The Syndicate

peace out dudes. Today was the only day for a while that I could really devote any time to the game.

What other reads do you have, Owner?

Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 7:48 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 7:03 pm
Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 6:53 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:59 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:54 pm I also like to make motivational speeches after only one of my teammates dying before D4.
So you think that post was made by scum Long Con because he’s just so excited about how well his team is doing that he just can’t hide it anymore?
Scum will slip sometimes. Like for instance why are you suspicious of this? I have pretty much the same reaction to Long Con's post. I think Creature has a good chance to be town.

There's still lots of mafia to eliminate I don't feel like I can celebrate anytime soon. I know we just eliminated scum, but that doesn't complete our wincon. I mean at the very least we aren't there yet. And if I look at the scum win rates on this site, I have plenty of reasons to stress needing to keep the momentum going and lynch more and more scum until they are all dead and town wins.

Okay yeah, I don't know Creature's alignment, but the mind meld I'm having with him on Long Con being scummy for that post, makes me really think that Creature is town.
Who said I was suspicious of it?
I did? Me: Your point is?

You were asking for Creature's reason. I assumed you were suspicious, otherwise you may have felt to urge to vote the same way that Creature did.

You have misread the situation.

Owner of a Lonely Heart wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 6:53 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:59 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:54 pm I also like to make motivational speeches after only one of my teammates dying before D4.
So you think that post was made by scum Long Con because he’s just so excited about how well his team is doing that he just can’t hide it anymore?
Scum will slip sometimes. Like for instance why are you suspicious of this? I have pretty much the same reaction to Long Con's post. I think Creature has a good chance to be town.

There's still lots of mafia to eliminate I don't feel like I can celebrate anytime soon. I know we just eliminated scum, but that doesn't complete our wincon. I mean at the very least we aren't there yet. And if I look at the scum win rates on this site, I have plenty of reasons to stress needing to keep the momentum going and lynch more and more scum until they are all dead and town wins.

Okay yeah, I don't know Creature's alignment, but the mind meld I'm having with him on Long Con being scummy for that post, makes me really think that Creature is town.

Who said I was suspicious of it?

juliets wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 6:18 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 6:07 pm Freddy mechanics would be nice in a game like this.
What are Freddy mechanics?

RIP nova and quin, sad to see you both go.

I think he’s referring to a player from HCRealms, Fredwood. I’m guessing he’s known for mechanical analysis. He’s played a few games here.

Now tell me who you’ll belooking at today, juliets.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 6:02 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 6:00 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:59 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:59 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:54 pm I also like to make motivational speeches after only one of my teammates dying before D4.
So you think that post was made by scum Long Con because he’s just so excited about how well his team is doing that he just can’t hide it anymore?
It's the entrance I imagine scum doing.
Why? What’s the mindset behind a post like that?
“Let’s rejoice that Zola is dead but oh what would Town think they’d probably be mildly concerned about losing two important roles”

I wanted Creature’s answer.

Creature wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:59 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:59 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:54 pm I also like to make motivational speeches after only one of my teammates dying before D4.
So you think that post was made by scum Long Con because he’s just so excited about how well his team is doing that he just can’t hide it anymore?
It's the entrance I imagine scum doing.

Why? What’s the mindset behind a post like that?

Creature wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:54 pm I also like to make motivational speeches after only one of my teammates dying before D4.

So you think that post was made by scum Long Con because he’s just so excited about how well his team is doing that he just can’t hide it anymore?

Creature wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:46 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:38 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:31 pm [VOTE: Long Con] aubergine
why?
The reason is right above my vote.

Pretend I am helplessly dense and need everything spelled out for me.

Why did i just ask creature to explain a thing that he did?

Creature wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:31 pm [VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

why?

I voted for Quin. Hashtag You Only Live Once

I said I would do things today. I am a liar. But it seems we have a probable cop-confirmed suspect on our hands, so if there’s any day for me to be an absolute fart, it’s today.

i will get myself back into this game tomorrow. too tired to function as a mafia player right now.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 3:20 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 3:18 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 3:11 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 3:10 pm [VOTE: luna] aubergine

nutella’s vote for me is silly, but they always are. Why does she have votes?
Cause she’s contributing nothing and throwing shade.
I took a quick glance at her posts and did not get this impression.

A few things that have been said about luna looked good to me, and she made one post earlier that looked like mafia trying to downplay suspicion. That constitutes a strong vote for me at this moment in time.
She’s called me scum twice for no good reason.

She does that to me every game.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 3:11 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 3:10 pm [VOTE: luna] aubergine

nutella’s vote for me is silly, but they always are. Why does she have votes?
Cause she’s contributing nothing and throwing shade.

I took a quick glance at her posts and did not get this impression.

A few things that have been said about luna looked good to me, and she made one post earlier that looked like mafia trying to downplay suspicion. That constitutes a strong vote for me at this moment in time.

[VOTE: luna] aubergine

nutella’s vote for me is silly, but they always are. Why does she have votes?

I am back. Who should I vote for?

Dom should read the rest of my posts on this page. I am getting on a kayak now. Do active things, everyone else.

Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 9:25 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 9:16 am
Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 9:15 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 9:10 am
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 2:49 am
Dom wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2019 11:30 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:23 pm ......hello-o-ooo??!?? kinda expected to have more to read here lol
do you know that you have control of the amount of content in the thread?
Not when I'm not fucking here? Seriously dude you need to work on prioritizing your callouts to things that actually matter, not non-existent issues
I’m voting for Dom to put attention on this exchange. I feel like something is happening here but I don’t know what it is. But it’s visible to me and I want to make sure it’s visible to other people too. I won’t be here to do other things the rest of the day. Sorry.
um, looks like a lot of nothing to me.
Why?
It's just bickering about the thread's length and whos fault it is that there isn't more to read. What did you gather from it?

Not a whole lot. I’m more interested in seeing what it can generate. Dom calls out nutella for something she says is bogus and Epi is apparently on board (I don’t actually see his involvement in the exchange). Maybe there’s nothing meaningful here. Maybe there is. It’s something to talk about. Is Dom full of poop, or just an aggressive civilian? Is nutella cornered scum, or is she rightfully defensive?

Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 9:15 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 9:10 am
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 2:49 am
Dom wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2019 11:30 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:23 pm ......hello-o-ooo??!?? kinda expected to have more to read here lol
do you know that you have control of the amount of content in the thread?
Not when I'm not fucking here? Seriously dude you need to work on prioritizing your callouts to things that actually matter, not non-existent issues
I’m voting for Dom to put attention on this exchange. I feel like something is happening here but I don’t know what it is. But it’s visible to me and I want to make sure it’s visible to other people too. I won’t be here to do other things the rest of the day. Sorry.
um, looks like a lot of nothing to me.

Why?

Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 9:05 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 8:44 am Luna is the only person I really feel comfortable putting my vote on right now, but I don’t want to create an even more lopsided poll by voting for her right now. But i’m also about to be kayaking on a river for several hours and I don’t plan on bringing my phone with me.
that sounds lovely. I need a kayaking buddy right now but my husband insists on sleeping in on vacation, and my sister in law is tired. lol

Syndicate Kayak Outing: all are welcome except speedchuck.

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 2:49 am
Dom wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2019 11:30 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:23 pm ......hello-o-ooo??!?? kinda expected to have more to read here lol
do you know that you have control of the amount of content in the thread?
Not when I'm not fucking here? Seriously dude you need to work on prioritizing your callouts to things that actually matter, not non-existent issues

I’m voting for Dom to put attention on this exchange. I feel like something is happening here but I don’t know what it is. But it’s visible to me and I want to make sure it’s visible to other people too. I won’t be here to do other things the rest of the day. Sorry.

Luna is the only person I really feel comfortable putting my vote on right now, but I don’t want to create an even more lopsided poll by voting for her right now. But i’m also about to be kayaking on a river for several hours and I don’t plan on bringing my phone with me.

Creature wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:31 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:24 am I won’t be judging Tony based on that post alone. He was crafty as hell in Fallout.
doesn't look very crafty here however.

What makes you say that? “Not looking crafty” would be part of the craft.

I don’t disagree with any of the words I’m seeing in Tony’s post. Epi’s suspicion of luna does/did appear to be grounded in real things. That’s not something he’d be incapable of faking, but “he could be faking” is not a good argument to follow on Day 2.

I won’t be judging Tony based on that post alone. He was crafty as hell in Fallout.

Why are you singling me out wty that question, [mention]Creature[/mention]?

I am doing family things the next three days. I’ll probably continue to be a useless lump in here. I’ll try to keep up as much as I can.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 5:14 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:44 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:00 pm Guess who's back back again
Can someone summarize noteable events from the 24hours I missed in one hunch?
People voting for Creature are bad or alternatively Creature is bad

Why?

sig should always be lynched Day 1.

I’m sitting at a rest stop and need to vote now before i get back on the road. I won’t be back until well after this phase has ended.

I’m not actually interested in lynching Michelle. I don’t feel compelled to lynch Rej either. I see the case but I don’t find it convincing for a player I’ve never seen before. I can’t say I have a firm grasp on why I should vote for any of the current wagons. The player I’m most comfortable voting for is Dyslexicon.

When Dizzy was catching up, my egomaniacal mind kept waiting for my name to pop up in their analysis, but it never did. I eventually got a shrug from Dizzy and this question:

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:59 pm @Rej I really don't think it's unreasonable or even not town-like for someone to ask you to read D0 for yourself. It was 4 pages as they said. And they hadn't read it themselves. Like, it just doesn't seem that strange to me to answer that.

@Sloonei You've mentioned a couple of times that you haven't paid much attention to the Timmer/Rej deal. I would like for you to give whatever thoughts you do have anyway. I don't really understand why you're avoiding this.

I’m not avoiding anything. I’ve just been too busy to sink my teeth into everything in this game and am being upfront about my level of comprehension.

In my limited view of Dyslexicon here, they feel like a player who is unsure what to do with Sloonei but wants to appear inquisitive.

That’s gonna be the extent of my contribution for the end of this phase. I do apologize for being so light, but today’s a busy day. Do good, y’all. This has been a solid Day 1 so far, I think.

timmer wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2019 1:35 pm I... think maybe the next time that you ask the other players to tell you how you should feel about what you read, you should preface it with (Oh and anyone who doesn't answer in a way I approve of is bad and will get my vote because clearly not doing what I asked means you are bad)

I mean if we all did this it would become very difficult to lay traps for the bad guys. But that being said, I don’t feel like your response to Rej at the beginning of this whole kerfuffle was worth all the attention it’s received. I haven’t followed it much otherwise

Michelle wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2019 3:33 am
Quin wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2019 3:24 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2019 3:12 am I need some help with the forum use, of course i can play with it myself to figure it but on mobile is harder.

How can i refresh the page to see the posts?
How can i vote?
How can i see the posts made by a player?

I will maybe ask other silly things connected with the forum use
1. I just have a refresh button on my phone. You probably do too?

2. There's a multiple choice poll at the top of each page - select one and submit. If you want to indicate it in text ie [VOTE: Quin] aubergine (pls no) then make your post using the full editor button instead of quick reply, and select the 'vote' button in that list of text options at the top. Type the name of your vote in between the tags that show up.

3. On the left side of each post where profiles are, press "Isolated Posts by...".
Thanks ^^
Spoiler: show
I don't find the refresh button but i discovered that the postnumber is a link so if i press it the page is reloaded and i think i have a mobile friendly view which doesn't show the left side of the posts but i will search this on PC later

If you’re on mobile the ISO links on the left hand side of the page won’t show up. That’s only there on PC. But the player list on the front page includes ISO links for everybody, so you can just go there too.

You refresh the page as you would refresh any webpage. We don’t have a built-in page refresher.

[mention]Michelle[/mention] tell us about yourself as a mafia player. Where do you come from, what’s your strategy? What are you looking for or looking at in this game right now? Does anyone or anything stand out?

Also I should note that i’m probably about to become scarce here. I’m driving home to the wild lands of massachusetts tomorrow, and spending most of today packing/cleaning/generally preparing to leave. I still hope to keep half an eye on things, but I won’t be a very active contributor for the rest of this phase.

Michelle wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2019 4:54 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:36 pm
Michelle wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 4:32 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 4:10 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 1:52 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 10:57 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 9:32 pm This looks boring.
Wanna play chess?
1. d4
2. d5
chess inside mafia? that's nice.
Long con wants to divert the attention elsewhere though..
I clicked on Michelle’s name because she’s one of a few who I have not played with before. This is her only on-topic post. It’s super cherrypicked and a little arbitrary.

[VOTE: Michelle] aubergine
o/ i remember your name though but i don't recall if it was in a game or in other thread at MU being linked with Soneji's name because it's similar

I’ve played a couple games on MU. I was a finalist in season 3 of the tournament over there. Or it could just be the soneji connection. I’ve mistaken myself for him as well.

Welcome to the Syndicate! What do you think of my vote for you?

sig wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2019 8:57 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:37 pm As I've said often, lynching Sloonei Day 1 is -EV.
I agree with this and he hasn't done anything that truly raises my suspicion.

Juliet is playing like she always does, I don't see fakeness in her welcome post, but she can still have been being honest about welcoming them and be mafia. Basically what I'm saying is that post doesn't mean much to me it's a null post that I'd just void.

I’m still not clear on why you thought you saw a teammate relationship between myself and dragomir at the very beginning of the game.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:53 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:41 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:38 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:36 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:24 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:07 pm I don't see either one as "more likely" bad, as I said I considered them teammates at the time I made my accusation. I'm keeping an open mind until Saturday.
Sloonei thoughts?
Am I being asked for my thoughts, or is Epi being asked for his thoughts about me?

I have not given much thought to the Timmer/Rej relationship. It exists. I'm not usually in the habit of looking for potential partnerships on Day 1. I've never played with Rej before and timmer is a player who I usually am able to get a good grasp on in the middle stages of games.
I was asking for your thoughts but I mean more thoughts is always good (though Epi’s was just )
I was making fun of Sloonei because he said something similar earlier (not making fun of you).
I got it we’re good

At the other one- I will try to kill Sloonei early when I am scum because I am now permanently scared of him.

To further the point to Dom, if scum wants to kill Sloonei on average early, the town does not want to kill Sloonei on average early

idk what i even did to you, i am harmless

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:24 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:07 pm I don't see either one as "more likely" bad, as I said I considered them teammates at the time I made my accusation. I'm keeping an open mind until Saturday.
Sloonei thoughts?

Am I being asked for my thoughts, or is Epi being asked for his thoughts about me?

I have not given much thought to the Timmer/Rej relationship. It exists. I'm not usually in the habit of looking for potential partnerships on Day 1. I've never played with Rej before and timmer is a player who I usually am able to get a good grasp on in the middle stages of games.

Dragomir wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:26 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:23 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:19 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:41 pm it has been very hard to read this thread while also watching the red sox bang dingers against the yankees.
You a Sox fan?
I am
You a Patriots fan too?

Mostly a Tom Brady fan at this point. I don't care too much about football in general, but I grew up watching him and I can't look away now. Baseball's the only sport I follow closely these days.

Dom wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:21 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:07 pm I don't see either one as "more likely" bad, as I said I considered them teammates at the time I made my accusation. I'm keeping an open mind until Saturday.
Sure.
I think the "fellow civillian" line was suspicious in its own right. What do you think? For me, it was very...

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:07 pm Dom, I didn't answer your question because it seemed as though you were grilling me over a point that I did not make.
...cool excuse you've used twice now.
I'm not interested in your dodges. I'm interested in answers.

We can be motivated to believe sig because he might be town. sig's reputation as an easy mislynch candidate is thoroughly documented. Tempering our natural inclination to suspect him for doing sig things on Day 1 feels more wise than jumping down his throat for doing sig things on Day 1.

I have not made an argument for or against the suspicion of sig for his preemptive meta defense. I don't care about it one way or the other. I don't think it makes him look bad, I think it makes him look like sig. I believe this now qualifies as an argument against the suspicion.
Dragomir brought up a point on Day 0. I provided an opposing viewpoint.

Why does this matter so much to you?

holy linki

Dragomir wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:19 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:41 pm it has been very hard to read this thread while also watching the red sox bang dingers against the yankees.
You a Sox fan?

I am

Dom, I didn't answer your question because it seemed as though you were grilling me over a point that I did not make.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:57 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:55 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:53 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:45 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm

Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.
I think it’s a very interesting point, but not one about you.

One of our first major topics of conversation was sig’s preemptive meta description. A few people (Dragomir is the one I distinctly remember) got in his face about it.

You did something in the same ballpark, but not exactly the same as what sig did. I would like to hear what those people who complained about sig have to say about you here.
Huh? I have a running complaint with nova that he likes to see first impression reads from people and I am not a believer that that tactic works for me. How is that similar to sig giving a meta read on himself?
Because you are telling us all about your meta.
I was responding to nova, period. There was no intent on my part to do anything else.
There is also no part of this that is an accusation against you, to be clear.
How come?

Because that's not the rhetorical subject of this particular conversation.

There can be an accusation against juliets. I am not making one.

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:53 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:45 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:15 pm

Oh no, you know how I hate those. I can't tell squat from a first post.
This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.
Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.
I think it’s a very interesting point, but not one about you.

One of our first major topics of conversation was sig’s preemptive meta description. A few people (Dragomir is the one I distinctly remember) got in his face about it.

You did something in the same ballpark, but not exactly the same as what sig did. I would like to hear what those people who complained about sig have to say about you here.
Huh? I have a running complaint with nova that he likes to see first impression reads from people and I am not a believer that that tactic works for me. How is that similar to sig giving a meta read on himself?
Because you are telling us all about your meta.
I was responding to nova, period. There was no intent on my part to do anything else.

There is also no part of this that is an accusation against you, to be clear.

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:44 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:39 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:15 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:06 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:53 pm

Seriously? Because he told you there were only 4 pages to read?
Hey Juliets. It's time for the first impressions
Oh no, you know how I hate those. I can't tell squat from a first post.
This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.
Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.
I think it’s a very interesting point, but not one about you.

One of our first major topics of conversation was sig’s preemptive meta description. A few people (Dragomir is the one I distinctly remember) got in his face about it.

You did something in the same ballpark, but not exactly the same as what sig did. I would like to hear what those people who complained about sig have to say about you here.
Huh? I have a running complaint with nova that he likes to see first impression reads from people and I am not a believer that that tactic works for me. How is that similar to sig giving a meta read on himself?

Because you are telling us all about your meta.

it has been very hard to read this thread while also watching the red sox bang dingers against the yankees.

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:34 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:15 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:06 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:53 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:34 pm [VOTE: timmer] aubergine
Seriously? Because he told you there were only 4 pages to read?
Hey Juliets. It's time for the first impressions
Oh no, you know how I hate those. I can't tell squat from a first post.
This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.
Tony I don't understand what you mean by this.

I think it’s a very interesting point, but not one about you.

One of our first major topics of conversation was sig’s preemptive meta description. A few people (Dragomir is the one I distinctly remember) got in his face about it.

You did something in the same ballpark, but not exactly the same as what sig did. I would like to hear what those people who complained about sig have to say about you here.

Michelle wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 4:32 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 4:10 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 1:52 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 10:57 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 9:32 pm This looks boring.
Wanna play chess?
1. d4
2. d5
chess inside mafia? that's nice.
Long con wants to divert the attention elsewhere though..

I clicked on Michelle’s name because she’s one of a few who I have not played with before. This is her only on-topic post. It’s super cherrypicked and a little arbitrary.

[VOTE: Michelle] aubergine

I do not agree with Owner’s grievance against Tony, but I think she looks very town because of it.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 8:13 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:15 pm
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 6:06 pm
juliets wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:53 pm
Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:34 pm [VOTE: timmer] aubergine
Seriously? Because he told you there were only 4 pages to read?
Hey Juliets. It's time for the first impressions
Oh no, you know how I hate those. I can't tell squat from a first post.
This is maybe a more subtle version of explaining meta but if we’re judging the lot I think this is just as noteworthy.

What do you make of it? What do you make of sig’s meta explanation?

Search found 79 matches