least one mafia followed that case. I'm trying to identify who that might be.

Western hemisphere supremacy wins out again

It occurs to me that the last time I played with Tony, I said that I couldn’t wait to play more games with him.

So then I lynched him on Day 1.

Note: Lady LambdaDelta is also a player in this game.

I might as well look at sabie's vote as well.

sabie12 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:33 am I have suspicions on all three of the people with votes. In looking through Tony's posts a lot of his focus is on jack. He makes it a point to say "if I'm nightkilled jack is scum" and that he needs a few days to figure him out subtle ways of saying dont lynch me im town without actually saying it. When he was mafia in the past his main focus of discussion was his own teammates so if they got killed off he could be like see I'm not bad. Ive seen jack do this as well. Also his post making it a point to say how many mislynches we can have was a little sketchy. I see a lot of fair points on him and he hasnt done much to counteract these points.

Jack I've expressed my suspicion on him. There's a fair amount of back and forth discussion on him but I'm still leaning towards thinking he is mafia.

Nutella can be very difficult to read as she does often follow the waves of the thread but her response to things so far hasn't made me feel confident about her being town.

This day 1 is hard there are fair points on all three. Voting tony as I feel worst about him and his efforts thus far.

I notice sabie seems to support Michelle's point about Tony's lynch math being "sketchy", but I continue to not know why that is the case. Sabie, what did you find suspicious about Tony counting the number of mislynches? And how does this lynch change the way you see Jack and nutella, if at all?

Most of the tony votes seem to have piled in while I was asleep. I think it was just sabie and I on him when I left for the night. I've talked about why I don't like Michelle's progression. Let's look at Dom and Epi because I'm bored with my school reading right now.

Dom:

Dom wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 4:17 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 9:04 pm Some Tony things:

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:19 am I haven’t played a game with a setup like this is a while lemme recap for myself. Three bad lynches allowed, find scum within six days.

Why does this post exist? Michelle also called him out for this but my beef is slightly different. It's not that he's doing math, it's that he's putting these words into the thread. They're isolated, not really attached to or inviting in any further discussion. He just plopped some cursory mechanical chatter into the thread and moved on.

His progression on Dom also looks strange. Is strange bad? Let's see.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:48 pm I don't want to lynch Dom right now. That makes me paranoid.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:55 pm nutella, you've said that you're good at reading Dom in the past I think. What should I think here?

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 4:07 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 3:10 pm

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:55 pm nutella, you've said that you're good at reading Dom in the past I think. What should I think here?

I think he's town. He's doing his typical thing of gathered reactions to lots of little things.

Okay thanks for your opinion.

anyone want to dissent?

I do not know what the initial stance on Dom is supposed to reflect. Do Tony and Dom have a particular history together where the former tends to suspect the latter? He then calls on nutella to offer her allegedly expert read, indicating that Tony doesn't have a particular history with Dom, but then beckons anyone else to disagree with her. In all of this, Tony has done nothing resembling independent work to read Dom. He has observed Dom's presence in the game and asked a specific player to comment on it, then he has sought dissenting opinions all across Australia.

What is your read on Dom, Tony? Does something stand out about him one way or the other? Why are you so interested in him here?

No.

And I don't like that I didn't see a response to this.
[VOTE: Tony] aubergine

Spicy

Why does Tony's supposed lack of an answer to that question warrant a final critical vote in the Day 1 poll? Does it mean anything that Tony had indeed answered the question?

This doesn't look deserving of a final vote. I can make the excuse for Dom that there weren't many strong reads going around on Day 1 at all, but at a certain point we need to start exploring why that is the case. A vote like this can be seen as complacent, for maintaining the status quo and keeping stronger reads from developing. Maybe.

Epi:

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 3:59 am Yeah, not voting nutella because Jack said so.

[VOTE: Tony Stark Prime] aubergine

There is nothing here. Epi gave us nothing to work with Day 1. I could go either way with that. I could see evil epi skating by on the knowledge that people aren't going to lynch him Day 1, knowing that the small size of this game means that he (and his team) don't need to keep us fooled for that long. This allows him to just be a stick in the mud for a few days while the civilians struggle to get off the ground. Or he's just busy and is moving his vote around whimsically as he sees fit.

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 2:57 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 1:52 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 1:51 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 1:05 pm Yeah, if the Tony lynch was uniquely scum orchestrated it means that both Jack and nutella are bad. Nah.

There could easily be one or two bad guys on any of the wagons though. I come out of this lynch feeling worse about Michelle.

You were the one who convinced me that Tony looked bad.

And?

And so I don't know why you only name those two players in the scum orchestrated Lynch, shouldn't your name be on that list as well?

No. I name them because in order for the Tony lynch to have made sense as a mafia team orchestration, that would have to mean that there were no civilian bandgwagons available prior to him. Therefore nutella and jack were both mafia wagons. I do not believe that to be the case.

G-Man wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 2:22 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 1:49 pm @G-Man why did you not vote?

Nodded off on the couch after company left late last night, and I didn’t set an alarm to wake me up before the deadline. I hadn’t ISO’d everyone by the time I had to start making dinner, so I held my vote until later. Later just never came.

I believe this.
Who do you think you would have voted for based on the ISOs you did do?

Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 4:04 am

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 11:37 pm I’m pretty sure this is solid reasoning. I think on probability people who take lines like Michelle are more likely scum and people who take lines like Sloonei are more likely town.
Disagree? Y/N

Yes about me.
I thought is wolfy that you're doing the math day 1 because this may be a thing to pose in town carring.

Also I disagree with any playstyle comparison.

Sloonei's post was townish by itself and the mention of him being probably asleep at Eod and honestly pointing that his vote will last, I think this is villagery.

So you take my post and his post, make a comparison and find me scum? This is scumtactic from you and I notice a bad progression of you on me.

Michelle's progression on Tony loses me a bit. She deems my play "townish" while contrasting it to Tony's "wolfy" play, but I don't know what qualifies either of our actions to earn those labels. In particular, I'm not sure why it's suspicious for Tony to have an eye on the math involved in this game. It makes sense to want to know how many mislynches we have available to us. (Preemptive note: I called Tony out for the apparent emptiness of his mechanics talk, not for the mechanics talk itself).

Michelle's read of Tony here doesn't look like it amounts to much more than hand-waving. "You did a thing and that's bad", with no justification of why she feels that way.

Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 5:27 am

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 11:17 pm There is so little to pry on here.
Rainbowish from memory:

Me
Jack
Dom
DF
Sloonei
Sabie
LC
G-Man
——————————
Epi
Michelle
Nutella

Sloonei lower than DF in these reads comes as odd for me, Tony never said nothing about DF as town iirc while he had a post comparing me and Sloonei.

And Quin is missing

Lot of reads coming out of nowhere, and his agenda for me is visible.

I could say the exact same about you, Michelle.

Michelle wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 7:36 am

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:37 am I didn’t know Quin was in the game until after I posted the list. And I really appreciate how you think my agenda is visible because of the positioning of two people. What’s my agenda? Save my teammate DF? Lynch Sloonei? Well if my agenda is lynch Sloonei then why did I say he was townier than you? That would have been a mistake.

your agenda is to shade me. I think your attitude towards Sloonei is pockety .

We now know that Tony was not nefariously angling to shade Michelle, and I don't think this was an accurate read in the moment either. Tony is being lynched here, with the counterwagons of Jack and nutella. He's hard defending Jack and advocating for a nutella lynch. There isn't much reason for an evil Tony to start devoting energy to shading and antagonizing a civilian Michelle in this moment. He would be trying to convince her to change her vote.

If I'd been awake I expect that my vote would have moved, but there's no use saying that now. I'm not a fan of Michelle's progression here.

[mention]Michelle[/mention] why did you feel like Tony's actions were "wolfy"? What specifically made you feel that way about him, and why did you think his agenda was visible? Who are your next suspects going into Day 2?

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 1:51 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 1:05 pm Yeah, if the Tony lynch was uniquely scum orchestrated it means that both Jack and nutella are bad. Nah.

There could easily be one or two bad guys on any of the wagons though. I come out of this lynch feeling worse about Michelle.

You were the one who convinced me that Tony looked bad.

And?

[mention]G-Man[/mention] why did you not vote?

Yeah, if the Tony lynch was uniquely scum orchestrated it means that both Jack and nutella are bad. Nah.

There could easily be one or two bad guys on any of the wagons though. I come out of this lynch feeling worse about Michelle.

I’m falling asleep. If we’re lynching between Jack and nutella, I’d choose nutella. Jack’s play looks emphatically town, whereas nutella’s just looks emphatically nutella. That’s not a suspicion, it’s just absence of a firm town read.

I am not satisfied with those two options. I’m leaving my vote on tony and encourage anyone who’s awake to look at him and continue discussing other names.

I probably meant I don’t think that’s how mafia Long Con would start the game. Which is to say I talked myself out of suspecting you.

Quin wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 1:54 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 1:11 am

Quin wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:49 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:43 am

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:39 pm nah, jack is fair dinkum right now.

google said you think Jack is honest, is that correct?

nah yeah he's a good bloke i reckon

Why do you reckon that, esteemed Australian Quin? Who do you reckon ain’t such good blokes?

mate its hard to roleplay and make choc a bloc posts at the same time

i reckon i'd call the coppers on nutella for starting the DF beef against jazza, that whole thing was a pissup.

[VOTE: nutella] aubergine

Crikey

I will say that my main takeaway from today has been that Jack was in no way angling for a DFaraday lynch with his initial prod. I don’f know if I suspect anyone in particular for following up on it, but it’s the type of thing that could be seized upon by opportunistic bad guys at this stage.

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 1:54 am I guess you said you're not sure either but you did say you had been directly suspicious of them, that's the part I object to

You object to me pursuing my Day 1 suspicions, got it.

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 1:30 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 12:43 am I’m unconvinced by the things Tony has said in response to me, but I don’t want the discussion to end there.

Long Con and G-man are the other two players I’ve felt directly suspicious of for more than a brief moment this game. I’ve held off on G-man because he hasn’t played in forever and he’s good company. And some of my pings could just be derived from his eagerness to get back in the action.

Long Con has felt a little flat. I may or may not be able to substatntiate that.

How are these real reads

I’ve read or skimmed most of the thread and my responses have been such that I came out feeling this way about things. I’ve expressed nothing firm or concrete here. Why do you object?

DFaraday wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 1:28 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 1:08 am I gave Michelle a town read because the energy in her posts seemed to be trending in a constructive direction, but I haven’t seen many other opinions on her besides Tony’s failing her for her response to his mechanic chatter. How do we read her?

I just went through her posts, and noticed a lot of questions and very little in the way of offering her own views. I've never played with her that I can recall; is this normal behaviour for her?

(I spelt "behaviour" the Australian way for the game. Also "spelt.")

I am sympathetic to players who ask questions before offering views.

Quin wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:49 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:43 am

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:39 pm nah, jack is fair dinkum right now.

google said you think Jack is honest, is that correct?

nah yeah he's a good bloke i reckon

Why do you reckon that, esteemed Australian Quin? Who do you reckon ain’t such good blokes?

I gave Michelle a town read because the energy in her posts seemed to be trending in a constructive direction, but I haven’t seen many other opinions on her besides Tony’s failing her for her response to his mechanic chatter. How do we read her?

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 10:55 am DF plays that way enough of the time that pinging him to play is fake because you already know from experience that he'll play how he plays pings or not. Filler content not real content. Flush Out Fillers, as they say. Done. "Answered" Wolf motivation: early seemingly useful but no really content.

Long Con’s ISO is a few jokes and some posts shoveling coal in the engine of the Jackwagon, like this one here. If he’s bad, he entered with a forced casual air and then pounced on an obvious and easy bandwagon. But as I type this out I have to ask if I really think LC would kick the game off like that.

I think I’d add Epi to my Do Not Lynch list for today. His play feels entirely uncalculated and nonchalant. These are not things I associate with evil epi.

I’m unconvinced by the things Tony has said in response to me, but I don’t want the discussion to end there.

Long Con and G-man are the other two players I’ve felt directly suspicious of for more than a brief moment this game. I’ve held off on G-man because he hasn’t played in forever and he’s good company. And some of my pings could just be derived from his eagerness to get back in the action.

Long Con has felt a little flat. I may or may not be able to substatntiate that.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 11:28 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 11:22 pm ....I don't get it. Saying a post that was made to generate content was unnecessary can definitely be a scum argument. And I don't get your point about Michelle's comment either.

I think scum tends to take an explosive response because it can generate more discussion and town will tend to take a more genuine line. “This post isn’t solving” is a cop out argument in general, but here I think it functions as a sign that Sloonei doesn’t have an agenda. I also liked Sloonei’s phrasing but I tend not to delve into syntax cause 1) people think it’s stupid and 2) it makes future syntax arguments more WIFOMy.

People who think syntax doesn’t mean anything are wrong.

G-man compiled some ISO links here:

G-Man wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 11:21 am Needing to ISO people resulted in creating this list. You're welcome.


DFaraday
Dom
Epignosis
G-Man
Jackofhearts2005
Lady LambdaDelta
Long Con
Michelle
nutella
Quin
sabie12
Sloonei
TonyStarkPrime


I'll post some observations around lunch time.

[mention]MacDougall[/mention] any chance you could toss these up in that there OP?

We are playing this game on Australian time, which isn't unfair since the 'stralians usually have to adapt to the Western hemisphere's hijinks around here. But I want to note this just in case anyone's operating under the usual clock procedures. This phase will end while most of us Americans are asleep. That includes myself. I don't know how much I'll be around tonight, so for the moment my Tony vote can be considered potentially final. At the very least, I hope that my questions for/about him can be addressed in some manner.

I do not advocate a Jack lynch today, since he's been our leader for most of the phase. nutella feels like herself, and I've liked the direction of Michelle's play so far. Other than that I don't have any strong reads worth expressing.

Some Tony things:

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:19 am I haven’t played a game with a setup like this is a while lemme recap for myself. Three bad lynches allowed, find scum within six days.

Why does this post exist? Michelle also called him out for this but my beef is slightly different. It's not that he's doing math, it's that he's putting these words into the thread. They're isolated, not really attached to or inviting in any further discussion. He just plopped some cursory mechanical chatter into the thread and moved on.

His progression on Dom also looks strange. Is strange bad? Let's see.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:48 pm I don't want to lynch Dom right now. That makes me paranoid.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:55 pm nutella, you've said that you're good at reading Dom in the past I think. What should I think here?

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 4:07 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 3:10 pm

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:55 pm nutella, you've said that you're good at reading Dom in the past I think. What should I think here?

I think he's town. He's doing his typical thing of gathered reactions to lots of little things.

Okay thanks for your opinion.

anyone want to dissent?

I do not know what the initial stance on Dom is supposed to reflect. Do Tony and Dom have a particular history together where the former tends to suspect the latter? He then calls on nutella to offer her allegedly expert read, indicating that Tony doesn't have a particular history with Dom, but then beckons anyone else to disagree with her. In all of this, Tony has done nothing resembling independent work to read Dom. He has observed Dom's presence in the game and asked a specific player to comment on it, then he has sought dissenting opinions all across Australia.

What is your read on Dom, Tony? Does something stand out about him one way or the other? Why are you so interested in him here?

sabie12 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 5:53 pm So right now I'm feeling suspicious of both Jack and nutella. Jack specifically commented on everyone in response to g man's post except me. He would have actually had to delete my name from the original post because now it's not there. Jack has played multiple games with me so why leave me out? Accidentally forgot me? Maybe... So far whenever I've played a game with jack and he's been mafia he makes it a point not to accuse me and ends up lulling me into a false sense of security just to come out and win in the end. Last time I realized just one lynch too late that it had happened again. He said hi to me in the beginning of the game so he knows I'm here. Also, I'm not sure how to take the whole making a big deal about DFs playstyle in the beginning.

I know nutella can be waffley a lot of times but some of what she's said kind of pinged me such as saying she didn't even know that Jack already votes and thinking tony would have tmi this early in the game. Some of her posts are just contradicting statements.

What are your thoughts on G-man and Tony?

[VOTE: Epignosis] aubergine

I do not like his Jack vote.

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 12:35 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 12:34 pmJack is town.

Why's that

Prodding DF the way he did probably isn’t a thing scum jack does. Overreacting to initial concerns over it definitely is not a thing scum jack does. He’s a player that people treat with skepticism fairly often because his style of play doesn’t change much between factions. I sense that his frustration today stems from being tired of being misread, especially this aggressively so early on in a game.

Dom wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 12:29 pm @Sloonei

]Sloonei[/mention]

Maybe I missed it, but why are you voting LC?

He made a bland entrance.

Jack is town.

[VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:24 pm Hey everyone! I hope we're not all acting Australian somehow, because I don't know how to do that and I'd end up going Crocodile Dundee.

Because this is his only post and it’s nothing at all.

Why is Jack’s behavior Not A Good Look?

Jack is the nazgul?

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:22 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:16 pm

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:12 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:54 pm tbh I thought the "guy who tends to get himself lynched all on his own" was a reference to Dom.

which dom do you play with?

I should clarify that I thought jack was talking about you because that's where his vote was. I have no comment on whether or not I would agree with that assessment of you.

So you commented on something you have no comment on?

I clarified my position so as to not be mistaken for commenting on that which I have made no comment on.

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:12 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:54 pm tbh I thought the "guy who tends to get himself lynched all on his own" was a reference to Dom.

which dom do you play with?

I should clarify that I thought jack was talking about you because that's where his vote was. I have no comment on whether or not I would agree with that assessment of you.

tbh I thought the "guy who tends to get himself lynched all on his own" was a reference to Dom.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:51 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:48 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:37 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:34 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:04 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:58 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:28 pm @DFaraday

You have a history of missing day phases and ending games with under 10 posts. I understand that irl stuff happens but It has become a pattern.

I would absolutely love to play a mafia game with you but that’s going to require you to play a mafia game with me as well.

Please post.

You're mafia.

No you.

If I was mafia, I wouldn’t start the game with a push on a guy who tends to get himself lynched all on his own.

I don’t see why not.

[VOTE: Jackuvfarts] aubergine

Seriously. When is the last time DF wasn’t just “resolved” by the town without anyone even scumreading him?

I’m trying to for once have a read on him before it gets to that point. That starts with him posting.

And I appreciate that. But it doesn't necessitate town jack in this game right now.

And wolf Jack doesn’t need to do it either.

Glad we agree it’s nai at worst. So why are you voting me, mate?

Because we're 12 hours into Day 1 and nothing else is happening. Why are you concerned?

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:39 pm nah, jack is fair dinkum right now.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:37 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:34 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:04 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:58 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:28 pm @DFaraday

You have a history of missing day phases and ending games with under 10 posts. I understand that irl stuff happens but It has become a pattern.

I would absolutely love to play a mafia game with you but that’s going to require you to play a mafia game with me as well.

Please post.

You're mafia.

No you.

If I was mafia, I wouldn’t start the game with a push on a guy who tends to get himself lynched all on his own.

I don’t see why not.

[VOTE: Jackuvfarts] aubergine

Seriously. When is the last time DF wasn’t just “resolved” by the town without anyone even scumreading him?

I’m trying to for once have a read on him before it gets to that point. That starts with him posting.

And I appreciate that. But it doesn't necessitate town jack in this game right now.