The Syndicate

Cool game. Sig kept me alive in BTSC on Day 2 which was really neat. And I absolutely loved what SVS did with my curse.

I was beary amused.

Why was I killed first, jerks?

Kamaji is the best character tbh.

S~V~S wrote:Pandamoneum ensues

The consequences could be grizzly.

i don't even know what i'm commenting on here, i just wanted to join in.

Call me Brother Seaweed.

hey what's my placeholder name?

Matt wrote:Real quick, I realize Wilgette saved me from getting lynched by placing the deciding vote on Llama...

Still, something fishy is up. Hrm.

Later peeps

No, nothing fishy is up in this game of mafia. We are all town, Matt.

EBWOP: tell us everything

sprityo wrote:*goes to play League of Legends like a terrible human being*

oh, the turn around on llama, i'll have to read up on that tomorrow to see how that occurred

Please do tell is everything you come up with.

But I liked him when he got turned into that mouse thing.

Hey wilgy, stop self-voting.

I do not get why you or anyone else wants to lynch Long Con (as always) but I don't have time to explore it at all today.

Also why would you say it doesn't seem worth your time? You just admitted that I pointed out a legitimate inconsistency in your posts, and you brushed it off as not being worth your time, implying it is inconsequential that you stated an inconsistency in the thread. But then you proceeded to respond to it anyway.

I wasn't being defensive. I was accusing you of submitting a very weak read. That it happened to be against me is mostly irrelevant. "A little off" means absolutely nothing. Stating that a player is "a little off" and then forgetting why you supposedly thought that to be the case is a highly suspicious thing, imo, especially for Day 1. I like where my vote is. I have to leave for work in less than an hour and won't be back before the end of day, so it looks like that's final. I encourage others to continue looking into this particular llama.

Can I get any opinions at all on this post? I think llama looks bad as far as Day 1 goes, but it's always good to have multiple perspectives.

thellama73 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:What are you hoping to achieve with this exchange, Gollama?
Which exchange, the one with Long Con?
Yes. Calling him tricksy just seems to be planting seeds of doubt for no real purpose, and I am not sensing any sort of attempt to scum hunt or actually read him. Is it just banter for the sake of banter?
He is tricksy. He has tricked me before. It is a fact. I am hoping I am reading him correctly this game, but there are no guarantees of that.

You seem to have a problem with pretty much everything I'm posting. Would you prefer I post less? I happen to think there are many things that can be achieved by conversation in the thread.

Thank you for reminding us that Day 1 reads are not guarantees of anything. Care to address my mini case on you a few posts above us?

thellama73 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:What are you hoping to achieve with this exchange, Gollama?
Which exchange, the one with Long Con?

Yes. Calling him tricksy just seems to be planting seeds of doubt for no real purpose, and I am not sensing any sort of attempt to scum hunt or actually read him. Is it just banter for the sake of banter?

What are you hoping to achieve with this exchange, Gollama?

Putting my vote on thellama

thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Both Matt and Long Con are reading Civ to me, so I find Wilgy's accusation of chaos on LC weird. I guess I could vote for Wilgy today, but Sloonei still has my eye.
Why Sloonei? I see nothing alarming there.
I just thought Sloonei's reaction to my criticism of the no lynch option (which I make in basically every game) was a little defensive and OTT. It's only a slight ping, but I don't have anything much stronger to go on right now.

This is the only post I've made that touches on the no lynch discussion at all:

Sloonei wrote:Let's stop talking about no lynches now. Guess what movie I watched last night instead.

Where's the overreaction to llama's involvement? What I did react to, however, was llama's extremely vague comment that Sloonei seems "a little off" as an extrenely weak way of stating a suspicion. He brushed it off by saying it's Day 1, and now he's backing up the suspicion again here with something that is entirely false. The Llama ain't looking good here.

What did Quin do?

Matt wrote:
sig wrote:
Matt wrote:I'ma hold Wilgy hostage until Sloon has moved her vote to sig, who we should lynch today.
I don't think she should do that. (Sorry Sloonie I had to. :P)

You haven't mentioned me at all this game yet you want to lynch me why?
I didn't like this post...

sig wrote:Nobody wants to fly around as a fly with me.
Felt like you were forcing the fact that you are all alone in this game with no baddie friends and *sadface*

That is not how I interpreted that post at all.

That's the second time in the last 24 hours i've been called a lady on this site.

Matt wrote:Proceeded to say nothing about him? It feels like you're getting on my case because of the opposite, that I said too much about him. "Waffly", I believe you called it.

In any case, at this stage of the game, simply from his ridiculous rainbow list listing himself as top bad guy, I think Wilgy is civ.

Do you not like it when people theorize on how a player could possibly be both civ and/or bad? Is it not cool to look at every option? When I said "if Wilgy is bad", that was less "waffles", and more "look out for his red reads just in case he is bad, cuz Wilgy's def the type of player zany enough to list his entire team in red if so".

Sloonei, stop being a meany and please remove your vote off of me.

You said nothing because you mentioned every possible interpretation of his actions in one post. But you're more committed to a direction now so I like that. I'll move my vote when I'm good and ready.

Matt wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I forgot to mention earlier that I voted for Matt because of that one post where he gave us his thoughts about Wilgy.
What's wrong with my post on Wilgy?

I said I believed him to be a confident civvie, do you disagree?

soneji, yeah, I made a role claiming joke about Scotty with his tying comment, but it really did ping me too.

Also, is G-Man the type of player who always has some fun on Day 0/1, or should we be worried that his Haiku thing is some kind of sinister plot to destroy the town? Hrm.

Matt wrote:No ideas yet on where to find dem bad guys, but I'm liking Wilgy so far. Either he's a confident civ who put himself as lowest red on his rainbow for funnies, or he's a ballsy bad guy outing himself to the world. I'm going to say the former.

If he is bad, tho, I wouldn't put it past him to name all of his teamies as red, too, so if he ever flips bad, let's keep an eye on Wilgette, SVS, and G-Man.

That's a whole lot of different trains of thought to ride in such a short post so early in the game. It reads like you picked the most noteworthy target to talk about in the thread, and then proceeded to say nothing about him.

Have you at least taken note of the results privately?

thellama73 wrote:Good morning, gents! I'm pleased to see that Dom has adopted my tactic of asking people whether they are bad or not. Very wise.

You were happy to see Dom using your favorite tactic but you made no notice of his results. Why not?

thellama73 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Stifle stifle.

Do you have any topics related to things that ARE in this game to discuss?
I don't really have any major suspects yet. Sloonei does seem a little off this game, but it's premature to draw any hard conclusions. I'm just trying to get people talking to see if I can spot anything suspicious.

How about you, any suspects?
"A little off" is the vaguest way to state a suspicion ever.
Welcome to Day 1.

It is Day 1 and I do not like either of these posts you've made.

Gravity?

thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Stifle stifle.

Do you have any topics related to things that ARE in this game to discuss?
I don't really have any major suspects yet. Sloonei does seem a little off this game, but it's premature to draw any hard conclusions. I'm just trying to get people talking to see if I can spot anything suspicious.

How about you, any suspects?

"A little off" is the vaguest way to state a suspicion ever.

I forgot to mention earlier that I voted for Matt because of that one post where he gave us his thoughts about Wilgy.

Make sure to watch it in Japanese with English subtitles. The English dub is never as good.

Let's stop talking about no lynches now. Guess what movie I watched last night instead.

DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Linki - Yes, why did you feel the need to express the many games you are in multiple times?
Because I like to be honest. Why should I be spooked?
Because I think there was 58% chance there was malicious intent.

I agree with your comment about Matt.

Let me know if you think anything else I do is malicious.

Dom wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Dom wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Dom wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:G-Man, expect some early aggro from me. I'll back off if you pick up too much heat though.

I'm excited to be on a team with you Bubbles!

Which part of this post are you :suspish:ing at?
Which part am I not at?
That's a better question.
The answer is none of it.
Why do my jokes disappoint you though? *raises chin and places his hand on his chest* I thought I had good humor.
jokes somtimes have truth in them, no
'tis why they're funny

You object to Wilgy being aggressive? And you object to the possibility that he and Bubbles are both town?

Scotty wrote:
Dom wrote:
Scotty wrote:Hi all!

My role is a cute little boy.

Note: I haven't looked at my role yet.
are you bad
I'm bad at tieing my shoes.
I'm not bad in this game.

I know a llama who thinks you're bad.

Matt wrote:No ideas yet on where to find dem bad guys, but I'm liking Wilgy so far. Either he's a confident civ who put himself as lowest red on his rainbow for funnies, or he's a ballsy bad guy outing himself to the world. I'm going to say the former.

If he is bad, tho, I wouldn't put it past him to name all of his teamies as red, too, so if he ever flips bad, let's keep an eye on Wilgette, SVS, and G-Man.

Thank you for that Wilgy analysis, Matt. This is an awful lot of waffles for so early in the game.

DrWilgy wrote:Linki - Yes, why did you feel the need to express the many games you are in multiple times?

Because I like to be honest. Why should I be spooked?

Dom wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:G-Man, expect some early aggro from me. I'll back off if you pick up too much heat though.

I'm excited to be on a team with you Bubbles!

Which part of this post are you :suspish:ing at?

DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:The problem is vague. I'v only tried balancing multiple games on a couple of occasions, and what always ends up happening is that one game gets most of my focus. I usually still follow along in the other game, but my commitment is not as high. I don't know exactly what this will entail for this game. I expressed the exact same sentiment in the sign up thread.
And that's why you are only orange on my rainbow. You spooked?

No. Should I be?

The problem is vague. I'v only tried balancing multiple games on a couple of occasions, and what always ends up happening is that one game gets most of my focus. I usually still follow along in the other game, but my commitment is not as high. I don't know exactly what this will entail for this game. I expressed the exact same sentiment in the sign up thread.

sig wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
DrWilgette wrote:
thellama73 wrote: You won't tell us whether you are mafia or not? What possible motivation could you have to be vague on this?
Since you asked nicely, and you're not Wilgy, I will tell you that I am not bad
Could this duck's face lie?
Yes. Yes it could.

Initial suspicions based on entrance:
Dom
Sig
Scotty
Sorsha
Quin
Sprityo
Dfaraday
Matt
Llama
Long Con
Sloonei
DrWilgette
SVS
G-man
DrWilgy

What say you bathousers?
Why am I so high.

You probably just went a little overboard, it'll pass.

I say your rainbow is bogus, man.

On principle, my Day 1 vote is going to a player who hasn't seen this movie.

I am here and I am terrible at balancing multiple games at once.

Search found 44 matches