to quote one of my favorite movies: "He never drinks two cups of coffee at home!"Ricochet wrote: ==
I've no doubt the mafia may have thought they could smear me with this kill, but nah. I don't shush my verbal adversaries. Ika even changed his read on me after Day 1, so no suss-shushing purposes either.Scotty wrote:BUT I can see Rico killing ika to quell the beast (since they both had opposing viewpoints) and Silver allowing Rico to kill ika in an attempt to get him on his back. If Silver is on a different side than ika, I wouldn't put it past her to kill him before he figures out her game.
==
By all means. I've reviewed the case on DF's posts giving a vibe and they give none. As I've said, unpingworthy. In line with people under intense catchup stress merely posting that they are in that process. DF even missed the vote, compared to a few others throwing some questionable votes around, so, despite the fact that missing the vote is not exemplary, I still think it speaks rather ok of him.Scotty wrote:I've caught DFaraday before on little more than this, and, again, his 1 post did nothing to make me feel good about him. I don't feel like I have to explain this choice with no concrete info, but I can elaborate if that will make you feel better.
For what are you leaning civ on her? You say you don't rely on meta, but she did. For entirely justifying a vote on a player with zero posts at that time, moreover.Scotty wrote:I do not rely much at all on meta. There are some things that remind me of the way they played previously, but I find that it is not always an evidential reasoning for alignment. In this game, I'm actually leaning civ on zebra.
Any other thoughts on Zebra, anyone else?
In other words, this doesn't mean you wouldn't, it just means your tendency is not to do so. I don't wholly rely on meta, so...
![l'il shrug :shrug2:](./images/smilies/shrug.gif)
even though you don't find it ping worthy, I did. Whether or not I do now is another story. Black rock would have gotten my vote for not showing up in the game but she did on the second half of day 1:
That was her first post. She then spent the rest of the day catching up and actually being part of the discussion.Black Rock wrote:So say we all.
I'm here, finally! My schedule didn't leave room for Mafia this weekend. In fact weekends are going to be hard for me going forward. I just thought I'd post and say I'm catching up, as well as I can today.
Compare that with DFaraday, who I know is a notoriously low poster:
No explanation of where he will be or...anything...until 6 hours before EoD, after I voted for him:DFaraday wrote:So say we all
The game started 12 hours ago and we're up to 8 pages already?This is gonna be a long game.
He finally divulges his reasoning, but even then he calmly states he hasn't read anything but the page we were on. Not to rag on him for being busy. Hell, I'm busy. I know it. But no explanation mixed with an absence of 72 hours doesn't look good.DFaraday wrote:My reason is I'm currently in 3 games and this game is already longer than a Dostoevsky novel.Scotty wrote:At this time, I need to make a vote and since I'm not sold on any one person and its day 1, im going with the most suspicious low poster, and that is DFaraday. He has given no other reason for being absent and has given nothing to the thread.
Voting DFaraday.
From what I've read on this last page (the only one I've read since I last posted), I should point out that BR has low posted as a civ before. I'm not sure where Zebra is getting that idea.
why does missing the vote make him look ok? He had 2 posts and therefore 2 situations where he could have voted. I would argue that that makes him look less civilian because a missed vote has no accountability for actions. Today, if I miss the vote, will that make me look ok to you?
i don't inherently suspect people that rely on meta. I don't view her as bad right now on a hunch. I don't have info or some shit, but a pretty good hunch that she's good