The Syndicate

Sloonei wrote:I am groggy and don't know how to think but I see this lynch train is rolling right along. I don't know whether to feel scared or confident about this, but we'll find out soon enough.

In the end, I think Epi is right in that if indi is bad, it would be stupid to stop the tidal wave of she is your partner

Keeping my vote where it is.

LoRab, what if INH's response "tipped you" to vote for him? I think it's a strong and true assumption that he is Silvertongue.
Enjoy Rent! I have several friends on it, so let me know if they suck lol

Sloonei wrote:Here's a rainbow list.

Jay

Quin

insertnamehere
zebra/epi 2.0
motel room
Glorfindel
LoRab
Dom

Mac

Scotty

DrWilgy
Indiglo

Assuming INH is Silvertongue.
I'd like to revisit LoRab, Dom, and Mac later when I'm not absorbed in a baseball game or at work. I've mostly been going off of gut for those three without giving them much of a substantial look.

I feel better about Scotty today but the combination of him + sprityo still has not done enough to win me over.
I think we all agree that Wilgy and indiglo are suspects. indiglo seems to be the more popular of the two. I'm fine with either one.

Quite a lot of civ reads there, Sloons. Seeing as I know I am good, I'm wondering how you'll start weeding out some of those green daffodils from the rest.

I'm also surprised you still haven't changed your vote. Why would make you move your vote to indi like you say you might?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Hello crew.

Car post. From the passenger seat. There doesn't seem to be much to talk about. Maybe a good opportunity for someone with more time to ISO a high content swing player like MacDougall. Or Glorfindel, since suspicion on him seems to be semi-consistent but also vague.

Amateur

Sloonei wrote:

Scotty wrote:Dom: GOOD
DrWilgy: BAD
Epignosis 2.0: GOOD
Glorfindel: BAD
Indiglo: BAD
insertnamehere: GOOD
JaggedJimmyJay: GOOD
LoRab: GOOD
MacDougall: GOOD
motel room: GOOD
Quin: BAD
Sloonei: BAD


I feel like Glorf could go either way for me, and I'm still operating under the assumption that INH saved himself.
Quin is literally a gut read based on dribblings of post she he has made, and I have no evidence to think him bad besides that.

indi and wilgy seem to be pretty universally suspected. I am confident that we can find at least one baddie between the two of them.

I'm surprised at your bad reads on myself and Quin, Scotty. Can you explain those?

Umm. I did.

Quin is purely a gut read like I said in the post you quoted.
I think you are suspicious based on my feeling that indi is bad, as I said a few posts ago

Dom: GOOD
DrWilgy: BAD
Epignosis 2.0: GOOD
Glorfindel: BAD
Indiglo: BAD
insertnamehere: GOOD
JaggedJimmyJay: GOOD
LoRab: GOOD
MacDougall: GOOD
motel room: GOOD
Quin: BAD
Sloonei: BAD


I feel like Glorf could go either way for me, and I'm still operating under the assumption that INH saved himself.
Quin is literally a gut read based on dribblings of post she he has made, and I have no evidence to think him bad besides that.

Sloonei wrote:Scotty, would you be able to produce some sort of rainbow list or GTH scum list right now if I asked you to?

Sure, I guess. Still people I haven't looked at closely, so I'm not confident of those holding too much weight.

Sloonei wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Scotty wrote:@JJJ: indi just drops a vote unannounced and doesn't offer anything else on the table.

Is that a civ or mafia look for her?

I think it is a bad look. It hints at her being withdrawn and uninspired again.

Would you vote for her? This is the most trepidation I've seen from you regarding indi, but haven't yet seen you pull the trigger.

I would now. Initially I thought you two looked similar because neither of you seemed to be putting in a lot of effort after subbing in. I thought you looked the worst of the two, but you're completely fipping that theory on its head now.

Oh, am I?

Anything in particular? Maybe my if/then indictment of you? Or my dashing good looks?

Sloonei wrote:

Scotty wrote:@JJJ: indi just drops a vote unannounced and doesn't offer anything else on the table.

Is that a civ or mafia look for her?

I think it is a bad look. It hints at her being withdrawn and uninspired again.

Would you vote for her? This is the most trepidation I've seen from you regarding indi, but haven't yet seen you pull the trigger.

@JJJ: indi just drops a vote unannounced and doesn't offer anything else on the table.

Is that a civ or mafia look for her?

Hummm. I can definitely see indi as bad.

And if Indi is bad, I have a very strong inclination that Sloonei is her teammate. It adds up based on a quick search of indiglo through Sloonei's posts. He has been protecting her most the game. Hell, Sloonei's first mention of her is:

Sloonei wrote:Thanks for the reminder, MP! Look how weak this GTH scum team is.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Elohcin, Glorfindel, sprityo, indiglo

AKA "The four quietest players in the game"

A casual defending of Elo and possibly Indi.

In a previous day, he starts casting little glances over his merry Sloon kingdom to Indi as if he could very well vote for her over Wilgy or sprityo, but even so he says

Sloonei wrote:If the choice came down to Scotty and indiglo, i'd choose Scotty 9 times out of 10.

Check out this post in Day 4:

Sloonei wrote:

LoRab wrote:

Sloonei wrote:I ain't reading shit tonight, but if anyone's got questions for me I'm all ears until I pass out in a drunken stupor in an hour or two.

What's your gut read of Dom?

Indiglo?

I think Dom's good. He's just taking a tight lipped approach, is all.

Indi is I dunno. Gun to head, I'll call her scum. There has been frustration in her response to the conversation around her, but I could go either way on that. If she's town and came in to pre-existing suspicion, bummer. But if she's scum then that's an even bigger bummer, and I think she'd have even more cause for frustration. I'll need to do more digging on her before I can offer a confident read.

'She could be bad I guess, but, like, she could be good and I want her to be good, and it would really make my day poopie if she were bad, so I'm just gonna go brush my teeth'

Dunno what came of the digging. But if Indi were lynched, Sloon could reference this post and go 'See! I had suspicion of her this whole time!'


Note this is from the perspective that Sloon is protecting indi. If indi is good, then that's a far bette rlooo for him. But also I'm just surprised Sloon is still alive, which is what got me looking at him to begin with.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Please remember that I have to judge your alignment too.

What kind of weird comment is that last sentence?

Sometimes I get the impression people don't consider that when I'm being told in some way or another that I'm being a ball hog. When I make a post like the one I entered this thread with just now, the intent isn't to be an authoritarian figure and shut down dissenters, but to incite reactions from people who can be bad. I didn't intend for that reaction to be an emotional/personal one though, so perhaps it's my fault for not considering the appearance of the post before putting it down.

Your intent is to incite bad people, but sometimes you can incite egoistic good people too. Just offering this viewpoint because I can be one of those bullheaded people. I just choose not to be incited these days

indiglo wrote:Voting Wilgy

Hi.

You and I are suspicious for one reason or another, how does that make you feel?

MP's death seems to me a product of lazy killing. MP was already plenty suspicious by several people and therefore if a baddie was killing him based on the danger of people taking to his reads, they must have not been reading the thread. UNLESs that last long legacy post Mp made scared the shit out of someone and they dun pulled the trigger.

I do see validity in one of Mp's orange reads being mafia, but I also walk into that with caution knowing I'm one of them.

The mafia seem to not like big talkers this game. Does someone fit that profile? I know for instance Epi doesnt like to NK JJJ because he likes the challenge of getting him mislynched instead.
But how about Epi/JJJ/Rico/MP. The ones that talk the most?

And why not Sloonei over MP last night? By post count alone, he fits the profile of someone that is likely to be Nk'd.

I don't like Glorfindel's voting record.
Day 1, early Mac vote. Disappears later and lets the wind of time dictate the lynch.
Day 2, no vote.
Day 3, he makes the second to last vote in the poll and votes for LoRab to tie the lynch. Motel room brings down the hammer on Elo. (Good look for MR)
Day 4, (which i just read) he says he broke the tie, but I can't tell. This one I'm not as bothered about, because he had expressed suspicion of INH prior to the vote. This EoD makes me twitch slightly because we DONT have a lynch and so it's hard to analyze if anyone was protecting someone with votes. I'd like to believe that Wilgy is still bad. But Glorf could be an accomplice.

I don't know Glorf's baddie game all that well. I could be looking for truffles in the wrong forest.

I might need some help from people that were there:

Sloonei, do you remember if you voted Early or Late on day 2? I'm sorta avoiding Day 2 since it's like 30 pages.

I'm sorry if you've answered this, but what made you change your vote on Day 1 for Elo (1st voter) to INH on day 2 and LoRab on Day 3 (1st voter)?

Was it something that you said Elo did or said that made you change your mind from voting her again?
I ask because it seems like Elo was not really in any danger of being lynched day 1, and this could have been a legitimate appeal for credit if she did.

And who started the LoRab suspicion on day 3?

I'm going to assume INH is Silvertongue. I agree with Sloonei's sleuthing. Where did GMan say he likes to include hints in his host post?

motel room wrote:I am getting all up in people's guts. Hopefully the back way.

Scotty seeing as you're around, what do you make of insertnamehere? Gut read?

Not really worth my opinion, but off hand? A really crafty bad guy or a pissed off good guy. Haven't even analyzed his votes or anything.

Ok, I have to do this show now.

Make sure it doesn't end in a tie is my request.

Sloonei wrote:My preferred lynch order for the 4 players who currently have multiple votes:

INH
Scotty
indiglo
DrWilgy

Avoiding a tie is obviously a priority. I am not willing to move my vote off INH for indiglo at this time. I will move to Scotty if that will produce a lynch. It doesn't appear we have a ton of people online right now, and only zebra is not currently on one of these wagons. I think those of us who are here should be working together to make the most satisfying lynch.

Would y'all who are here mind sharing your own rankings of these 4 players?

Not Scotty.

I firmly believe that you all ade deadset on sprityo being mafia before I arrived, and topped with my lack of time I can only

If I'm the best lynch you have based on a mostly inactive before me and me being pretty close to inactive as well, then so be it. I can't say looking in from your PoV that I wouldn't vote for me either as a continuation vote, because I usually love those but all I can say in my defense right now is:

I am not bad.
I haven't fully caught up. You all view sprityo as bad and want me to make reads, while still keeping me on the burner.
I can't promise I'll be the most attentive person, since subbing in wasnot particularly on my agenda since getting lynched as 1.0, but give me a shot.

I skimmed random part so of the thread this evening.
I don't remember Quin's baddie game, but this could be it. I like the substance in his posts. They're pretty qualitative which is, on the surface, good.

I'm not qualified based on my lack of substantive re reading to give GTH reads, which is also why I showed up now to vote for one person whom I suspect, and not get caught up in back and forth discussions because I'm tight pressed for time

Other things since I feel like a botched Brazilian wax right now.

I trust JJJ as a civ but I don't believe everything he says as gospel. Everyone makes mistakes, and although he (and others) felt strongly Scotty 1.0 was bad, he was wrong. Granted, I don't blame him for voting that way.

I suspected MP for some things day 1 that I hope to come back and quote later on during the day tomorrow.

Motel room, I have a slight mafia read on you. Why? Gut.

motel room wrote:

Scotty wrote:His votes just seem too parallel to Elo's. ,

Do you think scum would normally vote together?

Yes, Wilgy did this as a baddie in the Kingdoms game. He cray cray

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Scotty wrote:Voted Wilgy.

Sorry I haven't been around but I'm still going off his voting, and not necessarily what people have said

What have people said?

I'm saying I don't know wat people have said. This is based off of the vote polls.

motel room wrote:Hey scotty

motel room wrote:

Scotty wrote:Just looking at the polls of the past few days, my biggest suspicion lies with Wilgy. I'm glad I didn't replace him, because I think he is bad, whereas The role I was given is not.

Note: I haven't read people's manifestos since day 1 when Scotty 1.0 was lynched, but I will try my best to catch up

Scotty wrote:I'm actually not going to comb through most of Day 2. I wish the poll thread had the order of the votes, but Wilgy's vote parallels with Elo.

Hard to do a voting analysis unless I spend an hour comparing time stamps from 30 pages ago, and my time is limited as a toddler's vocabulary is limited.

Is this just based on the last day's vote? Wilgy's vote on LoRab?

I'm not sure why you've singled out Wilgy. What do you make of the other voters on that wagon?

Hey.

His votes just seem too parallel to Elo's. ,

I feel like I'm playing horribly from subbing in. I'm sorry guys, gotta do a show

Voted Wilgy.

Sorry I haven't been around but I'm still going off his voting, and not necessarily what people have said

Sloonei wrote:

Scotty wrote:Why is JJJ confirmed good?

I mean, I think he looks pretty good regardless but isn't there a baddie that can survive their first NK attempt?

I had the tiniest bit of doubt about his confirmed status, but the host post says "Johnny the Boy" attempted to kill him, so that's a pretty strong confirmation.

You replaced sprityo, who was read as scum by 5 out of the 5 players who did the GTH exercise last night. It would have been 6 out of 6 had I been there. How do you feel about that?

Yes, I realize it would mean they would do a massive frame job, yes. It seems far-fetched but I don't like eliminating that possibility from the board.

As for everyone scumreading my predecessor...

He wasn't really around to do anything. JJJ calls it the low hanging fruit and rightfully so. I'm rather busy and don't really know what to answer to in the case of sprityo's faults. Could someone point me in the direction of why they view sprityo as bad and see if I can assuage any fears?

I'm actually not going to comb through most of Day 2. I wish the poll thread had the order of the votes, but Wilgy's vote parallels with Elo.

Hard to do a voting analysis unless I spend an hour comparing time stamps from 30 pages ago, and my time is limited as a toddler's vocabulary is limited.

Why is JJJ confirmed good?

I mean, I think he looks pretty good regardless but isn't there a baddie that can survive their first NK attempt?

insertnamehere wrote:

Scotty wrote:Oh, you know. Just have to catch up on 50 pages of shit.

You people talk more than the voices in my head. That's disturbing to me.

Gman who did I replace?

Spirityo, yo.

It's sprityo, yo

And thanks.

I have a show to do right now but am traveling all day tomorrow so I'll do my best to catch up.

Just looking at the polls of the past few days, my biggest suspicion lies with Wilgy. I'm glad I didn't replace him, because I think he is bad, whereas The role I was given is not.

Note: I haven't read people's manifestos since day 1 when Scotty 1.0 was lynched, but I will try my best to catch up

Oh, you know. Just have to catch up on 50 pages of shit.

You people talk more than the voices in my head. That's disturbing to me.

Gman who did I replace?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Scotty wrote:You might also recall I tried a different day 1 strategy last time in Red v Blue that had me voting off of tone day 1 and I was ultimately bad.

I'm fine with sticking to the script if non/low-posters even if you don't agree with it

I do recall. I'm not willing to give you that meta though.

"Scotty votes for lurkers as a townie. Scotty votes for other people as a baddie."

If I grant that, then you have the easiest job as a baddie in the history of planet Earth.

I see you are gone now so I might as well be putting the Chinese finger trap on my other finger here and stress that it would be a stupid idea on my part to behave the same way as my last baddie game in which I was lynched day 1 if I were a baddie.



That's my best defense on that matter. The show starts in 4 minutes so I'll be out until right before deadline.

S~V~S wrote:Also Scotty, that, what JimmyNeil said.

I know what I'm talking about.

I'm just not the best person to explain it.

My union rep is indisposed

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Scotty wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Scotty wrote:I would also expect that maybe a baddie Epi would steer clear from the day 1 bussing if we were both bad. I'm still not deadest that Epi is bad either, so I'd like to move on from him for now.

These sentences confuse me. Could you restate? I'm not sure why you're even thinking about the potential for Epignosis bussing you -- that requires you to be bad to even reach the first stage of thought.

I'm putting it through the magical Neil perspective.

I dunno man. I kinda just talk off the cuff and sometimes I don't really defend myself with my thoughts. I've been nothing but honest this game.

Regarding your other question -- no I'm not interested in lynching sanmateo either. It'd be ideal if he were here obviously, but I'd prefer to give him more time. He hasn't played here in a while, and nothing would encourage a person to stop coming here than to lynch them before they make a post.

In Red vs. Blue you snuggled up to me and made me look like a doofus at the end of Day 1. I am cold to your warmth! I do not feel your emotion! Neil Hartley is less easily moved than his agent!

Explain yourself in a meaningful way. Not just "I don't know what I'm talking about."

Hah, good times those were

I see your point on sanmateo, and I would hate to give off the impression that we murder newcomers or those back from a break.

But I also don't reward those that don't show up to play. My very first game on online mafia I was killed N1, and didn't take it personally. I was pretty fine with it. I might be an outlier there though.

You might also recall I tried a different day 1 strategy last time in Red v Blue that had me voting off of tone day 1 and I was ultimately bad.

I'm fine with sticking to the script if non/low-posters even if you don't agree with it

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Scotty wrote:I would also expect that maybe a baddie Epi would steer clear from the day 1 bussing if we were both bad. I'm still not deadest that Epi is bad either, so I'd like to move on from him for now.

These sentences confuse me. Could you restate? I'm not sure why you're even thinking about the potential for Epignosis bussing you -- that requires you to be bad to even reach the first stage of thought.

I'm putting it through the magical Neil perspective.

I dunno man. I kinda just talk off the cuff and sometimes I don't really defend myself with my thoughts. I've been nothing but honest this game.

As much as I don't wanna die I'd even be willing to vote myself if it at least results in a not-tie. That way maybe we can learn Something from my death

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I think lynching BWT because he has no posts is a bad move. Lynching people on Day 1 purely for not being here is already generally a bad move, but it's especially bad with BWT in particular. He isn't always the most active player, but he still usually finds a way to get involved eventually. He isn't the guy that spends the entire game at 0-4 posts. Let him figure out there's a game being played. This thread hasn't gotten that big, so catching up shouldn't be that hard.

How about sanmateo then? I could go either way but there was already a vote for BWT when I voted.

Don't vote for me on d1, y'all. Don't do it.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Scotty's responses to this recent criticism leaves me torn. On one hand, what he actually said remains unjustified: he specifically elected to cast some amount of suspicion on Epi for his proposed Elohcin/Rico/Dom/??? baddie team. Scotty himself also viewed two of the three named players with some amount of suspicion, so it's hard to understand why he'd feel that way about Epignosis.

On the other hand, he is being rather transparent at least about how it makes no sense, and he just crammed his own make-shift logic into the thread to justify a gut read. Townies are capable of that, irrational as it is.

Actually now that I think of it, this incident is rather similar to what happened in Red vs. Blue -- Scotty made a misstep on Day 1 by providing an inconsistent read relative to Epignosis (either his own votes or someone's votes for him, I can't recall exactly), and Epignosis (his partner) helped lynch him for it. I'm not saying this is necessarily a bus job, but rather that there's a recent precedent for a baddie Scotty to do something like this.

I'd say he's still more suspicious than not.

WIFOM ALERT

I change up my baddie games. At least enough that I wouldn't make that same mistake again in back to back appearances. I think it would be a bad idea to spar with either a) my partner baddie Epi or b) a civ Epi and I as mafia on day 1. I dunno what Epi is, but at this point I have nothing to lose in calling him out when I feel, cause I be civ this game.

I would also expect that maybe a baddie Epi would steer clear from the day 1 bussing if we were both bad. I'm still not deadest that Epi is bad either, so I'd like to move on from him for now.

He isn't getting lynched today, and I'm not currently planning to vote for him [today]

Epignosis wrote:There's a possibility Scotty is bad.

Lol

I also don't want this lynch to end in a tie, so if it comes down to it, I will switch to someone I have a slight ping on.

Otherwise, I don't think BWT is a bad lynch today, bucaroos

Sloonei wrote:@ Scotty, what prompted you to read Epi as potentially misdirecting the discussion onto the wrong names opposed to say, anyone else who states a case against anyone? It looks like an arbitrary suspicion from you at this point. I recall a recent example of you doing that as a bad guy.

Dunno, tbh. I didn't like Epi's tone out of the gate, and looked to motivations as a way of justifying my pings of him.

Epignosis wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I'm changing my vote to Scotty.

Scotty wrote:Epi is on my radar for stringing some names along that I think could be pushing us away from the right track. May just be Epi being curt and mildly pompous with his explanation, but I see the angle where he could be bad.

I have so far voted Elohcin and Ricochet.

Scotty wrote:As for the Rico-Mac debacle, I have to take the side of Mac here, and while I understand Rico taking a stand to policy lynch for his own personal reasons, i feel like the other woman in the relationship- like, the other other woman that wants no part in sloppy 12ths. Ya know what I'm saying? I want to say only one of them is mafia, if that. In no world are they both mafia IMO. I'm currently leaning neither are.

Scotty wrote:Elo might be bad...I don't like that apparent "preservation" vote 24 hours early, and although I've done that before by mistake for not reading the deadline thoroughly, I was bad both times I did so. Though nothing else she has said is jumping out to me right now.

To which of those votes do you object?

I'm currently voting for BWT, so I'm not sure what you're up in arms about.

I think you are proficient in steering the thread if you need to be, and even though I have my reservations about similar candidates, it still doesn't mean you aren't fishy.

Your (semi) accusation against me is that I'm pushing people away from the right track. That implies that you think RIcochet and Elohcin are civilians, and that I am trying to get either of them lynched.

However, in the same post, you imply Ricochet and Elohcin are bad. How can you accuse me of pushing people in the wrong direction when you, in some capacity, agree with both of those directions?

You're talking like I'm talking in absolutes, when I'm not. I simply think both could be bad. Leaving myself an out, I know. Still voting for a no-show day 1.

You're very hard to pin down, and I have never confessed to be any good at having a rousing or level argument with you. I thought it worth noting that there is a possibility you could be leading us down the wrong track. Whether or not that is the case I have no idea.

Of course there's that possibility- that possibility exists for everyone who has posted. Why is it worth highlighting me over anybody else if we're just dealing with possibilities?

Just one of my thoughts as I was reading through is all.

Epignosis wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I'm changing my vote to Scotty.

Scotty wrote:Epi is on my radar for stringing some names along that I think could be pushing us away from the right track. May just be Epi being curt and mildly pompous with his explanation, but I see the angle where he could be bad.

I have so far voted Elohcin and Ricochet.

Scotty wrote:As for the Rico-Mac debacle, I have to take the side of Mac here, and while I understand Rico taking a stand to policy lynch for his own personal reasons, i feel like the other woman in the relationship- like, the other other woman that wants no part in sloppy 12ths. Ya know what I'm saying? I want to say only one of them is mafia, if that. In no world are they both mafia IMO. I'm currently leaning neither are.

Scotty wrote:Elo might be bad...I don't like that apparent "preservation" vote 24 hours early, and although I've done that before by mistake for not reading the deadline thoroughly, I was bad both times I did so. Though nothing else she has said is jumping out to me right now.

To which of those votes do you object?

I'm currently voting for BWT, so I'm not sure what you're up in arms about.

I think you are proficient in steering the thread if you need to be, and even though I have my reservations about similar candidates, it still doesn't mean you aren't fishy.

Your (semi) accusation against me is that I'm pushing people away from the right track. That implies that you think RIcochet and Elohcin are civilians, and that I am trying to get either of them lynched.

However, in the same post, you imply Ricochet and Elohcin are bad. How can you accuse me of pushing people in the wrong direction when you, in some capacity, agree with both of those directions?

You're talking like I'm talking in absolutes, when I'm not. I simply think both could be bad. Leaving myself an out, I know. Still voting for a no-show day 1.

You're very hard to pin down, and I have never confessed to be any good at having a rousing or level argument with you. I thought it worth noting that there is a possibility you could be leading us down the wrong track. Whether or not that is the case I have no idea.

Epignosis wrote:I'm changing my vote to Scotty.

Scotty wrote:Epi is on my radar for stringing some names along that I think could be pushing us away from the right track. May just be Epi being curt and mildly pompous with his explanation, but I see the angle where he could be bad.

I have so far voted Elohcin and Ricochet.

Scotty wrote:As for the Rico-Mac debacle, I have to take the side of Mac here, and while I understand Rico taking a stand to policy lynch for his own personal reasons, i feel like the other woman in the relationship- like, the other other woman that wants no part in sloppy 12ths. Ya know what I'm saying? I want to say only one of them is mafia, if that. In no world are they both mafia IMO. I'm currently leaning neither are.

Scotty wrote:Elo might be bad...I don't like that apparent "preservation" vote 24 hours early, and although I've done that before by mistake for not reading the deadline thoroughly, I was bad both times I did so. Though nothing else she has said is jumping out to me right now.

To which of those votes do you object?

I'm currently voting for BWT, so I'm not sure what you're up in arms about.

I think you are proficient in steering the thread if you need to be, and even though I have my reservations about similar candidates, it still doesn't mean you aren't fishy.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:What thought are you trying to convey about that Zebra post, Scotty?

Dammit.

Scotty wrote:[quote="a2thezebra]

Sloonei wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I moved my vote to someone with no votes.

Rico's an interesting choice and I refuse to believe it's random or arbitrary. Tell me why.

I'm liking you Sloonei even if you're not liking me. And no, I'm not elaborating on why I voted for Scotty. It should be clear enough from the post I quoted, my distaste for it, and my vote. Not everything needs to be intricately articulated.

And if you ask, it should be clear enough from the post I quoted my distaste for it.[/quote]
It should also be clear that I am disgusted with how I quoted that last post. Carry on.

[quote="a2thezebra]

Sloonei wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I moved my vote to someone with no votes.

Rico's an interesting choice and I refuse to believe it's random or arbitrary. Tell me why.

I'm liking you Sloonei even if you're not liking me. And no, I'm not elaborating on why I voted for Scotty. It should be clear enough from the post I quoted, my distaste for it, and my vote. Not everything needs to be intricately articulated.[/quote]


And if you ask, it should be clear enough from the post I quoted my distaste for it.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Catching up now, but I have to teach shortly so it probably won't be complete until later.

Scotty wrote:What dingbat planned a show with a 6:30p curtain? I have 5 min before we start, but I appreciate Rico': approach.

I also get a tonal read of Mp as a "non-offensive poser with a capital P.
SVS, while I appreciate her soft defending of me, comes off as too nice right now.

I'd still be down to vote someone like bwt though... unless he posts more

and I'm sorry to hear that Glorf!!

Poser? What is this, 1990s mafia?

I don't understand your statements regarding me and S~V~S. Does that mean you suspect us? Why?

Yea dude. Totally.

I think you are buttering up the biscuit that is this thread. Your "content" is missing...some amount of substance and grit, I feel.

Some have said this feels like SVS' civ game... It still amazes me when people can point out another's [type] game every time. You'd think they would be better at broadcasting tells as a given alignment. I just think that she's taken to the mama bear role and is not getting dirty.

Yes, MP. I think there is a slightly grody finger pointing at you and SVS from my direction.



As for the Rico-Mac debacle, I have to take the side of Mac here, and while I understand Rico taking a stand to policy lynch for his own personal reasons, i feel like the other woman in the relationship- like, the other other woman that wants no part in sloppy 12ths. Ya know what I'm saying? I want to say only one of them is mafia, if that. In no world are they both mafia IMO. I'm currently leaning neither are.

Random thoughts:
Epi is on my radar for stringing some names along that I think could be pushing us away from the right track. May just be Epi being curt and mildly pompous with his explanation, but I see the angle where he could be bad.

DrWilgy might be a doctor.

Glorf! Great to hear things are progressing well! Always great to have your presence!

Dom seems good.

Elo might be bad...I don't like that apparent "preservation" vote 24 hours early, and although I've done that before by mistake for not reading the deadline thoroughly, I was bad both times I did so. Though nothing else she has said is jumping out to me right now.

Neil Hartley already with the rainbow lists. You do you, man. My list is straight 1930's Disney movie color.

@zebra well I know I'm voting BWT because he hasn't posted yet. Dunno about the others.

What dingbat planned a show with a 6:30p curtain? I have 5 min before we start, but I appreciate Rico': approach.

I also get a tonal read of Mp as a "non-offensive poser with a capital P.
SVS, while I appreciate her soft defending of me, comes off as too nice right now.

I'd still be down to vote someone like bwt though... unless he posts more

and I'm sorry to hear that Glorf!!